THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF M.M. DEGREE COLLEGE, MODI NAGAR.versusVICE-CHANCELLOR, MEERUT UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

r
I




              THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF M.M. DEGREE                                A
                      COLLEGE, MODI NAGAR.
                                           v.
            VICE-CHANCELLOR, MEERUT UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

                                 MARCH 17, 1997
                                                                                    B
                 [K. RAMASWAMY AND G.T. NANAVATI, JJ.]

            Service Law:

           Removal from service-Head of Department of Statistic~We11t 011          c
    foreign assignment for one year with prior approval of Management of the
    College-After expiry of stipulated period Management asked the teacher to
    join duty-He did not joilt-An inquiry into unauthorised absence of the
    teacher conducted-He did not participate-Management dismissed him sub-
    ject to confirmation of Vice-Chancellor-Vice-Chancellor asking the Manage- D
    ment to give an opportunity to the teache,.-/ntimation sent by the
    Management to the teacher-Later when he came to India he was not allowed
    to join duty--ile filed writ petitio1t-High Court allowed the petition holding
    that since the approval of termination was not given earlier, Vice-Chancellor
    had no power to review the order and accord sanction for tenninatio1t-Held,
    approval sought by Management was after expiry of period of foreign assign- E
    ment-The teacher, therefore, unauthorisedly remained absent from
    duty-Approval by the Vice-Chancellor to dismissal of teacher from service is
    a precondition and Vice-Chancellor had passed the order with a direction to
    give further opportunity to the teacher for joining-On teacher's failure to join
    duty, the approval of Vice-Chancellor stood accordecf-ln the circumstances,
    removal of the teacher from service is in accordance with law.                   F

            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 2548 of
    1997.

         From the Judgment and Order dated 8.1.95 of the Allahabad High            G
    Court in C.M.W.P. No. 9343 of 1981.

            D.K. Garg for the Appellant.

          Goodwill lndeevar, K.N. Balgopal, A.P. Mukund, B.P. Singh and
    R.G. James for the Respondents.                                     H
                                    1183
    1184                  SUPREME COURT REPORTS                  [1997) 2 S.C.R.

A          The following Order of the Court was delivered :

           Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

          The third respondent, Dr. B.S. Goel, while working as Head of the
    Department of Statistics in MMD Degree College, Modinagar had gone
B   on foreign assignment in Basra University, Iraq for a period of one year.
    Subsequently, a letter was written by the Managing Committee on August
    20, 1979 seeking the third respondent to join duty. Since he did not join
    the duty, the managing committee passed a Resolution to hold an enquiry
    into unauthorised absence from duty. On 27.2.1980, a charge-sheet in the
c   shape of a letter was sent to respondent No. 3. He did not participate in
    the enquiry. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report on 19.6.1980. The
    Managing Committee, on consideration of the report, dismissed the third
    respondent on 31.7.1980 subject to the confirmation by the Vice-Chancel-
    lor. The Vice-Chancellor in his letter dated 19.12.1980 stated that since the
        " respondent had gone on foreign assignment, with the approval given
    third
D   by the appellant- Management, termination without giving an opportunity
    to the respondent to join duty is not proper. Accordingly, a cable w.is sent
    to the third respondent university as under:

             "On 20.1.1981, the University sent him a cable on his Basrah
             address and had also sent a copy in confirmation of the above
E
             cable that he should join M.M. College, Modi Nagar (Ghaziabad)
             immediately and latest by 15th February, 1981 positively failing
             which the Vice-Chancellor will approve the termination proceed-
             ings in this case."

F         Admittedly, the third respondent, Dr. B.S. Goel did not join the duty
    by the prescribed time. Consequently, he was not taken to the duty when
    he later on reported for duty after coming to India. He filed a writ petition
    in the High Court. The High Court, in the impugned order, dated January
    8, 1996, in Writ Petition No. 9343/81, has held that since the approval of
G   termination was not given earlier, the Vice-Chancellor had no power to
    review the order and accord sanction for termination by the proceedings
    dated 21.2.1981.

          We find that the view taken by the High Court is not correct. The
    approval sought by the appellant for third respondent's absence from
H   service was after the expiry of the period of foreign assignment. Necessari-
     'r
     I           MANAGING COMMrrIBEOP M.M. DEGREE COLLEGEv. V. C., MEERlIT UNIVERSITY   1185

          ly, he, therefore, unauthorisedly remained absent from duty. Approval by             A
          the Vice-Chancellor to the dismissal of teacher from service is a precon-
                                                                              a
          dition and the Vice- Chancellor had passed on order with direction to
          give further opportunity for joining. Letter dated 15.2.1981 is a conditional
          letter. On his failure to join duty, the approval of the Vice- Chancellor
          stood accorded. Under these circumstances, the removal of the respondent             B
          from service is accordingly in accordanceWith law.

                The appeal is accordingly allowed. The judgment of the High Court
          stands reversed. The writ petition dismissed. No costs.

          R.P.                                                            Appeal allowed.




 f
-·