Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
136 judgments · newest first · showing 1–136
The State of U.P. filed an appeal against Vikram Singh and another, but the appeal was lodged 189 days after the decree, exceeding the prescribed period. The State sought condonation of the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, submitting an affidavit and arguing that there was no deliberate …
Petitioner Mohd. Iqbal sought a writ of mandamus directing the police not to register any further FIRs against him without first conducting a preliminary inquiry as mandated by Section 173(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The petitioner also asked for video‑conferenced statements …
Mohd Iqbal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging a sanction order dated 28‑11‑2024 issued by the Chairman of the U.P. Legislative Council under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondents raised preliminary objections, contending that …
Dr. Man Singh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking multiple mandamus orders directing cyber authorities and global platforms to investigate and curb alleged AI‑generated deepfakes and cyber offences under the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and related provisions. …
Meera Devi filed a criminal appeal under Section 413 of the BNSS Act challenging the acquittal of two accused (Pushpa Devi and Arun alias Kallu) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah, in a murder case arising from the death of her husband, Anil Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the accused …
Petitioners Avkash Maurya and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bihar National Security Act (BNSS). The State, …
Petitioner Dinesh Chandra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 130 of 2026. The petitioner alleged that the investigation had not been conducted properly and requested a time‑bound …
Petitioners Ambika Rughta and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 registered under several sections of the BNSS and the D.P. Act. An inadvertent error duplicated petitioner‑3’s name in the cause title, and the court allowed amendment of the …
Petitioner Neetesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 10‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3)B of the BNSS and Section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The State argued that the investigation was complete, a charge‑sheet had been filed on …
Petitioners Tejpal and another filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 03.09.2026 that alleged offences under Sections 123, 308(5), 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed the FIR was malicious, filed to evade rent liability, and asserted their innocence. The State and …
Petitioner Atish Chandra Gupta, the first informant in FIR No. 13.12.2024, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondents to conduct a fair investigation under IPC sections 318(4), 336(3) and 340(2). The State, through the learned Additional …
Petitioner Aman Rai, an employee of RBL Finserve Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20-07-2026 registered under Section 316(5) B.N.S. (referred to as Section 409 IPC). He alleged that the FIR was belated, lacked specific details, and was based solely on …
Petitioners Siddharth Sonkar and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 25‑03‑2026 registered under Section 351(3) of the BNS Act and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. They alleged that the FIR was fabricated because petitioner‑1 was in a …
Petitioners Ahmad Ali and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 13‑08‑2026 registered under sections 75, 333, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. During the pendency of the petition, sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act were added, making the alleged victim a child. …
Petitioners Gufran Ali and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.06.2026 and the subsequent charge sheet filed under various IPC sections. The State, represented by the Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and the …
The appellant Shashi Pratap Singh challenged the acquittal of Arun Singh and his mother-in-law Usha Singh for alleged dowry harassment, dowry death and related offences arising from the death of his sister Asmita Singh, who was found hanged within a year of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the …
Petitioner Rafik Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18.03.2026 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Kushinagar, under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gunda Control Act, 1970. The State’s Additional Advocate General raised a …
The applicant, Ramji Gupta, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite two pending Sessions Trials (Nos. 577/2024 and 576/2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 308 and 304 IPC. The State opposed, and the Court …
The applicant, Sapna Pandey, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a court order directing the Family Court to decide the pending Miscellaneous Case No. 597 of 2022 (under Section 125(3) read with Section 128 CrPC) within a fixed time‑frame. The State opposed …
The applicant, Smt. Rajani Paliwal Shukla, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, to take cognizance of a charge‑sheet dated 12‑04‑2026 and to summon the State and two other parties. The State opposed, arguing …
Smt. Neha Chaudhary filed a Section 23 application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for interim maintenance in a Ghaziabad court, which remained pending. She approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction that the lower court decide the application within a …
The applicant, a rape victim whose identity is protected under Section 72 of the BNS Act, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNS seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite the pending Sessions Trial No. 1290 of 2025 (State vs. Neeshu). The High Court examined whether it …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite the disposal of a pending Sessions case (No. 467 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 420, 328, 376, 384 IPC and Sections 66D, 66E of the IT Act. The respondent, the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 BNSS seeking a direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of Criminal Case No. 471 of 2014, which involves offences under Sections 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that the case, pending since 2014, should be decided within a …
The applicant, M/s Tyagi Enterprises, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 879 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it could …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 78342/2021) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant argued that the case, filed on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Family Court, Mau, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 654 of 2025) within a fixed time. The respondents did not object, provided the lower court was not overloaded. The High Court referred to …
