AVANISH BHAGWATBHAI GAJJARversusUSHABEN ALIAS JYOTSNA BEN D/O KARSANBHAI W/O KANUBHAI GALABHAI
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed a Special Civil Application seeking permission to withdraw the proceeding and to be allowed to file an appeal before the Collector of Kheda. After hearing arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners requested liberty to withdraw the application and to pursue the appeal. The Court examined w…
AMBALAL RATILAL PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Ambalal Ratilal Patel filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Denish Morakhia, informed the court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the petition because a final order had already been passed in the pending related proceedings. The petitioner also sought libe…
RATHOD NAGJIBHAI RAVABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
Petitioners Rathod Nagjibhai Ravabhai and another filed a special civil application before the High Court of Gujarat. Their counsel submitted the matter through the online portal. The Court, after considering the submission, accepted the request and ordered that the matter be listed for hearing on the same day at 1:45 …
MAFATJI JENAJI THAKORversusDEPUTY MAMLATDAR, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (Amended as per oral order dated 24/07/2026)
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
Mafatji Jenaji Thakor filed a Special Civil Application seeking a direction that the Deputy Collector, Gandhinagar, hear and decide RTS Appeal No. 314 of 2025 expeditiously. The respondents, represented by an Additional Government Pleader, agreed to hear the appeal within eight weeks. The Court allowed a draft amendmen…
DECEASED PRAMODBHAI ATMARAM DESAI THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRSversusTHE SPECIAL SECRETARY (APPEALS) REVENUE DEPARTMENT
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to quash two orders dated 20‑01‑2025 and 28‑03‑2005 affecting their land, and to stay their execution. The High Court noted that an earlier order of 31‑12‑2015 had been set aside and the matter remanded to the Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department (SSRD) for a fresh decision.…
LAKHUBHAI SAJAN KODIYATARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
Petitioner Lakhubhai Sajan Kodiyatar was directed by an order under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code to remove an encroachment on government waste land (Survey No.1064). He subsequently filed an application for regularisation of the encroachment under Section 202 of the same Code on 9 July 2025, which remain…
JAMILSHA KADARSHAH SAIYYEDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Jamilsha Kadarsah Saiyyed, has occupied and constructed on Survey No. 408 in Shirva village for 18 years, paying taxes and maintaining an electric connection. He applied to the Collector for regularisation of his occupation on 30‑05‑2026, which is pending. The Mamlatdar issued a notice under Section 202…
NARSINHBHAI VITHALBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
A special civil application was filed by Narsinhbhai Vithalbhai against the State of Gujarat. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Shalini S. Mair, failed to appear on two scheduled dates. The court noted the non-appearance and, having received no prosecution of the petition, dismissed the application. No substantive merits o…
ROUND FOREST , PAVAGADHversusSHRI VITTHALBHAI CHHAGANBHAI BARIA (AMENDED AS PER ORDER DT 05/05/2026)
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed a Special Civil Application to set aside a Labour Court award dated 28‑08‑2024 that held a workman to be a permanent employee and declared his oral termination illegal. The petitioners argued that the workman was a daily‑wager, had not worked 240 days each year for five years, and that the dispute…
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusGUJARAT RAFFIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Employees State Insurance Corporation filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking restoration of a Special Civil Application (No. 35731/2025) against Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited. The High Court of Gujarat, after hearing counsel, considered the merits of the restoration request. The Court ordered that the …
VAJESINH CHHATRASINH CHAUHANversusDEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, a daily‑wage labourer, claimed he had worked continuously for seven years with the respondent and sought reinstatement with back‑wages, alleging violations of Sections 25F, 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Labour Court, finding a breach of those provisions but noting the petitioner had cr…
JAGRUTIBEN PINKESHBHAI PATELversusMANAGER, DHANSHOBHAVAK CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.
