Created by Fuzzy Cloud

A P SEN

231 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

NAVNIT R. KAMANI & ORS.versusR.R. KAMANI

1988 INSC 283Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over the revival of Kamani Tubes Ltd., where the workers, through their union, proposed a scheme for revival that was examined and sanctioned by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) …

HINDUSTAN THOMPSON ASSOCIATES LTD.versusMRS. MAYA INDERSON ISRANI & ORS.

1988 INSC 284Dismissed

The Nibhana Co-operative Housing Society (Respondent No.2) sought possession of flat No. 62 allotted to Mrs. Maya (Respondent No.1) from Hindustan Thompson Associates Ltd. and others (Appellants), alleging they occupied the flat as licencees without the Society's written consent. The Appellants …

DR. M.C. BINDALversusR.C. SINGH & ORS.

1988 INSC 286Disposed off

The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised for the post of Food & Drug Controller, requiring a medical degree and five years of experience in drug standardisation or testing. Dr. M.C. Bindal applied, claiming seven years of experience, and was provisionally recommended pending …

SMT. KRISHNA RAJPAL BHATIA & ORS.versusMISS LEELA H. ADVANI & ORS.

1988 INSC 288Dismissed

The dispute arose from a 1964 agreement whereby the tenant‑co‑partner member of the Shyam Cooperative Housing Society, Smt. Devibai H. Advani, allowed Rajpal Bhatia to occupy her flat on a leave‑and‑licence basis. After the licence was terminated, Advani sought eviction of Bhatia under Section 91 of …

BHARAT GENERAL & TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

1988 INSC 289Dismissed

The petitioners, manufacturers of washed cottonseed oil, challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 41 and 41A of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, alleging that the State of Maharashtra’s power to grant tax exemptions to new units in backward areas and to withdraw those exemptions for edible‑oil …

A.V.R & CO. & ORS.versusFAIRFIELD COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

1988 INSC 290Dismissed

The Fairfield Co‑operative Housing Society, a tenant‑partnership society, discovered that its member Smt. Vishni J. Kalwani had let flat No. 7 to A.V.R. & Co. and J.R. Enterprises as licencees without the society’s consent, violating its bye‑laws. The society filed a dispute under Section 91 of the …

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.versusK.G. MADHAVAN PILLAI AND ORS.

1988 INSC 291Dismissed

The State of Kerala issued a Gazette order (Ex. P‑4) sanctioning 91 private agencies to open or upgrade unaided recognised schools under the Kerala Education Act, 1957. After a change of government, a subsequent order (Ex. P‑7) cancelled the earlier sanction without hearing the applicants. The …

SHIV KUMARversusJAWAHAR LAL VERMA & ORS.

1988 INSC 278Case Allowed

Shiv Kumar, a landlord, filed an eviction suit on 11 June 1973 under the U.P. Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, claiming the Act did not apply because the shop was constructed in 1966 and was exempt for ten years. The tenants argued that the Act did apply and that …

CALCUTTA YOUTH FRONT & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

1988 INSC 268Dismissed

The Calcutta Youth Front and its president filed a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the State of West Bengal, municipal officials and the lessees of an underground air‑conditioned market had violated the Supreme Court's order of 18 August 1987 which permitted …

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.versusLAISAL HAQUE & ORS. ETC.

1988 INSC 269Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent riot in which Laisal Haque and others entered an oil mill, opened fire and caused the death of Gulam Rabbani and injuries to several others. The Additional Sessions Judge convicted sixteen of the forty‑two accused under sections 148, 302 and 324 of the IPC, while …

SIRSILK LTD. AND ANOTHERversusTEXTILES COMMITTEE & ORS.

1988 INSC 270Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined challenges by several textile mills manufacturing rayon and nylon yarn to the fee imposed by the Textiles Committee under Rule 21 of the Textile Committee Rules, 1965 (made under s.22 of the Textile Committee Act, 1963). The mills argued that the fee was unconstitutional …

RAM NARAIN GUPTAversusSMT. RAMESHWARI GUPTA

1988 INSC 271Dismissed

The husband filed a suit for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging that his wife suffered from schizophrenia so severe that cohabitation was unsafe. The trial court granted a decree of divorce, but the Allahabad High Court reversed it, holding that the …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusGURNAM KAUR

1988 INSC 267Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) sought to remove pavement hawkers, including Gurnam Kaur, from the footpath outside Irwin Hospital under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. A Subordinate Judge had held that the hawkers could occupy their licensed sites but could not be removed …

DR. BALIRAM WAMAN HIRAYversusJUSTICE B. LENTIN AND OTHERS

1988 INSC 272Case Allowed

The State of Maharashtra appointed Justice B. Lentin as a one‑man Commission of Inquiry to investigate the death of 14 patients at J.J. Hospital. The Commission found the appellant, Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray, gave contradictory evidence and issued a show‑cause notice for perjury under s.193 IPC read …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHERversusSMT. SUSHILA MAFATLAL SHAH & OTHERS

1988 INSC 264Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra detained Bhadresh Mafatlal Shah under the COFEPOSA Act after he was caught with gold biscuits. The detention order was issued by D.N. Capoor, a specially empowered officer, who informed the detainee that he could make representations only to the State and Central …

M.L. JAINversusUNION OF INDIA

1988 INSC 231Case Allowed

M.L. Jain, a retired Judge of the Delhi High Court, challenged the pension fixed by the Pay & Accounts Officer at Rs.26,000 per annum, contending that amendments to the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act in 1986 and 1988 and related Office Memoranda entitled him to a higher pension. The …

STATE OF U.P.versusKRISHNA GOPAL & ANR.

1988 INSC 221Case Partly allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh charged Krishna Gopal and an associate with murder under IPC sections 302 and 34. The trial court convicted them based on two eye‑witnesses and the deceased's statements recorded as dying declarations, accepting that the victim remained conscious long enough to make those …

OM PRAKASHversusAMARJIT SINGH & ANR.

1988 INSC 217Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Om Prakash, was placed ex parte in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a small piece of land. He filed several applications to set aside the ex parte order, but they were dismissed as unsigned or time‑barred. The trial court decreed specific performance based on …

DR. AJAY PRADHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS

1988 INSC 212Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two appeals by Dr. Ajay Pradhan and Dr. Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava who sought admission to postgraduate medical seats that became vacant towards the end of the 1986-87 academic year. Both relied on Rule 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Selection for Post‑Graduation Courses Rules, …

CHANDRAKANT KHAIREversusDR. SHANTARAM KALE & ORS.

1988 INSC 194Dismissed

The first meeting of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation was convened on 6 May 1988 to elect the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Standing Committee members. A violent disturbance broke out when opposition councillors seized ballot boxes and chairs were thrown, prompting the Municipal Commissioner to …

J.R. RAGHUPATHY, ETC.versusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS. ETC.

1988 INSC 193Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed under Art.226 challenging the location of Revenue Mandal Headquarters in Andhra Pradesh, which had been notified under sub‑section (5) of Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974. The High Court had, in some cases, quashed the …

RAJENDRAKUMAR NATVARLAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT &. ORS.

