Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KAMLESHSINH @ KAMLESHJI S/OF LALAJI BADUSINH THAKOR THRO RAKESHSINH S/OF LALSINH CHAUHAN (THAKOR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The Court exercised its discretion and granted parole for 21 days with a Rs. 25,000 personal bond and two sureties, without permitting extension or reduction of the bond.

Summary

The applicant, Kamlesh Singh, convicted and appealing his conviction, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to arrange funds for his appeal. The High Court considered the grounds raised and the circumstances of the case, and exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant. The Court ordered his release on parole for 21 days, subject to a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and imposed conditions of daily police reporting and restriction from entering the local limits of Ladol Police Station except for reporting purposes. The Court expressly barred any extension of the parole period and refused any application to reduce the bond amount. The application was allowed and the rule was made absolute.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to parole leave pending his appeal against conviction
  • Whether the bond amount and surety requirements can be reduced
  • Whether an extension of the parole period can be granted

Subjects

parolespecial criminal applicationdiscretionbondsuretyGujarat High Courtcriminal procedure

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/2074/2026                           ORDER DATED: 12/02/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 2074 of
                               2026
==========================================================
 KAMLESHSINH @ KAMLESHJI S/OF LALAJI BADUSINH THAKOR THRO
        RAKESHSINH S/OF LALSINH CHAUHAN (THAKOR)
                          Versus
                 STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VINAY VISHEN, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
       DESAI

                          Date : 12/02/2026

                            ORAL ORDER


1.     The present application is           led by the applicant for

enlarging him on parole leave on the ground of                     ling an

appeal against his conviction and for arranging funds for

the same.



2.      Rule returnable forthwith.            Learned APP waives

service of rule on behalf of the respondent State.



3.      Having considered the ground mentioned in the

application and considering the facts and circumstance of


                              Page 1 of 2
        R/SCR.A/2074/2026                                                   ORDER DATED: 12/02/2026




the case, this court is inclined to exercise discretion in

favour of the applicant.



4.        The applicant is ordered to be released on parole for

a period of 21 days from the date of his actual release,

upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees

Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of like

amount to the satisfaction of the jail authority. The

applicant shall mark his presence before the concerned

police station every day and shall not enter the local

limits of Ladol Police Station, Mehsana except for the

purpose of marking his presence and surrender to the jail

authorities on expiry of the parole period.                                          It is clari ed

that, no extension shall be granted on expiry of the parole

period and this court shall also not entertain application

for reduction of amount of personal bond and surety. The

application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute accordingly. Direct service is permitted.



                                                        (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
DIVYA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: DIVYA NAIR(HC00199), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/02/2026 17:32:35

                                                 Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.