Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
151 judgments · newest first · showing 1–151
Petitioner Chandravir filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 09-10-2024 and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. He submitted that the police investigation had concluded, exonerating him, and the police report had been forwarded to the court. The State, …
The petitioners, Smt Momin and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel Syed Riyaz Askari and Advocate Mohammad Hassam, prayed for leave to not press the petition. The respondents, represented …
Manvendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20‑09‑2021 (Case Crime No. 434 of 2021) and a mandamus to restrain his arrest under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, informed …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the FIR dated 05‑07‑2026 in Crime No. 200, filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 74, 91 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and also sought a mandamus directing the …
The petitioner, Fool Chandra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, K.C. Mishra, requested leave to not press the petition, effectively seeking to withdraw it. The Court granted the leave sought by the petitioner. …
The physical record of Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22206 of 2026 was misplaced, and a digitized copy was placed before the Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition without pressing it on merits, seeking liberty to pursue any other appropriate …
Arvind Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 26‑01‑2026 under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, and requested that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits of the petition but …
Petitioner Pankaj Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11 September 2026 under Section 74 of the B.N.S., 2023, and requested that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State …
Vinod Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 9‑August‑2026 under Sections 329(3), 221 and 132 of the B.N.S. 2023 and a direction that he not be arrested. He also prayed that, before any arrest, the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in …
The petitioner sought leave to have the writ petition dismissed as infructuous. The State, as respondent, did not contest this request. The Court granted the leave and dismissed the petition as infructuous. No substantive factual or legal issues were examined. The order was pronounced on October 1, …
The petitioners, Meena Sharma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, their counsel, Anurak Upadhyay, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as …
Petitioners Sudha Sharma alias Sudha Thakur and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Anurag Upadhyay, moved the court for leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 07.08.2026 that alleged offences under various sections of the IPC, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and the Scheduled Castes/Tribes Act. They made an innocuous prayer that the police, before making any arrests, should follow the Supreme Court …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 8 September 2026 registered under sections of the B.N.S. Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, and asked that they not be arrested. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the Supreme …
The petitioner, Aftab Alam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 16 September 2026 registered under Sections 76 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, before any arrest, the …
Petitioners Harnarayan and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 9 September 2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(3), 352 and 85 of the B.N.S., 2023, and to obtain a direction that they not be arrested. The petitioners also prayed that, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 28.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 110 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the …
Petitioner Yesh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 08.08.2026 under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and a mandamus restraining his arrest. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down by the …
Petitioner Asher Bhasker filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 23.07.2019 under Section 294 IPC and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. He also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273. …
Ganesh Rajbhar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 26‑06‑2026 and a direction that the police not arrest them under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 118(1) of the B.N.S. The petitioners also prayed that, before any arrest, the police …
Alok Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashal of an FIR dated 22‑07‑2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petition also requested that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any …
Hardeep Singh and six others filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 15‑09‑2026 and to stay their arrest under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed …
Petitioners Bhagwan Sharan Shau and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the IPC and a mandamus restraining their arrest. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the …
Mahendra and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 18‑09‑2026 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They sought a certiorari to quash the FIR and a mandamus directing the police …
The petitioners Alisher Khan and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR No. 0009 of 2026 (registered on 20.01.2026 under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 105 and 89) and a mandamus directing the second respondent not to arrest them. The learned Additional …
