Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
48 judgments · newest first · showing 1–48
The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) issued an interim order on 7 August 2025 allowing the promotion process for Executive Engineer posts to continue while restraining the State from issuing any final promotion orders until a later date. Petitioners Manojkumar Sheonath Pandey and others …
The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) issued an interim order on 7 August 2025 allowing the promotion process for Executive Engineer posts to continue while restraining the State from issuing any final promotion orders until a later date. Petitioners Manojkumar Sheonath Pandey and others …
Mr Rupendra Dinesh More filed Writ Petition No. 14688 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear at the hearing scheduled on 7 July 2026 and again on 27 July 2026. The Court observed that his non‑appearance indicated a lack of interest in prosecuting the petition. The respondents, the …
The petitioner, Ramakant Suryajirao Darekar, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the Charity Commissioner, Pune. He later applied to withdraw the petition in order to file a proper representation before the Commissioner. The petition was unopposed, and the Court allowed the withdrawal, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the High Court’s intervention to ensure that his original application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) is heard and decided promptly, fearing that further delay would cause him to exceed the upper age limit for appointment. The MAT had …
The petitioners, a widowed senior citizen and family, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 to compel the Railway Claims Tribunal (RCT) to update their address in the record of OA No.1061/2014 so that a compensation of Rs.8 Lakhs, awarded on 21 December 2023, could be released. The Tribunal …
The petitioners, Nilam Sandeep Chaudhary and Restaurant & Bar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They later informed the court that their business had been closed for over a year and they no longer wished to pursue the writ. The …
The petitioner, Golden Bullion, challenged an Order-in-Original dated 13 November 2025 issued by an Adjudicating Authority, alleging that its show‑cause reply filed on 20 June 2025 via the departmental portal was not considered. The petitioner argued that this omission violated the principles of …
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging a January 2020 order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal that directed Dr. Ghanshyam to take a suitable policy decision for certain applicants. The State produced a Government Resolution dated 15 March 2024, asserting that the …
The petitioners, Dudham Harishchandra Bhaguji and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Deputy Collector Special Cell SRA and other respondents. The respondents argued that the petitioners had an alternate and efficacious remedy before the Apex …
The applicant, Haresh Dulhanomal Chugaria, filed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 6416 of 2023, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution by a coordinate bench on 5 May 2026. The petition was dismissed because the applicant failed to pursue the proceedings. The …
The petitioner, Mahadev Ganpati Devkar, filed a civil writ petition seeking a directive that the Chief Administrative Officer, Maharashtra Water Resources, CIDCO, decide a representation he submitted on 22 April 2026, which he alleges remains pending and affects his impending retirement. The …
The petitioner, Mukunda Ananda Jadhav, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought to unconditionally withdraw it. Service of the petition had been effected on the respondents, who expressed no objection to the withdrawal. The court accepted the respondents' statement and allowed …
The petitioner, Rahul Uday Shrivastav, filed a criminal writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. During proceedings, the Attorney General for the State informed the court that statements of both the petitioner and the detainee were recorded on 13 May 2026 at Charkop …
The petitioner, Debashish Debnarayan Ghosh, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The respondent, the State, raised no objection to the …
The petitioners sought relief from an order dated 11 March 2026 issued by the Senior Citizen Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Senior Citizens Act, 2007, alleging imminent eviction from a property. The petition raised urgency, but the respondents pointed out that a related application …
The petitioners, Shaikh Sajid Shaikh Kalil & Ors., filed a civil writ petition challenging actions of the Joint District Registrar Class‑I and Stamp Collector, Nashik. The High Court directed the petitioners to approach the Chief Revenue Controlling Authority, Pune, for a merits‑based decision. The …
The applicant, Gaurav Gupta, filed an interim application seeking permission to travel abroad despite a Look-Out Circular (LOC) issued on 24 November 2025. The court noted earlier orders that had already permitted travel on similar terms and considered the applicant's request for additional trips to …
The applicant, Yogeshh Jogindernath Mehra, filed an interim application seeking permission to travel to the United States from 19 May to 28 May 2026 and to have a Look‑Out Circular issued against him suspended. The court noted a prior order allowing travel in December 2025 and considered whether the …
The petitioner, Dhanji Dubriya, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition and instead approach the Sessions Court at Daman, which has jurisdiction over the matter. The …
The petitioner was appointed as a Group‑C Firefighter by the Panvel Municipal Corporation, conditional on producing a caste validity certificate within six months. The petitioner failed to submit the certificate, leading the corporation to issue a show‑cause notice for termination of service. The …
The petitioner, Jitendra Shankar, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the State of Maharashtra's Disability Welfare Department that required him to submit his Unique Disability ID (UDID) Card. The petitioner produced a UDID Card based on a disability certificate dated 14 March 2012, …
