Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ARUN R PEDNEKER

140 judgments · newest first · showing 1–140

DASHRATH BHAURAO BHILWANDEversusSHAIKH NAVAB SK. HUSENSAB and ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

Shaikh Navab filed a writ petition in 2001 against Dashrath Bhiwan and others. After more than two decades, the petitioner’s counsel argued that the matter had become infructuous because of the passage of time. The Court examined whether the petition could still be entertained. Finding that the …

DASHRATH BHAURAO BHILWANDEversusSHAIKH NAVAB SK. HUSENSAB and ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

Shaikh Navab filed a writ petition in 2001 against Dashrath Bhiwan and others, seeking relief that remained pending for many years. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the matter infructuous. The Court examined whether the petition could still be entertained despite …

MARUTI BHAU MALI DIED THROUGH LRS BHAMABAI (ABATED) MANDAKINI SUBHASH BHALERAOversusGULABRAO DUNGARWAL DIED THR LRS MANKARNABAI DIED THR LRS VIJAYKUMAR DIED THR LRS SUNANDA AND ORS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

An application (Civil Application No. 1703 of 2026) was filed seeking to fix a date for the final hearing of two second appeals. The court examined the reasons provided in the application. It allowed the application and ordered that the second appeals be listed for hearing on 16/04/2026. The court …

MADHUKAR VIKRAM KALAL.versusCHANDULAL RAMDAS GURAV.

DISPOSED OFF

Madhukar Vikram Kalal filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Talode, which rejected his applications for an adjournment and for a summons to the Registrar of Nandurbar to produce the original sale deed in Civil Suit No. 17/1988. The trial court held the …

GOPAL MAREPPA KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Gopal Mareppa Kamble filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking payment of leave encashment and cash arrears under the 7th Pay Scale. The respondents, including the Education Officer, submitted that a proposal on the payment would be decided within four weeks and the petitioner …

SUNIL PUNAJI DABHADEversusPRAGTIK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sunil Punaji Dabhade, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the Education Officer (Respondent No.2) decide his representation dated 04.01.2021 within a reasonable time. The petitioner argued that the representation was pending without decision. The Court examined the …

SIDDHARTH SANJAY BOPALKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 LATUR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Siddharth Sanjay Bopalkar, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The core issue was whether, after the faceless reassessment scheme introduced on 29‑03‑2022, the JAO retained …

UDAY SAHEBSING PAWAR AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Uday Sahebsing Pawar and others filed a writ petition in 2001, but failed to appear before the court. The court observed that due to the passage of time the petition had become infructuous. No arguments or evidence were presented by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the …

GOVARDHAN TAPIRAM BOROLEversusLATE BHADU ANAJI PATIL LRS PRATAP AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Govardhan Tapiram Borole, filed Civil Application No. 3081 of 2025 seeking an early hearing of a second appeal (SA/685/2016). The court considered whether the reasons provided justified expediting the hearing. Finding the applicant’s reasons sufficient, the judge ordered that the …

SHAIKH NAVAB SK.HUSENSABversusDASHRATH BHAURAO BHIWANDE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shaikh Navab, filed a writ petition in 2001 seeking relief against the respondents. Over the ensuing years, the matter remained unresolved and became stale. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the passage of time rendered the petition infructuous. The Court considered the claim …

MANIK PUNDLIK CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought inclusion of their names in the seniority list of village‑panchayat employees to be appointed in Class‑III/IV cadres of the Zilla Parishad, along with age‑relaxation appointment orders. They argued that the Zilla Parishad had failed to fill 10% reserved posts since 2015 and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusGABAJI JIJABAI THUBE THR LRS

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a reference court award that granted the claimants compensation of Rs.28,000 per hectare for agricultural land acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The land, classified as Jirayat, was acquired for a percolation tank project. The reference court had …

GORBA SAKHARAM CHAVAN AND ORSversusKASHINATH RADHAKISHAN MANE AND ORS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petition sought to bring the legal heirs of the deceased appellant No.2 onto the court record, requesting the court to condone a 22‑day delay in filing the application. The primary issue was whether the court could excuse the procedural delay. The bench considered the reasons provided in the …