Petitioners Gulrej and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑02‑2026 and a mandamus restraining their arrest, invoking several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court …
Petitioners Kanti Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 29‑April‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled through a compromise deed verified by the Special Chief Judicial …
Petitioner Shivraj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, through counsel, he sought leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting …
Petitioners Rajeev Rai and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 05‑07‑2025 and mandamus to restrain arrest and coercive action under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State counsel informed the Court that the …
The petitioner, Anju Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to complete the investigation of a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 0042 of 2025) under Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act, 2008. The State, through its Additional …
Petitioners Rahil alias Arshan and five others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 02‑09‑2025 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled through a mediation agreement dated 07‑04‑2026, which involved payment of Rs.15 …
Satish Yadav @ Anjney Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of an inquiry. The Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, filed a personal affidavit and the investigating officer filed a compliance affidavit indicating that an inquiry …
Petitioner Priyanshu Pandey, a minor, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.08.2026 and a mandamus restraining his arrest under Sections 316(2), 308(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that the police be directed to follow the Supreme Court’s …
The petitioner, Adbhut Jain, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23018 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the …
Petitioners Radhey Shyam and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23019 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State of Uttar …
Petitioners Nanhi Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 25‑11‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them under several IPC sections. They argued that the investigation was complete and a …
The appeal challenged a conviction under the Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains Dealers (Licensing and Restriction on Hoarding) Order, 1976 for allegedly storing 40 quintals of wheat in a tractor‑trolley. The trial court had interpreted clause 3(2) of the Order to treat storage in a conveyance as "store" and …
Shashi Devi filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that three brothers had raped her on 19 July 2023 and used caste‑related abusive language. The police investigation recorded that the complainant later recanted, stating the allegations were false and made …
Dalip Singh filed a criminal appeal (No. 6111 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction by the State of U.P. The appellant was represented by Senior Advocate Saurabh Chaturvedi. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant indicated that the appellant no longer wished to …
The appellant Sunil Kumar Chauhan appealed against a charge‑sheet dated 20‑01‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 25‑03‑2026 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and related statutes. Both parties asserted that …
The appellant Saurabh Teotia appealed against a charge sheet and cognizance order relating to alleged sexual offences committed in 2017 when the complainant was purportedly 17 years old. The complainant alleged that the appellant lured her with a promise of marriage, established a physical …
The appellant Aman Singh appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Etawah, which had closed his opportunity to cross‑examine PW‑1 in a case involving offences under Sections 366, 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of the SC/ST Act. The trial court observed that PW‑1’s …
The appellant, Aneeta, challenged an order of the trial court dated 30.05.2026 which had treated her application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS, 2023 as a complaint case under Section 223 and failed to register a First Information Report (FIR). The High Court recalled its earlier decision in …
The appellant, Pooza Chaturvedi, was alleged to have entrapped the complainant, Govind Diwakar, in a honey‑trap scheme to extort money, subsequently threatening and assaulting his family members and making casteist remarks. An FIR was lodged by the complainant under various provisions of the SC/ST …
The appellants challenged a summoning order issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case involving alleged offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The FIR listed six accused, but the charge sheet named only three adults, with the remaining …
The appeal challenges a summoning order issued by a Special Court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions, alleging that the complaint of caste-based harassment and outraging modesty is false and unsupported by evidence. The complainant, whose husband is a convicted …
The appellants, Ramashray Yadav and others, appealed against a conviction under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act arising from FIR No. 505 of 2025. They contended that the medical examination was delayed, the injuries were minor, and the FIR was …
The appellants – Darun Pal Singh, Jiledar Singh, Smt. Lajjawati, Prahlad Singh and Ved Pal Singh – filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the first three appellants, and the State was represented by A.G.A. The Court noted that the appeal of the first three …
The appellant Munna Lal filed Criminal Appeal No. 950 of 1988 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the pendency of the appeal, the counsel for the appellant, G.P. Dixit, died, and subsequently the appellant himself also passed away. The court was required to …
