Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ABHAY S OKA

215 judgments · newest first · showing 201–215

LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT THR. SECRETARY & ANRversusATTRO DEVI & ORS.

2023 INSC 357Disposed off

The Land and Building Department appealed a Delhi High Court order that held the acquisition of land in Ghonda, Delhi had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act because compensation had not been paid. The High Court relied on Pune Municipal Corporation v. Misirimal Solanki, interpreting the …

SHIVA KUMAR @ SHIVA @ SHIVAMURTHYversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2023 INSC 306Case Partly allowed

The appellant was convicted under IPC sections 366, 376 and 302 for raping, kidnapping and murdering a woman, and the trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment for the murder. The appellant appealed, arguing that only the High Court or Supreme Court can impose a modified punishment such as a …

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusBATTI & ORS

2023 INSC 276Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority appealed against a Delhi High Court order that held the acquisition of a 3,500‑hectare parcel of land had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 because compensation …

NEERAJ DUTTAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI)

2023 INSC 245Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Electricity Inspector, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding a bribe of Rs 10,000 to facilitate the installation of an electricity meter. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on the testimony of a shadow‑witness (PW‑5) and on the …

M/S. CREATIVE GARMENTS LTDversusKASHIRAM VERMA

2023 INSC 243Appeal(s) allowed

The employer, M/s. Creative Garments Ltd., appealed against a Labour Court award that reinstated employee Kashiram Verma with back wages. The employee never reported for duty despite multiple communications, and his permanent address was never furnished; only a "care of Union" address was provided. …

PAWAN KUMAR CHOURASIAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2023 INSC 227Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under Sections 302 r/w 34 and 201 of the IPC for the murder of two boys, the conviction being based solely on an alleged extra‑judicial confession. The prosecution alleged that the appellant confessed to several witnesses (PW‑1 to PW‑9), but the key witnesses (PW‑7, PW‑8, …

VIKAS RATHIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2023 INSC 186Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Vikas Rathi, owned a tool manufacturing firm where the deceased, Bachchu Prasad, worked. After Prasad's murder, an FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and later the deceased's wife alleged Rathi's involvement, leading to his being listed as a prosecution witness. The complainant …

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX DELHIversusQUICK HEAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

2022 INSC 801Disposed off

Quick Heal Technologies Ltd. sold antivirus software on CDs together with a license key and free updates to end‑customers. The Revenue argued that the transaction comprised two components – sale of the CD (goods) and provision of updates (service) – and that service tax should be levied on the …

DHANANJAY RAI @ GUDDU RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2022 INSC 723

The appellant, Dhananjay Rai, was convicted of murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms and appealed the conviction before the Patna High Court. The appeal was admitted, but the appellant subsequently absconded, leading the High Court to dismiss the appeal on the ground of …

RAVI SHARMAversusSTATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

2022 INSC 699Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was found dead on 30 May 2011 and an FIR was lodged; the father (PW‑1) and brother (PW‑2) of the deceased gave statements that eventually pointed suspicion at the appellant, a friend of the deceased. A firearm and related items were recovered under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, …

SHISHPAL @ SHISHUversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2022 INSC 670Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants A1 and A3 were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the murder of a man in a liquor‑store queue, based primarily on the testimony of a single eye‑witness (PW3) and the prosecution’s claim of a common intention. Both the trial court and the Delhi High Court …

HCMI EDUCATIONversusNARENDRA PAL SINGH

2022 INSC 698Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent approached HCMI Education to secure admission to an MBBS programme in the Philippines for the 2007-2008 academic year. After admission was obtained, the Philippine Commission on Higher Education abolished the MBBS programme effective 2008-2009 and offered an alternative BS Biology …

WIPRO FINANCE LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2022 INSC 417Appeal(s) allowed

Wipro Finance Ltd. borrowed a foreign‑currency loan to finance its leasing and hire‑purchase business and incurred a loss due to exchange‑rate fluctuations while repaying the loan. The company claimed a deduction for this loss under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and also sought to treat a …

DR. JOE JOSEPH & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2022 INSC 409Directions issued

The Supreme Court heard petitions concerning the safety of the Mullaperiyar Dam after the enactment of the Dam Safety Act, 2021. The Court noted that the Act creates a multi‑tier institutional framework, including a National Dam Safety Authority (NDSA) under s.8 with functions detailed in s.9. Since …