Created by Fuzzy Cloud

A K PATNAIK

139 judgments · newest first · showing 1–139

DR. ALOYS WOBBEN & ANR.versusYOGESH MEHRA & ORS.

2014 INSC 416Disposed off

Dr. Aloys Wobben, holder of several wind‑turbine patents, sued Yogesh Mehra and others for patent infringement in the Delhi High Court. The respondents filed revocation petitions before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board under s.64(1) of the Patents Act and also raised counter‑claims in the …

MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2015 INSC 316Disposed off

The case concerns a pre‑planned terrorist attack on the police guarding the American Centre in Calcutta on 22 January 2002, which resulted in five police deaths and multiple injuries. The accused, including Md. Jamiludin Nasir and Aftab Ahmed Ansari, were convicted under the waging‑war provisions of …

B.S. SANDHUversusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS. & ETC.

2014 INSC 401Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether land in village Karoran, notified under Section 3 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 and regulated by Sections 4 and 5, automatically qualifies as "forest land" under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The High Court had held that the entire …

KISHOR K. MEHTAversusREKHA H. SHETH & ORS.

2014 INSC 976Disposed off

The petitioner, a lifetime trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, alleged that respondent No.6 failed to give notice of a Board of Trustees meeting as ordered by this Court on 14 February 2014, constituting willful contempt. The Court had earlier stayed the meeting scheduled for 7 …

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIAversusCRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 974Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals arising from a public interest litigation filed by the Cricket Association of Bihar challenging the constitution of a probe panel by the BCCI to investigate betting and spot‑fixing allegations in the 2013 IPL. The Court noted that the Justice Mudgal Committee …

ADAMBHAI SULEMANBHAI AJMERI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2014 INSC 399Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of six accused in the 2002 Akshardham temple terrorist attack, which were based largely on confessional statements recorded under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), testimony of accomplices, and two Urdu letters allegedly recovered from the terrorists' …

COMMON CAUSEversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2014 INSC 975Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined illegal mining in Odisha where numerous leaseholders were operating without environmental or forest clearances and without renewal under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The Central Empowered Committee identified 102 non‑working leases, 29 …

MANJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2014 INSC 325Disposed off

Manjeet Singh and two companions were charged with murder (Sec. 302 IPC), attempted murder, and offences under the Arms Act after firing a carbine in a hotel hall, killing Rajnish (Rintu) and injuring others. The trial court convicted Singh under Sec. 302, Sec. 324 IPC and Sec. 27 of the Arms Act; …

LAUT KUMAR YADAV @ KURIversusSTATE OF UTIAR PRADESH

2014 INSC 327Case Partly allowed

Laut Kumar Yadav alias Kuri was convicted for murdering an 18‑year‑old girl and attempting to rape her. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: a sniffer‑dog trail, recovery of a blood‑stained sickle and the accused’s clothes, and prior eve‑teasing of the victim. The trial court sentenced …

VISHAL GOYAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2014 INSC 322Case Allowed

The petitioners, who had completed their MBBS/BDS degrees in Karnataka, were barred from appearing for the 2014 Post Graduate Entrance Test (PGET-2014) by a clause in the National Board of Examinations' Information Bulletins that required candidates to be of "Karnataka origin" as narrowly defined. …

GOA FOUNDATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 962Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined public‑interest petitions concerning illegal iron‑ore mining in Goa, the validity of the Justice Shah Commission report, and the status of mining leases deemed to have arisen from pre‑1961 Portuguese concessions. It held that the Commission’s report could not be quashed …

HARSHAD GOVARDHAN SONDAGARversusINTERNATIONAL ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

2014 INSC 955Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who were tenants of premises mortgaged to banks, challenged the seizure of those premises by the secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act. The Supreme Court examined whether a lease made by the mortgagor, either before or after the mortgage, remains valid and binding on the secured …

T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 182Disposed off

The Supreme Court disposed of several interlocutory applications filed by various States seeking greater releases from the Ad‑hoc Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA). The Court modified its earlier order of July 2009, directing the National CAMPA Advisory …

RANJIT KUMAR BOSE & ANR.versusANANNYA CHOWDHURY & ANR

2014 INSC 176Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, landlords, leased a shop to the respondents under a notarized tenancy agreement that contained an arbitration clause. When the respondents failed to vacate after a termination notice, the landlords filed a suit for eviction, arrears of rent, municipal taxes, mesne profits and …

THE M.D., CHENNAI METRO RAIL LTD.versusN. ISMAIL & ORS.

2014 INSC 122Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu, through Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., sought to resume land (Survey Nos. 43/2 and 41) that had been granted in 1898‑99 for a choultry and later leased to N. Ismail, who built hotels on it. The original grant contained a condition that the land would revert to the Government if …

M/S ENGINEER BUILDER & ASSOCIATESversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

[2014] 1 S.C.R. 977Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a construction contractor, obtained an arbitration award on 4 September 2007 and filed an execution petition. The respondents sought to set aside the award under Section 34 of the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997, but the High Court directed them to file under …

MATHEW VARGHESEversusM. AMRITHA KUMAR & ORS.

