Created by Fuzzy Cloud

A M KHANWILKAR

184 judgments · newest first · showing 1–184

ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2022 INSC 770Disposed off

The appellant, a US permanent resident, filed a writ petition in Karnataka High Court seeking habeas corpus to have his 11‑year‑old son, a naturalised US citizen born in the United States, returned to the US. The child had been taken to India by the mother without the father's consent in March 2020, …

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANRversusB. R. MURALIDHAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 761Disposed off

The State of Karnataka issued a land acquisition notification under Section 17 of the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973. The petitioners challenged the notification on grounds of inadequate consideration of objections, alleged lapse of the acquisition process, and the …

THE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD & ANRversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS

2022 INSC 762Directions issued

The Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) initiated compulsory land acquisition under Section 33(2) of the Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962 without a housing scheme having been sanctioned under Section 24(2). Petitioners argued that such acquisition was void for lack of a sanctioned scheme, relying on …

NEMAI CHANDRA KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORSversusMANI SQUARE LTD. & ORS

2022 INSC 756Dismissed

The appellants leased a property in Calcutta for 20 years from 1973 to 1993 and erected pucca structures on it. After the lease expired, they applied to the Thika Tenancy Controller claiming status as thika tenants under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949, the 1981 Act and the 2001 Act, seeking …

VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 757Reference answered

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of most provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), including the definition of money-laundering, attachment of property, search and seizure, arrest, bail conditions, and burden of proof. The Court interpreted Section 3 to …

GHULAM HASSAN BEIGHversusMOHAMMAD MAQBOOL MAGREY & ORS.

2022 INSC 750Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Ghulam Hassan Beigh alleged that seven accused formed an unlawful assembly, assaulted him and his family, and caused the death of his wife, whose post‑mortem reported cardio‑respiratory failure. The trial court, after reviewing the medical report and limited oral evidence, discharged …

ALL INDIA HAJ UMRAH TOUR ORGANIZER ASSOCIATION MUMBAIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2022 INSC 749Dismissed

The petitioners, a consortium of Haj Group Organizers (HGOs) and private tour operators, challenged the levy of service tax/GST on the packages they provide to Indian Haj pilgrims, arguing that the place of supply is outside India and that the Mega Exemption Notification should exempt their …

NARINDER SINGH & ORS.versusDIVESH BHUTANI & ORS.

2022 INSC 737Disposed off

The case concerned several civil appeals and writ petitions challenging National Green Tribunal orders that restrained non‑forest activities on lands in three villages of Faridabad district, Haryana, on the ground that these lands were covered by special orders issued under Section 4 of the Punjab …

HIMANSHU KUMAR AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 720Dismissed

The petitioners, led by Himanshu Kumar, alleged that police, Special Police Officers, Salwa Judum activists and paramilitary forces carried out brutal massacres of tribals in three Chhattisgarh villages in September and October 2009 and sought a mandamus directing the CBI to investigate and …

RAJESWARI CHANDRASEKAR GANESHversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2022 INSC 721Appeal(s) allowed

The petition filed by a mother under Article 32 sought a writ of habeas corpus to compel the father to return their two minor children, who were US residents, from India to the United States in accordance with a shared parenting plan ordered by an Ohio court. The Supreme Court examined whether a …

SUBRATA ROY SAHARAversusPRAMOD KUMAR SAINI & ORS.

2022 INSC 1308Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined an appeal filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging a Patna High Court order that, while hearing an anticipatory bail application filed by co‑accused Pramod Kumar Saini under s.438 CrPC, directed notice to third parties including the appellant who was not an accused. The …

MANOJ PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2022 INSC 652Dismissed

Manoj Pratap Singh was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a seven-and-a-half-year-old mentally and physically disabled girl. The prosecution proved its case through a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including DNA matches, blood‑stained clothing, the victim’s body recovered at …

ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2022 INSC 653Dismissed

The case arises from the 2002 Gujarat riots following the Godhra train burning incident, in which the appellant's husband was killed in the Gulberg Society massacre. The appellant filed a complaint alleging a larger criminal conspiracy at the highest level of the state government, including the then …

JASWINDER SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVEversusNAVJOT SINGH SIDHU & ORS.

2022 INSC 603Case Partly allowed

The case arose from a 1988 dispute over a right of way in Patiala where respondent No.1, a 25‑year‑old international cricketer, struck a 65‑year‑old man with his bare hands, resulting in the victim's death. The High Court convicted the cricketer under Section 304 Part II IPC, but the Supreme Court …

VEERENDRAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2022 INSC 565Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Veerendra, a cousin of the victim’s mother, was found to have raped and strangled to death an eight‑year‑old girl, the daughter of his cousin sister. While in police custody he disclosed the location of the body, which was recovered from a dilapidated building. Post‑mortem and …

SURESH MAHAJANversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.

2022 INSC 552Directions issued

The petition challenged the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Act, 1956, the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 and the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961, alleging they unduly restricted the State Election Commission’s power to …

WIPRO FINANCE LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2022 INSC 417Appeal(s) allowed

Wipro Finance Ltd. borrowed a foreign‑currency loan to finance its leasing and hire‑purchase business and incurred a loss due to exchange‑rate fluctuations while repaying the loan. The company claimed a deduction for this loss under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and also sought to treat a …

NOEL HARPER & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2022 INSC 411Disposed off

The petitioners, a group of NGOs and individuals, challenged the 2020 amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, specifically sections 7, 12(1A), 12A and 17, alleging that the prohibition on transfer of foreign contributions, the requirement to open a single FCRA account with …

DR. JOE JOSEPH & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2022 INSC 409Directions issued

The Supreme Court heard petitions concerning the safety of the Mullaperiyar Dam after the enactment of the Dam Safety Act, 2021. The Court noted that the Act creates a multi‑tier institutional framework, including a National Dam Safety Authority (NDSA) under s.8 with functions detailed in s.9. Since …

NKGSB COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITEDversusSUBIR CHAKRAVARTY & ORS.