The applicant, Rekha Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction that the lower court expedite the disposal of a pending case (Case No. 1235 of 2024). The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection, but the High Court examined precedent that …
The applicant, Asha Jyotsna, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Mainpuri, dispose of a pending criminal case (State vs Vimal Kumar) within a fixed time. The applicant argued that the trial was unduly delayed, …
The applicant Badal filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court noted the counsel's statement and proceeded to dismiss the application as …
The applicant, Gulnaz Bano, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kanpur to decide a pending complaint under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act filed in 2018. The applicant argued that the case had been …
The applicant, Shanti, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to decide a pending Domestic Violence Act (Section 12) application within a fixed time. The High Court examined whether it could impose a time‑bound schedule for disposal of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to dispose of a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint within a fixed time. The applicant argued that the case, filed on 04‑06‑2025, remained undecided and required a …
The applicant, Ratnesh Kumar Gautam, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and noted that the applicant had …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the disposal of State vs. Yogendra Nishad (S.T. No. 1261 of 2024), a case involving offences under IPC sections 376(3) and 328 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The State's Additional …
The applicant, Smt. Sonam, filed an application under Section 529 CrPC seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a domestic‑violence complaint (Case No. 3090 of 2024) and an interim‑maintenance application filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence …
The applicant, Jitendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a criminal case pending since 2003. The applicant argued that the matter had remained undecided for an inordinate period and requested a time‑bound schedule …
Shayam Lohiya filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction that the trial court expedite the pending criminal case (No. 1192 of 2020) involving offences under the IPC, the Public Property Damage Prevention Act and the Criminal Law Amendment …
The applicant, Dhruvchand Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a 2015 complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Civil Judge, Gorakhpur. The applicant argued that the case had …
An application was filed before the Allahabad High Court under Section 529 of the BNSS by the applicant, Tameem Akhtar. The applicant, through counsel Ajay Vikram Singh, expressed a desire not to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The State of U.P., represented by G.A., raised no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a criminal case (Case No. 3404 of 2009) that has been pending for many years. They argued that the matter required a time‑bound disposal. The State opposed, and the court considered …
The applicant, Smt Rati Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Family Court in Mirzapur decide her pending maintenance case (Case No. 617 of 2025) and an interim maintenance application filed under Section 144 of the BNSS on a time‑bound …
The applicant, Smt Anjana Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite a pending criminal case (Case No. 7448 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court in Muzaffarnagar expedite the trial of State vs. Bhoora (Case No. 2509/9 of 2018), which involves offences under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter …
Kishan Chaudhary filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite criminal case No. 973 of 2024 (State vs. Virendra Singh) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The State opposed the direction only if the lower …
Deepika Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court in Kanpur to dispose of her pending Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance case within a fixed time‑frame. The applicant argued that the case, filed on …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of a criminal case (State vs. Ram Bachan, case No. 5085 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, under Sections 323 …
The applicant, an accused in a criminal case (Session Case No. 31201/2020 under Section 380 IPC), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to dispose of the case within a stipulated time. The State’s counsel raised no objection provided the …
The applicant, Ikramuddin, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Ashwini Kumar Srivastava, informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑1, Jaunpur, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 991 of 2022) under Section 128 of the Cr.P.C. within a stipulated time‑frame. The State opposed the prayer, …
The applicants, Smt. Manju Rani and another, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, decide their interim maintenance application and the pending maintenance case (Case No. 1933 of 2025) within a fixed time‑frame. They …
Smt Rakhi Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS requesting that the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Banda, decide a pending criminal case (Criminal Misc. Case No. 111/XI of 2026) under Section 144(3) BNSS within a stipulated period. The State’s A.G.A. raised no objection …
The applicant, Mrityunjai Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (Case No. 117674 of 2023). The applicant argued that the case had been pending since November …
The applicant, Kavita Kumari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the counsel's request and, finding no objection, …
The applicant, Kamlesh Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1130 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 323, 504 and 342 IPC. The applicant argued that two …
The applicant Bhupendra Yadav filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction for the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Deoria, to expedite the pending complaint case No. 4632 of 2025. The applicant argued that the case, filed in 2025, remained …
Satya Prakash filed an application under Section 529 CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Case No. 83 of 2016 (State vs. Daulat Ram) involving offences under Sections 420 and 120‑B IPC, which has been pending since 2016. The State, represented by the Attorney General, …
Smt Nagma filed an application under Section 144 BNSS seeking a direction that the trial Family Court decide her interim maintenance application filed on 30‑01‑2026 on a time‑bound basis. The High Court examined whether it could impose such a schedule, noting Supreme Court pronouncements that …
The applicant, Nirmal Mishra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking the trial court to expedite a complaint under Section 138 of the same Act pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad. The trial court had earlier directed the …
