Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

VASAVA MANOJBHAI LALLUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion and granted the applicant parole leave for 21 days with specified bond and surety conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Vasava Manojbhai Lallubhai, filed a special criminal application seeking an extension of parole leave. The State of Gujarat opposed the application. The court considered the jail remarks and the grounds presented, and exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. It granted parole for 21 days, subject to a personal bond of Rs.25,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, with conditions to mark daily presence at the police station, avoid entering the Kadi Police Station area except for presence marking, and surrender after the parole period. The court ordered that no further extensions or reductions in bond amount would be entertained.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of parole leave under the circumstances presented

Subjects

parolebail bondsuretycriminal procedurehigh court discretion

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/1938/2026                                 ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 1938 of
                               2026

==========================================================
                          VASAVA MANOJBHAI LALLUBHAI
                                     Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
       DESAI

                                Date : 10/02/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


 1.     The present application is                led by the applicant for

        enlarging him on Parole Leave on the ground mentioned in

        the application.

2.      Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants and learned APP

        appearing on behalf of the Respondent – State.

3.      Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of

        Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

4.      Having considering the jail remarks and ground mentioned

        in the Application, this Court is inclined to exercise

        discretion in favour of the applicant.

5.      The application is partly allowed. The Applicant is ordered

        to be released on Parole Leave for a period of 21 days from

                                    Page 1 of 2
      R/SCR.A/1938/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




         the date of actual release, upon furnishing a personal bond

         of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with

         two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

         jail authority, and on a condition that the Applicant shall

         mark his daily presence before the concerned police station

         and on the condition that the applicant shall not enter

         within the geographical limits of Kadi Police Station,

         District Mehsana except for marking presence and on a

         further condition that the Applicant shall surrender to the

         Jail authorities on expiry of the Parole Leave Period.

6.       The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. It is

         hereby clari ed that no further extension shall be granted

         and further the Court shall not entertain any application for

         reduction of amount of Bail bond and surety. Rule is made

         absolute.


                                                       (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
ANIRUDH OJHA




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/02/2026 18:15:12




                                                Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.