Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

SEEMAversusASHWANI KUMAR

Citation
2005 INSC 211
Decided
15 April 2005

Holding

Until suitable legislation is enacted, the Court held that government orders or executive instructions directing officials to keep records of marriages may be made enforceable under its directions.

Summary

The Supreme Court entertained Transfer Petition (C) No. 29 of 2005 arising out of a matrimonial suit between Ashwani Kumar and Seema. The Court ordered an interim stay of the pending suit and directed issuance of notice. While hearing, the Court observed that the absence of official records of marriage dates and parties creates significant evidentiary problems. It therefore invited the Solicitor General to consider directing State Governments and Union Territories, through executive instructions, to authorize officials to maintain marriage records until appropriate legislation is enacted. The Court opined that such executive orders can be made enforceable under its directions, serving as an interim measure where statutory provisions are lacking. The order also sought views from the states and Union Territories before finalising any directive.

Issues considered

  • Can executive instructions be issued to State Governments and Union Territories to authorize officials to keep records of marriages in the absence of specific legislation?
  • Can such executive instructions be made enforceable under the Supreme Court's directions?
  • Whether an interim stay of the matrimonial suit is appropriate pending resolution of the record‑keeping issue?

Subjects

family lawmarriage registrationexecutive instructionsinterim staySupreme Courtlegislationrecord-keepingMatrimonial suit

Judgment

                                  SEEMA                                         A
                                     v.
                              ASHW ANI KUMAR

                                APRIL 15, 2005

                [ARIJIT PASAYAT ANO S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.)                          B


        Family Law:

      Record of marriages-Dates of marriages and parties to marriage-
Record of-To be kept by official to be auhorised by State Government- C
Necessity of Legislation-Court suggesting State Governments to consider
issuing of executive instructions which may be made enforceable in terms of
orders of Supreme Court, till suitable legislation in this regard is made-
Legislation-Necessity of-Suggested

        CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Transfer Petition (C) No. 29 I of        D
2005.

        Balraj Dewan for the Petitioner.

        The following Proceeding/Order of the Court was delivered :
                                                                                E
                                    ORDER

        Issue notice.

        Issue notice on the application for ex-parte stay also.
                                                                                F
      There shall be interim stay of proceedings in Matrimonial Suit No. 104
of 2004 entitled Ashwani Kumar v. Seema, pending before Learned Addi.
District Judge, Delhi.

      During the hearing of this petition, it appeared to us that in the absence
of records relating to dates of marriages and parties to the marriage, problems. G
come up which have far-reaching consequences. We, therefore, request learned
Solicitor General to consider whether Government orders by way of executive
instructins can be issued, on the basis of directions of this Court, to various
States and Union Territories to authorise officials specifically to keep record
                                      649.                                     H
    650                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS                   [2005) 3 S.C.R.

A   of marriages so that they can be placed as evidence in different proceedings
    if the necessity arises. Learned Solicitor General submitted that there may be
    necessity of a suitable legislation in this regard as the Government Orders/
    executive instructions may not suffer. We are of the view that until a suitable
    legislation is made, the Government Order/executive instructions can. be made
B   enforceable in terms of the orders of this Court. These may be implemented
    where there is no statutory prescription for recording/registering the marriage,
    and may be done as an additional measure when there is any such prescription.

           We have also requested Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. to assist us in this
    matter. If learned Solicitor General feels and if so advised, he may require
C   the State Governments regard and the Union Territories to place their views
    in this regard before him and this Court so that appropriate directions can be
    issued. A copy of our order be handed over to learned Solicitor General and
    Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. for necessary steps in this matter.

    R.P.                                                             Notice issued.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "family law"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.