Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
130 judgments · newest first · showing 1–130
The petitioner, Sultan Ahmad Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a 2015 order of the Civil Judge and a 2021 order of the Additional District Judge that had rejected his interim injunction application and its appeal. The petition was listed as infructuous and no counsel …
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents. The court noted the lack of any party presence and classified the petition as infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed …
Shambhu Saran filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to pass an order for payment of the third Assured Career Progression benefit and leave encashment for 300 days. The petitioner claimed entitlement to these benefits …
The appellant filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court but failed to pay the required court fees of Rs. 56,977.50. The court initially granted the appellant a month to deposit the fees on 28 March 2024, and later, on 6 April 2026, gave a final one‑month extension as a last chance. …
The appellant filed a first appeal (Defective No. 165 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court but had a deficiency of court fees amounting to Rs. 2,67,215. The court initially granted the appellant a month to pay the fees on 28 March 2026 and later, on 6 April 2026, gave a final one‑month extension …
The appellants, Indrasen Singh and nine others, filed an appeal in the Allahabad High Court but failed to pay a court fee deficiency of Rs. 3,98,770. The court initially granted them a one‑month extension on 28 March 2026 to remedy the deficiency, followed by a final one‑month extension on 6 April …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a September 2024 order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge in a rent appeal (Rent Appeal No. 20 of 2021) and to enforce a Small Cause Court judgment granting them possession of a property in Saharanpur. The …
The petitioners Ahsan and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was listed as infructuous and no appearance was made by the petitioners on the scheduled date. The court observed that …
The writ petition filed by Suryakant and another under Article 227 was listed as infructuous, meaning no parties appeared before the court. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of being infructuous. No substantive facts, legal issues, or arguments were addressed. The …
The petitioners, Sharda Prasad and another, challenged two office orders dated 29‑12‑2016 and 05‑01‑2017 that directed their removal from contractual Technical Assistant posts after attaining the age of 62. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the orders and a mandamus directing the respondents …
The petitioner, originally appointed as a Seasonal Collection Amin and later temporarily promoted to Collection Amin, was terminated under the Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975 after a show‑cause notice revealed that his appointment was based on an …
Durga Prasad, a Technical Assistant appointed in 1980, was asked by the Department to produce his High School Certificate and Intermediate marksheet, which he could not furnish because the school was closed during his leave. The Department threatened discharge for non‑compliance and subsequently …
Constable Bacha Lal Singh, appointed to the Border Security Force in 1973, voluntarily resigned in 1984 after serving just over ten years due to family circumstances. He later sought a proportionate pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, but the respondents rejected his claim, stating that …
The petitioner, a former Accounts Officer, challenged a disciplinary order dated 24‑12‑2002 that directed recovery of Rs.1,45,450 from his salary in monthly installments. The order, issued after a departmental inquiry into alleged irregularities, was never enforced during his service and was later …
The petitioners, members of the Meena community, applied for Constable positions in the Provincial Armed Constabulary of Uttar Pradesh, claiming Scheduled Tribe reservation based on a Rajasthan ST certificate. Their recruitment was cancelled, and they sought a mandamus directing the state to train …
The petitioner, Ram Pravesh Sonkar, was selected as a constable in the Railway Protection Force and sent to a BSF training centre. He was reported to have absconded from training on two occasions, despite being given two opportunities to complete it. The petitioner alleged that the training …
Ram Ratan Paswan, a former Constable of the CRPF, was discharged in April 2001 for alleged unauthorized absence after taking leave for his wife's illness. He challenged the discharge in Writ Petition No. 4467 of 2005, and the Allahabad High Court reinstated him, directing that the period of …
The petitioner, Upendra Mohan, filed a writ petition challenging the result of a recruitment process for various police posts in Uttar Pradesh, seeking a certiorari to quash the result dated 19 July 2022 and a mandamus directing the Police Recruitment and Promotion Board to issue a fresh list that …
The petitioner, Gyan Lata Pal, was selected for the post of Deputy Jailor under a 2008 advertisement that did not prescribe physical standards for female candidates. After her appointment in July 2015, the State invoked physical standards introduced by a 2014 amendment to the U.P. Prisoner …
The petition was filed by Gyan Lata Pal against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petitioner was represented by counsel Nikhil Mishra, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. After hearing, the Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition. The court directed that …
The writ petition (Writ A No. 21015 of 2024) filed by Gyan Lata Pal and others against the State of U.P. and others was disposed by the Allahabad High Court. The petition was heard before Justice Anish Kumar Gupta. No substantive findings on facts or legal issues were recorded in the present order. …