2022 INSC 238Disposed off

The NKGSB Cooperative Bank, a secured creditor, sought possession of a mortgaged flat after the borrowers defaulted on a loan, invoking Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the asset, a move upheld by several …

PAPPUversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2022 INSC 164Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Pappu, lured a seven‑year‑old girl under the pretext of picking lychees, raped and murdered her, and later disclosed the location of her body to the police. He was convicted by the trial court and the High Court of offences under IPC sections 376, 302 and 201 and POCSO sections 5 and …

ASHISH SHELAR & ORS.versusTHE MAHARASHTRA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY & ANR.

2022 INSC 116Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, twelve BJP MLAs, were suspended for one year by a resolution of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly after a heated monsoon session. They challenged the resolution under Articles 14, 21 and 190(4) of the Constitution, arguing that the suspension exceeded the period allowed by Rule …

UNION OF INDIAversusALAPAN BANDYOPADHYAY

2022 INSC 18Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India filed a transfer petition under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 to move a disciplinary case filed by Alapan Bandyopadhyay before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Kolkata bench to the Principal Bench in Delhi. The Delhi Principal Bench allowed the …

STATE OF UP THROUGH SECRETARY (EXCISE) & ORS.versusM/S MCDOWELL AND COMPANY LIMITED

2022 INSC 13Appeal(s) allowed

A fire on 10 April 2003 destroyed 35,642 cases of Indian Made Foreign Liquor stored in the bonded godown of M/s McDowell & Co. Ltd. The Uttar Pradesh Excise Department levied a demand for excise duty on the destroyed liquor, which the High Court set aside on the ground that the fire was an act of …

SANDOZ PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2022 INSC 8Disposed off

Sandoz Private Limited, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), sought refund of Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid by its Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) unit for goods supplied to the EOU. The Union of India and other respondents contended that the EOU was ab initio exempt from excise duty under the Foreign …

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE I (2), KUMBAKONAM & ANR.versusV. MOHAN & ANR.

2021 INSC 886Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the interpretation of Section 6 of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976. The Competent Authority had issued forfeiture notices under Section 6(1) to the relatives of a convicted smuggler, V.P. Selvarajan, but not to the convict …

C. SIVASANKARANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 833Directions issued

C. Sivasankaran, an Ambassador-at-large of Seychelles, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution claiming diplomatic immunity to avoid criminal proceedings in India. The Madras High Court rejected his claim, holding that he does not fall within the definition of a "diplomatic agent" …

UNION OF INDIAversusBHARTI AIRTEL LTD. & ORS.

2021 INSC 684Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged a Delhi High Court order that read down paragraph 4 of a GST circular dated 29‑12‑2017, which barred rectification of Form GSTR‑3B for the month in which an error occurred. Bharti Airtel Ltd. (respondent No.1) argued that due to the non‑operability of Form GSTR‑2A in …

G H RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 689Directions issued

The petitioners, teachers with B.Ed. (Special) and D.Ed. (Special) qualifications, sought a mandamus directing the Union and State governments to appoint regular special teachers for children with special needs (CwSN) in accordance with a 1:5 pupil‑teacher ratio. The Court examined the interplay of …

KAVITHA LANKESHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2021 INSC 654Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh, investigated under the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 (KCOCA). The Commissioner of Police granted prior approval under Section 24(1)(a) to invoke Section 3 of KCOCA against several accused, including Mohan Nayak, based on …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusANKITA SINHA & ORS.

2021 INSC 624Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 can initiate suo motu proceedings in environmental matters. The matter arose when the NGT, on its own motion, took cognizance of a news article on solid waste mismanagement at the Deonar …

G. MOHAN RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2021 INSC 311Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu legislature enacted three land‑acquisition statutes (1978, 1997 and 2001) which were later held repugnant to the Central Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The Madras High Court declared the three state statutes …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. RAJ GROW IMPEX LLP & ORS.

2021 INSC 307Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged the Bombay High Court's orders directing the release of large quantities of yellow peas imported by M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP and M/s. Harihar Collections, which were imported in excess of the quantitative limits and without the required licence under the 2019 FTDR …

ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGHversusG. PATTANAIK & ORS.

2021 INSC 305Disposed off

The petitioners, former Assistant Engineers of Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam, claimed that the corporation violated court orders by re‑engaging them without continuity of service and back wages, and later by terminating them without a prior hearing. The Supreme Court examined two sets of contempt …

INDIAN SCHOOL, JODHPUR & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2021 INSC 281Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined challenges by private unaided schools in Rajasthan to the Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016 and its 2017 Rules, alleging violations of Articles 19(1)(g) and 13(2) of the Constitution. It also considered the State's order dated 28 October 2020, issued by the …

LAXMI PAT SURANAversusUNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

2021 INSC 220Disposed off

Union Bank of India extended a term loan to Mahaveer Construction, a proprietorship firm, and obtained a guarantee from Surana Metals Ltd, a corporate entity. After the loan was declared a non‑performing asset on 30‑01‑2010, the bank filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and …

APARNA BHAT & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

2021 INSC 192Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a bail order that required the accused, who was charged with sexual harassment and related offences, to visit the complainant’s house, tie a rakhi, and give gifts as a condition of bail. The Court held that such conditions amount to judicial overreach, compel contact with …

AMAN LOHIAversusKIRAN LOHIA

2021 INSC 190Disposed off

The father (Aman Lohia) filed a guardianship petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking declaration as guardian of his two‑year‑old daughter. The mother (Kiran Lohia) did not file a written statement but filed several applications under CPC, including a …

KALPRAJ DHARAMSHI & ANR.versusKOTAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS LTD. & ANR.

2021 INSC 173Disposed off

The corporate debtor Ricoh India Ltd. initiated a corporate insolvency resolution process under the IBC, inviting resolution plans. Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd. (KIAL) submitted its plan on time, while Kalpraj submitted a belated plan which was later accepted by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) …

VIKAS KISHANRAO GAWALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2021 INSC 150Disposed off

The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of Section 12(2)(c) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 and two State Election Commission notifications that reserved OBC seats beyond the 50% ceiling in several districts. Relying on the Constitution Bench decision in …

SUBHASH & ORS.versusSUREKHA HANUMANT BANKAR & ORS.

