STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.versusM/S. UNIVERSAL EXPORTERS AND ANR.

               ST ATE OF UTT AR PRADESH AND ANR.                                   A
                                v.
               M/S. UNIVERSAL EXPORTERS AND ANR.

                           SEPTEMBER l 0, 1997

         [S.P. BHARUCHA AND M. JAGANNADHA RAO, JJ.]                                B


      Sales Tax·:

      U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948/U.P. Sales Tax Rules, 1948:
                                                                                   c
      S.3AAA!Ru/e 12A(5)~Presumption regarding certain sales-Assessee
appliedfor issue of Form III in order to enable him to rebut the presumption-
Sa/es Tax Officer rejected the application holding that transactions entered
into by assessee were export of leather-Held, whether or not the presumption
under s.3AAA can be rebutted is to be considered only after the blank form         D
has been issued and it is duly filled in and.submitted along with such other
proof as the dealer adduces-Order of Sales Tax Officer rejecting assessee 's
application for blank forms was Improper and must be quashed-After the
blank forms are issued to the assessee and duly filled up and submitted along
with such proof as the ass;;:ssee may adduce, it shall, be open to the assessing
aulhot:ity to satisfY itself as to whether or not the 'presumption under Section   E
3-AAA stands rebutted

      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 2535of1991.

      From the Judgment and Order dated 19.8.83 of the Allahabad High Court        F
in C.M.W.P. No. 48of1983.

      R.C. Verma, C.D. Singh and R.B. Misra for the Appellants.
                                               .              ,..
      R.F. Nariman for the Respondents.

      The following Order of the Court was delivered :                             G

       Section 3AA and Section 3AAA of the Uttar. Pradesh Sales Tax Ai:t,
. 1948, at the relevant time read thus :

        "3~AA. Rate and point of tax in respect of certain goods - subject to      H
                                      49
    50                       SUPREME COURT'REPORTS [1997) SUPP. 4 S.C.R.

A           the provisions of Section 3-D, the turnover in respect of goods declared
            under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1958 (Act 74 of 1956)
            to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce shall not
            be liable to tax except at the point of sale by a dealer to the consumer
            and the rate of tax shall be such, not exceeding the maximum rate for
            the time being specified in Section 15 of the said Act, as the State
B           Government may, by notification in the Gazette, declares."

            "3-AAA: Presumption regarding certain sales. Where goods are liable
            to tax under this Act only at the point of sale to the consumer, every
            sale by a dealer.
c              (a) to a registered dealer who does not purchase them for re-sale
               within the State or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce,
               in the same form and condition in which he has purchased them
               or,

D           (b) to any person other than a registered dealer,

           shall be deemed to be a sale to the consumer, unless the dealer proves
           otherwise to the satisfaction of the assessing authority and, for the
           purpose, also furnishes to the assessing authority such declaration
           obtained from the purchasing dealer, in such form and manner and
E          within such period, as may be prescribed."

         Rule 12A(5) of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules read thus :

           "If the Sales Tax Officer is satisfied that the requisition of the dealer
           for blank forms is genuine and reasonable, he may issue the same in
F          such manner as he deem fit. If the fee paid is more than the fee
           payable for the number of forms issued, the balance shall be credited
           to the account of the dealer to be adjusted against any future issue
           of the forms."

G It appears that the assessee applied for a form to enable it to rebut the
    presumption under Section 3-AAA. The application in this behalf was not
    dealt with. The assessee thereupon filed a writ petition in the High Court at
    Allahabad. Pending the disposal of the writ petition, the Sales Tax Officer
    rejected the application as, in his opinion, the transactions entered into by
    the assessee were by way of export of leather. The writ petition was amended
H   and the refusal was challenged.
                      ST ATE v: UNIVERSAL EXPORTERS                            51
         Two .learned Judges of the High Court having differed on the writ           A
  petition, it was referred to a third learned Judge. The third learned Judge
  agreed that the writ petition should be allowed. Hence, this appeal by special
  leave at the instance of the State.

       The assessee not having appeared, we thought it necessary to appoint          B
  amicus curiae, and we are obliged to  Mr.
                                        R.F. Nariman for havmg assisted the
  Court as such.

         Section 3.-AAA provides for a presumption in respect of certain sales.
  It states that where goods are liable to tax under the Act only at the point       C
  of sale to a consumer, every sale by a dealer to a registered dealer who does
  not purchase the goods for re-sale within the State or in the course of inter-
  State trade or commerce, in the form and condition in which he has purchased
  them, or to any person other than a registered dealer shall be deemed to be
  a sale to the consumer. The Section, .however, goes on to provide that the
  aforesaid presumption may be rebutted when it states that the dealer may           D
  prove otherwise to the satisfaction of the assessing authority. For such
  purpose the dealer is required to furnish to the assessing authorities a
  declaration from the purchasing dealer in such form and manner and within
  such period as may be prescribed. Rule 12-A(S) empowers the Sales Tax
  Officer to issue blank forms in .this behaif (which are entitled Form Ill-A) if    E
  he is satisfied that the requisition in that behalf "is genuine and reasonable".

         That the Sales Tax Officer may satisfy· himself that the requisition for
  the blank Forms is genuine and reasonable does not empower him to pre-
. judge the issue as to whether or not the presumption under section 3-AAA           F
  can be rebutted. That is something that the assessing authority must consider
  only after the blank form has been issued and it has been duly filled in and
  submitted, along with such other proof as the dealer adduced. It is only then
  that the assessing authority may consider whether such proof, along with the
  filled in form is sufficient to rebut the presumption drawn under the provision.
                                                                                     G
       The arrogation of the authority to reject the assessee's application for
 blank Forms by the Sales Tax Officer on the ground that the concerned
 transactions entered into by the assessee were by way .of export of leather
 was improper and must be quashed. After the blank forms are issued to the
 assessee and duly filled up and submitted along with such proof as the              H
    52                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1997] SUPP. 4 S.C.R.

A   assessee may adduce, it shall, of course, be open to the assessing authority
    to satisfy itself as to whether or not the presumption under Section 3-AAA
    stands rebutted.

         The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.

B RP.                                                        Appeal dismissed.