Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

PARAG HARSHADBHAI SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

Holding

The court directed the concerned authority to decide the furlough leave application as expeditiously as possible.

Summary

The petitioner, Parag Harshadbhai Shah, a convicted prisoner, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking ten days of furlough leave, which was pending before the concerned authority. The State of Gujarat opposed the application. Both parties were represented, and the matter was heard by Justice Utkarsh Thakorbhai Desai. After considering the applicant's submissions, the court directed the concerned authority to decide the furlough leave application as expeditiously as possible. The order disposed of the application, permitting direct service of the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the concerned authority should expedite the decision on the applicant's request for ten days of furlough leave.

Subjects

furlough leavespecial criminal applicationhigh court orderprocedural directionprisoner rights

Judgment

     R/SCR.A/1162/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FURLOUGH LEAVE) NO. 1162 of
                           2026
==========================================================
                               PARAG HARSHADBHAI SHAH
                                        Versus
                               STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
        DESAI

                                         Date : 10/02/2026

                                           ORAL ORDER

1.      On perusing the Jail Remarks it appears that the Applicant

has preferred an Application before the concerned authority for

grant of 10 Furlough Leave which is pending.

2.      Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP

for the Respondent - State.

3.      Considering the submissions advanced by the learned

Advocate for the Applicant, the concerned authority is directed

to decide the Application )led by the Applicant for grant of

Furlough Leave as expeditiously as possible.

4.      The Application is disposed of in above terms. Direct

service is permitted.

                                                      (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
ANIRUDH OJHA
 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
 Digitally signed by: ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/02/2026 18:15:58

                                               Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "furlough leave"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.