2021 INSC 124Disposed off

The Gram Panchayat Sarpanch was elected in 2017, but in October 2020 the Panchayat members passed a no‑confidence resolution against him. The Sarpanch approached the Collector, who ordered that a special Gram Sabha be convened to ratify the resolution by secret ballot under the supervision of an …

ASHA JOHN DIVIANATHANversusVIKRAM MALHOTRA & ORS.

2021 INSC 121Appeal(s) allowed

Mrs. F.L. Raitt, a foreign national, sold a portion of her Indian immovable property to the predecessor of the appellant after obtaining prior RBI permission, but gifted another portion to respondent No.1 without such permission. The appellant and respondent No.4 sued to declare the gift deeds void; …

V. N. PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS. ETC.

2021 INSC 117Dismissed

The appellant, V.N. Public Health and Educational Trust, sought an Essentiality Certificate (EC) and Consent of Affiliation (CoA) to start a medical college for the academic year 2020‑2021, but the State Government and Kerala University of Health Sciences repeatedly rejected its applications citing …

RACHNA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2021 INSC 116Dismissed

The petitioners, who had taken their last permissible attempt at the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2020, claimed that the Covid‑19 pandemic prevented them from effectively preparing and therefore sought a mandamus directing the Union of India to grant them an additional attempt. The …

SWATI ULHAS KERKAR AND ORS.versusSANJAY WALAVALKAR AND ORS.

2021 INSC 74Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the admission of 22 persons, including the appellants, as members of Prabodhan Education Society on 17 September 2017 was valid despite a pending no‑confidence requisition against the then Managing Committee. The Registrar had set aside that admission as illegal …

M/S VELLANKI FRAME WORKSversusTHE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

2021 INSC 20Dismissed

M/s Vellanki Frame Works imported timber and claimed exemption from Central Sales Tax under Section 5(2) of the CST Act, arguing that the goods were sold on the high seas to end‑buyers before crossing India’s customs frontiers, making the sale a "sale in the course of import". The Commercial Tax …

RAJEEV SURIversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS

2021 INSC 4Disposed off

The Supreme Court, by a majority, upheld the Central Vista Project of the Government of India, which involves redevelopment of the Parliament House and Central Secretariat. The challenge was based on alleged procedural irregularities, lack of public participation, and violations of heritage and …

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNITversusP.V. KRISHNAMOORTHY AND ORS.

2020 INSC 688Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of notifications issued under Sections 2(2) and 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 that declared a green‑field stretch (C‑K‑S) as National Highways NH‑179A and NH‑179B and authorised land acquisition for the Chennai‑Krishnagiri‑Salem corridor. The Court …

AMISH DEVGANversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 682Disposed off

The petitioner, journalist Amish Devgan, hosted a televised debate on the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act and described the Sufi saint Pir Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti as an invader, terrorist and robber, leading to seven FIRs in different states under Sections 295A, 153A and 505(2) of the …

RUSODAY SECURITIES LTD.versusNATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LTD. & ORS.

2020 INSC 650Disposed off

Rusoday Securities Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange (NSE), exceeded its gross exposure limits in 1997, leading the NSE to withdraw its trading facilities and later expel it for failing to maintain required capital deposits. The appellant challenged the validity of the NSE's …

RATTAN SINGH & ORS.versusNIRMAL GILL & ORS. ETC.

2020 INSC 641Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined civil suits filed by Joginder Kaur (deceased) represented by Nirmal Gill, seeking to declare a 1990 General Power of Attorney (GPA) and related sale deeds as fraudulent and void. The lower courts had held the documents genuine, but the High Court reversed that finding, …

NTPC LTD. (SIMHADRI PROJECT)versusRAJIV CHAKRABORTY

2020 INSC 642Disposed off

The appeal arose from a corporate insolvency resolution process under the IBC where the appellant’s claim was listed in the Information Memorandum (IM) under “List of Other Creditors” rather than under “Claims of Operational Creditors”. The appellant contended that the classification was incorrect …

M/S. L. R. BROTHERS INDO FLORA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

2020 INSC 525Dismissed

M/s L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) producing cut flowers, imported inputs duty‑free under Notification No. 126/94-Cus but sold a portion of its produce in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) without the required approval of the Development Commissioner and without …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusAGRICAS LLP AND OTHERS ETC.

2020 INSC 508Disposed off

The Union of India amended the import policy for peas and other pulses, shifting them from a free to a restricted category and imposing quantitative import limits through notifications and a trade notice issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act). Importers …

RAJ PAL SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HARYANA, ROHTAK

2020 INSC 505Dismissed

The appellant owned land that was leased to a college; the lease expired in 1967 and the Haryana Government issued a notification for compulsory acquisition on 15 May 1968, later making an award on 29 September 1970. The dispute centered on when capital gains under Section 45 of the Income‑Tax Act, …

BABULAL VARDHARJI GURJARversusVEER GURJAR ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 490Appeal(s) allowed

The corporate debtor Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries defaulted on its loans on 08 July 2011. The financial creditor, JM Financial Assets Reconstruction Company, filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in March 2018 to initiate a corporate insolvency …

SUKH SAGAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 474Dismissed

The Gujarat Sukh Sagar Medical College & Hospital Trust obtained an Essentiality Certificate in 2014 to establish a medical college in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. Despite conditional permission for the 2016‑17 academic year, the Medical Council of India (MCI) repeatedly denied renewal of permission …

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL & ORS.versusMANJIT KAUR & ORS.