1988 INSC 161Dismissed

The appellant, a liquor broker in Gujarat, was arrested for importing foreign liquor from Rajasthan and later detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1985, sub‑section 2 of s. 3, to prevent him from acting prejudicial to public order. He challenged the detention on …

MOORTHYversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1988 INSC 156Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a leprosy inspector, had an illicit relationship with Jayasambal, the wife of a doctor, which was terminated after their daughter discovered it. Aggrieved, the appellant watched a violent film and later attacked Jayasambal's house, killing her and her 12‑year‑old son and grievously …

SALIM RAJMOHMAD MUSLIMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

1988 INSC 131Case Allowed

The petitioner, Salim Rajmohmad Muslim, was detained under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 on 11 June 1987. He filed a representation on 15 July 1987 to both the detaining authority (Police Commissioner, Surat) and the State Government, alleging that …

LAXMI RAJ SHETTY AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1988 INSC 119Dismissed

Appellant No.1, Laxmi Raj Shetty, was convicted of murder, robbery and house trespass and sentenced to death, while his father, Appellant No.2, Shivram Shetty, was convicted of harbouring and possessing stolen property. The prosecution relied entirely on circumstantial evidence, including the …

SMT. SUDHA DEVIversusM.P. NARAYANAN & ORS.

1988 INSC 121Appeal(s) allowed

Sudha Devi sued the tenant (defendant 1) for non‑payment of rent and wrongful sub‑letting, and also sought possession against a third defendant who allegedly occupied the flat after a decree. The defendants did not appear, and an ex‑parte decree was passed based on the plaintiff’s sole witness. The …

ABDUL HAMID SHAMSIversusABDUL MAJID AND OTHERS

1988 INSC 104Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, a former partner, sued his brothers for dissolution of a partnership and for accounts, alleging they had excluded him and falsified a partnership deed. He valued the suit at a nominal Rs.150 (Rs.50 each for declaration, accounts, and profit) and paid the corresponding court fee. The …

BAL CHAND BANSALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1988 INSC 102Dismissed

B.C. Bansal was arrested on 2‑4‑1987 for allegedly directing illegal foreign exchange remittances and was kept in judicial custody until 13‑4‑1987. On the same day his bail was granted, the authorities issued a detention order under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention …

SMT. SOVA RAY & ANR.versusGOSTHA GOPAL DEY & ORS.

1988 INSC 79Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, sisters Smt. Sova Ray and others, sued for partition of family property claiming a one‑third share. The trial court granted the share and the parties later settled on a compromise whereby the defendant, their uncle Gostha Gopal Dey, would acquire half of their share (one‑sixth of the …

USMANBHAI DAWOODBHAI MENON & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1988 INSC 74Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Usmanbhai Menon and others, were arrested after an armed clash and produced before a Designated Court under the Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). Their bail applications were rejected by the Designated Court, and they sought bail from the Gujarat High …

DR. SHIVARAO SHANTARAM WAGLE & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1988 INSC 66Dismissed

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to stop the release of 7,500 cartons of Irish butter imported for the Operation Flood programme, alleging that the butter was contaminated with radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl disaster. The Bombay High Court declined to issue such a writ, holding that …

DR. CHAKRADHAR PASWANversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1988 INSC 67Dismissed

The State of Bihar created a Directorate of Indigenous Medicines with a Director and three Deputy Directors (Homeopathic, Unani, Ayurvedic). Using a 50‑point roster for reservation under Article 16(4) of the Constitution, the government reserved the sole vacancy of Deputy Director (Homeopathic) for …

ROSHAN SINGH & ORS.versusZILE SINGH & ORS.

1988 INSC 54Dismissed

The case involved descendants of a common ancestor who had partitioned their agricultural land in 1955 and later their residential properties. A memorandum of partition (Exh. P‑12) dated 3 August 1955, later confirmed by a settlement (Exh. P‑1) on 31 January 1971, listed the properties allotted to …

TEJINDER KAURversusGURMIT SINGH

1988 INSC 51Directions issued

The wife obtained a decree of dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty and appealed the decree, which was dismissed by the High Court on 16 July 1986. The husband subsequently contracted a second marriage on 17 August 1986, and the wife filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) under Article 136 of …

STATE OF PUNJABversusRAJ KUMAR

1988 INSC 40Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an Assistant Sub‑Inspector, was caught taking a bribe and was investigated and charge‑sheeted in a criminal trial. He challenged the framing of charges on the ground that the investigation violated Rule 16.38 of the Punjab Police Rules. The High Court held the rule to be mandatory …

VIDYA PRAKASHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1988 INSC 39Dismissed

Vidya Prakash, a soldier in the Indian Army, was dismissed after being found guilty of being absent without leave by a summary court‑martial convened by his corps Commanding Officer, Major P.S. Mahant. He challenged the dismissal, contending that the Commanding Officer was not competent to preside …

STATE OF GUJARATversusSUNIL FULCHAND SHAH & ANOTHER

1988 INSC 35Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat detained Sunil Fulchand Shah under Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, on grounds that linked him to a large smuggling operation. Co‑accused filed bail applications on 2 Oct 1984 and a retraction petition on 3 Oct …

DR. D.N. MALHOTRAversusKARTAR SINGH

1988 INSC 29Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, a retired government servant, filed an eviction petition under Section 13‑A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1985, claiming the premises for his own residence. The tenant argued that the landlord was not a "specified landlord" within the meaning of Section …

S.T. MUTHUSAMIversusK. NATARAJAN & ORS.

1988 INSC 20Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned an election for Chairman of a Panchayat Union in Tamil Nadu where two candidates claimed to be the official Indian National Congress (I) nominee. The Returning Officer first allotted unreserved symbols, but after a letter from the party president clarified the appellant as the …

AMRIT LAL CHUMversusDEVOPRASAD DUTTA ROY AND ANR. ETC.

1988 INSC 18Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a company‑allotted flat that a former officer continued to occupy after retirement. The company sought prosecution under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956, which penalises officers or employees who wrongfully retain company property. The Supreme Court examined whether the …

ANAND KUMARversusSRI KATTALI BHASKARAN & ORS.

1988 INSC 15Dismissed

Anand Kumar filed Special Leave Petitions challenging the method by which the age of the Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, K. Bhaskaran, was determined. The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to compel the President of India to decide the matter, arguing that the Council of …

M.VEERAPPAversusEVELYN SEQUEIRA & ORS.

1988 INSC 8Dismissed

The plaintiff, a tenant, engaged an advocate to file a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court against an eviction order. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and the plaintiff sued the advocate for negligence and misconduct, claiming damages. The plaintiff died during the suit, and his …

GURPREET SINGHversusCHATUR BHUJ GOEL

1987 INSC 378Dismissed

The respondent sued for specific performance of a contract for sale of a house. The trial court decreed in his favour and the High Court affirmed. During the hearing of the Letters Patent Appeal, the parties orally agreed that the appellant would pay Rs.2,25,000 as full and final settlement, but the …

SUSHIL KUMAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1987 INSC 364Dismissed

Sushil Kumar filed a civil suit and obtained a temporary injunction based on a copy of a partnership deed. The respondent alleged the deed was forged and lodged a police report, leading the magistrate to frame charges under IPC sections 465, 468, 120B and 420 but not under 471 and 474, citing …

G.C. GUPTA & ORS.versusN.K. PANDEY & ORS.

