Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ARUN BHANSALI

106 judgments · newest first · showing 1–106

DAYA NAND SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to order an inquiry into alleged irregularities by a Village Pradhan, based on a representation dated 5 January 2026. The Court examined the representation and found it to contain only vague, general …

MANINDRA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a self‑described agriculturist with only a 9th‑standard education, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking directions for the construction of water tanks in villages and a fair inquiry against a contractor. The court examined the petitioner's credentials and questioned his ability …

SMT. SANDHYA CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sandhya Chaudhary, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a court direction to demolish an alleged illegal construction by respondent No.5 at a village in Basti district. The record revealed that both parties are co‑tenants and neighbours, and the dispute arose from an …

ANVITARTH SHAHIversusM/S SUDHA REALTERS PVT LTD. AND 5 OTHERS

The appellant filed an application under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to withdraw the pending appeal against M/s Sudha Realters Pvt Ltd. and others. The court examined the affidavit supporting the withdrawal request. Finding the reasons satisfactory, the court …

MAHENDRA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking to restrain the State and Jal Nigam from demolishing and occupying a plot of land used as a Daswasthal and Samadhi in Puranpur, Pilibhit. The petitioner alleged that the construction of a pump house and related water‑supply facilities by Jal …

UNION OF INIDA AND 4 OTHERSversusKHURSHEED AHMAD HASHMI AND ANOTHER

The Union of India and four other respondents filed a writ petition challenging two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that directed the grant of Non‑Functional Upgrade (NFU) to two retired Junior Works Managers of the Department of Defence Production. The respondents had served in …

SMT BABITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a corporator of Nagar Nigam Prayagraj, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to correct a revenue record entry and to remove an encroachment on the land. The petitioner claimed to have repeatedly written to the respondents, the State of U.P. and five others, …

CHHATRAPATI SHAHU JI MAHARAJ UNIVERSITYversusSAKSHAM PAL AND 9 OTHERS

The University had issued an order on 1 May 2026 requiring a student to furnish psychiatric and psychological assessment reports, which the student challenged by filing a writ petition. The Single Judge, after a video‑conference hearing on 28 July 2026, quashed the University’s order without …

MOHAMMAD NAJIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation alleging that the Nagar Palika Parishad issued two work orders for the same repair work on the same day with different monetary values, suggesting possible defalcation. The petitioner also submitted a representation on 11.08.2026 raising general …

ACHYUTANAND SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Achyutanand Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ-C No. 7250 of 2009) which the court ordered to be connected with two earlier writ petitions, Chhotey Lal Verma v. State of U.P. (Writ-C No. 45382 of 2008) and Virendra Pathak v. State of U.P. (Writ-C No. 62361 of 2008). The first …

SOORAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of respondent No.8 from the post of Administrator of the Village Panchayat of Ramana Taufeer, alleging that a District Magistrate’s order dated 15 July 2026 had found the respondent guilty of wrongdoing and ordered a recovery. The …

ATI PICHHADA EKIKARAN MAHAABHIYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner-society filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to issue a Scheduled Caste certificate to the Prajapati caste of the Shilpkar community. The petition was presented as a public interest litigation, but the court observed that the …

HARISH CHANDRA SAINIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Harish Chandra Saini challenged his termination order of 2002 by filing an original application in 2015 after seeking condonation of delay. The Central Administrative Tribunal rejected the condonation request, deeming the 13‑year delay unexplained and dismissed the original application as …

RAKESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Permanent Way Mistri employed by East Central Railway, was deputed to Diesel Locomotive Works, Varanasi in 1997 for an initial three‑year period, which was subsequently extended repeatedly until 2019 when the deputation was terminated. He contended that the deputation had exceeded …

KRISHNA KESHAV SONIversusUNION OF INDIA THRU SECRY. HOME AND 2 ORS.

