STATE OF KERALAversusM.M. ABDUL KHADER
- Citation
- 1995 INSC 909
- Decided
- 15 December 1995
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Holding
Since the award of the Collector is of April 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Summary
The State of Kerala appealed a Kerala High Court judgment that had allowed claimants to receive additional compensation under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The sole question was whether the respondents were entitled to this additional amount given that the Collector's award was dated 21 April 1980. The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Section 23(1-A) and held that the award predated the provision’s effective date, rendering the claimants ineligible for the extra compensation. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court order and allowed the State’s appeal. No costs were awarded.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondents are entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, considering the Collector's award dated 21 April 1980.
Legislation cited
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894s. 23(1-A)
Subjects
Judgment
A STATE OF KERALA
v.
M.M. ABDUL KHADER
DECEMBER 15, 1995
B [K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.]
Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
S. 23(1-Aj-Award of Collector being dated 21.4.1980-Claimants nor
C entitled ro benefits under the section.
The State Government filed appeal against the jndgment of the High
Court allowing the claimants, the benefits of s. 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition
Act, 1894.
D Allowing the appeal, this Court
HELD : Since the award of the Collector is of April, 21, 1980, the
claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under s. 23 (l·A) of
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. [785-C]
E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 12120 of
1995.
From the Judgment and Order dated 28.1.93 of the Kerala High
Court in L.A.A. No. 244 of 1988.
F M.T. George for the Appellants.
N. Sudahakaran for the Respondents.
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
G Leave granted.
The only controversy is as regards the entitlement of the respondents
to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition
Act, 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of June 4, 1979, the claimants
are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said
H Act.
784
STATEv. M.M.ABDULKHADER 785
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The Order of A
the High Court is set aside. No costs.
CA. No. 12121 of 1995
Leave granted.
B
The only controversy with which we are concerned in this appeal is
as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount
under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Ac~ 1894. Since the award
of the Collector is of April 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the
additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act.
c
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The order of
the High Court is set aside. No costs.
R.P. Appeals allowed.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.