Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KOMAL UTKARSH PANDYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner’s counsel failed to appear.

Summary

The petitioner, Komal Utkarsh Pandya, filed a special criminal application before the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Poojan V. Bahrani, failed to appear when the matter was called on 25 March 2026 and again on 17 June 2026. The court noted the repeated non-appearance and issued a show-cause notice dated 17 June 2026. On the same day, the court observed that the petitioner’s advocate was again absent. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The order was signed by Justice M. R. Mengdey and recorded by the court stenographer.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner’s advocate repeatedly fails to appear before the court?

Subjects

Criminal ProcedureNon‑prosecutionDismissalAdvocate non‑appearance

Judgment

       R/SCR.A/15901/2025                                                     ORDER DATED: 17/06/2026




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 15901 of 2025

 ==========================================================
                                   KOMAL UTKARSH PANDYA
                                            Versus
                                   STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
 ==========================================================
 Appearance:
 MR POOJAN V BAHRANI(12056) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 MS. JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 ==========================================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

                                           Date : 17/06/2026

                                                  ORDER


           On 25.03.2026, this Court had passed the following order: -

                 “Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner is not present
           when the matter is called out. S.O. to 17.06.2026.”


           Today also, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner is not
 present when the matter is called out. Hence, the present matter is hereby
 dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                                                 (M. R. MENGDEY,J)
 RAVI OZA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RAVI OZA(HCW0111), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 17/06/2026 16:57:45




                                                  Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Criminal Procedure"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.