ZAHIR ISMAILBHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Holding
The application for parole leave was rejected.
Summary
Zahir Ismailbhai Shaikh, convicted for 1300 days for non-payment of maintenance arrears of Rs.6,50,000, applied for parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The State, represented by Ms. Jirga Jhaveri, highlighted the conviction and the nature of the offence. The Court examined whether the applicant's financial need warranted the exercise of discretion to grant parole. Finding that the conviction for willful non‑payment of maintenance did not inspire confidence, the Court declined to exercise its discretion in his favour. Consequently, the application for parole leave was rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether a prisoner convicted for non‑payment of maintenance arrears is entitled to parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to family
- Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant parole in such circumstances
Subjects
Judgment
R/SCR.A/3084/2026 ORDER DATED: 05/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 3084 of
2026
==========================================================
ZAHIR ISMAILBHAI SHAIKH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
DESAI
Date : 05/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
The Applicant has filed this Application for grant of Parole
Leave on the ground of providing financial assistance to the family.
Heard learned APP Ms. Jirga Jhaveri, on behalf of the
respondent – State, who has drawn the attention of the Court
towards the jail remarks from wherein it is reflected that, the
applicant came to be convicted 1300 days for non-payment of
arrears of maintenance amount to the tune of Rs.6,50,000/-. The
said reason does not inspire confidence of the Court hence, this
Court is not inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the
applicant.
The Application is rejected.
(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
KAJAL
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA(HCD0076), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 05/03/2026 17:49:28
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.