The applicant, Dr. Mobasshira Muzzam, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to this withdrawal. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Sessions Trial No. 810 of 2008 (State vs. Jagga @ Jagdish) concerning offences under Sections 302 and 394 IPC. The applicant argued that the trial, …
The petitioners, a minor named Ridima Rai and another individual, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been …
Guddu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and requested its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government Advocate did not oppose …
The petitioner Premchandar filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR dated 22‑11‑2025 under Sections 143(2) and 336(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a human‑trafficking case. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the same Act specifically …
Petitioners Bhola Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The court considered the request and, finding no …
Petitioners Bhola Nath Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate and the respondent's counsel raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Subhadra Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and police to conduct a free, fair, and time-bound investigation of an FIR dated 19-12-2025 (Case Crime No. 0266 of 2025) under Sections 318(4), 324(4) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, …
Petitioners Shakti Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after the investigation had been completed and a charge-sheet filed on 06-04-2026. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, …
The petitioner, Arshad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8795 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that he no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks its withdrawal. …
The petitioner, Manraj Meena, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8831 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Dileep Vishwakarma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s Additional …
Petitioner Kamrun Nisha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The …
Mohd. Akram filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8817 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State had already concluded its investigation and forwarded a charge sheet against the petitioner on 5 December 2025. The petitioner, through counsel, …
The petitioner, Arshad @ Mohd Arshed, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8818 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was arrested and, through his counsel, expressed that he no longer …
The petitioner, Ajay, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8851 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition …
The petitioner, Dilshad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8868 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mohd. Shahibe Alam, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer …
Petitioner Mukesh Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of …
The petitioner, Suraj Sharma, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8792 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that he does not wish to pursue the present petition and seeks to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition …
The petitioners, Mahaveer Arya and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8862 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The State had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge‑sheet against the petitioners. While the petitioners did not contest these facts, …
The petitioner, Pradyumn Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State had already completed investigation and forwarded the charge sheet on 12-11-2025. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed his intention to …
Petitioner Shruti Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that she had already been arrested by the police and no longer wished to pursue the petition, seeking to withdraw it. The respondent State and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Government Advocate for the …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8864 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been concluded and a final report favorable to them had been submitted, and they …
The petitioner, Dhanraj @ Vijay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The court noted that the investigation was already completed and a charge sheet had been filed, leading the magistrate to …
The petitioners, Satya Prakash Sharma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet dated 2 February 2021. The State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents opposed the petition. During the hearing, the …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge-sheet in a case where he was wrongly named in the FIR. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 17-04-2026. The petitioner did …
Petitioner Bharat Bhushan Tyagi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no …
Petitioner Asha Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8832 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel later informed the court that he wished to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioner's …
Shivdas Kushwaha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (respondent nos. 2 and 3) to conduct a fair and transparent investigation of FIR No. 0025/2026. The petitioner alleged that despite the FIR being registered on 2 March 2026, the …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair and proper investigation of an FIR dated 30-06-2025 under Sections 115(2), 352, 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner alleged …
The petitioner, Anita, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police of Bhoganipur police station to conduct a proper and fair investigation into Crime No. 120 of 2026 under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the BNS. She alleged that, although the FIR was lodged on 6 …
The appellant Udham Singh filed a criminal appeal challenging his conviction. Counsel for the appellant and respondent presented their arguments before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court examined the record to determine whether any legal or factual error warranted setting aside …
Raghunath Alias Batauli filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court challenging the decision of the lower court. The appeal was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Salil Kumar Rai and Hon'ble Justice Dr. Ajay Kumar-II. After consideration, the court found no merit in the …
The appellant Ranjeet filed Criminal Appeal No. 2195 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the decision of the lower court. The Court considered the record and, referring to the order in the connected Criminal Appeal No. 1978 of 2011 (Krishan Pal @ Lala & Anr. v. State of U.P.), …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard Criminal Appeal No. 1821 of 2011 filed by Bahadur against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The appeal was dismissed by a bench comprising Hon’ble Justice Salil Kumar Rai and Hon’ble Justice Dr. Ajay Kumar‑II. The court directed that the orders be as per the …
The High Court examined five connected criminal appeals arising from a 2008 trial in which six accused were convicted of murder and related offences for the killing of Pushpraj. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two injured eyewitnesses, Manoj Kumar and his sister‑in‑law Vimla Devi, who …