[2014] 2 S.C.R. 736Disposed off

The case concerned the sale of a mortgaged property by a bank under the SARFAESI Act. The Supreme Court examined whether the bank, as a secured creditor, had complied with Section 13(8) of the Act and Rules 8 and 9, which require a 30‑day individual notice and a public notice before any sale. It …

WORLD SPORT GROUP (MAURITIUS) LTD.versusMSM SATELLITE (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.

2014 INSC 50Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a Facilitation Deed containing an arbitration clause (Clause 9) that required disputes to be referred to ICC arbitration in Singapore. The respondent rescinded the deed alleging fraud and sought a temporary injunction restraining the arbitration. The Bombay High Court granted …

PARMINDER ALIAS LADKA POLAversusSTATE OF DELHI

2014 INSC 27Dismissed

The appellant was convicted under IPC sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) for forcibly raping a 14‑year‑old girl. He argued that only an attempt to rape occurred and that, under the proviso to Section 376(1), the sentence could be reduced below the statutory minimum of seven years …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusROSHAN KHAN & ORS.

2014 INSC 25Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan prosecuted six accused for gang rape and kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old mentally deficient girl, relying on the victim's testimony, her father's eyewitness account, medical examination, and forensic evidence showing semen on the victims' clothing. The trial court convicted all …

MAJOR GENERAL H.M. SINGH, VSMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2014 INSC 18Appeal(s) allowed

Major General H.M. Singh, the senior most Major General in the DRDO, was recommended by a Selection Board for promotion to Lieutenant General. As he was due to superannuate on 29‑Feb‑2008, the President granted two extensions of service under Army Rule 16A to allow his promotion to be considered. …

SADASHIV PRASAD SINGHversusHARENDAR SINGH & ORS.

2014 INSC 17Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from the public auction of Plot No.722, attached in a debt recovery proceeding against a partnership firm. Sadashiv Prasad Singh, the highest bidder, was confirmed as the purchaser, took possession and obtained mutation of the property. Harendar Singh, …

T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 901Disposed off

The petitioners sought compliance with the Supreme Court's order in Lafarge Umiam Mining Private Limited v. Union of India, which directed the Central Government to appoint a National Regulator under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 for independent appraisal and monitoring of …

SUNIL MAHADEO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 763Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the custodial death of a kidnapping suspect who was arrested by three police officers and found dead in the lock‑up. The trial court had acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted them under sections 302, 342, 218 and 193 IPC. The Court held that the arrest …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusBALVEER @ BALLI AND ANR.

2013 INSC 737Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan appealed the acquittal of Balveer and Ram Niwas for rape (IPC 376(2)(g)) and murder (IPC 302 r/w 34). The sole eyewitness, Rajesh, was granted pardon under Section 306 CrPC and testified as an approver. The Supreme Court held that an approver need not incriminate himself or be …

RAJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 736Case Partly allowed

The appellant Rajeev Kumar was convicted for dowry death (s.304B IPC) after his wife Vandana gave two dying declarations alleging dowry harassment and set herself on fire. The Supreme Court examined whether the dying declarations were admissible despite the post‑mortem finding that her larynx and …

TOFAN SINGHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2013 INSC 700Matter referred to larger bench

Tofan Singh was convicted under Sections 8(c) r/w 21(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly trafficking 5.250 kg of heroin. The conviction rested primarily on a statement recorded by an investigating officer under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, which the …

KISHAN RAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2013 INSC 665Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Suresh Chandra, who was tied up and assaulted with lathis and dandas by five accused including Kishan Ram, Pani Ram, Dev Singh, Har Ram and Chandan Singh. The trial court and the High Court convicted the five under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC and …

DELTA DISTILLERIES LIMITEDversusUNITED SPIRITS LIMITED & ANR.

2013 INSC 649Dismissed

Delta Distilleries supplied Indian Made Foreign Liquor to United Spirits under a contract that made the buyer responsible for sales tax. A dispute arose over a set‑off/refund claimed by Delta from the Sales Tax Department, which United Spirits argued reduced its tax burden. The arbitral tribunal …

VYAS RAM @ VYAS KAHAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2013 INSC 643Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of three accused—Vyas Ram, Naresh Paswan and Sugai Mochi—under TADA and several IPC provisions for a 1992 massacre that killed 35 people. The Court found serious investigative flaws, including non‑examination of the informant, absence of a test …

BALDEV SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 644Case Partly allowed

The appellants, a Deputy Superintendent of Police and a constable, were convicted for abducting seven members of a family and for their alleged murder. The prosecution alleged that the victims were taken on 29 October 1991, later seen in various police stations, and never returned, leading to …

DR. P.B. DESAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2013 INSC 621Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. P.B. Desai, a renowned surgeon, was convicted under Section 338 read with Section 109 of the IPC for allegedly causing grievous hurt to a cancer patient by advising and then omitting to perform an exploratory laparotomy. The patient later died, and the appellant was also found guilty of …

