Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MEDA DINESHBHAI BADIYABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

Holding

The High Court held that the petitioners must pursue the statutory grievance redressal mechanism under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 and its 2007 Rules, and a direct writ of mandamus is not appropriate.

Summary

The petitioners filed a special civil application under Article 226 of the Constitution and the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State to allot physical possession of land (Survey No. 92, Village Jarikhurd, Dahod) and to restrain the Forest Department from disturbing their possession. The respondents argued that the Act and its 2007 Rules provide an internal mechanism—starting with a Gram Sabha application, followed by the Forest Rights Committee and subsequent grievance redressal through sub‑divisional and district level committees—through which the petitioners must pursue their claim. The court examined whether the petitioners could bypass this statutory procedure and obtain a direct mandamus from the High Court. It held that the statutory mechanism is mandatory and the petitioners must first file an application with the Gram Sabha and follow the prescribed steps. Consequently, the petition was disposed, directing the petitioners to pursue relief under the Rules of 2007 within twelve months, without any order as to costs.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate remedy for petitioners seeking possession of forest land under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006?
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued by the High Court in lieu of the statutory procedure prescribed in the Act and its Rules?

Legislation cited

Subjects

Forest RightsScheduled TribesMandamusArticle 226Gram SabhaForest Rights CommitteeLand possession

Judgment

     C/SCA/14413/2024                              JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

          R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14413 of 2024


FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

==========================================
        Approved for Reporting          Yes    No
                                               ✔
==========================================
             MEDA DINESHBHAI BADIYABHAI & ORS.
                               Versus
                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================
Appearance:
MR VD PARGHI(568) for the Petitioners
MR ADITYA DAVDA AGP for the Respondents
==========================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                            Date : 30/03/2026

                                JUDGMENT


1.       RULE returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government
Pleader waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.


2.       With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the
respective parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.


3.       Present petition is filed by the petitioners under Articles 226 of
the Constitution of India and under the provisions of the Scheduled
Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest


                                  Page 1 of 4
     C/SCA/14413/2024                                   JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026




Rights) Act, 2006 and under the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes
and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights)
Act, 2008 seeking following reliefs:-

          (A)    YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to admit and allow
                 this petition.

          (B)    YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to issue a writ of
                 mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or
                 direction in nature of mandamus directing the State
                 Authorities that the physical possession of land
                 bearing Survey No. 92 (Old Survey No. 21), Account
                 No.203, situated at Village – Jarikhurd, Tal. Dahod,
                 District: Dahod be allotted to the petitioners as per
                 rules and regulations of the government and also
                 directing the Forest Department not to disturb the
                 possession in the land of the petitioners bearing
                 Survey No. 92 (Old Survey no.21), Account No. 203
                 situated at Village – Jarikhurd, Tal. Dahod, Dist.
                 Dahod.

          (C)    YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to issue a writ of
                 mandamus directing to the respondents to undertake
                 the procedure for compliance against the order issued
                 by State Government to the petitioners and handover
                 the possession of land to the petitioners bearing
                 Survey No. 92 (Old Survey No. 21), Account No.203,
                 situated at Village – Jarikhurd, Tal. Dahod, District:
                 Dahod forthwith.

          (D) YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to issue a writ of
              mandamus directing to the respondents to decide the
              matter within 3 months.

          (E)    Be pleased to pass such other and further relief that is
                 just, fit and expedient in the facts and circumstances
                 of the case, in favour of the petitioners.


4.       Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant
Government Pleader for the respondents. Perused the material placed
on record.



                                      Page 2 of 4
     C/SCA/14413/2024                            JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026




5.       Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submitted that
the petition has been filed seeking direction to the State authorities to
allot physical possession of the land as per the applicable rules and
regulations of the government, coupled with the direction to the
forest department not to disturb the possession.


6.       Learned Assistant Government Pleader, submitted that as per
the Schedule Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition
of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 read with the Schedule Tribes and other
Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Rules, 2007
(hereinafter referred to as the “Rules of 2007”), an inbuilt mechanism
is provided for the forest rights of the claimants. It is submitted that
the form, initially, is to be submitted to the Gram Sabha who, in turn,
after collecting all the necessary details, will submit it to the Forest
Rights Committee which, in turn, will take steps in accordance with
the provisions of Rule 12 of the Rules of 2007 and thereafter, will
submit it to the Gram Sabha and/or the authority concerned which,
thereafter, will pass a resolution either approving or rejecting the
rights and if any person is aggrieved by the resolution of the Gram
Sabha, the remedy available to the person concerned, is to file a
petition to the Sub-divisional Level Committee and it will take steps as
per the provisions of Rule 14 of the Rules of 2007 and further remedy,
is available of filing a petition to the District level Committee.
Therefore, it will be open to the petitioner to take steps in accordance
with the provisions of the Act read with the Rules of 2007.


7.       Learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the
petitioners, if have not filed any application, shall file the application
with the Gram Sabha and let the Gram Sabha and the Forest Rights
Committee, take decision in accordance with the provisions of the

                                 Page 3 of 4
       C/SCA/14413/2024                                                                JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026




 Rules of 2007.


 8.         In view of the above, the petition, is disposed of with a liberty to
 the petitioners to make an application in accordance with the Rules of
 2007, with a further direction to the Gram Sabha and the Forest
 Rights Committee, to take steps and/or decision in accordance with
 the Rules of 2007 as early as possible preferably within a period of
 twelve months from the date of receipt of the application. Rule is
 made absolute to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to
 costs. Direct service is permitted.


                                                                      (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
 V.R. PANCHAL

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VIJAYKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PANCHAL(HC00171), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/03/2026 17:09:31




                                                          Page 4 of 4


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Forest Rights"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.