1987 INSC 365Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the seniority of temporary Assistant Engineers in the United Provinces Service of Engineers (Buildings and Roads Branch) Class II. The petitioners, appointed temporarily between 1947‑1950 and later confirmed, claimed that their seniority should be measured from the date they …

STATE OF ORLSSA AND ANR.versusALEKH CHANDRA JENA

1987 INSC 363Appeal(s) allowed

A.C. Jena, the Sarpanch of Padanipal Gram Panchayat in Orissa, was suspended and later removed from office under Section 115 of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, after a report by the Sub‑Divisional Officer and a notice giving him a chance to show cause. The Collector’s suspension order expressly …

HANUMANT KUMAR TELESARAversusMOHAN LAL

1987 INSC 355Dismissed

The respondent mortgaged his shop and handed possession to the mortgagees, who subsequently let the premises to the appellant as a tenant. The respondent sued for redemption of the mortgage and vacant possession; the mortgage was redeemed and an order was made to give possession to the respondent. …

TH0TE BHASKARA RAOversusA.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND OTHERS.

1987 INSC 346Dismissed

The appellant, a former advocate, joined Hindustan Shipyard, a Government of India undertaking, and later applied for a District Munsif post under the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules. The recruitment rules required three years of legal practice, but a proviso allowed candidates already …

BHAGAT RAM SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

1987 INSC 332Dismissed

Bhagat Ram Sharma, a former member of the Punjab Legislative Assembly and later a member of the Punjab State Public Service Commission (PSPC) who retired in 1959, sought pension benefits under Punjab PSPC Regulation 8(3) and under the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly (Allowances & Pension of …

SMT. ARUNA KUMARIversusGOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS

1987 INSC 327Dismissed

The husband of the petitioner, Madhava Rao, was detained under Section 3 of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 for allegedly diverting levy cement meant for railway construction to private works. The petitioner challenged the detention …

BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITEDversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1987 INSC 317Disposed off

Bharat Coking Coal Limited filed a contempt petition alleging that Ram Nath Singh and his son, after the Supreme Court ordered maintenance of the "status quo as in the High Court" on 19‑12‑1986, deliberately concealed this order, approached the Patna High Court and obtained a favourable order on …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPOLLONJI DARABSHAW DARUWALLA

1987 INSC 322Dismissed

Pollonji Darabshaw Daruwalla, a customs appraiser, was searched and found to possess assets allegedly disproportionate to his known income for the period 1‑April‑1958 to 31‑Dec‑1968. He was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (s.5(1)(e) read with s.5(2)) for criminal misconduct, …

HARI NATH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P.

1987 INSC 315Appeal(s) allowed

In November 1973 a dacoity occurred at Gangaram Yadav's house, resulting in the death of two brothers. The accused were arrested on 9 November 1973, but a test identification parade was conducted only on 5 March 1974, nearly four months later. Three eye‑witnesses, who were relatives of the victims, …

STATE OF U.P.versusKAMAL KISHORE SAINI

1987 INSC 316Dismissed

Kamal Kishore Saini was detained under section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 on three criminal grounds. He challenged the detention before the Allahabad High Court, which quashed the order on the ground that he was not supplied with vital documents (statements under Sec. 161 CrPC, …

BALWANT KAURversusUNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH

1987 INSC 307Appeal(s) allowed

Balwant Kaur was convicted for the murder of her husband, Pritam Singh, based primarily on the testimony of co‑accused Ram Sarup, who turned approver. The prosecution alleged that Kaur conspired with Nand Singh and Sarup to murder her husband and that she had urged them to do so. The Supreme Court …

KAMAL SINGH GHUGTYALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 309Dismissed

Kamal Singh Ghugtyal, a former Havildar, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a pension under the Army Pension Regulations, claiming more than 15 years of service in the regular army, including a stint in the Lok Sahayak Sena (LSS). The respondents produced service records showing his …

SUBHASH BHANDARI & ANR. ETC.versusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LUCKNOW & ORS.

1987 INSC 310Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, contractors for supplying ballast to the Public Works Department, were detained under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 on grounds that they had attacked a rival contractor with firearms and grenades, allegedly to intimidate him and influence tendering. They challenged …

GULSHAN & ANR. ETC.versusZILA PARISHAD & ORS.

1987 INSC 287Disposed off

The petitioners challenged a bye‑law framed by various Zila Parishads under Section 239(2)(E)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Samiti and Zila Parishads Act, 1961, which required that the right to trade in carcass utilisation be awarded by public auction. Lower courts struck down the auction …

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusBADRINATH & ORS.

1987 INSC 283Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a senior IAS officer, Badrinath, who delivered a speech criticizing the Red Fort time‑capsule and later sought to sue the Chief Secretary for defamation. He applied for permission under Rule 17 of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, which bars civil servants from suing …

RANJIT THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1987 INSC 285Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a signalman in the Indian Army, was serving a 28‑day rigorous imprisonment when he was charged under Section 41(2) of the Army Act for refusing to eat food on a superior's order. A Summary Court‑Martial, presided over by the commanding officer who had previously punished him, …

CHHOTU SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

1987 INSC 262Appeal(s) allowed

Chhotu Singh, holder of a C.L. III country liquor licence in Village Sawli, applied to shift his shop to Village Narsi Chaurasta due to low demand. The District Collector, after making enquiries as per the Government circular dated 27 April 1984, recommended the shift, and the State Government …

BALDEV KRISHNA SAHIversusSHIPPING CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

1987 INSC 253Dismissed

The petitioner, a former joint manager of a government undertaking, was allotted a company flat during his service and was allowed to stay for six months after retirement on humanitarian grounds. He failed to vacate, prompting the Shipping Corporation of India to lodge a complaint under s.630 of the …

GULAB MEHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1987 INSC 249Appeal(s) allowed

Gulab Mehra, an under‑trial prisoner, was served with a detention order under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act while already in jail. He challenged the order on grounds that the detention grounds were vague, the detaining authority had not applied its mind, and that a preventive detention …

D. SATYANARAYANAversusP. JAGADISH

1987 INSC 250Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a sub‑tenant, was originally paying rent to the respondent, a tenant, but after receiving an eviction notice from the head lessor (title paramount) he attorned to the head lessor and began paying rent to him, ceasing payments to the respondent. The respondent filed eviction …

O.P. GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 238Appeal(s) allowed

O.P. Gupta, an Assistant Engineer in the Central Public Works Department, was suspended in 1959 pending a departmental enquiry that lingered for over a decade. He was reinstated in 1970 but the enquiry continued, leading to his compulsory retirement in 1972. The Delhi High Court quashed the …

JAI PRAKASH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1987 INSC 229Dismissed

The petitioners, life convicts for murder, were released on bail pending appeal and were granted a remission of 19 months and 12 days while on bail. The State, relying on a Governor's order and a subsequent letter, excluded prisoners on bail or with suspended sentences from remission under paragraph …

HAVA SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

1987 INSC 223Case Allowed

Haya Singh, aged about 18, was convicted of murder under sections 302/34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Because he was under 21, he was sent to a Borstal Institution under the Punjab Borstal Act, 1926. After turning 21 he was transferred to a district jail and continued to serve his …

CALCUTTA YOUTH FRONT & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

1987 INSC 216Dismissed

The Calcutta Youth Front and others challenged the Calcutta Municipal Corporation's grant of a 30‑year licence to Happy Homes & Hotels Pvt. Ltd. for the sub‑soil of Satyanarayan Park to construct an underground market and parking facility, arguing that the corporation lacked authority to alienate …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusNARSA REDDY

1987 INSC 211Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka charged Narsa Reddy and three others with murder and related offences. During the trial, two police officers were added as accused for disposing of the body, but they claimed that prosecution required prior sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC. The Sessions Judge rejected …

HARDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1987 INSC 210Case Allowed

Hardeep Singh, a constable on probation in the Haryana Police, was dismissed without a charge sheet or hearing after participating in a peaceful union protest. He challenged the order, arguing it was a punitive dismissal that required compliance with Article 311(2) of the Constitution and Rule …

PRATAPSINHJI N. DESAIversusDEPUTY CHARITY COMMISSIONER, GUJARAT & ORS.