UNION OF INDIAversusNAMIT SHARMA

2013 INSC 587Case Allowed

The Supreme Court reviewed its own September 2012 judgment that upheld Sections 12(5), 12(6), 15(5) and 15(6) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, on the ground that the earlier decision contained a manifest error of law. The Court held that the provisions merely require persons of eminence with …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSANTOSH SAVITA

2013 INSC 519Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan prosecuted Santosh Savita under Section 302 IPC for allegedly burning his sister-in-law by pouring kerosene and igniting her saree. The deceased gave two dying declarations naming the accused, which were recorded by a police officer and a doctor without a magistrate’s …

NIKHIL HIMTHANIversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2013 INSC 517Case Allowed

The petitioner, Nikhil Himthani, who completed his MBBS in a Uttarakhand medical college without entering through the State PMT, secured the 60th rank in the NEET‑PG for Uttarakhand and sought admission to a postgraduate medical seat. The State of Uttarakhand issued an Information Bulletin …

KANTILAL MARTAJI PANDORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2013 INSC 494Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kantilal Martaji Pandor, was married to two women; his second wife, Amriben, wrote a letter to the police alleging financial exploitation, starvation and threats, and subsequently died by jumping into a well. An FIR was lodged under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, leading to his conviction …

BARKU BHAVRAO BHASKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 495Dismissed

The appellant was charged under Sections 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a six‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on five circumstantial facts: the child was last seen with the accused, the accused made an extra‑judicial confession, a blood‑stained shirt recovered at …

KAILASHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2013 INSC 492Dismissed

The appellant was accused of raping a 15‑year‑old girl who later died by suicide. An eye‑witness, a cousin aged about 13‑14, testified that he saw the appellant committing the assault, and his testimony was supported by another witness and by medical and forensic reports that showed evidence of …

ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ SETHI GUPTAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2013 INSC 491Dismissed

The appellant, Anuj Kumar Gupta, was convicted for the murder of Chhotu Kumar Das based largely on a confessional statement he gave to the investigating officer (PW‑9) that led police to the victim’s body in a river. The trial court sentenced him to death, which the High Court later commuted to life …

MAHADEO S/O KERBA MASKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2013 INSC 487Reference answered

Mahadeo, a musician, lured a 15‑year‑old girl with promises of recording her bhajans, persuaded her to bring gold ornaments, and confined her for over a month during which he repeatedly forced sexual intercourse. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping) and 376 (rape); the …

LILY THOMASversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 456Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Parliament had the constitutional authority to enact sub‑section (4) of Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which postpones the operation of disqualification for sitting members of Parliament or State Legislatures pending an appeal. The Court …

THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER ETC.versusJAN CHAUKIDAR (PEOPLES WATCH) & ORS

2013 INSC 457Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the view that a person confined in prison or in police custody, who is barred from voting under sub‑section (5) of Section 62 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is not an elector and therefore cannot contest elections. The High Court held that such a person …

CHARANJIT & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2013 INSC 438Dismissed

The case arose from the alleged torture and rape of a woman (PW‑3) by police officials after she was taken for interrogation on 9 February 1989. PW‑3 filed a petition to the Governor, a criminal complaint before a magistrate, and later testified in trial, alleging that she was detained overnight and …

GANGA SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2013 INSC 434Dismissed

The appellant Ganga Singh was charged with rape under Section 376 IPC for allegedly assaulting PW‑5, the prosecutrix, in a field. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the sexual intercourse was consensual, but the High Court convicted him based on the prosecutrix's testimony, corroborated by …

KASHI VISHWANATHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2013 INSC 430Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kashi Vishwanath, was convicted under Sections 498A and 302 read with 34 of the IPC for the death of his wife, who died from burn injuries. The prosecution's case rested on three dying declarations (Ex.P.12, Ex.P.22, Ex.P.29) that were recorded in Kannada despite the victim speaking …

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusJAI CHAND

2013 INSC 431

The State of Himachal Pradesh prosecuted Jai Chand and two others for the murder of his wife under Sections 302, 34 and 498‑A IPC. The trial court convicted Jai Chand, but the Himachal Pradesh High Court acquitted him, rejecting the post‑mortem doctor’s testimony and other material witnesses. On …

RAJINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 424Dismissed

Rajinder Singh and co‑accused were convicted under Sections 304‑B, 498‑A and 201/34 IPC for the death of the bride, Santosh Kaur, within nine months of marriage. The prosecution proved that the death occurred otherwise than under normal circumstances, that the bride had been subjected to …

RANJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 426Disposed off

The appellant, Ranjit Singh, was convicted for the dowry death of his wife Jaswinder Kaur, who was found dead within four months of marriage. The prosecution proved that the deceased had been subjected to repeated harassment and demands for dowry, including a Maruti car, by the appellant and his …

S. ANIL KUMAR @ ANIL KUMAR GANNAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2013 INSC 427Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Anil Kumar, was convicted by the Karnataka High Court for dowry harassment (Sec. 498-A IPC) and dowry death (Sec. 304-B IPC) based on the suicide of his wife, Meena Kumari, in their matrimonial home. The trial court had acquitted all accused, finding contradictions in witness …

DHARAMVIR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 408Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Sepoy in the Indian Army, was discharged on grounds of 20% permanent disability due to epilepsy. The Army Medical Board held the disability was not service‑related and denied a disability pension. The High Court Single Judge granted the pension, but the Division Bench set aside that …

KAMAL JORAversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.