Krishna Keshav Soni filed Special Appeal No. 305 of 2014 against the Union of India. The appeal was listed for priority hearing but was barred by a delay of 139 days. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. The Court observed that the appellant had lost interest in the petition due to the …

NITEESH DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Niteesh Dixit, filed a writ petition (Writ-C No. 57105 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed as an 'Oldest Pending Cases' for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the hearing date. The court observed that, owing to the …

ASHISH ANANDversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashish Anand, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed for hearing on 2 February 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear. Subsequent hearings also saw no appearance by the petitioner. The court observed that the petitioner had lost interest in …

SHAHID AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 ORS.

The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 48508 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing. The court noted the passage of time and inferred that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court …

DINESH GUPTAversusCOMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, ADARSH INTER COLLEGE AND 7 OTHERS

The dispute concerned the election of the Committee of Management of Adarsh Inter College. The Regional Level Committee (RLC) disapproved the elections held on 21‑12‑2025 and ordered fresh elections, but the RLC order was signed by a single officer in two capacities, violating quorum requirements. A …

PANCHAM SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Postal Assistant, was dismissed from service after being convicted by the CBI Court for forging educational documents. He challenged the dismissal, arguing that he was not given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the show‑cause notice while in jail and that the departmental …

UNION OF INIDA AND 3 OTHERSversusPREM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal order that directed the release of a retired railway servant's pension despite a pending criminal appeal against his conviction. The respondent, a former Helper in the North Eastern Railways, had been reinstated …

KAILASH CHAND VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove alleged encroachments on specific Khasra parcels in Ghaziabad and on land belonging to the Nagar Nigam and the Hindon riverbed. The respondents contested the petitioner’s claim, asserting that the photographs and …

VIVEKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHER

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the appointment of an Orthopedic Surgeon at Government United Hospital, Sikandrabad, a post vacant for over a year, and also sought reinstatement of Dr. Pradeep Sharma. The court noted that the petition appeared to be …

JAI SINGH YADAV AND 78 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jai Singh Yadav and 78 others, filed Writ-C No. 30597 of 2018 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. The petition was heard by the Chief Justice's Court, comprising Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Arun Kumar. Counsel for the petitioners was …

GOPI AND 5 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 57770 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. They failed to appear on three scheduled dates (16‑03‑2026, 07‑04‑2026 and the date of hearing). The respondents argued that similar petitions had been dismissed for delay and laches, attaching relevant …

MURARI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND OTHERS

The petitioners Murari and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. The petition was heard by Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Arun Kumar. No substantive facts, issues, or arguments are detailed in the judgment. The Court dismissed …

LAKHMI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND OTHERS

The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking the release of land that had been earmarked for acquisition, arguing that the earlier order of 12 July 2011, which allowed them to seek compensation under the Karar Niyamawali, should not preclude an exemption from acquisition. The respondents contended …

BRIJESH KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the respondents to remove encroachments on State Highway No. 120 in Village Dawak, Mirzapur. The High Court issued directions ordering the removal of the encroachments. The respondents later submitted instructions …

JOKHU RAMversusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Jokhu Ram filed a public interest litigation seeking demolition of encroachments on a State Highway by certain respondents. The Court noted that one of those respondents had filed a separate writ (Writ‑C No. 29809 of 2026) in which the petitioner was impleaded, and a coordinate bench had already …

UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERSversusSUSHIL KUMAR SINGH AND 16 OTHERS

The petition challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order granting financial upgradation under the M.A.C.P. Scheme by counting 10, 20 and 30 year service periods. The Tribunal relied on a Cuttack Bench decision in East Coast Railway Engineers case to grant relief. The Union of India argued …

RACHIT KULSHRESHTHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The appellant Rachit Kulshreshtha filed a special appeal against an order dated 23 July 2026 in which a Single Judge, while noting that a counter‑affidavit was required, failed to decide the appellant’s stay application and merely listed the matter for 8 September 2026. The appellant relied on the …

HARKHOO RAM (SINCE DIED)versusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a railway employee, was promoted to Shunting Master Grade‑I after qualifying a departmental exam, but was later charged with using unfair means because another candidate had written his answer sheet. An inquiry was held during which the petitioner unconditionally confessed to the …