UTTAM KISAN SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Uttam Kisan Shinde, filed Writ Petition No. 7371 of 2022 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later approached the Court, through counsel, requesting permission to withdraw the petition. The Court …

ANADA KERBA CHOPWADversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Anada Kerba Chopwad filed a writ petition (No. 2727 of 2009) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for several years. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the petition …

UDHAV NARAYAN KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Uday Sahebsing Pawar and others filed a writ petition in 2001 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner appeared before the court, and due to the lapse of time the matter was deemed infructuous. The court held that the petition could not proceed without the …

THE STATE OF MAH and ORSversusNANDKISHORE BALIRAM PAWAR

DISMISSED

The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs.64,800 to the respondent, which was subsequently increased to Rs.82,800 by the Reference Court. The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal challenging the compensation amount. The High Court noted that the quantum involved was meager and, …

ASADULLAKHAN MOHAMMADKHAN PATHANversusADDITIONAL COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Asadullakhan Mohammadkhan Pathan, filed Civil Application No. 5499 of 2026 seeking relief in a writ petition originally filed as WP/6796/2011. The application was filed 7 days after the prescribed period, raising the question of whether such delay could be condoned. The High Court …

ORION ROPES PVT. LTD. THR MANAGERversusBHASKAR SHIVDAS PATIL AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions (Nos. 5409 and 5418 of 2012) filed by Orion Ropes Pvt. Ltd. against different respondents. Court service notices were served on the petitioner on 15 March 2014 and 29 April 2014 respectively. The petitioner failed to file any …

ORION ROPES PVT. LTD. THR MANAGERversusVITTHAL MADHUKAR CHAVAN AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

Orion Ropes Pvt. Ltd., through its manager, filed two writ petitions (Nos. 5409 and 5418 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging unspecified orders. Court service notices were served on the petitioner on 15 March 2014 and 29 April 2014 respectively. The petitioner failed to …

SANJIT JAGANNATHRAO KOMATWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, owners of several beer bars and permit rooms, filed writ petitions challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant liquor licences. They argued that the denial was arbitrary. The State contended that the petitions were no longer viable due to the lapse of time and subsequent …

SIDDHESHWAR BHIMAYYA BHANDARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A group of beer bar proprietors filed multiple writ petitions (WP 5478/19 & Ors.) challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant or renew licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent policy changes rendered their petitions ineffective. The Court examined …

NARAYAN MAROTIRAO KSHIRSAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Several proprietors of beer bars and permit rooms filed writ petitions (Nos. 5504‑5511 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant liquor licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in the law regarding liquor …

ARVIND BHAGWATRAO CHIRKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Several beer bar proprietors filed writ petitions (WP 5478/19 & Ors.) in the Bombay High Court challenging the denial or conditions of their liquor licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in licensing policy rendered their petitions ineffective. The State …

VAISHALI MANGESH PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners, appointed before 1 November 2005, filed a writ petition seeking entitlement to the old pension scheme. They contended that the issue was under active consideration by the State and that a proposal had been submitted to the Education Officer. The petitioners requested permission to …

BHILA SHIVRAM WAGHversusZILLA PARISHAD, JALGAON THR CEO AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Bhila Shivram Wagh filed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of a member of a village panchayat for the term that began in 2006. The petitioner did not appear before the court. The court noted that the term in question had long since expired, rendering the relief sought moot. …

PANDIT RUPCHAND IMALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Pandit Rupchand Imale filed a writ petition challenging the denial of benefits under the old pension scheme, contending that his appointment dated 01‑09‑2004 predates the November 2005 cutoff for the new scheme. The petitioner argued that he should be allowed to claim the old pension benefits. The …

SUKHDEV NAMDEV PATILversusCHINTAMAN NAMDEV PATIL DIED LRS UTTAM AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioner filed Civil Application No. 13130 of 2016 seeking to bring the legal heirs of the deceased respondent on record, requesting condonation of a 473‑day delay. The court examined whether such a delay could be condoned under procedural law. Finding the reasons for delay satisfactory, the …