2013 INSC 395Dismissed

The State of Uttarakhand dissolved the Municipal Council of Haridwar and appointed an Administrator under the Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1959, to facilitate its conversion into a Municipal Corporation. The Chairman, Kamal Jora, challenged the dissolution on the ground that no hearing …

HAMZAversusMUHAMMADKUTTY @ MANI & ORS.

2013 INSC 372Dismissed

The deceased woman was stabbed to death in her matrimonial home, leading to an initial prosecution of four in‑law family members under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, which resulted in acquittal. Two years later, the deceased's brother filed a complaint alleging that six family members, including A‑1 and …

VIJAY JAINversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2013 INSC 370Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Jain and co‑accused were convicted under Section 8/21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of brown sugar seized during a police raid. The trial court and the High Court held that the seized contraband had been produced in court, despite the …

SUCHA SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 371Dismissed

The appellant, Sucha Singh, was convicted under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for murdering Amrik Singh and stealing his mule cart. The prosecution relied on the testimony of five key witnesses, an extra‑judicial confession to one of them, forensic evidence linking recovered items to …

ROOP SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2013 INSC 369Dismissed

The appellant, Roop Singh, was convicted of rape under Section 376 IPC and house trespass under Section 450 IPC for forcibly entering his neighbour's house at night and having sexual intercourse with the complainant while she was asleep. The appellant appealed, claiming the complainant had consented …

HARI DASS SHARMAversusVIKAS SOOD & ORS.

2013 INSC 291Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, Haridas Sharma, sought eviction of the tenants under Section 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, claiming a bona‑fide need for the building to be rebuilt. The Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority upheld the eviction, but the High Court, relying on Harrington …

STATE OF HARYANAversusBASTI RAM

2013 INSC 208Disposed off

The State prosecuted Basti Ram for gang rape, kidnapping, confinement and intimidation of a girl, H.L., who was below 16 years at the time. The trial court, relying on H.L.'s detailed statement under Section 164 CrPC and her testimony, convicted Basti Ram under IPC sections 376(2)(g), 366, 342 and …

KULWANT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 205Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the death of Rachhpal Kaur, who died of aluminium phosphide poisoning within seven years of her marriage while staying at her in‑laws' house. The deceased had repeatedly complained of harassment and cruelty by her husband Kulwant Singh and his parents for allegedly …

STER LITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC.

2013 INSC 204Appeal(s) allowed

Sterlite Industries obtained environmental clearance and consent orders to set up a copper smelter in Tuticorin in 1995. The Madras High Court ordered its closure, citing lack of a mandatory public hearing, violation of a 25‑km distance condition from an ecologically sensitive area, and an …

BABU AND ANR.versusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENNAI

2013 INSC 175Dismissed

The appellants (A‑1 to A‑4) were convicted for the murder of Ravi under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34, based on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses who saw the accused attack the victim with knives. They challenged the conviction on several grounds, including that after the acquittal of two …

SUBODH NATH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TRIPURA

2013 INSC 176Disposed off

The appellants Subodh Nath and Paritosh were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for the murder of Ashutosh. Paritosh was 16 years old at the time of the offence, raising the question of whether the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, as amended, applied to an …

INDRAJIT SURESHPRASAD BIND & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2013 INSC 173Appeal(s) allowed

The wife of appellant No.1 committed suicide by pouring kerosene on herself on 18 May 2004. The prosecution alleged that the husband and his parents had subjected her to cruelty and harassment for dowry, instigating her suicide, and secured convictions under Sections 3048, 498A and 306 of the IPC. …

VIPIN JAISWAL(A-1)versusSTATE OF A.P. REP.BY PUB.PROSECUTOR

2013 INSC 159Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Vipin Jaiswal was convicted under Sections 3048 and 498A of the IPC for the death of his wife, who died from burn injuries. The prosecution alleged that the wife was subjected to cruelty and dowry harassment, citing a demand of Rs.50,000 for a computer six months after marriage. The …

SATYA PALversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

2013 INSC 160Dismissed

The appellant was accused of murdering his wife after she resisted repeated dowry demands for a television, fridge and cooler, which were accompanied by beatings and harassment. The trial court acquitted the accused, citing a 51‑hour delay in filing the FIR and inconsistencies in the witnesses' …

BHARAT BHUSHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2013 INSC 154Appeal(s) allowed

Madhuri married appellant No.1 and later committed suicide while staying at her parents' house. The prosecution charged the husband and his relatives, including appellant Nos.2 and 4, under IPC Sections 3048 (dowry death) and 498A (cruelty) alleging dowry demands and cruelty. The trial court and …

MODINSAB KASIMSAB KANCHAGARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2013 INSC 147Appeal(s) allowed

The husband (appellant) was convicted by the Karnataka High Court for dowry death (IPC s.304B), cruelty (IPC s.498A) and offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act after his wife committed suicide, allegedly due to his demand for a further Rs 10,000. The Supreme Court held that the Rs 10,000 demand …

GOUDAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2013 INSC 148Dismissed

The deceased husband was attacked and killed by his wife's father and four brothers after a marital dispute. The prosecution proved that the three younger brothers (accused 3, 4 and 5) entered the house, held the victim and, with the fifth brother delivering a fatal jambia blow, caused his death. …

JOYDEB PATRA & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2013 INSC 137Appeal(s) allowed

Madhabi Patra died after a ceremonial function and the prosecution alleged she was poisoned by her husband Joydeb Patra and his relatives. The trial court and the Calcutta High Court convicted the accused under IPC s.302 read with s.34, relying solely on the ocular testimony of the doctor who …

VIVEK KALRAversusSTATE .OF RAJASTHAN

2013 INSC 104Dismissed

The appellant, Vivek Kalra, was convicted of murdering his 13‑14‑year‑old cousin, Ankit Kalra, based solely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution alleged that Kalra lured the boy under the pretext of obtaining a cassette, used a dantli (sharp weapon) purchased from a blacksmith, and caused …

SANAULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2013 INSC 105Case Partly allowed

Sanaullah Khan was charged with the kidnapping and murder of three persons—Ravindra Prasad, his son Sunny Kumar, and a servant Arvind—following a dispute over milk supply payments. The prosecution relied on three linked circumstances: the appellant’s servant luring the victims to his premises, the …

STATE OF PUNJABversusSAUL SABHLOK AND ORS.

2013 INSC 106Disposed off

The State of Punjab appointed Harish Dhanda as Chairman of the Punjab Public Service Commission, prompting a public‑interest writ petition under Article 226 alleging lack of integrity, political affiliation and absence of requisite administrative experience. The Punjab & Haryana High Court Division …

NASIB KAUR AND ORS.versusCOL SURAT SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS & ORS.

2013 INSC 95Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a dispute over ownership and possession of land sold by Col. Surat Singh, the plaintiff, to Col. Girdhar Singh, who later sold it to the defendants. The plaintiff filed suits for declaration of title and permanent injunction, but the trial courts and the first appellate court found …

ATMARAM S/O RAYSINGH RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 87Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Atmaram, was convicted under Sections 306 and 498A of the IPC for the alleged suicide of his second wife, Purnabai, based on the presumption of abetment under Section 113A of the Evidence Act. The trial court and High Court held that the appellant had subjected the deceased to …

HIRAMANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 67Dismissed

The appellant, Hiraman, was convicted of murdering his wife Chandrakala, who died from 91% burn injuries after allegedly being doused with kerosene. The conviction was based primarily on two dying declarations recorded at the hospital shortly after the incident. The appellant challenged the …

M/S OSWAL AGRO MILLS LTD.versusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS.

2013 INSC 53Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a sugar mill, installed a 3,187.5 kW turbine‑generator (TG) set and obtained a memo on 8 December 1992 authorising its installation subject to conditions. The electricity board later issued demand notices alleging an unauthorized load of the TG set and standby load, invoking a load …

PARSHAVANATH CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS.versusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDU & ORS.

2012 INSC 591Dismissed

The Parshavanath Charitable Trust ran an engineering college that shifted to a new site in May 2008 without obtaining the No‑Objection Certificate or prior approval required under Clause 9.22 of the AICTE Handbook. Although AICTE later granted approval for the 2008‑09 and 2009‑10 academic years, the …

VINAY TYAGIversusIRSHAD ALI @ DEEPAK & ORS.

2012 INSC 587Case Partly allowed

The case concerned an FIR alleging terrorist activities against Irshad Ali and another accused, who claimed to be informers and were allegedly falsely implicated. The Delhi Special Cell filed a police report under Section 173(2) CrPC, after which the High Court ordered a CBI inquiry and later a …

MAA VAISHNO DEVI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2012 INSC 600Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered multiple writ petitions and appeals filed by private teacher‑education colleges, including Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya, which had obtained recognition from the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) but were denied affiliation by universities and the …

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.versusHINDUSTAN NATIONAL GLASS & IND. LTD. AND ORS.

2012 INSC 580Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Reserve Bank of India's Master Circular on wilful default applies to defaults arising from derivative transactions or is limited to traditional lender‑borrower relationships. Kotak Mahindra Bank had classified Hindustan National Glass and other parties as …

GURCHARAN SINGHversusSURJIT SINGH AND ANR.