2019 INSC 869Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a dispute over two adjoining land parcels (Khasra Nos. 935/1 and 935/2) where the predecessor of the appellants, Harbans Singh, claimed exclusive ownership based on a family settlement. A memorandum of family settlement (Exhibit P‑6) dated 10‑03‑1988 was executed by the brothers. …

SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANYversusINCOME TAX OFFICER

2020 INSC 468Dismissed

Shree Choudhary Transport Company (the appellant) entered into a contract to transport cement for a consignor and hired independent truck operators to perform the work. The appellant received freight charges from the consignor after TDS was deducted, but failed to deduct TDS on payments to the truck …

M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2020 INSC 456Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Ultratech Cement Ltd. was entitled to a 75% capital investment subsidy under the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme, 2003 (RIPS-2003) for its Kotputli cement plant. The Court held that the scheme’s sub‑clauses (vi) and (vii) granting 75% subsidy were deleted …

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER & ANR.versusMOHAN BREWERIES AND DISTILLERIES LIMITED

2020 INSC 446Disposed off

Mohan Breweries purchased empty bottles from unregistered dealers for bottling its beer and IMFL. The revenue argued that the purchase turnover of these bottles was liable to purchase tax under Section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, while the assessee claimed exemption based on …

SHAKTI BHOG FOOD INDUSTRIES LTD.versusTHE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

2020 INSC 413Appeal(s) allowed

Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd. filed a suit on 23 February 2005 seeking true accounts and refund of excess interest/commission charged by the Central Bank of India. The trial court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, holding the suit barred by the three‑year limitation period in …

RAMNATH & CO.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2020 INSC 415Dismissed

The appellants, engaged as agents procuring frozen seafood for foreign buyers, claimed a 50% deduction under Section 80‑O of the Income Tax Act for service fees received in foreign exchange. The Assessing Officer held the services were rendered in India, not "from India", and disallowed the …

STATE OF ORISSAversusM/S. B. ENGINEERS & BUILDERS LTD. & ORS.

2020 INSC 414Dismissed

The State of Orissa appealed a High Court order that granted M/s B. Engineers & Builders Ltd. reimbursement of sales tax paid on works contracts executed between 1998‑99 and 2000‑01. The contracts contained Clause 45.2 of the General Conditions of Contract (GCC) which obliges the employer to …

KAVITA KANWARversusMRS. PAMELA MEHTA & ORS.

2020 INSC 397Dismissed

The appellant, the younger daughter of Smt. Amarjeet Mamik, sought probate of a 2003 Will that left the entire immovable property to her, while excluding her brother and elder sister. The Trial Court and the Delhi High Court rejected the probate petition, finding numerous unexplained suspicious …

TRILOKI NATH SINGHversusANIRUDH SINGH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2020 INSC 385Dismissed

The appellant, who purchased land by a sale deed in 1984, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a compromise decree passed by the High Court in 1994 in a partition suit was illegal, fraudulent and void. The decree was passed in a second appeal concerning parties other than the appellant, who was a …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusMEHRAM & ORS.

2020 INSC 384Disposed off

The State of Rajasthan appealed against the High Court's conversion of the murder conviction of accused Mehram (No.5) under Section 302 IPC to a lesser offence under Section 326 IPC and the reduction of his sentence to five months. The facts reveal that the accused, armed with lethal weapons, lay in …

RATNAGIRI NAGAR PARISHADversusGANGARAM NARAYAN AMBEKAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 388Appeal(s) allowed

The Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad sought to set up a solid waste disposal project on land allotted by the State, which was challenged by a group of local residents who filed a suit for a permanent injunction. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of evidence, but the first appellate court and the …

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.versusATMANAND SINGH & ORS.

2020 INSC 387Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, Atmanand Singh, claimed that the Punjab National Bank had improperly transferred funds to his loan account and that an agreement dated 27‑05‑1990 required the bank to refund the amount with interest. The bank denied the existence of the alleged agreement and the documents, asserting …

KAPILABEN AMBALAL PATEL & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2020 INSC 386Dismissed

The appellants, legal representatives of the original landowner, challenged the State's forcible possession of surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, which was effected by a Possession Panchnama on 20 March 1986. After a series of applications, exemptions, and a …

NISHA PRIYA BHATIAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2020 INSC 355Disposed off

Ms. Nisha Priya Bhatia, a Director in the Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), complained of sexual harassment against senior officers, after which her identity was publicly disclosed and she attempted suicide. The government declared her "exposed" and "unemployable" and ordered her compulsory …

YUM! RESTAURANTS (MARKETING) PRIVATE LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

2020 INSC 353Disposed off

YUM! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Ltd., a wholly‑owned subsidiary of YRIPL, claimed that its advertising, marketing and promotion activities were carried out on a non‑profit, mutual‑concern basis and therefore its surplus should be exempt from tax. The Supreme Court examined the doctrine of …

BASIR AHMED SISODIYAversusTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER

2020 INSC 352Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a trader, was assessed for AY 1998-99 and the Assessing Officer added Rs.2,26,000 as "cash credit" under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, treating it as bogus entries because the appellant could not initially substantiate purchases from unregistered marble dealers. The appellant …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusEXCHANGE CENTRE

2020 INSC 354Dismissed

The UAE Exchange Centre, a UAE company, obtained RBI permission under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act to operate liaison offices in India for limited functions such as receiving remittance data, printing cheques/drafts and couriering them to beneficiaries. The Authority for Advance Rulings held …

ANEESH KUMAR V.S. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2020 INSC 365Dismissed

The Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) published a first Ranked List (RL‑I) for Sub‑Inspector of Police (Trainee) in September 2013 and later issued several advices from it, the last on 11 November 2015. The appellants, empanelled in RL‑I, sought appointment to 93 Non‑Joining Duty (NJD) …

SHIVAKUMAR & ORS.versusSHARANABASAPPA & ORS.

2020 INSC 349Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit claiming ownership of several properties on the basis of a Will dated 20‑05‑1991 executed by the deceased Sri Sangappa and sought to declare a trust created by the defendants void. The defendants challenged the genuineness of the Will, pointing to numerous irregularities …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusEXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ANR.

2020 INSC 350Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged the constitutional validity of clause (f) inserted by the Finance Act, 2001 into Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which made deductions for leave‑encashment payable only on actual payment. Exide Industries argued that the clause violated the assessee's right to …

M/S. TRIPOWER ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITEDversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 360Case Partly allowed

The borrower defaulted on a loan secured by a mortgage offered by the guarantor, leading State Bank of India to initiate SARFAESI proceedings and eventually auction the secured assets, which were purchased by Tripower Enterprises. The bank sought the return of original title documents deposited with …

SUJATA KOHLIversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS.

2020 INSC 364Dismissed

The appellant, a member of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service (DHJS), challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 27 of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 and the High Court's Full Court resolutions that introduced a five‑year "very good" (A) Annual Confidential Report (ACR) grading …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPURversusM/S. CHETAK ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.