36-MCA DISPOSED OF
The petitioner, Jagrutiben Pinkeshbhai Patel, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking restoration of a Special Civil Application that had been pending. The application had been delayed by 66 days. The Court examined the pleadings and, exercising its discretion, condoned the delay. Consequently, the Special Civi…
BIPINCHANDRA KANTILAL PATEL S/O KANTILAL SOMNATH PATELversusFIELD ADVISOR - NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The petitioner, Bipinchandra Kantilal Patel, failed to appear before the High Court of Gujarat as his residence was found locked and he had reportedly moved to Canada, leaving no known address. The court noted that the petitioner’s advocate had withdrawn and a fresh notice was issued, but the petitioner remained absent…
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,versusITS WORKMAN, C/O. HAMIRBHAI HIRABHAI MAKWANA
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
The Divisional Controller filed a Special Civil Application No. 6067 of 2007 against its workman, C/O Hamirbhai Hirabhai Makwana. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Avani S. Mehta, was not present when the matter was called out for hearing. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s counsel and consequently dismissed t…
M/S. BHARUCH DAHEJ RAILWAY COMPANY LIMITEDversusREGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER (C), VADODARA
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
M/s Bharuch Dahej Railway Company Ltd challenged an order dated 08.07.2024 of the Regional Labour Commissioner, Vadodara, which directed the company to deposit Rs.25,07,582 as overtime wages for workmen employed on railway track maintenance. The company argued that the order was passed ex‑parte, without giving it an op…
UMA DEVI SELVARAJversusINSPECTOR OF POLICE, NILAMBAUG POLICE STATION, BHAVNAGAR
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The petitioner, Uma Devi Selvaraj, filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat. The petitioner’s counsel repeatedly sought adjournments and failed to appear on the scheduled dates. On the last date of hearing, the petitioner did not appear when the matter was called out, leading to another adjour…
DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITEDversusINDUS TOWERS LTD.
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 23.03.2023 passed by the Forum in Review Application No.154 and the order dated 17.12.2022 in Appeal No.143/2022-23 that cancelled a supplementary bill raised by the petitioner. The respondent, Indus Towers Ltd., submitted an affidavit an…
SURESHBHAI JINABHAI SUDANIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sureshbhai Jinabhai Sudani, filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The petitioner’s counsel, M.R. Saiyed, submitted a request for withdrawal. The court, after hearing the submission, granted permission to wi…
KANABHAI BIJALBHAI TRAMATAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
Kanabhai Bijalbhai Tramata filed a special civil application seeking a direction that the State of Gujarat accept his application for compounding under Rule 12 read with Rule 22 of the Gujarat Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017, and allow him to deposit the compounding amoun…
BHARATSANG MANUBHAI DABHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Bhavesh Ramjibhai Gosiya, filed multiple special civil applications against the Passport Authority. The High Court, after hearing, issued a common order directing that all office objections be removed within four weeks from the date of the order. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in t…
KATHERINE BASHYAM W/O VINCENT BASHYAMversusAUTHORIZED OFFICER, AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Petitioner Ms. Sophia F. Pathan filed Special Civil Application No. 2878 of 2026 seeking relief against Authorized Officer, Authum Investment and Infrastructure Ltd. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the application and instead approach the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal for an appeal. The Court, …
PARESHBHAI HASMUKHBHAI PATELversusLIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD.
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Parshbhai Hasmukhbhai Patel and another, filed a Special Civil Application seeking interim relief against an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal that denied them protection and scheduled possession of their secured property on 14‑02‑2026. They argued that the time frame was insufficient to file an app…
RAKESHKUMAR KESHAVBHAI PRAJAPATIversusTHE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed a Special Civil Application seeking a writ of mandamus to quash a DRT order that denied their request for interim relief and to restrain the bank from taking possession of their secured property. They argued that the appeal against the DRT order was pending and that possession scheduled for 15‑02‑…
M/S J K PLYWOOD AND HARDWAREversusSAMMAN CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED)
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners sought a stay on the bank's action to take possession of secured assets scheduled for 14‑02‑2026, invoking their right to appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act. They argued that the Court Commissioner’s notice and the DRT‑II’s order refusing interim relief were only made available online a day aft…
KANBI RAVTABHAI DHARMABHAIversusLHS OF LRS OF DECD. KANBI DHANABHAI RAMABHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, owners of land in Village Mandal, alleged that the Mamlatdar improperly ordered them to remove obstructions on a road used by the respondents to access their agricultural fields. They challenged the Mamlatdar’s order and the Deputy Collector’s confirmation on grounds of procedural defects, limitation, …