The petitioner, Baleshwar Dayal Sharma, died on 2 July 2017. His legal heirs filed a substitution application along with a request for condonation of delay in filing the same. The court observed that the affidavit supporting the delay provided only a vague explanation and found no sufficient cause …
Petitioner Santosh Kumar Awasthi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition suffered multiple adjournments due to the counsel's repeated illness, and on the scheduled date of 16 September 2026 no counsel or representative appeared. The Court noted that the petitioner had not …
The petitioner, a retired government employee, challenged a deduction of Rs 4,93,073 from his leave encashment, which the respondents claimed was excess salary paid due to an erroneous pay‑scale fixation. The petitioner argued that, under the Supreme Court’s decision in State of Punjab v. Rafiq …
The petitioners sought mandamus directing the revenue authorities to record their names in a lease agricultural land record and to decide a pending representation. The State's standing counsel objected, stating that the petitioners must first file an application under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar …
The dispute concerned a registered agreement to sell a two‑storey house for Rs 40,00,000, of which Rs 10,00,000 was paid as earnest money. The respondents sought specific performance, alleging they were ready to pay the balance, but the appellant failed to appear at the Sub‑Registrar on the agreed …
The appellant Yudhishthir Yadav filed First Appeal No. 703 of 2026 against the judgment in the earlier case Yudhishthir Yadav vs. Abhishek Kumar and Another. The matter was heard before Hon’ble Justice Anish Kumar Gupta. The court delivered its judgment on 14 September 2026, wherein it dismissed the …
The petitioner, Bhawani Prasad Tiwari, filed a writ petition challenging the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate’s (S.D.M.) order dated 29 July 2026 that rejected his application for impleadment as an interested party in a revenue proceeding under section 38(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The …
The petitioner sought re‑installation of demarcation pillars that had been installed under an order passed pursuant to Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code on 06‑06‑2022, but were later removed by private individuals, leading to an FIR and a final report. The petitioner applied to the …
The applicant, Sanjiv Kumar Singh, filed a contempt petition against the Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Audit Section-1, Government of U.P., alleging non‑compliance with a prior court order dated 12 January 2026. The respondent filed a compliance affidavit, which the court took on record and …
The petitioners Diwas Kasana and Ravindra Shivamani filed writ petitions seeking a direction to implement an order dated 29 January 2026 of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue, issued under Section 80 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. They claimed that the required fee under sub‑section (9) of Section …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the Fast Track Court, Junior Division, Bareilly willfully violated an order dated 20 January 2026, which directed the court to decide an interim injunction application expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks. The order, issued by the …
The petitioners Munna and others challenged two orders: one dated 23 July 2026 dismissing their second appeal as not maintainable under Section 209(e) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, and another dated 16 October 2025 which remanded the matter back to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate after setting …
The applicant, Shiv Prasad Tripathi, filed a contempt application seeking to hold the respondents in contempt of an order dated 17 September 2025 issued in Writ A No. 13914 of 2025. That order required each petitioner to file an individual representation with a certified copy of the order, after …
Mewalal filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against the Director General of Police, Sri Rajeev Krishna, and two others. The applicant's counsel, Lal Chandra Mishra, submitted that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The court considered the …
The applicants filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had failed to comply with an order dated 9 September 2019 in Writ Petition No. 12175 of 2018, which required implementation of a Pension/Gratuity Scheme within eight weeks. Two special appeals (Nos. 1071 and 1072 of 2019) were …
Ashok Kumar Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Badlapur to decide a revenue case (Case No. 6174 of 2026) under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 within three months and to ensure that all proceedings are recorded and signed …
The petitioner, Smt. Mainawati, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue to decide a stay application filed in Second Appeal No. 4589 of 2025 and to maintain the status quo over the disputed property. The Board of Revenue had admitted the second appeal on 27 October …
The petitioner, a Lekhpal appointed in 1985, was transferred to a new posting on 30‑09‑1997. Shortly thereafter, a preliminary inquiry alleged that forged entries had been made in revenue records prior to his joining, and he was suspended and later terminated on 26‑03‑1998. The petitioner contended …
The petitioner, Azimul Islam, was appointed as a Seenchpal in the Irrigation Department after completing a three‑month apprenticeship and being placed on a select list prepared on 8 January 1996 under Rule 13 of the Irrigation Department Patraul Service Rules, 1953. He was subsequently terminated on …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging the conduct of the U.P. Upper Sub‑ordinate Services Preliminary Examination and the Returning Officer Preliminary Examination held on 8 April 2018 and 24 June 2018. An interim order allowed the petitioner to appear in the examinations …