2012 INSC 507Disposed off

The petitioner filed Special Leave Petition (SLP) No.7735 of 2010 against respondent Surjit Singh, who had actually died on 09‑06‑2009, a fact discovered only later. The petitioner then moved Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.2 seeking substitution of the deceased respondent’s legal …

SABEEHA FAIKAGE & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2012 INSC 486Disposed off

The petitioners, relatives of ten Indian seafarers who disappeared when the foreign‑flagged tug Jupiter‑6 went missing in September 2005, filed a writ under Article 32 seeking a marine casualty investigation and compensation, alleging violation of their right to life under Article 21. The Court …

DEVINDER @ KALA RAM & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

2012 INSC 484Case Partly allowed

The appellants Devinder @ Kala Ram, his mother and his brother's wife were convicted under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC for dowry harassment and the death of Devinder's wife by burns. The Supreme Court examined the evidence, finding that witnesses PW‑2 to PW‑5 reliably proved continuous dowry …

SELVAMversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2012 INSC 475Case Partly allowed

The case arose from a land dispute that led to an assault on 16 November 2006, during which the accused A‑1, A‑6 and A‑7 struck the victim's head with the blunt side of an aruval and a stick, causing injuries that led to the victim's death after nine days. The trial court and the High Court had …

RAJ PAUL SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE THROUGH P.S. MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD

2012 INSC 459Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of murder for stabbing the husband of the complainant after the husband warned them to stop abusive behavior. The trial and high courts upheld the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses. On appeal, the …

VINOD KAPOORversusSTATE OF GOA & ORS.

2012 INSC 444Dismissed

Vinod Kapoor challenged the construction of a bungalow on C‑land in Goa, alleging violations of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Coastal Regulation Zone notification under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The Bombay High Court dismissed his writ petition on the basis of a …

AMIT KAPOORversusRAMESH CHANDER & ANR.

2012 INSC 398Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the son of a woman who committed suicide, challenged the High Court's order quashing the charge of abetment of suicide (IPC s.306) framed against the accused property dealer. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court had correctly exercised its revisional (s.397) and inherent …

NAMIT SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA

2012 INSC 392Case Partly allowed

The petition challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 12(5), 12(6), 15(5) and 15(6) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which prescribe the eligibility criteria for appointing Chief Information Commissioners and Information Commissioners. The petitioner argued that the provisions were …

BHAWNA GARG & ANR.versusUNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS.

2012 INSC 378Disposed off

The Delhi University Bulletin for 2011‑12 reserved 30 of 150 MBBS seats in Lady Harding Medical College for Nominees of Government of India (NGOI), exempting them from the Delhi University Medical and Dental Entrance Test (DUMET). Female general‑category candidates who cleared DUMET but were not …

RAJAN PUROHIT & ORS.versusRAJASTHAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE & ORS.

2012 INSC 363Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined admissions to a private unaided medical college in Rajasthan where 117 students were admitted without a competitive entrance test, contrary to Regulation 5(2) of the MCI Regulations. The Court held that there was no consensual agreement between the college and the State to …

VICE CHANCELLOR, GURU GHASIDAS UNIVERSITYversusCRAIG MCLEOD

2012 INSC 334Disposed off

The Vice Chancellor of Guru Ghasidas University sought to discipline a student, Craig McLeod, for allegedly assaulting a professor, suspending him and restraining his campus access. The High Court stayed the university's interim orders, prompting the university to appeal to the Supreme Court under …

RAJOO @ RAMAKANTversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2012 INSC 327Remitted to Lower Court

Rajoo was convicted of gang‑rape and appealed to the High Court, which upheld his conviction but did not provide him with legal representation at the appellate stage. The Supreme Court examined whether, under Article 39‑A of the Constitution and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, an accused …

STATE OF A.P. & ORS.versusD. RAGHUKUL PERSHAD (D} BY LRS & ORS.

2012 INSC 324Case Partly allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh filed a suit for eviction against D. Raghukul Pershad and others, alleging that the appellants had failed to pay rent since 1986 and that the lease had not been renewed. The appellants contended that the lease deed and rent payments were made by mistake of fact and that …

AVISHEK GOENKAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2012 INSC 315Dismissed

The Supreme Court, in response to numerous applications seeking clarification or modification of its 27 April 2012 judgment, reaffirmed that Rule 100 of the Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 bars the use of any black film or other material on safety glasses, windscreens or side glasses of vehicles, …

SYED AHMEDversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2012 INSC 312Dismissed

The appellant, a police officer, was alleged to have demanded and accepted illegal gratification from Nagaraja (PW1) in exchange for inquiring into a complaint. The prosecution presented testimony of Nagaraja and two independent trap witnesses, corroborating the transaction of tainted currency …

SHYAMAL GHOSHversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2012 INSC 281Dismissed

The State of West Bengal prosecuted eight accused for the murder of Archideb Bhattacharjee, alleging they demanded money, strangulated him, dismembered his body and disposed of it in gunny bags. The trial court sentenced all to death, which was reduced to life imprisonment by the High Court, except …

ANAND MOHANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2012 INSC 277Dismissed

The case concerned the murder of a District Magistrate during a funeral procession of a political leader, where 36 persons were charged. The trial court convicted A‑1 (Anand Mohan) and six others under sections 147, 302/149, 307/149 and 302/109, sentencing A‑1, A‑3 and A‑4 to death. The High Court …

NUPUR TALWARversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.

