Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
256 judgments · newest first · showing 201–256
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dhara Singh, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.02 of 2026) alleging his participation in the beating and death of a man. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the injuries were accidental, …
The applicant was arrested in connection with the murder of a deceased whose body was recovered on 14 March 2025. The prosecution presented eyewitness statements that the deceased was last seen with the applicant and co‑accused on 10 March 2025, and a weapon (banka) was recovered after the applicant …
The applicant Junaid was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which Babu died and Javed was injured. While the FIR named 14 persons, the initial statements of the victims did not implicate Junaid, and later statements were contradictory but did not specifically allege that he caused the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Prince Dubey in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15034 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 108 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was missing, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay, accused in Criminal Case No. 751 of 2024 under Sections 103(1), 238(A) and 61(2)(A) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s witnesses only implicated co‑accused Rekha, Anjali and Shivani, and that he was falsely implicated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek, accused of murder under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act, in connection with the death of a young man who was allegedly in a love affair with Abhishek's sister. The prosecution alleged that Abhishek and co‑accused threatened …
Aneeta Yadav applied for bail in a murder case (Crime No. 29 of 2026) where she was alleged to be involved in a land dispute that led to the death of a woman. The prosecution’s narrative implicated other accused, particularly Babulal, while no specific allegation was made against Aneeta. Her counsel …
Mahendra Kumar Gupta was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 18 of 2026) where the deceased was allegedly struck with a wheel spanner by co‑accused Ravi Kiran Nishad. The applicant contended that he merely brought his son to the Primary Health Centre and that no incriminating …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhual Gupta in a murder case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) where the applicant was not named in the FIR and was allegedly implicated only on the basis of three witness statements that he was seen leaving the scene. The applicant argued that there was no …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip Kumar Patel, accused of murder, kidnapping and conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 364, 201 and 120B. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Anil Patel, had been released on bail in a similar case, that he had no prior criminal …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in Crime No. 390 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 147, 302, 307, 34, 504 and 506. The FIR alleged that Vikas and co‑accused assaulted the deceased, who later died, and also injured a witness named Vipin. During …
Vikas was arrested in a murder case under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife. The prosecution alleged that Vikas quarrelled with the deceased and murdered her, while the defence claimed the wife accidentally fell from a balcony and Vikas merely took her to hospital. The defence highlighted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh, accused in a murder case under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was only implicated through statements of other victims, and that no specific role was assigned to him; he also pointed …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shuaib, who was arrested in connection with a murder‑related case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7462 of 2025) under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the only allegation against …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Almuddin, accused in Crime No. 386 of 2024 under Section 103(1) of the BNS for allegedly running over a deceased with a tractor. The applicant argued that the death was accidental, that key eyewitnesses did not support the prosecution, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajat, who is charged under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 333 and 140(3) BNS for the death of his sister‑in‑law. The applicant claimed the incident was an accident that occurred during a family dispute, asserting that he …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sushil Kumar and Vishnu (Vinay) in a murder case (Sections 302 and 201 IPC) where the deceased was reported missing in July 2023 and a skeleton was recovered in May 2024. The DNA report presented by the A.G. showed a partial profile …
The applicant, Jainuddin, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Criminal Case No. 287 of 2021) under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that the deceased was last seen with the applicant, and blood‑stained clothing and a weapon recovered from the scene …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Ayub, who is charged under Sections 74, 64(1), 351(3), 103(1) BNS of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Income Tax Act in Crime No. 76 of 2025. The applicant claimed that his wife died accidentally in the bathroom and denied any …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kadeem Ahmad, who is charged under several sections of the B.N.S. for allegedly firing at a deceased relative during a family dispute. The applicant contended that the actual shooter was co‑accused Nadeem, that no weapon was recovered from him, …
Shivam Namdev applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 103(1), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2) and 352 of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR but was later implicated by an eye‑witness; no weapon was recovered from him and no specific role in the alleged …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishan Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 103(1), 352 and 61(2) B.N.S. for an alleged offence in Jaunpur. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that CCTV footage and eyewitness testimony did not …
Saif Ali was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 374 of 2025) under Sections 352 and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. His first bail application was rejected, but during trial the principal witnesses turned hostile, leaving no material evidence against him. The applicant, who has been in …
The applicant, Shoaib alias Sonu, was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have arisen from a salary dispute. The FIR broadly implicated all accused, but CCTV footage showed that the applicant only had a brief scuffle with the deceased, after which co‑accused Shahnawaz attacked the victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nagendra Choudhary in a case involving alleged firearm injuries leading to death. The prosecution alleged that the applicant fired at the deceased, but CCTV footage, as highlighted by both parties, showed that the co-accused Mohit was the one who …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Upendra Kumar Mishra, accused in Crime No. 209 of 2024 under IPC sections 302, 392 and 411. The FIR did not name the applicant and alleged that unknown persons committed the murder and robbery. Evidence consisted of CCTV footage showing …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramgopal @ Bhavval, who was charged under IPC sections 103(1), 309(6), 317(2) and Section 3 of the Arms Act in a case registered as Crime No. 0231 of 2024. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that CCTV footage was …