SAURABH SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The appellants, five villagers, intervened in a writ petition seeking the completion of consolidation proceedings in Gram Sabha Biral, Muzaffarnagar, which had remained pending for over three decades. The Single Judge ordered the authorities to finish the consolidation within six months, relying on …

UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERSversusGYAN PRAKASH TIWARI

The Union of India filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that granted the respondent a third MACP benefit. The CAT had relied on a Cuttack Bench decision (O.A. No. 485 of 2021) which was subsequently upheld by the Orissa …

UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERSversusSHRI VIRENDRA SINGH

The Union of India filed a review petition challenging the High Court’s modification of a Tribunal order granting a disability pension to Shri Virendra Singh. The petition was filed beyond the statutory 363‑day period, but the Court condoned the delay on the basis of the applicant’s affidavit. The …

SHASHIKANT RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the respondents to complete an enquiry and take legal action against respondent No.6 within a set time. The court examined the instructions and noted that a detailed inspection report dated 26 September 2025, prepared by …

AMRIT SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to clean and repair blocked drains that have caused waterlogging, foul odor, and vector-borne disease hazards for over thirty years. The petition cited a 2024 repair …

RAM NARESH MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

Ram Naresh Mishra filed a public interest litigation (PIL No. 610 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to act on an inquiry report dated 5 September 2024. The report had found the respondents guilty of failing to deduct tax …

NATHUversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing respondents No.2 and No.3 to demolish an alleged illegal construction on a public road, relying on an annexure purported to be a map. The court observed that the annexure was merely an authorization for filing the …

TANVEER AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

The appellant Tanveer Ahmad challenged a Single Judge’s order dismissing his writ petition that sought mandamus to compel a district magistrate to set up an enquiry into alleged manipulation of revenue records and to preserve various documents, among other reliefs. The High Court examined whether …

MAHENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation seeking an order directing the State to publish the marks, cut‑off marks and evaluated answer sheets of the L.T. Grade Teachers Examination 2025 to ensure transparency. The court observed that the petition did not disclose any personal …

PROF. OMPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition, filed as a public interest litigation by Prof. Ompal Singh, alleged that the principal of D.A.V. College, Kanpur, was permitting a staff member to harass students by demanding illegal gratification for uploading their research work. The petitioner claimed that complaints to the Higher …

PUSHPENDRA SINGH RATHAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to demolish a building alleged to be illegally constructed and dilapidated, claiming it posed a danger to road users. The petition relied solely on the petitioner's personal complaints, with no material evidence or objections …

SURYA NATH RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surya Nath Ram, filed a public interest litigation challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others, alleging violation of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The Court observed that the petitioner’s own …

ABBAS KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking an order to halt construction of a poultry farm, relying on a July 5, 2025 report by the Chief Veterinary Officer that the farm would cause pollution. The petition did not cite any specific statutory provision, rule, or guideline governing …

UMASHANKAR SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners Umashankar Singh and others filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits …

UDAY PRATAP SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd (DFCCI) to appoint him under a 2010 assurance that land losers would be given railway appointments. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dismissed the original application as not …

AMIT KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petition, filed as a public‑interest litigation, sought a court direction compelling the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant tube‑well electricity connections to farmers and to regularise private tube‑well connections under a government scheme dated 6 December 2018. The …

SUNITA SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sunita Sharma and another filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL No. 1198 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition sought relief on matters not detailed in the order. During the proceedings, the petitioners’ counsel moved the Court for withdrawal of …

RAJENDRA TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajendra Tiwari, filed a public interest litigation seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner later requested to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court considered the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …

PRADEEP KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Pradep Kumar Jaiswal, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive issues were adjudicated. …

GAYA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Gaya Prasad's license for a fair price shop was cancelled after his criminal conviction, as stipulated in his agreement with the State. He filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation, but the Single Judge dismissed it on the ground that the conviction was not stayed. The appellant then filed …