2012 INSC 254Dismissed

The case arose from the double murder of Aarushi Talwar and her domestic servant Hemraj in Noida in May 2008, for which a First Information Report was filed by the victim's father, Dr. Rajesh Talwar. The investigation was taken over by the CBI, which later submitted a closure report citing …

ALAGUPANDI @ ALAGUPANDIANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2012 INSC 208Dismissed

Alagupandi was convicted for murdering his step‑mother Tamilarasi. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the deceased's brother (PW‑1), corroborative statements of other witnesses, forensic evidence linking the accused's blood to the crime scene, and a confession that led to the recovery of the …

SAHADEVAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2012 INSC 209Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the murder conviction of three accused, two of whom appealed while the third did not. The prosecution's case relied heavily on an extra‑judicial confession and the theory that the accused were last seen with the deceased, but the confession was found unreliable, …

JITENDER KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2012 INSC 210Dismissed

The case concerned the murder of Indra, who was strangulated to death by her father‑in‑law, brother‑in‑law and others. Five accused were tried; four were convicted under s.120‑B, s.302 and s.34 IPC and one (Jitender Kumar) under s.120‑8 IPC. The appellants challenged the convictions on several …

PRIYA GUPTAversusSTATE OF CHHATISHGARH & ORS

2012 INSC 213Disposed off

The appellants, Priya Gupta and Akanksha Adile, were admitted to the MBBS programme at Government Medical College, Jagdalpur on 30 September 2006 through a hurried process that ignored higher‑ranking candidates, allegedly due to favouritism (the father of the second appellant was the Director of …

M/S BEST SELLERS RETAIL (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusM/S ADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD. & ORS.

2012 INSC 214Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Best Sellers Retail (India) Pvt. Ltd. (and A.C. Thirumalaraj), challenged a temporary injunction granted to respondent Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. that restrained the defendants from leasing or encumbering a suit property pending a suit for specific performance. The trial court and High …

NAGESHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2012 INSC 216Dismissed

The victim, a college student, was staying with accused No.1 in Belgaum when accused No.2 (the appellant) allegedly attempted to outrage her modesty, assaulted her and administered poison, leading to her death. Multiple eyewitnesses saw the deceased being taken in a car by the accused, with police …

STATE OF HARYANAversusSHAKUNTLA AND ORS.

2012 INSC 177Dismissed

The State prosecuted nine accused for the armed assault and murder of Manohar Lal and his wife Sushila, resulting in 30 and 33 injuries respectively. The trial court convicted all nine under Sections 148, 302/149 and 325/149 IPC. The High Court upheld convictions of six accused but acquitted …

BRIJ MOHAN LALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2012 INSC 178Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the status of judges appointed on an ad‑hoc basis under the Fast Track Courts (FTC) Scheme and whether they were entitled to regularisation or absorption into the permanent judicial cadre. It held that the appointments were expressly temporary, terminable at will, and did …

HIRALAL PANDEY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P

2012 INSC 174Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of three accused who fired on a motorcycle, killing Raja Ram Singh and Kunj Behari Singh on 22 September 1979. The prosecution relied on two eyewitnesses, PW‑1 (the complainant) and PW‑2, who testified that the accused fired multiple shots from a double‑barrel …

SAYED DARAIN A.HSAN @ DARAINversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.

2012 INSC 143Dismissed

The appellant Sayed Darain Ahsan was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the murder of Mughal, based on the testimony of four local eyewitnesses who identified him and his associate as the shooters. The defence argued that the eyewitness accounts conflicted with medical evidence showing only …

PROMODE DEYversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2012 INSC 144Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Pratima Nandi on 23 February 2002. An eight‑year‑old girl, Manika (PW‑2), testified that the accused, Promode Dey, entered the house with a large dao and killed her mother. Her testimony was corroborated by her grandmother (PW‑1), her father (PW‑11), a village …

N.K. BAJPAIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2012 INSC 134Dismissed

The petitioners, former members of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), challenged Section 129(6) of the Customs Act, 1962, which bars a person who has ceased to be a President, Vice‑President or Member of the Tribunal from appearing before it. They argued that the …

BHAJJU @ KARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2012 INSC 133Dismissed

The appellant Bhajju (Karan Singh) was convicted of murder for allegedly pouring kerosene on his wife and setting her ablaze. The sole direct evidence against him was the victim's dying declaration recorded by an executive magistrate and attested by a doctor, supported by medical, forensic and …

GOVINDARAJU@ GOVINDAversusSTATE BY SRIRAMAPURAM P.S. & ANR.

2012 INSC 135Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court reviewed an appeal by Govindaraju against a Karnataka High Court conviction for murder under s.302 IPC read with s.34, which had overturned a trial court acquittal. The Court found that the High Court did not show the trial court's judgment to be perverse and that the prosecution's …

RAJENDRA PRALHADRAO WASNIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2012 INSC 119Dismissed

The appellant, Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik, was convicted of raping and murdering a three‑year‑old girl under IPC sections 376(2)(f), 377 and 302. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence, including eyewitness testimony that the accused last saw the child with him, the discovery …

MANO DUTT & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2012 INSC 121Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Mano Dutt and Ram Narain for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The Court held that the accused had a pre‑planned common intention to assault and kill the deceased during a land‑dispute, and that the presence of fewer than five …

BRAJENDRASINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2012 INSC 116Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Brajendrasingh, was convicted of murdering his wife and their three young children after alleging an illicit affair between his wife and a neighbour. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, forensic findings, and the appellant's own statements under Section 313 CrPC, while …

