Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

CHETANKUMAR VASANTBHAI PATELversusTHE GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED

Disposal
DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Holding

The petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Chetankumar Vasantbhai Patel, filed Special Civil Application No. 3741 of 2024 seeking relief against Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited and others. The respondent, Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited, argued that the electric line had already been laid, the project completed, and the shifting work finished, rendering the petition moot. The respondent also submitted a photocopy of the map and an affidavit-in-reply to demonstrate that the relief sought could no longer be granted. The court considered the respondent's submission that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the court held that the petition could not proceed and ordered it to be disposed of as infructuous, discharging the notice. The order was pronounced by Justice Hemant M. Prachchhak on 7 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition has become infructuous due to completion of the project and related works
  • Whether the court should discharge the notice and dispose of the petition

Subjects

infructuous petitionspecial civil applicationdisposal of petitionnotice dischargeproject completion

Judgment

       C/SCA/3741/2024                                                               ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                  R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3741 of 2024
==========================================================
               CHETANKUMAR VASANTBHAI PATEL
                          Versus
   THE GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED &
                           ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AMIT P PATEL(3498) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR SP HASURKAR(345) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
==========================================================

   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                                               Date : 07/04/2026

                                                 ORAL ORDER


         Mr. S.P. Hasurkar, learned counsel for respondent
No.1, submits that after filing of this petition, the electric
line has already been laid and the project has been
completed, and the shifting work is also over. He further
submits that a photocopy of the map along with the
affidavit-in-reply has been produced and annexed to the
petition. He therefore submits that the present petition
does not survive and may be disposed of as having
become infructuous.
         In view of the above submission, present petition
stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Notice
is discharged.


                                                                        (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
SURESH SOLANKI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SURESHKUMAR MOTIBHAI SOLANKI(HC00208), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 07/04/2026 18:02:27




                                                       Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "infructuous petition"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.