The appeal challenges the conviction of Ritesh Maurya under sections 366 and 376 of the IPC arising from an alleged abduction and sexual assault of a girl from Varanasi. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. indicated that she was 18 years old, left home of her own free …
The appellants, Shamshad and another, appealed against a summoning order dated 21 January 2026 issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act in Complaint Case No. 29 of 2025 (Ramchandra vs. Shamshad). The order was based on sections 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) …
The appellants Ramesh Singh and another appealed against a cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑12‑2024 passed by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from FIR No. 319 of 2024. The appeal challenged the existence of an offence under Section 3(2)(va) …
The appellants challenged a summoning order issued by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the complaint was a retaliatory counter‑complaint and that no prima facie case existed. The complainant, a member of the Jatav caste, …
The appellant Bhagwat was accused of raping a nine‑year‑old girl on 5 August 1984; an FIR was lodged the next day and the victim was medically examined, revealing severe genital injuries. The victim, her father, and several eyewitnesses identified Bhagwat, while the medical officer’s report and …
The incident occurred on 14 September 1980 in Manaiya village where the deceased Brij Kishore was fatally assaulted with a katwasa and lathi by the accused Daya Shankar, Onkar Nath, Dev Narain and Hiramani, and the injured witness Girija Shankar also sustained injuries. The trial court convicted …
The appellant Raj Kumar was convicted under IPC sections 399 and 402 and Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly preparing to commit dacoity and possessing illegal firearms. The prosecution's case relied on police testimony and two public witnesses, one of whom was hostile and denied seeing any …
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner appealed a criminal matter against the deceased Raja Ram Jaipuria and S.P. Jaggi. Both respondents had died, as evidenced by death certificates dated 17 January 2015 and 18 December 2013 respectively. The court noted that the record could not be fully …
The appellants, who are pattidars belonging to the Scheduled Caste, filed an appeal against a summoning order issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Basti in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 147, 323, 452, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act. The …
The appellant Mohit was convicted under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC for allegedly abducting and raping a girl who was claimed to be a minor. On appeal, the defence argued that the victim's age was not conclusively proved, relying on a radiological report …
The appellant Rakesh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Agra, for raping an 18‑month‑old girl and for house‑trespass, under Sections 376 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to ten years imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution case relied on eyewitness testimony of the …
The appeal was filed by five accused who had been convicted under IPC sections 147, 308 read with 149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment, with the sentences to run concurrently. Over the years, four of the appellants died, and the fifth, Gulzar Singh, could not be located despite extensive …
The appellant, Indra Pal, filed a criminal appeal (No. 3343 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, a report dated 6 April 2025 from the Senior Superintendent of Central Jail, Agra, confirmed that Indra Pal died while receiving treatment at S.N. Medical College …
The applicant, Ravindra, filed a civil miscellaneous review application (No. 90 of 2026) challenging an order dated 21 April 2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The court examined whether the limited scope of review jurisdiction permitted reopening the matter on its merits. It …
Navi Mohmad, a businessman, challenged the attachment of his movable property (motorcycle, tractor, and a tipper) by the District Magistrate under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that no FIR under Section 3(1) of the Act was ever filed against him, …
The appellant filed an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order granting the insurer the right to recover, alleging misuse of an agricultural tractor for commercial purposes. The Tribunal found a breach of the insurance policy and the appeal was filed after a delay of 3,186 days. The …
The appellant Ateeq Ahmad appealed against a status‑quo order dated 23‑12‑2025 that restrained him from interfering with a disputed property. The original suit filed by Laxki Narayan sought a permanent injunction over portions shown as J, K, E, F on the plaint map, while the appellant claimed …
The appellants, a group of Scheduled Caste members, appealed a trial court order that dismissed their suit seeking to declare a 2023 declaratory deed cancelling a 2015 consortium agreement void and to compel specific performance of that agreement. They argued that the consortium agreement contained …
The revision petition filed by Priyanka Kumari and another against Vishwanth Singh and others was heard before Hon'ble Justice Abdul Shahid. The court examined the office report which indicated that the revision was not maintainable. Relying on the precedent set in Jupiter Chit Fund (Pvt.) Ltd. v. …
The appellant, Rambharosh, filed a possession suit in 2015 and the trial court, relying on an Amin's report, valued the property at Rs. 74,53,349 based on market rates of 2025. The appellant contended that valuation should have been based on the circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate in 2015, …