RAMNARESH & ORS.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2012 INSC 117Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of four accused for the rape and murder of Rajkumari, based primarily on the testimony of a 16‑year‑old servant, PW6, who was the sole eye‑witness. The Court found that PW6's statement was reliable, corroborated by medical evidence and the testimony of the …

AMITversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2012 INSC 100Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a neighbour, abducted a three‑year‑old girl from her home under the pretext of giving her biscuits, subsequently raping and murdering her. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 364, 376, 377, 302 and 201 and imposed death for the murder, which the High Court affirmed. On …

SONU SARDARversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH

2012 INSC 101Dismissed

The appellant, Sonu Sardar, along with four others, entered the house of a scrap dealer, demanded money, and committed dacoity followed by the murder of five persons, including two children, using a knife, axe and iron rod. The prosecution proved the appellant's participation through the testimony …

ABSAR ALAM @ AFSAR ALAMversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2012 INSC 80Case Partly allowed

Absar Alam was convicted of murdering his mother by beheading her after accusing her of causing his wife to leave home. The trial court and the Patna High Court sentenced him to death under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court, raising only the …

M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA

2012 INSC 26Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined two sets of appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. seeking exemption from excise duty on Reduced Crude Oil (RCO) and Naphtha under separate exemption notifications. The Court held that the proviso in each notification required satisfaction of two conditions: proof of the …

MIS. ESSEL PROPACK LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-ILL

2011 INSC 790Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Essel Propack Ltd. manufactured plastic tubes and fitted plastic caps supplied free of cost by its customer, Colgate, before the tubes left its factory. The Commissioner of Central Excise treated the value of the caps as part of the assessable value of the tubes and levied excise duty, penalty …

PANCHMAHAL VADODARA GRAMIN BANK & ORS.versusD.M. PARMAR

2011 INSC 701Disposed off

D.M. Parmar, a manager of Panchmahal Vadodara Gramin Bank, was dismissed after an enquiry found him guilty of multiple serious charges relating to loan sanction irregularities. He challenged the dismissal, arguing that the enquiry officer had denied him access to documents concerning his predecessor …

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusJANTHAKAL ENTERPRISES AND ANR.

2011 INSC 299Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and other authorities against the Karnataka High Court’s order permitting Janthakal Enterprises to lift 1,17,800 tonnes of dumped ore. The Court held that the High Court had erred by disposing of a writ petition involving disputed …

KULDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 640Appeal(s) allowed

The police, acting on secret information, seized four sealed bags containing 150 kg of poppy husk from the appellant's residence. No samples were taken at the time of seizure; instead, the Station House Officer later broke the seals, mixed the contents, and collected samples before resealing the …

M.A.A. ANNAMALAIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER

2010 INSC 507Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former director of R.P.S. Benefit Fund Ltd., filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash criminal proceedings initiated under Section 420 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize, Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The FIR alleged cheating by the …

RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR THR. CBI

2010 INSC 483Dismissed

The Supreme Court had earlier set aside a High Court order granting bail to Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav and directed his surrender. A review petition was filed challenging that order and also seeking exemption from surrender. The Court observed that despite the bail cancellation, the accused had …

KRISHNA KUMAR VARIARversusSHARE SHOPPE

2010 INSC 263Appeal(s) allowed

Krishna Kumar Variar, accused under Sections 415 and 420 IPC, was summoned by a Delhi court. He contended that only a Bombay court had jurisdiction and filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC in the Delhi High Court, which dismissed his challenge. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that an …

RABINDRA NATH SINGHversusRAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV & ANR.

2010 INSC 264Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court set aside a Patna High Court order granting bail to Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav in Sessions Trial No. 976 of 1999, despite a prior Supreme Court ruling that no further bail applications in the case would be entertained. The Court held that the High Court's grant of bail was a …

MUKESH KISHANPURIAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 266Disposed off

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which the Calcutta High Court rejected. He filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court challenging that order. The Court examined the record and found no justification to grant anticipatory bail. …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusC.S. SIDHU

2010 INSC 187Dismissed

C.S. Sidhu, an Indian Army officer commissioned on 22 June 1968 under a short‑service commission, suffered severe injuries including amputation of his right arm on 21 November 1970 while on duty at a high‑altitude posting. He continued in service until his release on 23 June 1978, but the Army …

MOHD. MAQBOOL TANTRAYversusSTATE OF J & K

2010 INSC 78Disposed off

Mohd. Maqbool Tantray was one of 18 accused in the abduction and murder of former MLA Mir Mustafa in 1990. After a protracted trial lasting nearly 20 years, only three co‑accused were tried with Tantray; the others were discharged, died, or absconded, and the two co‑accused were acquitted. Tantray …

JUGRAJversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 62Disposed off

Four persons, including Jugraj Singh, were accused of murdering former MLA Bachhitter Singh in December 1996. The trial court convicted all under Sections 302, 34 and related provisions, but the High Court acquitted three co‑accused while upholding Jugraj's conviction, relying on the recovery of a …