1987 INSC 206Dismissed

The appellant, a former ruler of Patadi, claimed that two temples he managed were private family property, not public trusts. The Deputy Charity Commissioner, under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, deemed them public temples and public religious trusts, a finding upheld by the Charity …

SMT. POONAM LATAversusM.L. WADHAWAN & ANR.

1987 INSC 202Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a writ petition challenging the detention of Shital Kumar under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA). The petition raised three main points: (i) whether the period of parole granted earlier …

U.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARDversusMODI DISTILLERY & ORS.

1987 INSC 199Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (the Board) refused consent to Modi Distillery's discharge of trade effluents into the Kali River because its application was incomplete and the unit lacked proper treatment facilities. After repeated notices, the Board lodged a complaint under section 44 of …

MOHINUDDIN @ MOIN MASTERversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEED & ORS.

1987 INSC 187Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was detained under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 and filed two representations – one to the Chief Minister and another to the Advisory Board – seeking release. While the Advisory Board considered the second representation promptly, the Chief Minister’s office delayed …

N.C. DALWADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1987 INSC 184Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an officer who was officiating as Superintending Engineer in the Gujarat Service of Engineers, was ordered to retire compulsorily under the first proviso of Rule 161(1)(a) of the Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1959, upon attaining the age of 55. He challenged the order, arguing that …

PALA SINGH (DECEASED) BY LRS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 182Dismissed

Pala Singh, a displaced person, was allotted land under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. In 1961 surplus lands were transferred to the Punjab Government under a package‑deal arrangement. In 1962 the Managing Officer allowed Singh to purchase excess land and he paid …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusK. GOPALAKRISHNA SHENOY & ANR.

1987 INSC 167Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka sought to recover motor vehicle tax arrears for a 12‑ton lorry that had been sold by the first respondent to the second respondent without reporting the transfer. Both respondents argued they were not liable: the first because he had sold the vehicle, the second because the …

BEOPAR SAHAYAK (P) LTD. & ORS.versusVISHWA NATH & ORS.

1987 INSC 168Dismissed

The appellant, Beopar Sahayak Ltd., sought possession of leased premises, but the respondents obtained a release order under Section 21 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent & Eviction) Act, 1972, issued by a Prescribed Authority who was an Executive Magistrate. The appellant …

P.D. AGGARWAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1987 INSC 163Dismissed

The case concerned Assistant Engineers in Uttar Pradesh who had been substantively appointed to temporary posts before the 1969 and 1971 amendments of the U.P. Service of Engineers Rules. They claimed that the amendments, which made seniority dependent on appointment to substantive vacancies, …

U.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, LUCKNOWversusP.L. KELKAR, ETC. ETC.

1987 INSC 157Dismissed

The respondent, P.L. Kelkar, was directly recruited by the U.P. State Electricity Board as an Assistant Engineer in 1964 and was granted nine advance increments because of his prior experience, whereas other engineers received only two. The Board framed the Service of Engineers (Integration and …

RAI BAHADUR SETH SHREERAM DURGAPRASADversusDIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT

1987 INSC 144Dismissed

The partnership firm of Rai Bahadur Seth Shreeram Durgaprasad exported manganese ore between 1952 and 1958 but failed to repatriate the full foreign‑exchange proceeds, contravening Section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. The Director of Enforcement initiated adjudication …

E. S. REDDIversusCHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF A.P. & ANR.

1987 INSC 145Dismissed

The case concerned the suspension of IAS officer E.S. Reddi under the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services Rules, which he challenged on the ground of arbitrariness under Article 14 of the Constitution, alleging that similarly situated officers were merely transferred. The Division Bench of the Andhra …

PUSHPADEVI M. JATIAversusM.L. WADHAVAN, ADDL. SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 141Dismissed

Mohanlal Jatia was detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) on the basis of documents seized from his brother‑in‑law and statements recorded by R.C. Singh of the Enforcement Directorate. His wife, Pushpadevi Jatia, challenged the …

AJMER SINGH ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 142Dismissed

The appellants, convicted by a General Court‑Martial under the Army Act, sought the benefit of Section 428 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) which allows set‑off of detention time during investigation, inquiry or trial against the term of imprisonment. The Supreme Court examined whether the CrPC …

KAILASH KAURversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1987 INSC 132Dismissed

Amandeep Kaur was brutally murdered by being doused with kerosene and set alight by her mother-in‑law, Kailash Kaur, and sister‑in‑law Mahinder Kaur, allegedly to extract additional dowry. The deceased’s dying declaration, a letter to her father detailing dowry harassment, and medical and police …

KHARGRAM PANCHAYAT SAMITY & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

1987 INSC 129Appeal(s) allowed

The Khargram Panchayat Samiti, empowered under section 117 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 to grant licences for cattle fairs, resolved to schedule two rival fairs on different days to prevent law‑and‑order problems. The High Court quashed this resolution, holding that the Samiti's power was …

SMT. POONAM LATAversusM.L. WADHAWAN & ORS.

1987 INSC 124Dismissed

The petitioner, Poonam Lata, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking habeas corpus for her husband Shital Kumar, who had been detained under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) on 28‑Feb‑1986. After a rejected …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

1987 INSC 116Dismissed

Vinod Kumar, a college student, was convicted for leading a pre‑planned triple murder in 1973 and sentenced to life imprisonment under IPC s.302 read with s.149. He appealed, the High Court affirmed the conviction, and later obtained special leave to raise a belated claim that he was a child (under …

STATE OF HARYANAversusUTTAM ALIAS CHEAKU

1987 INSC 117Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana prosecuted Uttam alias Cheaku and three others for a highway robbery on the Delhi‑Jaipur road, during which the victims Om Parkash and his wife Jai Rani were assaulted, robbed and injured. The trial court, after detailed consideration of victim testimony and identification …

MRS. Y. THECLAMMAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 112Dismissed

The petitioners, a teacher and vice‑principal of a Delhi aided school run by a linguistic minority society, were suspended by the school management on charges of fund diversion without obtaining prior approval of the Director of Education as required by section 8(4) of the Delhi School Education …

JOINT DIRECTOR OF MINES SAFETYversusTANDUR & NAYANDGI STONE QUARRIES (P) LTD.