2020 INSC 279Dismissed

The partnership firm Chetak Enterprises entered into an agreement with the Government of Rajasthan to construct a road and collect tolls. The road was completed on 27‑03‑2000 and the firm was converted into a private limited company on 28‑03‑2000 under Part IX of the Companies Act, 1956. The company …

SUBORNO BOSEversusENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR.

2020 INSC 278Dismissed

The Enforcement Directorate issued a show‑cause notice against Zoom Enterprises Ltd and its Managing Director, Suborno Bose, alleging violation of Section 10(6) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) for failing to use foreign exchange procured for the import of refrigeration equipment …

MOTAMARRI APPANNA VEERRAJU @ MAV RAJUversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

2020 INSC 216Disposed off

Motamari Appanna Veerraju (Mav Raju) was charged under several IPC sections and the Prevention of Corruption Act. After the Sessions Court rejected his bail, the Calcutta High Court granted him interim bail on 1 Oct 2018 and kept the regular bail application pending, issuing successive interim …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. ASSOCIATED CONTAINER TERMINAL LTD.

2020 INSC 182Disposed off

M/s. Kushang Apparel Ltd imported CTV kits and stored them in a bonded warehouse for a year under Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962. The importer failed to clear the goods or pay warehouse rent, leading to multiple auctions and tender sales. The Customs Department demanded customs duty, arguing …

LAXMIBAIversusTHE COLLECTOR, NANDED & ORS.

2020 INSC 197Disposed off

Laxmibai was elected as a member of a Gram Panchayat in Nanded but failed to submit her election‑expense account within the 30‑day period, submitting it 15 days late. The Collector, acting as the State Election Commission, disqualified her for five years, rejecting her medical certificate as a valid …

OM PRAKASHversusSURESH KUMAR

2020 INSC 111Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Om Prakash, owned a three‑room shop in Hamirpur and had evicted the respondent, Suresh Kumar, a cloth‑merchant tenant since 1969, on the ground that the premises were needed for reconstruction. The Rent Controller ordered eviction, which the High Court affirmed, but noted that the …

CHANDESHWAR SAWversusBRIJ BHUSHAN PRASAD & ORS.

2020 INSC 95Disposed off

In a Bihar Panchayat election for the post of Mukhia, the petitioner alleged that his valid votes were being rejected while invalid votes for the returned candidate were accepted. The Election Tribunal, after hearing evidence, ordered a recount and later declared the election of the returned …

DR. VIJAYAKUMARAN C.P.V.versusCENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF KERALA & ORS.

2020 INSC 93Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. C.P.V. Vijayakumaran, an associate professor on probation at Central University of Kerala, faced multiple complaints of sexual harassment by female students. An Internal Complaints Committee, constituted under UGC Regulations, conducted a formal inquiry, found him guilty, and recommended …

NIRMAL KUMAR PARSANversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ORS.

2020 INSC 60Dismissed

The appellants imported cigarettes, stored them in a bonded warehouse in West Bengal and sold them to the master of a foreign‑going ship as ship stores without paying customs duty. They claimed the sales were "in the course of import" and therefore exempt from West Bengal sales tax under the 1954 …

DHANSAI SAHUversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.

2020 INSC 74Matter referred to larger bench

DhanSai Sahu, who had worked as a daily‑wager before being regularised as a government employee, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after superannuation. The High Court held that Section 2(e) of the Act excluded him because his post was governed by the Chhattisgarh Civil …

DULESHWAR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH)

2020 INSC 61Disposed off

The case involved two violent incidents on 15 October 1998 in Kodebod, where a large group of armed men assaulted Dhanwaram, causing grievous injuries, and later beat Govind Singh to death. The trial court convicted ten of the eighteen accused under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC, while acquitting …

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusBIRENDER AND ORS.

2020 INSC 34Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased government employee died in a road accident caused by a negligent dumper driver, and her major married sons filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal awarded compensation based on the deceased's net salary, applying a 50% deduction for personal …

PURSHOTTAM CHOPRA & ANR.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)

2020 INSC 5Dismissed

The victim Sher Singh was set on fire after being doused with kerosene by the accused Purshottam Chopra and Suresh (telwala). While in critical condition with 100% burns, he gave two statements – one to Dr. Sushma (recorded in an MLC) and another to SI Rajesh Kumar – which were treated as dying …

DR. TANVI BEHLversusSHREY GOEL & ORS.

2019 INSC 1342Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Punjab and Haryana High Court order that struck down a domicile/residence‑based reservation provision in the prospectus of Government Medical College, Chandigarh for PG medical courses. The petitioners sought to uphold the reservation for candidates …

G H P. GOPALKRISHNAN @ DILEEPversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

2019 INSC 1303Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, accused in a rape case, sought a cloned copy of the contents of a memory card/pen‑drive that the prosecution intended to rely upon, arguing that the electronic record should be treated as a "document" under the Evidence Act and thus be furnished under Section 207 of the CrPC. The …

RADHA BAIversusRAM NARAYAN & ORS.

2019 INSC 1273Dismissed

The appellant, Radha Bai, claimed a half‑share in a piece of land that was originally part of the ancestral property of her great‑grandfather Sukhdeo. After Sukhdeo's death in 1965, his two sons Janakram and Pilaram partitioned the land in 1967, giving Janakram the exclusive share, which he later …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.versusM/S. BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED

2019 INSC 1268Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh rescinded a 1998 notification that granted a tax rebate to cement manufacturers using fly ash, by issuing a 2004 notification. Birla Corporation Ltd. and Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., which had set up units and begun production before the 2004 rescission, claimed that the …

M/S. SSPPL AND M/S. AIL WASversusSALMA DAM JOINT VENTURE & ANR.

2019 INSC 1249Appeal(s) allowed

WAPCOS Ltd entered into a contract with Salma Dam Joint Venture (SDJV), a 95%-5% joint venture of SSPPL and AIL, for the reconstruction of the Salma Dam. After the original contract’s arbitration clause, the parties executed an Amendment of Agreement (AoA) on 9 June 2015, which expressly stated that …

JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. & ANR.versusIDBI BANK LTD. & ANR.