M/S KRISHNA STEEL AND CROCKERYversusTHE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
M/s Krishna Steel and Crockery & Ors. filed a special civil writ petition before the High Court of Gujarat against the Authorized Officer. The petitioners contended that the reliefs they sought had become moot because the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai, holding the charge of DRAT, Mumbai, had already …
RAMESHBHAI JESANGBHAI KOLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, a resident of Tappar village, filed a special civil application seeking a writ directing the Collector to decide his earlier application and to restrain Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. from laying underground electric transmission cables through the village. The respondent corporation had o…
HARESHKUMAR UTTAMCHAND MORANDANI, PARTNER OF JAYSHREE TALKIESversusTHE PGVCL, PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Petitioner Hareskumar Uttamchand Morandani filed Special Civil Application No. 13247 of 2023 against PGVCL and Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. The petitioner, through counsel, communicated on 24.01.2026 that the parties had reached a settlement and he wished to withdraw the application. The court took the communicatio…
DHRUPESH HARESHBHAI CHAVDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
The petitioner challenged the Mamlatdar's order rejecting his application for a caste certificate, alleging that the Mamlatdar failed to consider all supporting documents and did not make findings on their genuineness. The petitioner submitted caste certificates of his ancestors, a committee recommendation dated 10‑04‑…
PATEL AGENCY THROUGH RAJANI VALLABHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE
Patel Agency filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the respondent State of Gujarat and its subordinate police officers strictly comply with a circular dated 08‑09‑2025 issued by the Home Department. The Assistant Government Pleader for the State affirmed that the circular must indeed be strictly followed. Rely…
M/S. FORTUNE GENERIX PHARMA LLP THROUGH ITS PARTNERS ASHWIN SHIVKUMAR SIRASLEWALAversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
M/s. Fortune Generix Pharma LLP filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court against the Central Bank of India. The petitioners, through counsel Ms. Riddhi Vadgama and Mr. Ritesh D. Patadia, sought permission to withdraw the petition due to subsequent events. The Court, after hearing the application,…
JETHABHAI RAMBHAI BARAIYAversusPUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Jethabhai Rambhai Baraiya, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court against the Public Information Officer. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the application, indicating an intention to pursue relief under the Right to Information Act, 2005 before the State Information Commi…
L P MANDARWAL - DIRECTORversusINFORMATION COMMISSIONER
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
In a Special Civil Application, L.P. Mandarwal, Director, sought relief against the Information Commissioner. The Central Information Commission had ordered the petitioner to pay Rs.5,000 as compensation to the complainant on 02.07.2007. The petitioner, through counsel, submitted that the compensation cheque had been h…
GUJARAT RAJYA POLICE A.S.I./ HEAD CONSTABLES ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH
The Gujarat Rajya Police ASI/Head Constables Association filed a special civil application seeking recognition of an association for Assistant Sub‑Inspectors, Head Constables and Constables, after an earlier application for the same was rejected by the Director General of Police on 12 September 2007. Relying on a 2006 …
KEPLER RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
Kepler Resources Private Limited, a new industrial undertaking manufacturing ferro‑vanadium, applied for exemption from electricity duty under Section 3(2)(vii) of the Gujarat Electricity Duty Act, 1958. The company began production on 29‑Nov‑2023 and was required to submit Form‑E within 90 days, i.e., by 26‑Feb‑2024. …
KASHISH TRADELINK PRIVATE LIMITEDversusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
Kashish Tradelink Private Limited applied for a fresh representation seeking allotment of Plot No.10A in the GIDC, Pandesara, Surat, invoking the existing GIDC policy. The petitioner argued that an expeditious decision was required because Respondent No.2 had already begun construction on the same plot. The High Court,…
BHAGEERATHA ENGINEERING LIMITEDversusGUJARAT PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS DISPUTES ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Bhageeratha Engineering Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal to expedite Arbitration Reference No.45 of 2001, which pertains to a contract for earthwork and related works under the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Project. The petition…
DASHRATHLAL RAMJIBHAI PARMARversusPRAJAPATI JASWANTBHAI HORGOVANBHAI
36-MCA DISPOSED OF
Dashrathlal Ramjibhai Parmar filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking to recall the order dated 08‑01‑2026 in Special Civil Application No.205 of 2026 and to restrain respondents 1‑6 from contesting the election of directors of Kheralu Nagarik Sahkari Bank Ltd, as well as to stop the Chief Election Officer (resp…
ASTHA INTERNATIONALversusSTANDARD CHARTERED BANK
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Astha International, filed a special civil application seeking permission to withdraw its writ petition against Standard Chartered Bank and another respondent. The petitioner argued that it wished to pursue its claims in the appropriate forum or authority rather than before the High Court. The learned c…