The petitioner, Indu Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Gyanpur to mutate a revenue order dated 24-10-2024 and restore her name in the khatauni for a specific plot of land. The petition relied on Section 219 of the Land Revenue Act, 1901, alleging that the …
The petitioner, Govind Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Manish Kumar Pandey, was unable to contact his client and indicated that the grievance might have been resolved. Consequently, the petitioner did not appear before the court and no …
The petitioner, Goving Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was listed peremptorily, and the petitioner’s counsel, Manish Kumar Pandey, requested an adjournment on a previous occasion. …
The appellant, Santraj Singh, filed an appeal under Section 74 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, challenging an order dated 24.03.2026. The Registry objected, stating that a Section 74 appeal can be filed only against …
Petitioner Satendra Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, U.P. Circuit Court Meerut to decide Revision No. 358 of 2025 (Amaruddin & others v. Satendra Singh & others) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed period. The petition …
The petitioners, Santosh Kumar and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23 September 2024 passed by the Board of Revenue in Revision No. 501/2009‑2010 (Rajendra Kumar vs. Smt. Meera Devi). They contended that the order was made against the deceased Meera Devi, who had died on 28 …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, Allahabad to decide a second appeal (No. 1222 of 2015) that had been pending for eleven years. The petition alleged that the delay violated their right to timely justice. The State did not oppose the prayer. The …
The petitioner, Ram Ratan, was initially engaged on a temporary basis as a Chaukidar from 1991 and later regularized in 1992, but his appointment was repeatedly treated as temporary. After a 1993 judgment allowed him to continue as a temporary employee, he was terminated on 3 December 1996 following …
The revisionist, Hariom Sharma, filed a criminal revision (No. 5823 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist failed to appear when the matter was listed on 03.06.2025, and again failed to appear on the subsequent date. …
The petitioner, a constable of the CRPF who had acquired substantive status, was compelled to resign in December 2000 to obtain leave for his ailing wife. He applied to withdraw his resignation on 17 January 2001, before the resignation became effective on 25 January 2001, and was subsequently …
Petitioner Dav Raj filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay him the minimum regular pay as per a 2002 Government Order and a 2010 Order, and to regularize his Group D service, relying on a Supreme Court decision in State of U.P. v. Putti Lal. The State …
The petitioner, Ram Babu, a tractor driver appointed in 2000, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation and a minimum pay‑scale. He had continuously served without break and was granted successive minimum pay‑scales in 2012 (Rs. 6050), 2011 (Rs. 7000) and 2023 (Rs. 18,000) along with arrears. The …
The petitioner, Ram Dev, a daily wager in the Forest Department since 1976, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay him the minimum salary applicable to Class‑IV employees in Uttar Pradesh. The respondents contended that daily labourers are not entitled to minimum …
Petitioners Kedar Nath and Shiv Govind, employed as Class IV workers in the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them the minimum pay scale applicable to their posts and to decide on their representation. The State, through its …
Petitioner Shree Pal filed a writ petition seeking to be placed on a minimum pay scale. The State of U.P., through its Additional Chief Standing Counsel, informed the court that the petitioner had already been regularized and was receiving the regular pay scale, rendering the relief sought moot. …
The petitioner, a daily wager in the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department since 1990, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation and payment of minimum pay scale, alleging continuous service prior to the cut‑off date of 29‑June‑1991 and wrongful oral removal after the petition was filed. The …
The petitioner, Naresh, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation as a Chaukidar and the grant of a minimum pay scale, claiming continuous daily‑wage service from 1998 to the filing date in May 2010. The State, through a counter‑affidavit, contended that the petitioner had only worked …
Petitioner Pooja Ram filed a writ petition seeking regularisation and the grant of a minimum pay scale from the State of Uttar Pradesh. The respondents rejected the petitioner's claim, citing subsequent orders in related writ petitions. The petitioner, through counsel, subsequently moved to withdraw …
Virendra Singh, an ex‑Constable, filed writ petition No. 38895 of 2002 in the Allahabad High Court against the Director General of C.R.P.F. and others. The petition was listed but no further steps were taken to prosecute it. The court noted that no party appeared to press the writ petition and that …
The petitioner, Ram Dhari, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 November 2019 that suspended him pending disciplinary proceedings. The standing counsel informed the court that the disciplinary proceedings had concluded, the petitioner was exonerated, and he subsequently retired with …
The petitioner, Yogesh Kumar, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash the order dated 15 September 2015 that cancelled his promotion to the post of Head Clerk Khand Shiksha Adhikari, and also sought a mandamus directing his promotion. The petition was filed …
The petitioner, Smt. Beena, sought a compassionate appointment after her mother, a peon, died in service. The respondent authority rejected her claim, stating that only unmarried daughters were eligible under the 1974 Rules. The Court examined prior judgments, notably Vimla Srivastava, which struck …