[2019] 14 S.C.R. 312Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard appeals arising from the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of Jaypee Infratech Ltd., a subsidiary of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd., after IDBI Bank filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and home buyers sought clarification on …

SATINDER SINGH BHASINversusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2019 INSC 1214Directions issued

Satinder Singh Bhasin, director of a company involved in the ‘Grand Venice’ mall and commercial tower project in the National Capital Region, faced multiple FIRs in Uttar Pradesh and Delhi alleging non‑delivery of possession, siphoning of funds and irregular land allotment. He filed a writ petition …

ROHTAS & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 1204Dismissed

The appellants Rohtas and Surender Singh were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for stabbing the deceased Mohar Pal, based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2). They challenged the conviction in a special leave petition, alleging deficiencies in the investigation, delay …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusLT. COL. KULDEEP YADAV

2019 INSC 1083Appeal(s) allowed

Lt. Col. Kuldeep Yadav, an officer of the Army Corps of EME, was found to have maintained unauthorized contact with a Brazilian national for over two years, stayed with her in Army premises, and kept official documents on a laptop connected to the internet. A Staff Court of Inquiry recommended …

THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, INDIAN BANKversusD. VISALAKSHI AND ANR.

2019 INSC 1067Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) in non‑metropolitan areas could entertain a secured creditor's application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) for taking …

SMT. GARGIversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 1056Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Smt. Gargi, was convicted of murdering her husband by strangulation and subsequently hanging his body to simulate suicide, based largely on the testimony of the deceased's brother and sister. The prosecution alleged strained marital relations, illicit affairs, and a property dispute …

SITA RAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusBHARAT SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS & ORS.

2019 INSC 1036Dismissed

The appellants, heirs of the original tenure holders of Plot No. 2902, challenged the validity of a 1973 sale deed that transferred the plot to the respondents and a subsequent 1974 exchange deed that was executed without the permission of the Assistant Collector required under Section 161 of the …

G H MANJIT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

2019 INSC 992Dismissed

The case arose from a violent incident on 03‑03‑2001 at the Barnala Court Complex where seven accused, including Manjit Singh and Sukhwinder Singh, attacked members of a complainant party, causing grievous injuries and the death of Dalip Singh. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of …

UNION OF INDIAversusT. R. MEHRA ETC. ETC.

2019 INSC 929Dismissed

The Union of India appealed against a show‑cause notice issued to respondents for importing certain goods in August 1997, which was based on an order dated 14‑Nov‑1986 issued under Clause 8(1) of the Imports (Control) Order, 1986. After the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 came …

SHAKEENA & ANR.versusBANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 922Dismissed

The appellants had taken term loans from Bank of India which later became non‑performing, prompting the bank to invoke sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act and take constructive possession of the mortgaged property. After a public auction on 19 December 2005, the highest bidder was issued a …

CBI GUJARATversusDILIP MULANI & ANR.

2019 INSC 925Disposed off

The respondent, Dilip Mulani, was charged under IPC section 120‑B and several provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The trial court rejected his discharge application, relying on documentary evidence, telephonic transcripts and witness statements that suggested his participation in a …

M/S. S.E. GRAPHITES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.

2019 INSC 743Disposed off

The appellants, dealers under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 and the VAT Acts, filed appeals against assessment orders but were rejected by the Appellate Authority for not producing proof of payment of tax dues as required by the second proviso of the relevant statutes. The High …

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR.versusJAGGU & ORS. ETC.

2019 INSC 727Disposed off

The case concerned 2,040 contract labourers employed in SAIL's captive limestone mine who, after a 1993 prohibition on contract labour under the CLRA Act, continued to work and claimed parity of wages with regular SAIL employees under the NJCS memorandum. The respondents sought relief under Section …

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusM/S AJANTA BOTTLERS & BLENDERS PVT. LTD.

2019 INSC 715Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Jharkhand, through its Revenue Board, issued a notification under Section 90 of the Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915 imposing an import fee of Rs.6 per litre of pure alcohol (LPL) on rectified spirit used for manufacturing Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). Ajanta Bottlers & Blenders …

SUNIL VASUDEVA & ORS.versusSUNDAR GUPTA & ORS.

2019 INSC 716Dismissed

The dispute concerned a Delhi property that had been sold at a public auction by the Income Tax Department in 1964 to V.N. Vasudeva. The respondents, grandchildren of the original owner, challenged the sale through a civil suit and a writ petition, while the appellants, heirs of the lawyer who …

SUNDAR GUPTA & ORS.versusSUNIL VASUDEVA & ORS.

2019 INSC 717Dismissed

In Sundar Gupta & Ors. v. Sunil Vasudeva & Ors., a contempt petition (C) No. 1721 of 2017 was filed alleging contempt of the Supreme Court under Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petition arose from proceedings in I.A. No. 4 of 2017 and Civil Appeal No. 5140 of 2019, which were also the …

MADHAV PRASAD AGGARWAL & ANR.versusAXIS BANK LTD. & ANR.

2019 INSC 707Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, home buyers, filed suits against the builder and Axis Bank seeking specific performance, possession and other reliefs concerning flats in the Orbit Heaven project. Axis Bank moved a notice of motion under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the CPC to have the plaint rejected only against it, …

ASIM SHARIFFversusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY

2019 INSC 709Dismissed

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) investigated the murder of Rudresh and charged Asim Shariff, the Bengaluru unit president of the Popular Front of India, along with four others under multiple provisions of the IPC, Arms Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Shariff filed an …

R. S. ANJAYYA GUPTAversusTHIPPAIAH SETTY & ORS.

2019 INSC 699Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant challenged a partition suit filed by his brother, claiming the properties were self‑acquired, while the plaintiff alleged they were bought with joint family funds and thus belonged to the Hindu joint family. The trial court held the properties were joint family assets and ordered …

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusDR. VASANTHI VEERASEKARAN

2019 INSC 698Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the State of Tamil Nadu was legally bound to provide alternate housing sites to landowners whose property was acquired for the Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) railway project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court had directed the State and the Tamil …

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.W.versusVITTHAL DAMODAR PATIL AND ANR

2019 INSC 702Appeal(s) allowed

The Executive Engineer appealed a High Court order that had enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on a valuation report prepared by Mr. Ravindra Ghanshyam Chaudhari. The appellant contended that the High Court failed to scrutinise the valuer's …

MAHARASHTRA ARCHERY ASSOCIATIONversusRAHUL MEHRA AND ORS.

