DAKSHABEN BHUPATJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
- Bench
- M R MENGDEY
Holding
The application is dismissed for non-prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner’s counsel.
Summary
Dakshaben Bhupatji Thakor filed a Special Criminal Application against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. V. B. Malik, was not present when the matter was called out before the High Court. The respondent’s counsel, Mr. Pranav Dhagat, was present. The Court noted that the petitioner’s advocate’s non-appearance amounted to a failure to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for non-prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a Special Criminal Application may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner’s counsel fails to appear before the Court?
Subjects
Judgment
R/SCR.A/6754/2025 ORDER DATED: 29/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 6754 of 2025
==========================================================
DAKSHABEN BHUPATJI THAKOR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR V B MALIK(5071) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Date : 29/07/2026
ORDER
Learned advocate for the petitioner is not present when the matter is
called out. Hence, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(M. R. MENGDEY,J)
Manshi
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: AMIN MANSI(HC01561), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 29/07/2026 14:54:15
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.