Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
21 judgments · newest first · showing 1–21
The petitioners, a group of farmers, filed a review application under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the earlier order that denied them alternate land after their original land was acquired by the State. The State argued that the land had already been acquired, an …
The appellants, Smt. Anagha A. Khandkar and others, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court against the respondents, Marulla B. Pathen and others. The appellants were represented by Ms. Neeta Patil, instructed by Mr. S.R. Nargolkar. No further instructions or pleadings were received from …
Arun Jacob Reberio filed a first appeal (No. 1431 of 2002) against P.C. Gandhi and Associates and others. The appellant and the cross‑objectors failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled dates of 11 March 2026 and 30 April 2026. The Court, noting the non‑appearance, issued an order that if …
The appellant failed to appear before the High Court of Bombay on the scheduled date of 30 April 2026. Earlier, on 12 March 2026, the Court had warned that if the appellant did not appear on the next date, the appeal would be dismissed. On the appointed date, no representative of the appellant was …
The High Court of Bombay heard multiple first appeals (Nos. 323, 324, 325 of 2010) filed by various appellants against Shamsuddin A. Kazi and others. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled dates of 17 December 2025 and 13 March 2026. The court, noting the continued non‑appearance, listed the …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by Indumati Nivrutti Kute and others against Anuradha Umashankar Jaiswal and others. The appellants failed to appear for the hearing on 4 March 2026, and the court noted that the order dated 4 February 2026 had not been complied with. The …
The appellant, the legal heirs of the deceased Smt. Fulyabai Trimbak Jadhav, filed a first appeal against the State of Maharashtra concerning a land acquisition matter. The High Court scheduled hearings and warned that the appeal would be dismissed if the appellant failed to appear or proceed. …
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking dismissal of a compensation claim after the appellants deposited and the respondents withdrew the amounts. The court considered a prior decision (First Appeal No. 737 of 2012) where the reference court awarded only a 25% uplift over the …
The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal against Babyabai Dwarkanath Tikone and others. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel informed the court of his intention to withdraw the appeal. The respondents' counsel sought the discharge of an undertaking they had given at …
Shirpur Shetkari Sahakari S. Karkhana Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an apparent clerical mistake in the oral order dated 4 March 2026. The petition sought correction of the year mentioned in paragraph 50, which incorrectly read 2022 instead of the intended 2002. …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation filed a first appeal against the deceased Ganpat Dhondu Malusare and others, accompanied by several civil applications seeking procedural reliefs. The appellant sought withdrawal of a withdrawn application and a duplicate application, …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking permission to add proposed respondents No.3 and No.4 to an existing writ petition, relying on a Will Deed dated 10 January 2000. The respondent No.2 was represented by S. D. Rayrikar, AGP, while the applicant was represented by Vijay Killedar. The …
The applicant filed a civil application to bring the legal heirs of the deceased applicant No.1, Manohar Krishnaji Mugdum, onto the record of a writ petition. The application was filed two days after the prescribed time, raising a question of condonation of delay. The court examined the submissions …
The High Court of Bombay heard three writ petitions filed by Vithal Damodar Sadgir, Irfan Yusuf Shaikh, and Dinesh Prabhakar Bhat. The petitioners, represented by Advocate Virendra Pethe, sought relief but the court found that the petitions had become infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of …
The petitioners filed three writ petitions before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioners' counsel, Mr. Virendra Pethe, submitted that the petitions had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and ordered that the writ petitions stand disposed as infructuous. No further orders or …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the enhancement of compensation awarded to the respondents for land acquired under the Chaskman Dam Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed compensation at Rs.1,02,969, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs.2,12,258. The State …
The Bombay High Court received a list of about 88 first appeals that were proposed to be heard together with First Appeal No. 2123 of 2005. The court examined whether these appeals fell within the jurisdiction of the learned Single Judge. It concluded that the list pertained to the jurisdiction of …
The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against the enhancement of compensation awarded to the heirs of the deceased Shri Kisan Kashiram Lilke for land acquired for the Karanjwan Dam Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed …
The petitioner, Parshuram Laxman Ravelalu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The Court scheduled a hearing for 13 January 2026 and warned that the petition would be dismissed if the petitioner failed to appear. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the respondent, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the enhancement of compensation awarded by the Reference Court in a land acquisition matter concerning a percolation tank project in Jamlewani, Nashik. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed compensation at Rs.12,193, which the Reference …