1987 INSC 97Appeal(s) allowed

The Joint Director of Mines Safety issued a notice under Sections 17 and 22 of the Mines Act, 1952, requiring Tandur & Nayandgj Stone Quarries (P) Ltd. to appoint a qualified manager after an inspection revealed that the open‑cast mine employed more than 50 persons in a day. The quarry filed a writ …

BEGUM SUBANU ALIAS SAIRA BANU & ANR.versusA.M. ABDUL GAFOOR

1987 INSC 95Appeal(s) allowed

Be​gum Subanu, a Muslim wife, filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance for herself and her minor daughter after her husband, Abdul Gafoor, married a second wife. The lower courts dismissed her claim, holding that the husband's offer to take her back and …

STATE OF ORISSAversusBHAGABAN BARIK

1987 INSC 93Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa appealed the acquittal of Bhagaban Barik, who had struck a man with a lathi on the head, causing death. Barik claimed he acted in private defence of his property, believing the deceased to be a thief, and invoked section 79 of the IPC as a defence of mistake of fact. The Supreme …

TOTA SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1987 INSC 91Appeal(s) allowed

Four men were tried for murder and attempt to cause hurt under Sections 302, 34 and 323, 34 of the IPC. The Sessions Court acquitted them, finding the delay in reporting, lack of motive, and the unreliability of two eyewitnesses (PW2 and PW6) sufficient to raise doubt. The Punjab and Haryana High …

ASHARFI LAL & SONSversusSTATE OF U.P.

1987 INSC 88Dismissed

Asharfi Lal and Babu, real brothers, along with their sons, entered the house of Smt. Bulakan on the night of 13-14 August 1984 to settle a property dispute. They brutally murdered her two daughters, Kumari Sumati (14) and Kumari Kalkanta (20), using a gandasa and a banka, and attempted to kill Smt. …

B.P. KHEMKA PVT. LID.versusBIRENDRA KUMAR BHOWMICK & ANR.

1987 INSC 72Permission to File SLP/Appeal-allowed and matter dismissed(including all pending IAs)

The tenant, B.P. Khemka Pvt. Ltd., was sued for eviction on the ground of rent default. While the suit was pending, the West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Ordinance 1967 introduced Section 17(2A) allowing tenants in default to pay arrears in instalments, and Section 5 gave it retrospective …

DIPAK KUMAR BISWASversusDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION & ORS.

1987 INSC 73Appeal(s) allowed

Dipak Kumar Biswas, a permanent government auditor, resigned to take up a lecturer post in a private aided college in Meghalaya, relying on the principal's assurance that the Director of Public Instruction's approval was a formality. After five months his appointment was terminated because the …

RAM ADHAR SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusBANSI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

1987 INSC 74Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a suit under Section 202 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 for possession of land on payment of a mortgage money. The mortgage in question was a usufructuary mortgage of an occupancy holding executed in 1869 when the Recovery of Rents (Bengal) …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusBRAHMA DATT SHARMA AND ANR.

1987 INSC 64Appeal(s) allowed

Brahma Datt Sharma, an executive engineer of Uttar Pradesh, was dismissed in 1972 after a departmental inquiry and later had the dismissal order quashed by the High Court in 1984 because he was not given a chance to see the recommendation on the quantum of punishment. While he was retired, the State …

BISWANATH GHOSHversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

1987 INSC 46Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, convicted under IPC sections 148, 302 and 149, appealed to the Calcutta High Court. The High Court admitted the appeal but, without receiving the Sessions Court records or fixing a hearing date, acquitted the respondents based on an alleged concession by the public prosecutor. The …

MAHABIR PRASAD SANTUKA & ORS.versusCOLLECTOR, CUTTACK & ORS.

1987 INSC 43Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants' land was acquired for an Aviation Research Centre and the Collector initially awarded Rs 2,000 per acre as compensation. The Subordinate Judge enhanced it to Rs 15,000 per acre, but the Orissa High Court reduced the amount to Rs 7,500 per acre, reasoning that the State’s concessional …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusWING COMMANDER R.R. HINGORANI (RETD.)

1987 INSC 29Appeal(s) allowed

Wing Commander R.R. Hingorani, a retired Air Force officer, was allotted a government flat in 1968. After his transfer in 1970 he failed to inform the Directorate of Estates and continued to occupy the flat for nearly five years beyond the two‑month concessional period, after which the allotment was …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusKRISHNA ALIAS RAJU

1987 INSC 19Appeal(s) allowed

Krishna alias Raju, a bus driver, was convicted of rash and negligent driving under IPC sections 279, 337, 304-A and Motor Vehicles Act sections 89(a) and 89(b) after his bus struck a bullock cart, causing one death and one injury. The magistrate imposed only nominal fines totaling Rs.345. The State …

BALBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1987 INSC 18Appeal(s) allowed

Balbir Singh, a former army officer and school lecturer, was charged under Section 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 for allegedly inciting a crowd of about 1,500 people during a rail protest in Siwah. The prosecution's case rested solely on the testimony of two …

T.R. KAPUR & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1986 INSC 270Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, diploma‑holding engineers appointed in the erstwhile Punjab Service, were promoted to Sub‑Divisional Officer in Class II and were eligible for promotion to Executive Engineer in Class I under the unamended Rule 6(b) of the Punjab Service of Engineers (Class I) Rules, 1964. The …

ASHOK GULATI & ORS.versusB.S. JAIN & ORS.

1986 INSC 271Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, Ashok Gulati and others, were promoted as Executive Engineers on an ad‑hoc basis by the Haryana Government in 1978, while respondents B.S. Jain and S.L. Gupta, who had earlier served as Temporary Engineers on an ad‑hoc basis, claimed that their service should count for seniority and …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusGOWTHU RANGHUNAYAKULU AND ORS.

1986 INSC 244Disposed off

The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted ten accused for forming an unlawful assembly and murdering a man returning from a canal, with several eye‑witnesses (PW‑1, 3, 4, 6, 7) testifying to the gruesome attack. The Sessions Court convicted the accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 302, imposing …

STATE OF KERALAversusA. LAKSHMIKUTTY & ORS.

1986 INSC 229Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala High Court had recommended a panel of five advocates for direct recruitment as District Judges and the Governor, acting on the Council of Ministers' advice, initially decided to appoint them but later withdrew the decision citing lack of representation of certain communities. The High …

STATE OF ASSAMversusMUHIM BARKATAKI & ANR

1986 INSC 214Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Assam charged Muhim Barkataki and Oulu Dutta with murder and arson, alleging they set fire to the deceased Nagen Dey's shop and body after pouring kerosene. The prosecution relied on eye‑witnesses who saw the fire, a dying declaration made by the victim while in severe pain, and …

HARI CHAND @ HARISH CHANDRAversusSHRI DAULAT RAM

1986 INSC 213Dismissed

Hari Chand (plaintiff) sued Daulat Ram (defendant) for recovery of possession of a disputed parcel of land, alleging ownership based on a registered sale deed and claiming the defendant had encroached by constructing a mud wall and khaprail in May 1961. The defendant counter‑claimed ownership by …

A.K ROY & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1986 INSC 205Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, A.K. Roy and others, were charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 after a Food Inspector from Faridkot filed a complaint alleging adulteration of noodles. The Inspector claimed authority to prosecute based on a delegation of power from the State Government to the …

PARVATI & ORS.versusFATEHSINHRAO PRATAPSINHRAO GAEKWAD

1986 INSC 193Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a 1958 government notification under section 88(1)(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, which reserved lands within Baroda municipality for non‑agricultural/industrial use, rendered the Act's provisions inapplicable retrospectively, thereby …

BASAVANTAPPAversusGANGADHAR NARAYAN DHARWADKAR & ANR.