HEMLATA MANIKCHAND CHUDIWALversusGTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (GIL) AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Hemlata Manikchand Chudiwal filed an arbitration appeal (Arbitration Appeal No. 36 of 2025) challenging an order and contended that the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not maintainable. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal while preserving the …

BHANUDAS MARUTI RASKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a doctor, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No.4) to remove encroachments on municipal land and a municipal road in Shrigonda. He alleged that despite his representation, the corporation had only removed encroachments of …

VINOD PREMCHAND SURANAversusTHE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Vinod Premchand Surana filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme …

GOVIND SUPDU PATILversusSUPDU DALPAT PATIL LRS BHAGWANT SUPDU PATIL AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Govind Supdu Patil, filed Civil Application No. 14182 of 2025 seeking to have the second appeal listed for a final hearing. The application was presented before the Hon'ble Justice Arun R. Pedneker. No respondents appeared before the court. The court considered the application and, …

NETAJI PURUSHOTTAM BRAHMANATHKAR L.RS. ALKA NETAJI BRAHMANATHAKAR and ORS.versusMANORAMABAI PURUSHOTTAM BRAHMANATHKAR L.RS. CHANDRASHEAKHAR L.RS. SUNIL PURSHOTTAM BRAHMANATHKAR

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Court considered Civil Application No. 1238 of 2024 filed by the appellant seeking to fix a date for the final hearing of Second Appeal No. 554 of 2007. The application was made on the ground that a hearing date needed to be scheduled. The Court examined the application and found no objection to …

HARINATH SANGRAMAPPA KALPEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe, challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. which held that after the faceless reassessment …

HARINATH SANGRAMAPPAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Harinath Sangramappa challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme came into …

India Through its Project Director, Amrish M. MankarversusSamadhan Dattu

DISMISSED

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud, and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. CALA had …

RAJENDRAKUMAR MADANLAL SURANAversusSANGEETA KAILAS AGRAWAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajendrakumar Madanlal Surana, filed a civil application seeking an extension of the arbitration mandate under section 29-A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner’s counsel argued that a recent Supreme Court judgment in Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule …

MANIK TUKARAM DUDHANEversusKALAKRUTI CREATIONS THR PRO. USHA D HALDE

Dismissed

Manik Tukaram Dudhane filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of Dusane and Kalakruti Creations. The petition was heard on 6 August 2026 before Justice Arun R. Pedneker. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was nothing left for adjudication, essentially …

GANESH VIRJI RABARI AND ANRversusSHANTARAM K BHUYAL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their appeal was not being entertained. They claimed that the Sub‑Divisional Officer had subsequently taken up the appeal and passed an order, rendering the petition redundant. The court examined whether any relief could still be granted. It held …

NILESH DHARMA SANTE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition after reaching an amicable settlement with the respondents. The petitioner's counsel applied for leave to withdraw the petition, which the court granted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and the related interim …

SITALAXMI KRISHNA KANCHAN AND ORSversusSANJAY YASHWANT MHATRE

Dismissed

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the maintainability of an eviction suit filed by the respondent under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, alleging that they were not recognized as tenants. The petitioners argued that the plaintiff had not acknowledged their tenancy, rendering …

MOHAMMED ALI RAJABALLY YUSUFALLYversusATEEQ ANWAR AGBOATWALA AND ORS

Dismissed

The applicant Mohammed Ali challenged a decree that had been passed against him on the ground that he was a non‑user of the suit premises for more than six months prior to the filing of the suit. The trial court and the appellate court had both found that the premises were not used by the applicant …

EKNATH BHIKA ALIAS BAKAJI SURYAVANSHI (BHILLA)versusCHITRA SURENDRASINGH PARDESHI

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26 November 2025 issued by the Revisional Authority under Section 23 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906, which had set aside the Mamlatdar’s order under Section 5 dismissing the respondents’ application for removal of obstruction and …

RAM MAHAL CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.versusRAVI JOSEPH PEREIRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay considered a civil revision application filed by Ram Mahal Co‑Operative Housing Society against Ravi Joseph Pereira and others. The applicant sought condonation of delay in filing the first appeal, which the court granted. Counsel for the applicant indicated that the parties …