The dispute concerned a landlord‑tenant relationship where the tenant (respondent No. 1) sought a permanent injunction to stop the owners (appellants) from obstructing access to a medical store and charitable hospital and from taking possession of the premises. The tenant also asserted an …
The plaintiff Amit Kumar Agarwal filed two suits (No. 104 of 2008 and No. 1280 of 2014) concerning the same plots of land, leading to overlapping litigation. He sought a transfer under Section 24 of the CPC so that both suits would be heard by a single court, arguing that the property issues were …
The appellant, Sushil Yadav, filed an appeal seeking enhancement of a motor accident compensation award of Rs 7,87,057 that had already been paid, but did so after a delay of 1,619 days. He claimed that permanent disability and loss of income prevented timely filing and that he could not afford the …
The appellants challenged an order of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) that allowed the plaintiff to withdraw his suit for permanent injunction under Order XXIII Rule Part 1(3) of the CPC, subject to a condition that the plaintiff could file a fresh suit if desired. The defendant consented to the …
The High Court heard a civil revision filed under Section 115 CPC challenging the trial court’s dismissal of an impleadment application against the plaintiff, Smt Poonam Singh, in an original suit concerning a disputed plot of land. The revisionist, M/s Super Cloud Pvt Ltd, argued that it was a …
The appeal filed by M/s Hapur Roller Flour Mills challenged the order of the Additional District Judge which had set aside a prior order dismissing the suit for permanent injunction. The appellant argued that the respondents had altered the partnership without consent, violating Clause 19 of the …
Devendra Kumar Maurya appealed the trial court's rejection of his application for a temporary injunction, seeking to declare a 2013 registered sale deed in favour of Tanvez Alvi void and to assert ownership based on a 1998 agreement and a verbal sale agreement of 2012. The High Court examined …
The appellants sought to amend and substitute the deceased defendant Arun Kumar Swaroop in a civil suit for permanent injunction, filing application 34‑Ka in a miscellaneous proceeding. The trial court found that the plaintiff had repeatedly delayed the case, filed the substitution application …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in respect of the death of Smt. Ramvati, a housewife, in a road accident involving the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. The claim was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for …
The appellant, Smt. Rani, filed a claim petition (No. 182 of 2011) which was decided on 08‑08‑2012 and she received the full award. Subsequently, she filed a First Appeal from Order Defective after a delay of 4,909 days, claiming she was unaware of the filing requirements because she had been …
The appellant, Chandra Pal Singh, appealed a 2009 award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and a 2025 order rejecting his application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC. He had filed the application after a delay of 6,141 days, seeking condonation of the delay and relief from a recovery certificate …
The appellant, Banarsi Lal Sharma, filed a first appeal seeking enhancement of a motor accident compensation award dated 18‑12‑2009. The appeal was filed after a delay of 7 years and 103 days, and the appellant sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The respondent …
Ravindra filed suit seeking specific performance of a registered agreement to sell land dated 03.10.2022, having paid Rs 20 lakh and demanding the balance consideration of Rs 64.22 lakh, alternatively a refund with interest and an injunction against further transfer. The defendant, despite the …
The appellant, Rakesh Kumar Yadav, appealed an ex parte injunction granted under Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC in the original suit No. 135 of 2025 filed by Smt. Sirtaji Devi. He had filed his written statement on 11 April 2025, indicating knowledge of the suit, and later filed a writ petition under …
The appellant, Ujjwal Ambesh, challenged the order of the Second Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (SC/ST Act) which dismissed his complaint after multiple investigations found no offence. The trial court detailed that several notices were served to the appellant at his residence, locked …
The appeal was filed by two surviving appellants, Satya Dev and Rameshwar Dayal, against the conviction and sentencing order of a Special Judge in Mainpuri. Rameshwar Dayal had already been released on probation, while Satya Dev, a first‑time offender, was sentenced to two years and three months. …
The appellant Ugrasen was convicted under sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, not challenging the conviction, but contending that the trial court failed to consider the beneficial provisions of Section 360 of …
Girja Yadav was convicted under IPC sections 324 and 323 and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine, and six months' imprisonment respectively. He appealed only against the sentence, arguing that as a first‑time offender the trial court should have invoked Section 360 of the CrPC …
The appellants, Banarasi and Sadhu Yadav, were convicted by the Additional District Sessions Judge, Varanasi, for offences under sections 324, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment and fines. They appealed, not challenging the conviction itself, but contending that the …
The appellants, who are government officials, were summoned by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act on allegations that they demolished a house allotted under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. The complainant, Ravi Shankar, failed to produce any documentary proof of ownership, photographs, or evidence …