FARZANA BIBIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petition, filed by elected Corporator Farzana Bibi as a public interest litigation, challenged notices issued by the Nagar Nigam Varanasi under the U.P. Nagar Nigam Act, 1959 that declared certain houses in the Dal Mandi area dilapidated and threatened demolition. The petitioner sought the …

NARESH KUMAR MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar Mishra, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the Railways to declare a train stoppage at Block Hut Raipalpur and to grant it full station status and a ticket distribution centre. The petitioner alleged that despite representations to the …

AVANESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the execution of orders passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 against several respondents. The petitioner alleged that despite the orders being passed and efforts made by authorities, the respondents were refusing to …

RAM NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction that the State transfer employees working under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) from one block to another as per state orders. The court noted that the petitioner offered no …

AMIT MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, General Secretary of the NUPPL Contract Workers Union, filed a public interest litigation seeking financial assistance and employment for residents of eight villages affected by land acquisition for NUPPL. The respondents argued that the issues of compensation, rehabilitation, and …

C/M DUNKA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, C/M Dunka Junior High School, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 60327 of 2015) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the delay rendered the petition infructuous. …

PRADEEP KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a self‑described social worker, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking enforcement of a Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board order dated 12‑09‑2023 directing the closure of a brick‑kiln in Village Narhani Turkwalia, Ballia. The petition alleged that the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate …

MOHAMMAD KHALID AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a court direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Nagar Palika Parishad to rename a road crossing and install a monument commemorating a Param Vir Chakra awardee. The Nagar Palika Parishad had already passed a resolution to change the …

NAVEEN KUMAR SHRIVASTAVAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Naveen Kumar Shrivastava, filed a writ petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order that closed his contempt proceedings, alleging the respondents had not granted the full Assured Career Progression (ACP/MACP) benefits ordered on 12‑04‑2024. The High Court …

RAVINDRA AHLAWAT @ RAVINDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court examined a public‑interest litigation filed by Advocate Ravindra Ahlawat seeking removal of alleged encroachments by Daurala Sugar Mill on a canal road. The Court found that the petitioner had concealed his prior role as Chairman of the Cane Development Council and had …

MANOJ KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a compassionate appointment for the petitioner's married son after the death of their husband/father, who was a permanent Trackman. The respondents rejected the application, citing that the son was over 30, married, and the family was already receiving a settlement of …

MANSHA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mansha Devi, sought a compassionate appointment in the Eastern Central Railway after her father, a post trackman, died in 2019. The Central Administrative Tribunal had earlier set aside a rejection of her claim and directed her to prove dependency on her father at the time of his …

MAHENDRA SINGH AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The appellants challenged orders of the Assistant Registrar, Gorakhpur, which published a tentative electoral roll of 120 members and later finalized it, directing elections for a time‑barred committee of a society. The Single Judge declined to interfere, allowing the election process to continue …

MOHD. RAIS KHANversusSATYA NARAIN GENERAL MANAGER ROADWAYS AND ANOTHER

The appellant, a retired senior clerk of the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, sought interest on delayed gratuity payments and filed multiple petitions, culminating in a contempt application and a writ petition. The Single Judge dismissed the contempt application, directing the appellant to …

MUSTAQ AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

The petitioner, Mustaq Ahmad, owned a half share in a parcel of land (Khasra No.165/1) that the State of Uttar Pradesh took possession of on 18‑08‑2001 for a dam project, but no formal acquisition proceedings were undertaken and no compensation was paid. The State contended that the land was …

SACHIN KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, former armed forces personnel, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a September 19, 2025 order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (Principal Bench, New Delhi) that dismissed their Original Applications under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 …

UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERSversusCENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER

The petition challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that allowed a retired Assistant Accounts Officer to claim a Composite Transfer Grant (CTG) of Rs. 91,246 as Travelling Allowance (TA) for moving to his declared home town of Khaga, Fatehpur. The petitioners argued that the respondent …

SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Mishra, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court considered the submission and allowed the withdrawal. …

UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERSversusSAMSON ROSHAN

The respondent, a former railway employee, claimed that his date of birth was incorrectly recorded as 27-08-1955 in his service book, leading to his premature retirement in 2015, whereas other documents showed his birth date as 27-08-1958 and a retirement date of 31-08-2018. He approached the …

C/M BEENAPARA INTER COLLEGE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 ORS.