1986 INSC 186Dismissed

The auction of a judgment-debtor's property was held on 26 July 1985 and the highest bid was accepted. The judgment-debtor deposited the bid amount on 29 August 1985 and filed an application under Order XXI Rule 90 to set aside the sale, followed by another application under Rule 89 on 6 September …

PRABHU DAYAL SESMAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

1986 INSC 180Dismissed

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission advertised a direct recruitment exam for the Rajasthan Administrative Service in 1983, stipulating that candidates must be at least 21 years old on 1 January 1984 and must not have attained the age of 28 on that same day. The appellant, born on 2 January 1956, …

RAJINDER KAURversusPUNJAB STATE & ANR.

1986 INSC 164Appeal(s) allowed

Rajinder Kaur, a temporary lady constable, was discharged under Rule 12.21 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 on the ground that she was "unlikely to prove an efficient police officer." She contended that the order was a disguise for dismissal on misconduct, based on a secret enquiry conducted without …

VASUDEO VISHWANATH SARAFversusNEW EDUCATION INSTITUTE & ORS.

1986 INSC 159Appeal(s) allowed

Vasudeo Vishwanath Saraf, a former principal of a school run by New Education Institute, challenged multiple departmental enquiries and termination orders that were passed without hearing or reasons. The High Court repeatedly dismissed his writ petitions with laconic orders such as "rejected" and …

ARUN S/O MAHADEORAO DAMKAversusADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE & ANR.

1986 INSC 114Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, a police inspector with an exemplary service record, was reverted to the rank of sub‑inspector on 4 January 1985, with a note that the reversion would not affect future promotion. He claimed the reversion was punitive and violative of Article 311(2) of the Constitution and filed a …

CHAGANTI SATYANARAYAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1986 INSC 116Dismissed

The appellants were arrested following a deadly riot and were remanded to judicial custody on July 20, 1985, with successive extensions until October 18, 1985. A charge‑sheet was filed on October 17, the 90th day of remand, and the magistrate granted bail, holding that the 90‑day limit in proviso …

JARNAIL SINGH & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

1986 INSC 110Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were appointed as ad‑hoc Surveyors in Punjab with a clause allowing termination at any time without notice. After a 1980 circular promised regularisation, their services were terminated on 31‑Jan‑1981 on the ground that the posts were no longer required. They challenged the …

DR. H.P. HAJELAversusN. S. VERMA & ORS.

1986 INSC 106Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior lecturer and Head of Department at D.A.V. College, Kanpur, was granted extraordinary leave without pay to serve on deputation at the University of Aden, with a guarantee that his lien and seniority would be preserved. Upon his return, the acting Head refused to hand over …

RAM CHANDERversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 107Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Chander, a Grade B shunter, was removed from railway service for assaulting his superior. An ex parte enquiry found him guilty, and the General Manager imposed removal. The appellant appealed to the Railway Board under Rule 18(ii) of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968, but …

SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS & ORS.versusK.S. MAHALINGAM

1986 INSC 90Appeal(s) allowed

K.S. Mahalingam, a customs examiner, was charged with misconduct and dismissed after an inquiry. He appealed, and the Madras High Court Single Judge quashed the dismissal, holding that no second show‑cause notice was given before the penalty and that the inquiry report was not supplied. The Division …

ROJASARA RAMJIBHAI DAHYABHAIversusJANI NAROTTAMDAS LALLUBHAI (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.

1986 INSC 70Dismissed

The appellant, an occupant of two plots of land, had earlier contracted to purchase the land from the former Girasdar, whose agreement required the Girasdar to obtain permission to convert the agricultural land into a village site before a sale deed could be executed. The appellant later entered …

G.K. DUDANI & ORS. ETC.versusS.D. SHARMA & ORS.

1986 INSC 64Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the inter‑se seniority between direct‑recruits and promotees in the Gujarat Civil Service (Deputy Collectors) after the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960. Direct recruits argued that promotees appointed to ex‑cadre and temporary posts between 1960‑62 were not "regularly appointed" …

VRAJLAL MANILAL AND CO. AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER

1986 INSC 58Dismissed

The appellants, a bidi manufacturing partnership and dealers in tendu leaves, challenged the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1968 and the 1971 amendment which re‑classified tendu leaves as non‑raw material and taxed them at a higher rate. They alleged violations of Articles 14, …

INDRAVADAN SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

1986 INSC 47Appeal(s) allowed

Indravadan, a Civil Judge (Senior Division) was eligible for promotion to Assistant Judge. His name appeared on the 1982‑83 select list but the list lapsed on 30 April 1983; having turned 48, he was struck off under Rule 6(4)(i) and 6(4)(iii)(a) of the Gujarat Judicial Service Recruitment (Amended) …

OM PRAKASH SHUKLAversusAKHILESH KUMAR SHUKLA & ORS.

1986 INSC 43Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the validity of a competitive examination held in 1981 for recruitment to Grade III ministerial staff of the Subordinate Civil Courts in Kanpur. The petitioner argued that the examination, conducted under the 1950 Rules, was unauthorised because the 1969 Amending Rules and the …

OM PRAKASHversusBHAGWAN DAS

1986 INSC 32Appeal(s) allowed

In Om Prakash v. Bhagwan Das, the landlord (appellant) sought eviction of the tenant under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, claiming a bona‑fide need for the premises and offering the tenant a reasonably suitable alternative …

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusCALCUTTA HARDWARE STORES AND ORS.

1986 INSC 21Appeal(s) allowed

The State seized about 600 metric tonnes of tin plates worth Rs.60 lakh from Calcutta Hardware Stores alleging violations of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the West Bengal Declaration of Stocks and Prices of Essential Commodities Order, 1977, and also invoked sections 1208 and 420 of the …

SHIVAJI ATMAJI & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1986 INSC 18Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the dismissal of two police officers, Shivaji Atmaji Sawant and Namdeo Jairam Velankar, who were terminated under sections 25(1) and 25(2) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, invoking clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution. The appellants …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusARUN KUMAR ROY

1986 INSC 7Appeal(s) allowed

Arun Kumar Roy was appointed as a temporary Stores Officer in the Zoological Survey of India on 30 July 1975, with a two‑year probation that was later extended by one year. On 27 July 1978 he was terminated during the extended probation, the termination order stating that he was entitled to one …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusDEVILAL

1985 INSC 258Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh divided the Manasa block into twenty constituencies for the Janapada Panchayat election and, after Gram Panchayat elections were completed, issued a notification on 25 November 1970 to re‑redistribute those constituencies. Devi Lal, a Gram Sabha Sarpanch, challenged the …

BALBIR SINGH DELHI ADMN. DELHIversusD.N. KADIAN, M.M. DELHI & ANR.

1985 INSC 246Disposed off

A complaint was lodged by a Special Railway Magistrate against two Delhi Police officers, Balbir Singh (Sub‑Inspector) and Ram Shankar (Constable), alleging that they tampered with search memos by adding a signature after the documents were in the court's custody. The issue before the Supreme Court …

UNION OF INDIA ETC.versusG.N. TIWARI, K.L JAIN & ORS.

