BHURIYA NANJIBHAI S/O PANGLABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH
- Bench
- HEMANT M PRACHCHHAK
Holding
The petition is dismissed; the petitioner must seek relief through the procedure laid down in the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 and its Rules.
Summary
The petitioner Bhuriya Nanjibhai filed a special civil application under Article 226 of the Constitution and the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State to allot physical possession of a specific parcel of land in Navanagar, Dahod and to restrain the Forest Department from disturbing his possession. The respondents contended that the Act, read with the 2007 Rules, provides an exclusive procedural mechanism requiring the claimant to apply to the Gram Sabha, which then forwards the claim to the Forest Rights Committee, with further remedies available before Sub‑Divisional or District Level Committees. The Court examined these statutory provisions and held that the statutory mechanism is exclusive and the petitioner must pursue relief through it rather than obtain a direct court order. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of, with a liberty granted to the petitioner to make an application in accordance with the Rules and a direction to the Gram Sabha and Forest Rights Committee to decide the claim within twelve months. No order as to costs was made.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can issue a writ of mandamus directing allotment of forest land contrary to the procedural scheme of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.
- Whether the petitioner must first exhaust the remedy provided under the Act and its 2007 Rules before approaching the court.
Legislation cited
Subjects
Judgment
C/SCA/14449/2024 JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14449 of 2024
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
==========================================
Approved for Reporting Yes
No
✔
==========================================
BHURIYA NANJIBHAI S/O PANGLABHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================
Appearance:
MR ARTH V PARGHI(11292) for the Petitioner
MR VD PARGHI(568) for the Petitioner
MR ADITYA DAVDA AGP for the Respondents
==========================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 30/03/2026
JUDGMENT
1. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government
Pleader waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the
respective parties, the present petition is taken up for <nal hearing.
3. Present petition is <led by the petitioner under Articles 226 of
Page 1 of 4
C/SCA/14449/2024 JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026
the Constitution of India and under the provisions of the Scheduled
Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest
Rights) Act, 2006 and under the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes
and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights)
Act, 2008 seeking following reliefs:-
(A) YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to admit and allow
this petition.
(B) YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to issue a writ of
mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or
direction in nature of mandamus directing the State
Authorities that the physical possession of land
bearing Survey No. 230 paiki 6, admeasuring 5 Acre
15 Gunthas out of total admeasuring 11 – 45 – 27 H –
R – A situated at Village - Navanagar, Tal. Dhanpur,
District: Dahod be allotted to the petitioner as per
rules and regulations of the government and also
directing the Forest Department not to disturb the
possession in the land of the petitioner bearing
Survey No. 230 paiki 6, admeasuring 5 Acre 15
Gunthas out of total admeasuring 11 – 45 – 27 H – R –
A situated at Village - Navanagar, Tal. Dhanpur,
District: Dahod.
(C) YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to issue a writ of
mandamus directing to the respondents to undertake
the procedure for compliance against the order issued
by State Government to the petitioners and handover
the possession of land to the petitioners bearing
Survey No. 230 paiki 6, admeasuring 5 Acre 15
Gunthas out of total admeasuring 11 – 45 – 27 H – R –
A situated at Village - Navanagar, Tal. Dhanpur,
District: Dahod forthwith.
(D) Be pleased to pass such other and further relief that is
just, :t and expedient in the facts and circumstances
of the case, in favour of the petitioners.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant
Government Pleader for the respondents. Perused the material placed
Page 2 of 4
C/SCA/14449/2024 JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026
on record.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that
the petition has been <led seeking direction to the State authorities to
allot physical possession of the land as per the applicable rules and
regulations of the government, coupled with the direction to the
forest department not to disturb the possession.
6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, submitted that as per
the Schedule Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition
of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 read with the Schedule Tribes and other
Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Rules, 2007
(hereinafter referred to as the “Rules of 2007”), an inbuilt mechanism
is provided for the forest rights of the claimants. It is submitted that
the form, initially, is to be submitted to the Gram Sabha who, in turn,
after collecting all the necessary details, will submit it to the Forest
Rights Committee which, in turn, will take steps in accordance with
the provisions of Rule 12 of the Rules of 2007 and thereafter, will
submit it to the Gram Sabha and/or the authority concerned which,
thereafter, will pass a resolution either approving or rejecting the
rights and if any person is aggrieved by the resolution of the Gram
Sabha, the remedy available to the person concerned, is to <le a
petition to the Sub-divisional Level Committee and it will take steps as
per the provisions of Rule 14 of the Rules of 2007 and further remedy,
is available of <ling a petition to the District level Committee.
Therefore, it will be open to the petitioner to take steps in accordance
with the provisions of the Act read with the Rules of 2007.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the
petitioners, if have not <led any application, shall <le the application
Page 3 of 4
C/SCA/14449/2024 JUDGMENT DATED: 30/03/2026
with the Gram Sabha and let the Gram Sabha and the Forest Rights
Committee, take decision in accordance with the provisions of the
Rules of 2007.
8. In view of the above, the petition, is disposed of with a liberty to
the petitioner to make an application in accordance with the Rules of
2007, with a further direction to the Gram Sabha and the Forest
Rights Committee, to take steps and/or decision in accordance with
the Rules of 2007 as early as possible preferably within a period of
twelve months from the date of receipt of the application. Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to
costs. Direct service is permitted.
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
V.R. PANCHAL
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VIJAYKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PANCHAL(HC00171), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/03/2026 17:09:48
Page 4 of 4
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.