Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
The applicant, Rajdeep Srivastava, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking continuation of interim protection that had been granted during mediation. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Center, which reported that no settlement was reached …
The applicant, Dinesh Chandra Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal revision order dated 31.08.2024 and a civil summoning order dated 29.02.2024. The parties had earlier been directed to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation …
The applicant, Ramesh Chandra Mishra, filed a miscellaneous review application (No. 103 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No party appeared before the court to pursue the matter, and the applicant showed no interest in prosecuting the case. The court noted the lack of …
Smt. Brija filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 22190 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others. No petitioner appeared before the Court and no request for adjournment was made. The Court observed …
The applicants, Gopal Dixit and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking revision of an earlier order. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, but no settlement was reached. Neither party appeared for further proceedings, …
The petitioners sought to confirm their right over Plot No. 679, a piece of land historically held by Zamindars and later possessed by their father Malhoo for fifty years. Malhoo obtained a favorable order from the Deputy Director of Consolidation on 23‑08‑1972 directing the land to be recorded in …
Petitioner Madhav Raj Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) to decide his application under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus to restrain respondent No. 10 from obstructing his access to his house. The …
The petitioner, Ram Shankar Gupta, obtained several unsecured credit facilities from the respondent bank in 2015 and subsequently defaulted, leading the bank to declare the account a Non‑Performing Asset and invoke the SARFAESI Act to recover the dues by taking possession of the secured assets. The …