Satish Kumar Bhatnagar filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 33136 of 2007) against the Union of India seeking relief after three charge‑sheets were issued to him. The High Court directed the respondent to file a counter‑affidavit to show what action had been taken. Both parties exchanged …
The petitioner, Bhoop Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 3 September 2007 that cancelled his selection as Constable in the 47‑Battalian PAC, Ghaziabad, on the ground that his high school mark‑sheet was found forged. The petition remained pending since 2007 and no …
Petitioner Triveni Dutt Sharma filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 19‑Mar‑2008 issued by the Commandant of 47‑Battalion, P.A.C., Ghaziabad, which led to his termination on the ground that his appointment documents were forged. The petition sought to quash the notice and the …
The petitioner, Yogesh Chandra Bajpai, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to retire him at age 58, to pay him salary and benefits as if his retirement age were 60, and to quash a policy decision that raised the superannuation age. The petition also challenged a specific …
Deep Chand Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to retire him at the age of 58 and to pay his salary and benefits as if his retirement age were 60. The petitioners were represented by counsel Rakesh Pandey and Sudhir Srivastava, …
The petitioner, Ram Murati, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to pay his General Provident Fund (GPF) amount (IRRTU 47095) and to decide a representation dated 14 June 2012. The respondent counsel informed the court that the GPF amount had …
The petitioner, a former peon/chainman, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to decide a representation he submitted on 21 August 2014 and to grant consequential service benefits. The representation pertained to his termination order dated 10 March 1998, which he had not …
The petitioner, a retired Assistant Prosecution Officer, challenged the recovery of Rs. 68,619 from his retirement dues, which the respondents claimed was excess pay due to an erroneous increment. After his retirement, the petitioner gave written consent to the deduction under pressure, and the …
Petitioner Ram Dhari filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 09.04.2013 that terminated his services as Collection Amin and also sought a mandamus directing his regular posting and payment of salary and benefits. He argued that the termination was illegal and that he should be …
Petitioner Lomesh Dutt Sharma filed a writ petition seeking mandamus orders directing the District Magistrate, Meerut, to pay various arrears, gratuity, and a share of GPF amount. The petitioner’s counsel, Mohan Srivastava, who is also the State’s Standing Counsel, requested time to file a fresh …
The petitioner, Imarti Devi, sought to enforce the payment of consequential benefits that were ordered to be restored after her late husband, Chhote Lal, a Class‑IV employee of the Allahabad High Court, had his punitive order of one‑increment stoppage quashed by the Court in Writ Petition No. 59565 …
The petitioner, a retired Sub Inspector of the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay his gratuity, post‑retirement benefits, full pension and arrears that had been withheld due to the pendency of a criminal case (Crime No. 431 of 1996). The …
The petitioner, Amar Singh Yadav, was appointed as a constable in the Uttar Pradesh Police on 1 February 1982 but was terminated on 26 June 1982. He was reinstated on 4 May 1991 by a government order that treated the intervening period as extraordinary leave, with the condition that he would not …
The petitioner, Babu Ram, a Class III employee, challenged a recovery order of Rs. 2,11,147 made from his retirement dues on the ground that the excess amount arose from a wrong fixation of his pay scale, for which he bore no responsibility and had not given any undertaking. The petitioner relied on …
The petitioner, Laiq Ahmad, challenged three orders dated 04.01.2024, 30.12.2024 and 31.12.2024 whereby the third ACP granted to him was withdrawn without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The petitioner argued that the orders violated the principles of natural justice. The Court examined …
The appellant, Lal Sahai, filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the order of the lower court. The court issued notices on 13 February 2026 directing the appellant to engage counsel, but no Vakalatnama or any representation was filed. The court presumed the notices were duly …
The petitioner challenged the selection of three Junior Clerks at the Government Woodcraft Industrial Training Institute, alleging violations of the advertised age limit and procedural rules. The advertisement stipulated a general‑category age limit of 18 to 35 years as of 1 July 2004, yet …
Petitioner Kundan Singh filed a writ petition seeking (a) a certiorari to quash an order dated 10 June 2010 and (b) a mandamus directing that he be allowed to continue in a Class III post with salary until the petition is decided. The petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court. During the …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging a suspension order dated 29 July 2010. The respondent State filed a counter‑affidavit stating that the disciplinary proceedings had concluded on 19 November 2010, exonerating the petitioner on two charges and finding indiscipline on only …
Ram Lal filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his application for regularisation of service and sought a certiorari and mandamus. He later died on 19‑11‑2014. A substitution application was filed in 2017 but the State respondents did not file a reply. The Court examined whether a …
The petitioner, Yashodhara Devi, challenged the cancellation of her appointment as Anganwadi Karyakartri after a fresh inquiry re‑classified her from BPL to APL. Initially appointed in 2011 based on a BPL certificate, a subsequent inquiry alleged she did not belong to the BPL category, leading to …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to pay post‑retrials benefits of Rs 12,88,9333/- to the legal heir of the deceased employee, along with interest at 12% per annum from the date of death. The High Court …