The appeal challenges the order of the Special Judge who convicted Ganesh Prasad Sharma and his sons under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(5A) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly preventing scheduled‑caste residents from using a government hand‑pump, installing a …
The appellants were summoned by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act for alleged assault, caste‑based abuse and criminal intimidation arising from a dispute over payment for a boundary wall construction. The complainant claimed the appellants beat him and used casteist language, but his statements …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking quash of proceedings arising from a charge sheet that included offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. Both parties submitted a compromise deed, …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking quash of proceedings arising from a charge‑sheet filed on 14‑08‑2025. Both parties submitted a compromise deed, which was verified by the Special …
The appellants Bakhat Singh Gurjar and another appealed against the order of the Special Judge who had proceeded with a case under Section 304 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that they had assaulted a 75‑year‑old man who later died of septicemia. The …
The appellant Rajnish Shukla challenged the cognizance order and charge sheet filed under multiple IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alleging that the alleged assault and rape occurred inside a private house and therefore did not satisfy …
The appellant Rameshwar Dayal was convicted of attempting murder under Section 307 IPC for allegedly shooting his wife Vimla Devi. The prosecution’s case rested on the injured wife’s testimony, corroborated by her father, a medical doctor, and the investigating officer, despite the absence of the …
This is Criminal Appeal No. 2298 of 1985 filed by Nathu Singh against Nanhey Singh. The appellant, Nathu Singh, had died on 29 October 2005 and no legal heirs or family members were residing at the address on record. Counsel for both parties were absent, while the State's A.G.A. was present. The …
The revisionist Rajeev Pandey filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Judge’s order dated 2 April 2025 that discharged Harish Chandra Tiwari and Sangeeta Tiwari in a case of alleged assault causing serious neck injury to his uncle, Kade Prasad Tiwari, on 6 August 2022. The FIR, lodged on …
The revisionist, owner of vehicle HR-45C-00547, challenged the magistrate's order refusing release of his seized vehicle, which was taken under the Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act and the U.P. Cow Slaughter Act on allegations of transporting cows. The magistrate dismissed the revisionist's …
The revisionist, Smt. Priti Saxena, sought discharge under Section 245(2) of the Cr.P.C. in a criminal case under Section 494 IPC alleging bigamy. She claimed her prior divorce was finalized on 28‑08‑2015 and that she had informed her new husband, but she failed to produce any divorce decree. The …
Seema Gupta filed a criminal revision under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, which rejected her application to add further accused in a family property dispute that resulted in injuries. The incident on 22‑02‑2025 led to …
Kapil Kumar challenged the charge sheet filed under IPC sections 323, 342, 504 and 506, alleging that the FIR dated 01.01.2022 was false and fabricated due to family enmity. He produced an alibi showing he was on the AMU campus on the alleged date and was appearing for an engineering exam on a later …
The police seized a pickup vehicle owned by Jitendra Bind, finding six bulls, one cow, a pistol and a cartridge, and the District Magistrate ordered the vehicle's confiscation under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and the Arms Act. The revisionist contended that the …
The revisionist, Chhote Lal Maurya, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 12‑08‑2025 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge which rejected his application for a CBI investigation into the murder of his son. The original investigation had exonerated three accused (Vinod Singh, …
The revision petition filed by Shambhu Paswan and others challenged a Sessions Judge's order rejecting their application under Section 251 of the BNSS. The petitioners argued that there was no injury sufficient to constitute an offence under Section 307 IPC and that the order was arbitrary. The …
The revisionist challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO‑related case, alleging that the medical evidence of the victim Gyanendra was incomplete because X‑ray and CT‑scan reports were not on record, and that the investigating officer’s credibility was compromised. The …
The revisionists, Harishchandra and three others, filed a criminal revision under Section 227 of the CrPC challenging the discharge order dated 20‑11‑2024 in a session trial concerning offences under Sections 323 and 308 of the IPC. They contended that the alleged incident occurred on 01‑11‑2022 and …
The revisionist, Akhilesh Kumar, filed a criminal revision under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to register an FIR and investigate offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC relating to a land dispute. The High Court examined whether the revisionist was an aggrieved …
The revisionists, Banti alias Mritunjay and three others, were charge‑sheeted under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the B.N.S. for injuries inflicted on several victims, including head wounds. They filed a discharge application which the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) rejected, …
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by Raman and four others challenging a summoning order under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revisionists argued that they were initially named in the FIR but later found to be falsely implicated, and no charge sheet was …