Petitioners, the Committee of Management of Beenapara Inter College, filed Writ Petition No. 35984 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents were the State of Uttar Pradesh and seven other parties. The petition was heard by Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra. …

THE C/M BINAPARA MINORITY EDU. SOCIETYversusABDUL QAYYUM AND 5 ORS.

The Special Appeal No. 328 of 2014 challenged a Single Judge’s order directing a fresh election of the Committee of Management of Binapara Inter College and the appointment of an authorized controller. The appellant argued that the earlier election of 2012 was invalid, while the respondents …

UNION OF INDIAversusTIRUPATI TEXCO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. 132-D

The Union of India appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against a series of orders of the Commercial Court, Kanpur Nagar that dismissed its applications under Section 34 of the same Act because it failed to make the statutory pre‑deposit …

THE COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Committee of Management filed a writ challenging two orders of the Deputy Registrar under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, which registered a list of members for elections and later declared an unopposed election. The appellants argued that the Registrar had not provided reasons for …

RAM PAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The appellants challenged a High Court order that had merely observed that fresh elections could proceed pending jurisdictional determination, arguing that the observation effectively authorized the elections held on 23 March 2026. The Single Judge had declined to quash the communication scheduling …

HIRDESH BIHARI YADAV AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The appellants, long‑time members of Janta Vidyalaya Samiti, challenged an order dated 24‑09‑2025 by the Deputy Registrar that declared them "rank outsiders" and excluded them from the Society's elected body. They argued that their membership, dating from 1997, had been continuously recognized and …

DINESH KUMAR MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, appointed as Extra Departmental Agents (Stamp Vendors), sought execution of a 2012 order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that had quashed a 2009 order rejecting their claim and directed preparation of a seniority list for possible regularisation. The High Court noted …

UNION OF INDIAversusM/S ATUL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND 3 OTHERS

The Union of India appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking condonation of a 375‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Commercial Court judgment dismissing its Section 34 application. The appellant claimed it was unaware of the …

BALRAM SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Balram Shukla, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to remove occupants who had allegedly encroached on land acquired for the construction of court buildings. The petition identified several individuals as occupants but did not implead …

RAHUL MADANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a government fitter appointed in 1997, sought the grant of Grade Pay of Rs.4600 (Level‑7) under the Minimum Alternate Cost of Pay (MACP) scheme, contending that he had only two regular promotions and thus was eligible. The Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed his application, …

GORAKH RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking to restrain the State and others from laying a 33 kV high‑tension line through a densely populated residential area and main road in Azamgarh, urging an alternative route. The respondents argued that the line already exists and is merely …

SMT GEETA CHAURASIAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Chief Matron of the Indian Railway Cancer Institution, challenged salary deductions ordered on 15 October 2015 and 6 November 2015, alleging that no charge sheet or disciplinary inquiry was conducted. She argued that the deductions, framed as a minor penalty under Rule …

ARUN KUMAR YADAVversusCENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Group D labourer promoted to a semi‑skilled Fitter (Mate), filed a writ petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's dismissal of his application for a higher grade pay of Rs.1,900, arguing that Clause 2.2.9 of the Sixth Pay Commission required his placement in …

ATUL KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, casual labourers engaged by the Archaeological Survey of India since 2012, sought quashing of an e‑tender and direction to grant them temporary status and benefits under various Office Memoranda, particularly the 2018 OM relating to the 7th Central Pay Commission. The respondents …

POORAN LAL MEENA AND 6 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, seven candidates (six ST and one OBC), sought appointment to Group‑D railway posts, invoking a Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) order dated 02.05.2019 that directed consideration of extra‑list candidates for vacant posts. The respondents contended that only 44 vacancies existed …