High Court of Gujarat
DR.S R PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
- Bench
- MAULIK SHELAT
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court of Gujarat despite the matter being called out. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution and discharged the rule. Any interim relief previously granted was vacated. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The order was pronounced by Justice Maulik J. Shelat on 21 January 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can proceed when the petitioners do not appear before the Court
Subjects
writ petitionnon‑prosecutiondismissalinterim relief vacatedhigh court procedure
Judgment
C/SCA/4672/2009 ORDER DATED: 21/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4672 of 2009
==========================================================
DR.S R PATEL & ORS.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3
ADVOCATE NOTICE UNSERVED for the Petitioner(s) No. 4,5
MR SIDDHARTH RAMI, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
Date : 21/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter was called out, none present for the
petitioners. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands
vacated forthwith.
(MAULIK J.SHELAT,J)
NILESH
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARMAR NILESHKUMAR R(HCD0068), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 21/01/2026 14:03:03
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "writ petition"Sign in to search