The applicant, Adil, sought bail in a murder case (Crime No. 393 of 2024) under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material existed against him. The prosecution presented eye‑witness statements, CCTV footage showing Adil …
The applicant, a 19‑year‑old student, was charged under Section 103(1) CrPC for firing a double‑barrel gun that killed a deceased during a scuffle, as alleged by the prosecution and corroborated by several eyewitnesses. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing the shooting was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amola Devi and Malti Devi, who were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and other statutes for a violent incident in Kushinagar. The applicants argued that the FIR and witness statements ascribed a general role to …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Kavi Chandra, who was charged under IPC sections 103(1), 190, 191(2) and 191(3) for a murder alleged to have occurred on 16 August 2025. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was absent from CCTV footage, and that …
The applicant, Sarvesh Devi, filed a bail cancellation application but later expressed a desire to withdraw it. The State's counsel had no objection to the withdrawal. The court considered the request and dismissed the bail cancellation application as withdrawn. No substantive issues on bail were …
Tahabbur Mewati was arrested in connection with a murder case (Cr. No. 331 of 2025) after an informer implicated him along with two co‑accused. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, no weapon was recovered from him, and the confessional statements of co‑accused did not allege any …
Manish Pandey applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNSS Act and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, based on nine suspicious transactions dated 06.05.2024. The FIR was lodged nearly two years after the transactions, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhi Khatri (Abhishek) in a murder case (Crime No. 1184 of 2025) under CrPC sections 103(1), 190 and 191. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s case was based solely on a non‑eyewitness statement implicating him, that the co‑accused had …
The applicant, Mohd Raja, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in anticipation of arrest in a case involving alleged offences under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. He contended that the FIR falsely implicated him, alleging that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Girish, who was named in an FIR for the murder of a deceased person, alleged to have been caused by strangulation after a scuffle. The applicant argued that no specific incriminating material linked him to the crime, that video footage …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamal, accused in a murder case (Crime No. 490 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 238(A) of the BNS. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out the absence of any weapon, incriminating material, or eyewitness testimony linking …
Naresh was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No.17 of 2026) involving alleged firearm injuries under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the alleged injury, and that a co‑accused, Vipin, …
The applicant, Usman, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging offences under various sections of the B.N.S. and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He claimed false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and pointed to the grant of …
The applicant Gulista applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8, 21, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, where she was named only in the confessional statement of a co‑accused and no contraband was recovered from her. The State opposed the bail, arguing the …
Kuldeep, the owner of a vehicle (HR626544) that was allegedly used by a third party, Sant Lal, to transport bovines, faced potential arrest under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. He filed an anticipatory …
Ankit Yadav applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 534 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant was not named in the FIR; the only allegation against him arose from statements of a garage owner and a painter, linking him to the co‑accused Sujit Yadav who was driving the car …
The applicant, Naresh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application claiming that no charge-sheet had been filed and that he was falsely implicated. The State opposed, asserting that a charge-sheet had indeed been filed and highlighting the applicant's prior involvement in seven criminal cases. The …
The applicant, Lakhan Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the bail application. The State's Additional Government Advocate expressed no objection to …
Mithiyo alias Mithlesh was arrested in connection with a case of assault leading to death, charged under several sections of the B.N.S. The FIR and eyewitness statements implicated eight persons but did not assign a specific role to Mithiyo, and the post‑mortem showed only one fatal head injury …
The applicant, Danish, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court, with Sunil Kumar Dubey appearing as counsel. The State of U.P. was represented by Prabhakant Singh, G.A. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Riyaz in Criminal Case No. 63 of 2025, alleged to involve murder under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 238(Ka) of the BNS. The applicant argued that the FIR made a general allegation against him and co‑accused Zeeshan, that the deceased’s death was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Manish, accused in a case involving multiple IPC offences including murder and assault. The applicant argued that the FIR and witness statements were vague, the third statement of the first informant was unreliable, and that he suffers …
Anita Chauhan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.310 of 2025) alleging false implication and lack of substantive evidence, including no weapon assignment. The FIR and statements only contain general allegations of beating the first informant. The applicant, a first‑time female offender, …
Shrimati Devi was arrested in connection with Crime No.310 of 2025, alleged under IPC sections 3(5), 109, 110, 115(2), 131, 333 and 352. She filed a bail application claiming she was falsely implicated, that the FIR and statements contain only vague allegations, no weapon was assigned to her, and …
Manoj Jatav applied for bail in a case where he is charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC for allegedly transferring land using a forged power of attorney. The applicant argued that he was merely a power of attorney holder acting on behalf of Kishan Chand, that the land was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Baljeet Yadav, who was arrested in Crime No. 510 of 2025 under Sections 305(a), 331(4) and 317(2) of the BNS Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was falsely implicated after a recovery of Rs. 24,300 and a yellow metal …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Hemendra Prakash Verma, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged forgery and cheating under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. The applicant argued that a forensic laboratory report showed his signature …
The applicant, Sanu @ Rashid, was taken into custody on 14‑16 September 2025 without a formal arrest, violating Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution and the procedural safeguards laid down in D.K. Basu’s judgments. The police failed to produce CCTV footage despite repeated orders from the Chief …