The petitioners, Sachin and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing criminal investigation. The Attorney General informed the Court that the police investigation had been completed and a report had been filed against the …
The petitioner, Faim Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been submitted. The petitioner’s counsel did not contest this fact but expressed a …
The petitioner, Kanhaniya Indene Gas Service, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced at the Bar that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State’s Additional Government …
Jagvir and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The investigation in the matter had already concluded, and a charge sheet was filed on 3 April 2026. The petitioners, through counsel, …
Harey Krishan Pandey filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8087 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection …
The petitioner, Shubham Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 30.03.2026 that alleged his involvement in the recovery of 121.45 kg of ganja, invoking Sections 8, 20, 25 of the NDPS Act and Section 207 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The FIR was based on information from an informer …
Sunil Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8562 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was arrested. Counsel for the petitioner then informed the Court that, in view of the arrest, the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and …
The petitioner, Devendra Shukla, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no …
The petitioner, Hambir Singh, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8099 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the …
The petitioner, Vivek Yadav, filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition (No. 8098 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue …
The petitioner, Atul Kumar Dubey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and police to conduct a fair, impartial and time‑bound investigation into FIR No. 210 of 2025. He alleged that despite the FIR being registered on 26‑07‑2025, the police had not …
The petitioner, Mangal Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after a charge sheet had been filed against him. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete …
Petitioner Arif Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The …
Gaurav Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8561 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's …
Petitioner Ikbaal Khan filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8559 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate …
Maneesh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8558 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Dwara Pramukh Sachiv (Grah) and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajesh Yadav, announced that the petitioner no …
The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8574 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The Assistant Government Advocate (AGA) for the …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s counsel raised no …
Petitioners Chandan Yadav and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and charge sheets had been submitted on 18 March 2025 …
The petitioners Kunal Singhal and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the police investigation and report filed on 01.04.2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and the police …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 13-11-2025. Petitioners did not contest these …
Santosh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8588 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had …
The petitioner, Shani, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and two other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its …
The petitioners, Ismile and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing investigation. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation had concluded and a charge sheet was filed on April …
The petitioner, Deepanshu Gautam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging aspects of the investigation, during which additional serious charges were added. The State counsel acknowledged the addition of graver sections, which the petitioner did not dispute. However, the petitioner …
The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Gautam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. During the proceedings, the Additional Government Advocate informed the court that more serious charges had been added to the case. The …
The petitioner, Gaurav Rai, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9500 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue it. The Additional Government …
Petitioner Rakesh Chandra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 0040 of 2024 under Sections 279 and 338 of the B.N.S., 2023, and to arrest the accused. The …
The petitioner, Rajat @ Sumit Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation was complete and the report favored the petitioner. The …
The petitioner Rameshwar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) to supervise and replace the investigating officer in Crime No. 19 of 2026, and to include his applications and affidavit in the investigation report, alleging …
The petitioner, Aarti Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to complete a fair and proper investigation into an FIR dated 05-10-2025 under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner alleged that the police were not …
The petitioner, Robin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain aspects of the investigation. During the proceedings, the State counsel informed the Court that additional, more serious charges had been added to the case. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Chandrashekhar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings against them. The State had already concluded the investigation, filed a charge sheet, and taken cognizance of the case. The petitioners did not dispute …
The petitioner, Farhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its …
The petitioners, Jarisha Khatoon and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Rajiv Sisodia, announced that the petitioners no …
The petitioner, Ratan Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police, Mainpuri, to ensure a fair and expeditious investigation of an FIR dated 31.01.2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. The petitioner alleged that the police were …
The petitioner, Rahul Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8808 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition sought relief, but during the hearing the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that …
Risal Singh filed a criminal appeal (No. 1490 of 2014) against the State of U.P. before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed that the appeal had already been declared abated by an order dated 11 December 2025, a fact that had not been reflected in the cause list. Consequently, the court …