2019 INSC 610Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the conduct of a court‑appointed Administrator who was tasked with amending the Constitution of the Archery Association of India (AAI) and conducting elections. The Administrator unilaterally introduced several amendments beyond the four changes expressly approved by the …

SEEMA SARKARversusEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS.

2019 INSC 612Appeal(s) allowed

The Little Andaman Panchayat Samiti, consisting of five elected members and one Member of Parliament (MP) as an ex‑officio member, scheduled a special meeting to consider a no‑confidence motion against the Pramukh. Only three elected members attended, and the Executive Officer dissolved the meeting, …

RAJANversusTHE HOME SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

2019 INSC 574Disposed off

The petitioner, Rajan, was convicted of multiple offences including dacoity, murder, and illegal possession of arms, receiving seven years' rigorous imprisonment for IPC 395, five years' rigorous imprisonment under the Arms Act, and life imprisonment for three counts of IPC 302 and four counts of …

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusNALWA SONS INVESTMENT LTD. AND ANR.

2019 INSC 564Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) allotted a commercial plot to Jindal Strips Ltd. (respondent No.1) under a perpetual lease deed containing clause 6(a) which requires prior written consent for any transfer and allows the lessor to recover 50% of the unearned increase (UEI). Respondent No.1 and …

CHERIYATH JYOTHIversusSAINUDEEN AND ANR.

2019 INSC 566Dismissed

Cheriyath Jyothi complained to the Gram Panchayat that a neighbour had erected an unauthorised building used as a rubber‑sheet plant, violating the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2011 and posing health hazards. The Lok Adalat ordered the respondent to demolish the existing structure within three …

AJIT KAUR @ SURJIT KAURversusDARSHAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2019 INSC 462Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a Hindu widow’s mere possession of property, without any recognized claim, right or devise, converts her limited interest into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The appellant, Ajit Kaur, claimed that her mother Banti’s oral …

NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCYversusZAHOOR AHMAD SHAH WATALI

2019 INSC 456Appeal(s) allowed

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) sought to deny bail to Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali, accused No.10 in a case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) and several IPC offences, alleging he was a key fund‑raiser for terrorist activities. The Delhi High Court granted bail, …

UNION OF INDIAversusPARMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

2019 INSC 438Disposed off

The Union of India (appellant) and several contractors, including Parmar Construction Company (respondent), entered into railway construction contracts containing an arbitration clause (clause 64). After completing work, the contractors submitted final bills with a "No Claim" certificate, but later …

M/S ACHAL INDUSTRIESversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2019 INSC 410Dismissed

M/s Achal Industries, a manufacturer registered under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, challenged turnover tax assessments for the years 1990‑91 to 1999‑2000, arguing that the tax should be levied on "taxable turnover" rather than "total turnover" as defined in Section 6‑B(1). The appellant …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusANTIQUE ART EXPORTS PVT. LTD.

2019 INSC 415Appeal(s) allowed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. settled two fire insurance claims of Antique Art Exports Pvt. Ltd. by issuing full and final discharge vouchers, which the claimant accepted without objection. Eleven weeks later, the claimant alleged that the settlement was obtained through fraud, coercion and undue …

LAHARI SAKHAMURIversusSOBHAN KODALI

2019 INSC 383Disposed off

The wife filed for divorce and custody of her US‑citizen children in a US court, which issued an interim order directing the father to appear for conciliation and later granted him temporary physical custody, ordering the children be returned to the US. She then travelled to India and, concealing …

THE STATE OF GUJARATversusANWAR OSMAN SUMBHANIYA AND ORS.

2019 INSC 280Dismissed

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and others by a Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The appeal centered on whether the prior sanctions issued under Section 20‑A(2) of TADA for the 1993 and 2005 …

LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD.versusSLEEPWELL INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.

2019 INSC 241Dismissed

LMJ International Ltd. and Sleepwell Industries Ltd. entered into two separate contracts for the sale of Thai rice, governed by GAFTA 48 with disputes to be arbitrated under GAFTA 125 in London. Two foreign arbitral awards were rendered in favour of the respondent, who then filed execution petitions …

SUNITA & ORS.versusRAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR.

2019 INSC 200Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a fatal road accident in which Sitaram, a government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle that collided with a bus owned by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and driven rashly by its driver. The claimants sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and …

EDAPADDI K. PALANISWAMIversusDHINAKARAN & ORS.

[2019] 3 S.C.R. 200Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered a miscellaneous application filed by T.T.V. Dhinakaran (respondent No.1) seeking directions to use a common symbol and name for his faction in upcoming elections, while a writ petition challenging the Election Commission's (ECI) decision on the AIADMK party split …

PAPPI @ MEHBOOBversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2019 INSC 140Dismissed

The appellant Pappi @ Mehboob was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Guddu, who was attacked with swords by a group of seven accused. Five of the accused, including the appellant, were tried; the others were absconding. While the trial court and the Rajasthan High Court upheld the …

BIKASH BORA AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF ASSAM

2019 INSC 141Disposed off

The case involved four accused—Bikash Bora, Atul Bora, Haren Rautia and Dipankar Bora—convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Jugeswar Kurmi. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence and the testimony of Lakhiram Kurmi (PW‑5), who was later held not to …

K. SASHIDHARversusINDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS.

2019 INSC 148Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by K. Sashidhar challenging the rejection of resolution plans for two corporate debtors, KS&PIPL and IIL, by the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The CoC had approved the plans with less than the statutory 75% voting share of financial creditors, leading the NCLT to …

BADRI VISHAL PANDEY AND ORS.versusRAJESH MITTAL AND ORS.

2019 INSC 12Dismissed

The petitioners, former daily‑wage workers of U.P. Jal Nigam, claimed that the Supreme Court’s order of 7 September 2015 required their reinstatement after they were retrenched in 1991, and filed contempt petitions alleging wilful disobedience by the department. The Court observed that the order …

UNION OF INDIAversusNARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD & ORS.