1985 INSC 241Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed against High Court orders that granted seniority benefits to several former State Civil Service officers who had been temporarily appointed as Collectors under Rule 9 of the IAS Cadre Rules, 1954. The respondents argued that their continuous officiation in a senior post …

EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 238Disposed off

The petitioners, Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. and others, challenged two notices: one issued by the Engineer Officer, Land & Development Office, for re-entry upon forfeiture of lease, and another by the Zonal Engineer (Building), Municipal Corporation of Delhi, for demolition of the Express …

DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFLCER. & ANRversusG.V. SUDHAKAR RAO & ORS.,

1985 INSC 233Appeal(s) allowed

The Forest Range Officer seized teak timber worth Rs.1,71,000 from G.V. Sudhakar Rao and produced it before the Divisional Forest Officer, the Authorized Officer under s.44(2A) of the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967, seeking confiscation. While confiscation proceedings were pending, a criminal …

GOLLALESHWAR DEV AND ORS.versusGANGAWWA KDM SHANTAYYA MATH & ORS.

1985 INSC 231Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned an ancient temple registered as a public trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. After trustees terminated the services of two licensees who refused to vacate temple premises, the trustees filed suits for declaration of title and possession. Earlier suits were dismissed for …

STATE DELHI (ADMINISTRATION)versusLAXMAN KUMAR & ORS.

1985 INSC 202Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the death of Sudha, who was found burnt in a Delhi flat; the prosecution alleged that her mother‑in‑law Shakuntala and husband Laxman Kumar deliberately set her on fire to avoid dowry demands, while the defence claimed an accidental fire from a kerosene stove. The trial court …

HIRACHAND KOTHARI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

1985 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant entered into a 1951 deed of exchange with the State of Rajasthan for a plot swap, but the State failed to deliver the exchanged plot. The appellant sued for possession and compensation; interrogatories revealed the exchanged plot had been transferred to a third party and his original …

JASWANT SINGH & ANRversusTHE CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, NEW DELHI

1985 INSC 125Dismissed

Two brothers sold a half‑interest in their ice factory to Saghir Ahmed, who later became an evacuee. After a decree for the balance of consideration, Ahmed's properties were attached and sold in execution; Jaswant Singh, a decree‑holder, purchased them. The Custodian of Evacuee Property sought to …

STATE OF BIHARversusBANSHI RAM MODI & ORS.

1985 INSC 126Disposed off

The State of Bihar granted a mining lease in 1966 for mica on 80 acres of reserved forest. During mining, the lessee discovered felspar and quartz and, in 1983, the parties executed a Deed of Incorporation to include these minerals in the existing lease. The Divisional Forest Officer barred the …

K.M. CHIKKAPUTTASWAMY ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1985 INSC 100Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants operated stage‑carriage services on inter‑State routes between Mysore (now Karnataka) and Andhra Pradesh and were exempted from motor‑vehicle tax by a notification dated 27 March 1963 issued under Section 9(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963. After the Mysore …

KAPOOR CHAND MAGANLAL CHANDERIAversusDELHI STATE (ADMINISTRATION)

1985 INSC 91Case Allowed

Kapoor Chand, a British citizen of Indian origin, entered India with a car under the Carnet de Passage convention and later sought an import licence, altering an affidavit by changing "for three years" to "permanently". He was prosecuted under IPC s.420 read with s.511 (cheating) and related forgery …

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusSWAIKA PROPERTIES & ANR.

1985 INSC 77Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 authorized the acquisition of land in Jaipur for a public development scheme. A notice under s.52(2) was served on the respondents at their Calcutta office, and the land was later vested in the State of Rajasthan by a notification under s.52(1). The …

ARUN KUMAR CHATTERJEEversusSOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY & ORS.

1985 INSC 47Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a clerk transferred at his own request from the North-Eastern Railway to the South-Eastern Railway in 1958, was placed below temporary staff in the seniority list of the Sealdah Division, contrary to Rule 312 of the Railway Establishment Manual. He made representations and later filed …

RAMANATHANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.

1985 INSC 39Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Government, invoking powers under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and a central notification (G.S.R. 800, 1978), issued the Tamil Nadu Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1982, which completely banned the transport of paddy from certain districts. Traders challenged the order, …

AYYASWAMI GOUNDER AND ORS.versusMUNNUSWAMY GOUNDER AND ORS.

1984 INSC 176Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a 1927 partition of jointly owned agricultural land where a common well (W2) and its channel were retained for joint use. The appellants, owners of an exclusive well (W1) purchased in 1928, irrigated their allotted plots by connecting a small channel from W1 to the common channel …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSUNJL KUMAR GHOSH

1984 INSC 149

The petitioner, a passenger, fell from a bogie that was being shunted at a railway station and sustained a hand injury. The Railway Administration argued that the injury was not the result of an "accident to the train" as contemplated by Section 82A of the Indian Railways Act, 1890. The High Court …

PUNJAB UNIVERSITY CHANDIGARHversusDEVJANI CHAKRABARTI & OTHERS

1984 INSC 109Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab University had initially recognised the 12th standard examination of the 10+2+3 system as equivalent to its pre‑University exams, but later altered this policy in April and May 1980, stating that only examinations conducted by recognised boards would be deemed equivalent. A group of …

PUNJAB UNIVERSITYversusSUBASH CHANDER AND ANR.

1984 INSC 110Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned Subash Chander, who entered the M.B.B.S. programme of Punjab University in 1965 under Regulation 25 which allowed grace marks up to 1% of the total aggregate. In 1970 the University amended the rule, adding an exception that for M.B.B.S. examinations grace marks could be given …

L.D. JAIKWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

1984 INSC 111Dismissed

Senior advocate L.D. Jaikwal, after being asked to appear in proper court attire before a Special Judge, left the courtroom and later submitted a written application using scurrilous language, calling the judge a "corrupt judge" and "contaminating the seat of justice" and forwarding copies to …

ANANDILAL & ANRversusRAM NARAIN & ORS.

1984 INSC 108Dismissed

Anandilal and others, the original decree‑holders, had obtained a decree against the respondents which was affirmed by the High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the High Court stayed execution of the decree under Order XLI, r.5 of the CPC, but only the sale of the attached properties was …

ANANT KIBE & ORS.versusPURUSHOTTAM RAO & ORS

1984 INSC 83Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a family dispute over a 15.62‑acre inam garden granted in 1837, which had become part of the joint Hindu family estate. After the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 came into force, the inam holder became a bhumiswami under s.158(1)(b), and the question arose whether this …

HARI SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1984 INSC 78Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 8 January 1980 to acquire 60 plots of land for a market yard, simultaneously exempting the proceedings from Section 5‑A by an order under Section 17(4). A subsequent notification under Section 6 …

BIHARI CHOWDHARY & ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1984 INSC 67Dismissed

Bihari Chowdhary and another filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of immovable property against the State of Bihar. Before filing, they served a notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code on 18‑Feb‑1969 but instituted the suit on 2‑Apr‑1969, i.e., before the two‑month …

CHINGLEPUT BOTTLERSversusMAJESTIC BOTTLING COMPANY

1984 INSC 59Disposed off

The Madras High Court, on a petition under Art. 226, quashed the Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise’s order rejecting two licence applications and, by mandamus, directed the Commissioner to grant a licence to Majestic Bottling Company despite the requirement of prior State Government approval …

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, DAVANGEREversusP. VEERABHADARAPPA ETC. ETC .