The case arose from an FIR filed on 3 October 2024 under Sections 376 and 506 IPC against Sub‑Inspector Sachin Kumar and three of his family members for alleged rape and criminal intimidation, predicated on a false promise of marriage. The trial court rejected the discharge applications of all …
The High Court of Allahabad examined a criminal revision filed by Manvir Singh challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hathras, which dismissed his complaint alleging that his daughter Sapna Singh was beaten to death by her husband and in‑laws. The revisionist contended that the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained a criminal revision filed by advocate Moharram (the revisionist) against an order that summoned him as an accused under Section 319 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The revisionist …
The Bareilly Development Authority (BDA) prosecuted Rajendra Prasad under Sections 26(1) and 28(4) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, alleging illegal construction. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding that the prosecution had not produced the original inspection report, the …
Aarti (the revisionist) challenged the trial court's order dated 5 February 2026 that had named her as a conspirator in the murder of her brother-in-law. She argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the incident, that there was no independent eyewitness, no call data records, and no material …
The revisionists were charged under Sections 302 and 120B IPC for the alleged poisoning death of Vijay Chauhan, whose body was found to contain aluminium phosphide. The FIR was lodged seven months after the incident, and the investigation relied heavily on affidavits and a post‑mortem report, while …
The revisionist Vishal Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting his discharge application under Sections 74, 351(2) and 70(1) of the B.N.S. The High Court examined the earlier order dated 30.10.2025, which had directed that any discharge application …
The revisionist Mamta Devi filed a criminal revision under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to recall and further examine the complainant (PW‑1). The trial court had rejected the application, noting that the examination‑in‑chief of the witness was completed on 22‑Nov‑2021 and …
Ravindra Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging the Special Court's order that rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application to introduce a power of attorney and a notice in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He alleged that the cheques were misused by the …
The petitioners, Ramsewak and another, who had stood as sureties for the accused Abhayram (convicted under Sections 147, 302, 149, 120‑B and 201 IPC), filed a criminal revision seeking discharge from their surety bonds after the accused was released on bail on 15‑Oct‑2025 during the pendency of a …
The revisionist, Shabana Parveen, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. seeking registration of an FIR alleging forcible entry, theft and intimidation by the house owner Akil Ahmad and his family. The trial court treated the application as a mere complaint, holding that no new …
Praveen Kumar appealed a criminal revision challenging the order that framed charges against him under IPC sections 376D, 354, 506, POCSO Act sections 5 and 6, and SC/ST Act section 3(ii)(v). The revisionist argued that the victim was a consenting adult, the FIR was filed three days after the …
The revision petition was filed by Vanshika challenging the Special Judge (POCSO) order dated 25‑11‑2024 that dismissed her complaint under Section 203 CrPC. The complaint alleged that on 04‑06‑2024 the accused, identified as Sonu Dhobi and others, had attempted to assault her, threatened her with a …
The petitioners, Harendra Kumar and another, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 24-11-2025 that framed charges against them under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the charges were improper because they had been …
The revisionist, Veer Narayan Rathaur, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed his complaint alleging that his daughter‑in‑law and her relatives had retained jewellery and cash and had assaulted him. He claimed the trial court erred …
The petitioner, Ghanshyam, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Basti dated 24‑11‑2025 which rejected his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code against two government officials alleging misappropriation of funds …
The High Court of Allahabad heard a criminal revision filed by Riyaz and others against a Sessions Court order that had framed charges under Sections 333, 115(2), 110, 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The revisionists contended that the order was not a speaking or reasoned one, that the medical report …
Brijesh Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a rape case (Sec. 376 IPC) filed by the complainant. He argued that the alleged sexual relationship was consensual and that a marriage under Section 125 CrPC had been solemnized, thus …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Sunil Agarwal challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application under Section 245(2) CrPC in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 420, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The revisionist argued that the receipt produced by the …
The revisionist, sister‑in‑law of the deceased, challenged the Sessions Judge’s order convicting her under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide, arguing that the FIR was lodged six months after the incident, that the deceased had committed suicide, and that a compromise had been reached. The …
The revision petition filed by Arpit Rai challenged the order of the Special Judge that summoned him as an accused under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Although his name appeared in the FIR, the investigation exonerated him and no charge‑sheet was filed. The trial court, however, issued …