Smt. Dulari filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 7059 of 1982) against D.D.C. and others. The petition remained pending for decades. On the hearing dated 29‑03‑2023, no counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the petitioner was reported to have lost interest in pursuing the case. The respondent’s …
Petitioner Shashima Maurya filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 51005 of 2012) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the …
Petitioner Radhey Shyam filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 10393 of 2023) seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 08‑06‑2023 issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Aligarh, and a mandamus directing the State to refund an amount deducted from his funds. The petitioner’s counsel, Amit …
Kunwar Pal Singh, a constable of the Uttar Pradesh Police, was alleged to have been intoxicated while on duty in 2011 and, as a result, a bullet from his service rifle injured two civilians. A criminal FIR was lodged and he was later tried under IPC sections 286 and 338, where he was acquitted. The …
Manoj Kumar Yadav, an Inspector in the Railway Protection Force, was arrested after being caught red‑handed taking a bribe and an FIR was filed under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A disciplinary enquiry was simultaneously initiated against him for the same allegations, and he …
The petitioner, a constable in the Uttar Pradesh Police, sought to quash an order that denied his medical leave, salary for 86 days, and imposed a fine, alleging that his medical certificates were improperly rejected because they lacked the Chief Medical Officer's countersignature. He had been on …
Jamuna Prasad filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 26959 of 2002) seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 15 June 2002 passed by the Director General of Police, PAC. The petition was presented before the Court No. 34, but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear at the hearing, and only the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 28 August 2025 that rejected a restoration application under Section 48(3) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, despite a compromise between the parties. The dispute arose from a sale of a share in an agricultural chak, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The case had been listed for priority hearing and earlier adjournments were requested by the petitioner’s counsel. On the hearing date, the petitioner’s counsel reported illness but failed to arrange an alternative …
Ram Kishan alias Kishan filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the sole petitioner had died, rendering the petition infructuous. The court held that the death of the petitioner abates the proceeding. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, challenged a suspension order dated 12‑12‑2025 that attached him to a government Ayurvedic hospital pending disciplinary proceedings. The respondents argued that disciplinary action was being initiated, a charge sheet was to be issued shortly, and the petitioner was …
The petitioner, Km Ritu Singh, challenged the document verification and final result of the UP Police Computer Operator Grade A 2023 direct recruitment, alleging that her OBC caste certificate, though issued later, should be accepted. The recruitment advertisement required OBC candidates to submit a …
The petitioner was appointed as an orderly in June 1987 and terminated in October 1987 under the Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975. An interim order stayed the termination, allowing him to continue in service until June 2022, despite the writ petition …
Petitioner Moti had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel moved to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, directing that the benefits already granted continue until the …
The petitioners, Kamalesh Kumar and another, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. Their counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, therefore moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating it had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court …
The petitioners, having already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, moved the High Court to withdraw their writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. It ordered that the benefits already granted to the petitioners shall continue until their superannuation, …
The petitioners, having already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, moved the High Court to withdraw their writ petition. Their counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, argued that the relief already obtained rendered the petition infructuous. The Court accepted the withdrawal and …
The petitioner, Suresh Singh, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. His counsel therefore moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating it had become infructuous. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further …
The petitioner, Brij Bhoosan, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears. Consequently, his counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition, arguing it had become infructuous. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further …
The petitioners, Lallan Prasad and another, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears. Consequently, their counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the relief sought was already obtained. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as …
