Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

BHIL CHIMANBHAI MANIYABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

Holding

The court held that the Forest Rights Act, 2006 does not prescribe a deadline for filing claims, and therefore the petitioners must be provided the necessary forms to lodge their claims.

Summary

The petitioners, a group of tribal individuals, complained that they were not provided the necessary forms to lodge their forest‑rights claims, alleging that the authorities had denied them on the ground that the stipulated filing period had elapsed. The respondents, the State of Gujarat, relied on a communication from the Ministry of Tribal Affairs indicating that under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, there is no fixed deadline for filing such claims. The court examined whether the petitioners were entitled to the claim forms despite the alleged time lapse and whether any statutory time limit existed. It held that the absence of a statutory deadline meant the petitioners could be furnished with the forms, and the grievance was thereby redressed. Consequently, the petition was disposed of, with the rule made absolute and the respondents directed to decide a related representation within eight weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to be provided claim forms for filing forest‑rights claims despite the alleged lapse of a stipulated time period.
  • Whether the Forest Rights Act, 2006 imposes any deadline for filing such claims.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Forest Rights Acttribal rightsclaim filingprocedural delayGujaratno statutory deadline

Judgment

   C/SCA/15306/2024                                 JUDGMENT DATED: 20/03/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
            R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15306 of 2024

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Sd/-
==========================================================
           Approved for Reporting                  Yes          No
                                                                No
==========================================================
                      BHIL CHIMANBHAI MANIYABHAI & ORS.
                                    Versus
                           STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MANOJ SHRIMALI(2331) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
MS DIXA PANDYA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                               Date : 20/03/2026

                                 JUDGMENT

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives service

of notice of rule on behalf of respondents.


2. Heard Mr.Manoj Shrimali, learned advocate for the

petitioners and Ms. Dixa Pandya, learned AGP for the

respondents.


3. Essentially the grievance of the present petitioners was

that for (ling their claims with regard to recognizing of

forest rights, the petitioners were not given the necessary

forms for (ling their claims on the ground that the

                                   Page 1 of 3
  C/SCA/15306/2024                       JUDGMENT DATED: 20/03/2026




stipulated time that had gone by.


4. In light of the communication dated 18.07.2022

addressed by the Ministry of Tribal A0airs, Government

of India to the Principal Secretary, Tribal Development

Department, Government of Gujarat, which indicates that

as per Forest Rights Act, 2006, the (ling of the claims

and vesting of forest rights is an ongoing process and

there is no deadline/time limit for (ling of such claims.


5. In light of this, since the forms have been issued so as

to enable the petitioners to lodge their claims, present

petition which was essentially (led as such forms for

(ling the claims was not being handed out to the

petitioners, for the present, the grievance is redressed.


6. The representation dated 21.12.2023 made by the

petitioners to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall be decided

by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 within period of eight weeks

from the date of receipt of copy of present petition, in

accordance with law.




                           Page 2 of 3
    C/SCA/15306/2024                                                                JUDGMENT DATED: 20/03/2026




7. The petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute to

the aforesaid extent. It is needless to say that the policy

is/will be implemented for all Tribal Districts.

          Direct service is permitted.



                                                                                            Sd/-
                                                                        (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
SURESH SOLANKI

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SURESHKUMAR MOTIBHAI SOLANKI(HC00208), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/03/2026 17:45:10




                                                       Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Forest Rights Act"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.