1984 INSC 9Appeal(s) allowed

The State Government acquired several thousand acres of agricultural land in 1971-72 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) awarded compensation using a multiplier of fifteen years' purchase of net annual profits, which the High Court upheld. The …

SILIGURI MUNICIPALITY & OTHERSversusAMALENDU DAS & OTHERS

1984 INSC 7Appeal(s) allowed

The Siliguri Municipality sought to levy a graduated consolidated rate on the annual value of its holdings under the Bengal Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1980. The Calcutta High Court, invoking its jurisdiction under Article 226, issued an interlocutory order staying the municipality's recovery of the …

VINEET KUMARversusMANGAL SAIN WADHERE

1984 INSC 6Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed a suit for eviction, arrears of rent and damages against the tenant, alleging that the premises were not covered by the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 because the building was less than ten years old at the time of filing. The …

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHERversusDINA NATH

1983 INSC 179Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Dina Nath, defaulted on liquor licence fees and was subjected to revenue recovery proceedings under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, resulting in a proclamation prohibiting the transfer of his half‑share in a residential property and notifying it for auction. He filed a suit …

BISHNU RAM BORAH & ANR.versusPARAG SAIKIA & ORS.

1983 INSC 177Disposed off

The dispute concerned the grant of a liquor licence for Jorhat Country Spirit Shop No. I under the Assam Excise Rules, which give preference to "educated unemployed youth". The Board of Revenue upheld the licence in favour of the appellants, Bishnu Ram Borah and Bipin Chand Borah, rejecting the …

CHANDRIKA JHAversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1983 INSC 164Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a political figure, was appointed Secretary of the first Board of Directors of the Vaishalli District Central Cooperative Bank under Bye‑law 29, which allowed the Registrar to nominate the Board for up to one year at a time. The Board's term was repeatedly extended by directions from …

MOTOR GENERAL TRADERS & ANR. ETC ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. ETC. ETC.

1983 INSC 163Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of clause (b) of Section 32 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, which exempted all buildings constructed on or after 26 August 1957 from the Act's rent‑control provisions. Petitioners argued that after more …

CHARANJI LALversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1983 INSC 161Appeal(s) allowed

A food inspector seized a sample of kutcha khoya from the appellant’s sweet‑meat shop, divided it into three parts and sent one to the public analyst (who found adulteration) and two to the local health authority. The appellant invoked his right under s.13(2) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration …

SOUNDARARAJversusDEVASAHAYAM & ORS.

1983 INSC 159Appeal(s) allowed

Soundararaj sued the respondents for demarcation of his property boundary and a mandatory injunction to remove eaves protruding onto his land. The trial court, after accepting the commissioner’s report, decreed a boundary wall and ordered removal of the eaves. Both the subordinate judge and a Single …

PANDURANG DATTATREYA KHANDEKARversusTHE BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA BOMBAY & ORS.

1983 INSC 152Appeal(s) allowed

P.D. Khandekar and A.N. Agavane were found guilty of professional misconduct by the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India for giving improper legal advice in two matters – a purported marriage and a gift deed – and were suspended for four months and two months respectively. They …

M/S PUNJAB TIN SUPPLY CO.,CHANDIGARH ETC. ETC.versusTHE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT & ORS.

1983 INSC 154Dismissed

The petitioners challenged three notifications issued by the Chief Commissioner of Chandigarh under Section 3 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (as extended to Chandigarh), arguing that the section delegated excessive legislative power, violated Article 14, was ultra‑violet of the …

RAM SARUPversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1983 INSC 144Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Sarup, dismissed from service, filed a suit as an indigent person which was dismissed. He appealed to the Delhi High Court as a pauper under Rule 1 of Order 44, CPC, seeking permission to appeal without paying court fees. The High Court dismissed the application by a one‑word order and also …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusSMT. SHANTI DEVI ETC. ETC.

1983 INSC 140Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned lands acquired for the Beas Dam Project that were notified in 1962‑63 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The compensation was fixed using the capitalisation method, multiplying the net annual income of the land by a "years' purchase" multiplier. The Land Acquisition Officer and …

MOHD. YUNUSversusMOHD. MUSTAQIM & ORS .

1983 INSC 139Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the sale of a property executed against a judgment-debtor. The sale was ordered by a Subordinate Judge after the surety of the judgment-debtor failed to deposit the required amount and subsequently died. …

ALIJAN MIAN AND ANOTHERversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DHANBAD

1983 INSC 119Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined two writ petitions challenging orders of preventive detention under the National Security Act, 1980 issued against Alijan Mian and Jadunandan Sah, who were already in jail and likely to be released on bail. The detaining authority justified the detention on the ground …

SREENIVASA GENERAL TRADERS & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. ETC.

1983 INSC 114Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966, particularly section 7(6) which bans sale of notified produce outside the market, and section 12(1) which authorises a market fee. The petitioners argued that these …

RAM NARAYAN AGARWAL ETC ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS

1983 INSC 101Case Partly allowed

The petitioners, who had defaulted on Uttar Pradesh sales tax, were subject to arrest and detention under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, as a method of recovering arrears treated as land revenue. They challenged the constitutionality of this process, alleging …

BEGULLA BAPI RAJU ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ETC. ETC.

1983 INSC 102

The Supreme Court examined several Special Leave Petitions challenging the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973. The petitioners argued that a separated minor son should not be treated as a member of the family unit, that land transferred by such sons before the …

JHARIA S/O MANIYAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER

1983 INSC 81Dismissed

The petitioner Jharia was convicted under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and sentenced to life imprisonment, a conviction upheld by the Rajasthan High Court while his co‑accused were acquitted. He applied for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 136, but the petition was dismissed, …

BHARWADA BHOGINBHAI HIRJIBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1983 INSC 70Dismissed

The appellant, a government servant, was convicted by the Sessions Court of rape, outraging modesty and wrongful confinement of two minor girls aged about 10‑12, and the High Court affirmed the convictions for confinement and outraging modesty while reducing the rape conviction to an attempt. He …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusADIMURTHY ALIAS B. MOORTHY

1983 INSC 67Appeal(s) allowed

A supervisor of the Karnataka Electricity Board discovered that the respondent had tampered with the electric meter to avoid recording consumption and lodged a complaint with the police. The trial magistrate acquitted the respondent, holding that the supervisor was not authorized under section 50 of …

HOECHST PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. AND ANOTHER ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

1983 INSC 61Dismissed

The appellants, major pharmaceutical manufacturers, challenged the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 which imposed a 10% surcharge on dealers with a gross turnover exceeding Rs.5 lakh and prohibited those dealers from passing the surcharge on to purchasers. They argued that the provision conflicted with the …

SHIV DUTT RAI FATEH CHAND ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. ETC.

1983 INSC 64Dismissed

The petitioners, dealers under the Central Sales Tax Act, challenged the constitutional validity of sub‑section (2‑A) of section 9 of the Act (as amended in 1976) and the retrospective validation of penalties, alleging excessive delegation of legislative power and violations of Articles 19(1)(f), …

MALWA BUS SERVICE (P) LTD.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS

1983 INSC 50Dismissed

The petitioners, owners of stage‑carriage motor vehicles in Punjab, challenged a 1981 amendment that raised the motor‑vehicle tax to Rs 500 per seat (maximum Rs 35,000) alleging it was expropriatory, violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 301 and 304(b) of the Constitution and was beyond the State’s …