The appellant Ajay Kumar Mishra filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional District & Sessions Judge’s order that rejected his discharge application and framed charges under Sections 376, 366 and 506 of the IPC. The appellant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting adult, citing …
Hira Singh Pal filed a criminal revision challenging an order that directed the police to register an FIR under section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. The State argued that the petitioner, being a prospective accused, lacked locus standi to file such a revision. The Court examined whether the order …
The revisionist, Shekhdidar Ali, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, which had treated his application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code as a complaint rather than a State case. He argued that the dispute involved 200 grams of …
The revisionist Jatindra Dhiman challenged a discharge order dated 12‑12‑2025 issued by the Civil Judge, Chhata, which had rejected his application for discharge after a charge sheet was filed on 10‑06‑2024 under IPC sections 406 and 420. He contended that the charge sheet was hastily prepared, the …
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a criminal revision filed by Ashok Puri challenging the Sessions Judge’s order rejecting his discharge application in a Section 306 IPC case. Puri argued that the FIR did not disclose any act of abetment under Sections 107 and 108 IPC and that the trial court’s …
Manoj Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which released a seized vehicle (UP-17 AT-6415) to the registered owner, Pashupati Shah, under Section 207 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The revisionist argued that the magistrate lacked …
The revisionists challenged the criminal proceedings initiated under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, arguing that the FIR dated 29‑07‑2023 was lodged by a police inspector rather than an aggrieved person as required by the unamended Section 4 of the Act. …
The revisionist Anil Gangwar filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 11‑09‑2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Amroha, which rejected his discharge application and framed charges under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The …
Rampal Sharma, a senior citizen, purchased land in Meerut in 1982 and alleges that a forged Will dated 1973 and an ex‑parte probate obtained in 1980 were used to create fraudulent sale deeds and powers of attorney to usurp his property. He filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Code of …
The revision petition challenged the Special Judge's order rejecting an application under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code to summon two prospective accused in a POCSO case involving a 17‑year‑old victim. The petitioners argued that the statements of two eyewitnesses had already been …
The appellant Raj Pal Singh appealed against an acquittal of the respondents under Section 435 IPC. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died on 14 March 2021 and his heir expressed no wish to continue the proceedings. The question before the Allahabad High Court was whether the appeal, filed …
The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 147, 323 and 149 and sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment each, to run concurrently. They appealed solely on the sentence, arguing that as first‑time offenders the trial court should have considered the Probation Offenders Act, 1958 and …
The revision petition filed by Pyari Devi challenged the District Magistrate's order confiscating her diesel pick‑up (Reg. No. BR‑45 GA‑9178) under Section 5(A)(7) of the Uttar Pradesh Cow Slaughter Act. The petitioner argued that no offence was established, the vehicle was her sole means of …
The revisionist, a social worker, filed a criminal revision challenging an order dated 18‑12‑2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hathras, which dismissed his application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S. alleging forgery and embezzlement in the construction of a Panchayat Bhawan. He contended that …
Vidhi Narayan Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court’s refusal to discharge him despite the prosecution not having produced evidence under Section 244 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that the case was a counter‑blast, the place of occurrence differed, the medical …
The revisionists challenged the Sessions Judge's order framing charges under Sections 323, 324, 325, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in a case arising from an incident on 21 March 2024. They claimed no vital injury occurred, asserted an alibi supported by CCTV footage, and argued that the …
The petitioners Yahiya and another filed a criminal revision under Sections 438/442 of the B.N.S.S. challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC and Section 7 …
Dharmveer Singh (revisionist) filed a criminal revision against the State of U.P. and another party, seeking relief from a conviction dated 04.03.2024 and an appellate order dated 05.12.2024. Both parties entered into a compromise, with the revisionist paying Rs. 4,00,000 to the complainant by way …
The revisionist Kanhaiya challenged his summons under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C., arguing he was only a witness in the FIR and lacked any mens rea for the alleged offences. The FIR, lodged on 07.06.2024, accused Pujari Mahant Hemraj Suryavanshi of sexual assault under Sections 376 and 506 IPC and …
The Allahabad High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Dr. Farahim, a reputed doctor, who alleged that he was falsely implicated in a murder case and that the order of the lower court dated 12‑03‑2025 was unjust. The revisionist contended that there was no material placing him at the …