2018 INSC 1114Disposed off

The original lease of a 99‑year term on a plot in Mumbai, used for a cotton mill, later vested in a charitable trust. After the lease expired, Podar Mills occupied the premises as a protected tenant under the Bombay Rents Act. The Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995 vested the statutory …

P.E.C. LIMITEDversusAUSTBULK SHIPPING SDN BHD

2018 INSC 1053Dismissed

P.E.C. Limited chartered a vessel from Austbulk Shipping and a dispute arose over freight and demurrage. The parties had an arbitration clause in the charter party, and a sole arbitrator awarded US$150,362.18 to Austbulk. P.E.C. filed a petition for enforcement of the foreign award in the Delhi High …

AMBADAS LAXMAN SHINDE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 1023Appeal(s) allowed

Six accused were convicted for murder and related offences; three (1,2,4) received death sentences while the other three (3,5,6) were sentenced to life imprisonment. The State appealed for enhancement of the sentences of 3,5,6, and the Supreme Court bench dismissed the appeals of 1,2,4 and imposed …

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusBALIRAM SINGH & ORS.

2018 INSC 1010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, former Adult Education Supervisors, were terminated when the Non‑Formal Education Scheme was abolished on 1 April 2001 and later re‑appointed in 2007 under a fresh appointment that recognised only pension benefits for prior service. They filed a writ petition in 2013 seeking …

ASAR MOHAMMAD AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P.

2018 INSC 985Disposed off

The case involved the murder of Zahida Begum and her son Ishlam, whose bodies were recovered from a septic tank after appellant No.1, Asar Mohammad, confessed and led police to the site. The trial court convicted all three accused under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, sentencing them to death (later …

ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 671Directions issued

The Supreme Court entertained an interlocutory application filed by the All India Judges Association seeking improvement of judicial infrastructure, particularly in subordinate courts. The Court noted that inadequate infrastructure hampers the delivery of justice and violates constitutional …

DEVIDAS LOKA RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 560Appeal(s) allowed

Devidas Loka Rathod was convicted under Sections 302 and 324 IPC for assaulting several persons with a sickle, resulting in one death. He pleaded unsound mind, asserting that a pre‑existing psychotic disorder rendered him incapable of understanding his acts. The trial and appellate courts rejected …

UNION OF INDIAversusINDIAN RADIOLOGICAL AND IMAGING ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2018 INSC 236Disposed off

The Union of India appealed against a Delhi High Court judgment that struck down Rule 3.3(1)(b) of the PCPNDT Rules, 1996 and Rule 6 of the Six‑Months Training Rules, 2014 on the ground that the Act did not empower the Central Government to prescribe qualifications or training for persons using …

KUDRAT SANDHUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 185Directions issued

The petition sought judicial directions on the selection of chairpersons, judicial, administrative, technical and expert members of various tribunals under the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017. The …

IQ CITY FOUNDATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 101Disposed off

IQ City Foundation, a medical college, applied for renewal of its permission under Section 10‑A of the Medical Council Act, 1956 to admit 150 MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection and the subsequent Hearing Committee found a faculty deficiency of …

CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORMSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 1091Dismissed

The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Supreme Court to constitute a Special Investigation Team, headed by a retired Chief Justice of India, to probe an FIR (RCIO(A)/2017‑AC.III) alleging conspiracy and bribes …

KAMINI JAISWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2017 INSC 1112Dismissed

The petitioners, including a member of the Commission for Judicial Accountability and Reforms, filed successive writ petitions alleging that an FIR implicated senior judicial functionaries and that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) should not hear or assign the matter. They sought a Special …

UNION OF INDIAversusAKHILA BHARATHIYA ADIVASI VIKASA PARISHAD & ORS.

[2017] 11 S.C.R. 251Disposed off

The Union of India moved a transfer petition under Article 139A seeking to shift a writ petition (Civil) No. 15798 of 2009, pending before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, to the Supreme Court. The High Court writ challenged the constitutional validity of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional …

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. & ORS.versusK. BALU & ANR.

[2017] 14 S.C.R. 614Disposed off

The Supreme Court was approached by the State of Tamil Nadu for clarification of its 15 December 2016 order that prohibited the grant of liquor licences along national and state highways, including stretches within municipal limits. The Court clarified that the purpose of the order is to curb liquor …

CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORMSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 1091Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court clarified that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is the sole authority to constitute benches and allocate cases, a principle derived from the State of Rajasthan v. Prakash Chand judgment and applicable to the Supreme Court. The Court held that a two‑judge bench cannot direct the …

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRANAY SETHI AND ORS.

2017 INSC 1068Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined the computation of compensation under Sections 163‑A, 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in death claims, focusing on the appropriate multiplier, the addition of future prospects to the deceased's income, and the quantification of conventional heads such as loss …

ROYAL MEDICAL TRUST AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 889Disposed off

The Royal Medical Trust, which runs Kerala Medical College, applied for a Letter of Permission (LOP) to admit 150 MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year. After a surprise inspection by the Medical Council of India (MCI) revealed several deficiencies, the Central Government barred the college …

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIAversusCRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.

2017 INSC 15Modified

The Supreme Court, in an order dated 2 January 2017, directed the appointment of a new senior counsel to assist the Court in nominating members of the Committee of Administrators for the BCCI, after senior counsel Fali S. Nariman expressed a conflict of interest due to his prior retainer for the …

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIAversusCRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.

2017 INSC 9Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the Board of Control for Cricket in India's (BCCI) failure to implement the Lodha Committee recommendations, particularly the appointment of a CAG nominee to the Apex Council, despite a prior judgment dated 18 July 2016. The Court found that President Anurag Thakur had …

VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA

2016 INSC 1161Directions issued

The Supreme Court admitted a batch of writ petitions challenging the demonetisation notification of 8 November 2016 and issued interim directions. It examined the legality of the RBI's power to demonetise under the Reserve Bank of India Act and its compatibility with constitutional provisions. The …

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusNEELAM NAG & ANR.

[2016] 8 S.C.R. 436Order modified

The Supreme Court of India, in Civil Appeal No. 4715 of 2011 (State Bank of India & Ors. v. Neelam Nag & Anr.), issued a correction to its earlier judgment dated 16 September 2016. The correction clarifies that the name "Neelam Nag" in the cause title should read "Neelam Nag & Anr." and that every …