Supreme Court of India

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusNEELAM NAG & ANR.

Citation: [2016] 8 S.C.R. 436
Decided: 9 November 2016
Disposal: Order modified
Bench: T S THAKURA M KHANWILKAR

Holding

The judgment is corrected to read "Neelam Nag & Anr." in the cause title and to replace "respondent" with "respondent No. I" throughout the judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court of India, in Civil Appeal No. 4715 of 2011 (State Bank of India & Ors. v. Neelam Nag & Anr.), issued a correction to its earlier judgment dated 16 September 2016. The correction clarifies that the name "Neelam Nag" in the cause title should read "Neelam Nag & Anr." and that every occurrence of the word "respondent" in the judgment should be read as "respondent No. I". No substantive alteration to the merits of the case was made; the order merely amends the textual references for accuracy. The correction is to be treated as part of the original judgment. The order was signed by Justice Nidhi Jain.

Subjects

judgment correctioncivil appealSupreme Court of Indiamodification order

Judgment

                                [2016] 8 S.C.R. 436


A                       STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
                                         v.
                             NEELAM NAG & ANR.
                           (Civil Appeal No. 4715of2011)
B                              NOVEMBER 09, 2016
            [T.S. THAKUR, CJI AND A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.]
            Judgment/Order - Modification/correction - To be treated as .
      part of the judgment reported in [2016] 5 SCR 278- Word "Neelam
C     Nag" in the cause title to be read as "Neelam Nag & Am: - Word
      "respondent" in the judgment to be read as "respondent No. l ".
            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4715
      of201 l.
         From the Judgment and Order dated 28.06.2010 of the High Court
D of Judicature at Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh in WA 80 of2010.
            K. V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv, Sanjay Kapur, Anmol Chandan,
      Ms. Priyanka Das, Ms. Shubhra Kapur, Advs. for the Appellants.
           Atul Jha, Sandeep Jha, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, R. B. Sharma,
      Akshat Shrivastava, Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Advs. for the Respondents.
E
      The following Order of the Court was delivered
                                     ORDER
             The following modification/correction shall be treated as part of
      the judgment dated 16.09.2016 in the aforementioned appeal:-
F
              (i)    The word "Neelam Nag" in the cause title shall be read as
                     " Neelam Nag & Anr."
              (ii)   The word "respondent" whereever referred in the judgment
                     shall be read as "respondent No. I".
G ~
      Nidhi Jain                                      Modification in earlier judgment




                                       436

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "judgment correction"Sign in to search