The petitioners, associations of management of various unaided colleges in Maharashtra, filed multiple writ petitions seeking direction for the State to pay pending scholarship, freeship and reimbursement fees to their institutions. The Court held that these writ petitions should be treated as …
The Karbhari Anna Charitable Foundation, operating a primary school, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement from the State of Maharashtra. The State, through the Principal Secretary of Education, submitted that it had received recommendations from the Zilla Parishad, Pune, and forwarded the …
Petitioner Sharada Vijay Sapkale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner later sought leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition due to subsequent events. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and another, opposed the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Sadashiv Gaikwad, a superannuated employee, filed a writ petition seeking immediate promotion to the post of Executive Engineer, claiming he had been exonerated in departmental proceedings. He argued urgency because his superannuation date was 31 March 2026. The …
The Association of Management of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the applicability of the 2024 Regulations to its BAMS programme for the academic year 2026‑27. The petition sought interim permission to continue the course while the grievance was being …
The petitioner, a Sectional Engineer appointed in 2016, was terminated on 29 May 2025 by Respondent No. 2 without the inquiry mandated by Rule 8 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1979. The petitioner challenged the termination as a breach of natural justice. The High …
The petitioners, employees of Life Insurance Corporation of India, filed an interim application seeking permission to amend their writ petition for regularisation as directed by a Nagpur Bench judgment. The amendment sought to add new grounds and replace prayer clauses, with the respondents not …
The petitioner, a MBBS student, filed a writ petition seeking correction of her internal assessment marks in Anatomy, which were erroneously recorded as TH‑00 and PR‑00 instead of the correct TH‑44 and PR‑59, causing her to appear to have failed the subject. The college acknowledged the clerical …
Arjun Dhangar More, a Health Assistant, challenged his suspension order dated 13 February 2025 issued by the Zilla Parishad. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief against the suspension. The Zilla Parishad subsequently issued a revocation order on 27 February 2026, directing the …
The petitioner, Capt. Shri Y.D. Joshi, filed Writ Petition No. 5922 of 2006 in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the Union of India and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could grant …
The petitioner, Shri Vikrant Vasant Ghavat, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his writ petition which had been rejected on 19 August 2025 by the Registrar for failure to remove office objections. The petitioner claimed genuine difficulty in complying with the deadline. The Court …
Dr. Asrar Samad Shaikh and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to Respondent No.3 to consider a joint representation dated 13 October 2025 within a stipulated period. The petition had earlier been marked for dismissal due to non‑appearance, but the petitioners …
The petitioner, Saloni Pradeep Patil, sought a writ directing the admission of her son to Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Pune. The college stipulated that admission would be granted only after the petitioner complied with specific procedural requirements, including registration at the admissions …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
The High Court was asked to clarify an interim order dated 17 February 2026 that directed the State CET Cell to allow petitioners to apply for postgraduate medical seats under the 35% Institutional Quota, including unclaimed 15% NRI seats. Petitioners argued that, under Section 7(iii) and Section 14 …
Akhil Kumar Jain, a student of the Children Welfare Centre’s College of Law, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the college to declare his Semester III results and to allow him to apply for revaluation beyond the stipulated 10‑day window. The petitioner alleged that the college had not …
Maharashtra Shaikshnik Arogya Vidyanagari filed Writ Petition No. 14864 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Commissioner, State Common Entrance Test Cell and others. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Suresh M. Kamble, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition …
Dr. Raghunandan B. Nikam retired on 31 December 2017 at age 60 and petitioned the Bombay High Court for a direction to the State of Maharashtra and Thane Municipal Corporation to pay his pension of Rs. 23,375 and gratuity of Rs. 7,00,000 based on his basic pay. He relied on a Division Bench decision …
The petitioners, Vishnu Vaman Nimse & Ors., filed Writ Petition (St.) No.11420 of 2025 seeking payment of their old pension. The Registrar (Judicial‑I) raised office objections, gave two weeks for compliance, and upon non‑removal rejected the petition on 7 May 2025. The petitioners filed an interim …
The matter titled Tabrez Khan Wrongly Mentioned In Judgment was listed before the Bombay High Court. The parties are Tanrej Khan (appellant/petitioner) and Abhushama Hyatulla Chaudhary (respondent). The Court noted a paucity of time and consequently adjourned the hearing to 23 March 2026. No …
Ms Unnati Rawat, a first‑year LLB student at ILS Law College, Pune, sought a court order to condone her 45% attendance for the 2025‑26 academic year on humanitarian grounds, as she was the primary caretaker for her father undergoing prostate‑cancer surgery. The college, governed by the Pune …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of clerical errors in an order dated 17 January 2026. They specifically requested amendments to dates, monetary figures, and exhibit references contained in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of that order. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted a …