The petitioner, Sharada Prasad, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, making the pending writ petition redundant. His counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Verma, had previously been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears by the authorities. On the basis of this relief, his counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, moved that the present writ petition had become infructuous and sought its withdrawal. The Court accepted …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, rendering the pending writ petition unnecessary. His counsel, Lallan Prasad Pal, moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and ordered that …
The petitioners, represented by Lallan Prasad Pal, sought relief regarding their pay scale but informed the court that they had already been granted a minimum pay of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, rendering the petition unnecessary. Consequently, the petitioners requested withdrawal of the writ petition. …
The petitioner, Chhavinath Dwivedi, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, rendering the pending writ petition unnecessary. Accordingly, his counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court ordered that the …
Petitioner Shree Ram Rajbhar filed a writ petition seeking a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that this relief had already been granted, rendering the petition infructuous, and requested its withdrawal. The court accepted the withdrawal and …
The petitioners, Deo Raj Singh and two others, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, making their writ petition effectively moot. Their counsel moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as …
Petitioner Guddu filed a writ petition seeking a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the relief had already been granted, rendering the petition infructuous, and requested its withdrawal. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the …
Petitioner Fauzi Pal had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, and his counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition on that basis. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further directed that the benefits already granted …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or present any counsel when the case was listed, even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been previously granted. …
The petitioner, Jagvir Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 40488 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no representative of the petitioner appeared even after a revised call. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and proceeded to dismiss the petition on …
Petitioner Uma Shankar Tiwari filed Writ Petition No. 73919 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed for hearing but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, even after a revised call. The Court …
The petitioners, having already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, moved the High Court to withdraw their writ petition. The petition was consequently dismissed as withdrawn. The court directed that the benefits already granted to the petitioners shall continue until their …
The petitioner, Suresh, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears by the authorities. Consequently, his counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition, stating it had become infructuous. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The …
Petitioner Anil Kumar had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, rendering the relief sought in the writ petition unnecessary. Counsel for the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition on this basis. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and directed that …
The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the minimum pay scale had already been granted, rendering the petition infructuous, and requested its withdrawal. The court dismissed the …
The petitioner, Najeer Hussain, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs.18,000 with arrears, and his counsel moved to withdraw the writ petition on that basis. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The Court further directed that the benefits …
The petitioner, Haushila Prasad Yadav, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs 18,000 with arrears, rendering the writ petition unnecessary. Accordingly, his counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and ordered that the benefits already …
The petitioner, Bhagwan Deen, had already been granted a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, rendering the pending writ petition unnecessary. His counsel moved to withdraw the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn. The court directed that the benefits already awarded to the …
The petitioners, Nanhak and another, filed a writ petition seeking a higher minimum pay scale. While the petition was pending, they were granted a minimum pay of Rs. 18,000 with arrears, rendering the petition infructuous. Their counsel, A.R. Dube, moved to withdraw the petition. The Court dismissed …
Petitioner Rajendra Singh sought a writ for a minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000 with arrears. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the minimum pay had already been granted, rendering the petition infructuous, and requested its withdrawal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. It …
Petitioner Pooran Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the original petition record was missing but had been reconstructed. Counsel for the petitioner later moved that the petition be withdrawn as there was no longer any grievance. The court accepted the …
Petitioner Ahilkar filed a writ petition seeking relief regarding his minimum pay scale. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the order granting the minimum pay scale without allowances had already been obtained, and therefore requested to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the …
The petitioner applied for a Constable post in 2013, passed the written and physical tests, but was declared unfit in the medical examination due to poor vision (6/24 left, 6/18 right). He sought a re‑examination, which again found him unfit, and later produced private medical certificates claiming …
