Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
165 judgments · newest first · showing 1–165
The High Court of Bombay at Goa entertained a contempt petition filed by Gajanan Y. Assolkar. The petition was taken on board by the bench of Justices Valmiki Menezes and Hiten S. Venegavkar. The court ordered that notice be issued to the respondents, Hanumant Rajaram Asolkar and another, with a …
Petitioners, represented by Anton Nazarov's guardian, filed Writ Petition No. 472 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the Union of India and several officials. They later sought to unconditionally withdraw the petition, citing imminent travel to Russia and the need to present air …
The applicant, Vinayk Kishor Salunkhe, filed a bail application in Sessions Case No. 45 of 2025 for offences under sections 103(1), 109, 189(1), 189(2), 189(4), 190, 115(2), 352 and 351(1) of the Bombay Police Act. The trial court rejected the application on 21‑02‑2026. After a co‑accused was …
The applicant, Faisal Abdul Rahim Salar, filed a bail application in a Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) case (Special Case No. 297 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 555 of 2025. The applicant sought release on bail pending trial. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Prasannakumar Joshi, …
Altaf Balekhan Bairagadas applied for bail in connection with a case registered at Shiroli MIDC Police Station (Crime Reg. No. 132/2026). While the bail application was pending, the charge sheet was filed, prompting his counsel to seek withdrawal of the bail application and to file a fresh one …
Mrs. Rajubai Bibhishan Salgude applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 0219 of 2026) involving alleged assault on an informant and his mother. The offences alleged are under Sections 191(3), 191(2), 190, …
The applicant, Sagar Dattatray Patange, accused No.2 in a case involving multiple IPC offences and sections of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, has been in judicial custody since 18 February 2021 without any charge being framed. The applicant sought regular bail, arguing that the …
The applicant, Nitin Balasaheb Rahatal, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release on bail for offences under sections 302, 326, 324, 323, 427, 504, 143, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. During the pendency of this application, Accused No.1 was released on bail …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Vivek Rajesh Kharade, accused (Accused No. 7) in a Special MCOCA case for allegedly brandishing and firing a pistol in a public place on 20 June 2024. The applicant argued that …
The petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 26 of 2010 and related charge‑sheet for offences under IPC and the IT Act. The FIR arose from a civil dispute between the petitioner (former …
The applicant, Rohit Kishor Nikalje, filed a bail application in connection with FIR No. 76/2018 alleging offences under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC, Section 4(25) of the Arms Act and Section 37(1) read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Vivek …
Lata Ratan Rokade filed a bail application seeking relaxation of a bail condition under Section 483(i)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (equivalent to Section 439(i)(b) of the CrPC). The applicant, through counsel Satyavrat Joshi, later requested to unconditionally withdraw the …
The applicant, Sachin Nanduprasad Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (CR No. 407 of 2025) in which his co‑accused, Sameer Jadhav, allegedly killed his wife and burned the body. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rests mainly on a confession made by Jadhav while in police …
Mukesh Laxman Gholap applied for bail in a 2019 case involving IPC sections 75 and 302 and Arms Act sections 4(25) and (27). This was his third bail application; the first was withdrawn and the second was disposed. The State indicated it would examine six eyewitnesses within six months from 1 August …
The applicant, Shahid Shariff Bagwan, filed Bail Application No. 232 of 2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Ghodnadi. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Tejas Kamble, informed the court that a change in circumstances warranted filing a fresh bail application within a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Namdeo Ghatkamble, accused No.3 in Crime No.306 of 2024, which involved numerous offences under the IPC, Prevention of Corruption Act and Motor Vehicles Act. The applicant argued that all other nine accused had already been released on bail …
The applicant, Akshay Pappu Dede, was arrested in connection with a narcotics case (Crime No. 271 of 2025) where 70 grams of Mephedrone was recovered from a co-accused. No contraband was found on the applicant, nor were there any call records or financial transactions linking him to the offence, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Ravikant Pandurang Rathod, accused No.2 in a case (C.R. No. 893 of 2024) involving alleged cheating and fraud under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The applicant, accused No. 4 in a murder‑related case (Crime No. 646 of 2024), was arrested on 28 January 2025 and his earlier bail application was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, …
The petitioners, Sunil J. Anandpara and his company, challenged an order dated 04‑04‑2025 of the Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) that took cognizance of an alleged offence without granting them a pre‑cognizance hearing. They argued that the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking to quash FIR No. I-568/2021 and the related charge-sheet for offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 504 and 506 of the IPC. After hearing, the applicants, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application and …
In a criminal bail application, the applicant's counsel sought correction of a clerical error in the order dated 22 July 2026, where the police station was incorrectly named as Deola instead of Chichwad. The respondent's counsel did not oppose the correction. The court examined the request and, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhijeet Sanjay Kulkarni and another accused in a case involving alleged cheating of investors amounting to Rs.6.22 crore, charged under Sections 406, 409, 420, 468, 471 of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of …
The applicant, Kiran Yowraj Bhilare, filed a criminal bail application (No. 1130 of 2026) in a case registered at Sinhagad Road Police Station, Pune. The applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail application and re‑file it before the trial court, relying on observations made by the High Court …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 90/2026 registered for an alleged offence under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR stemmed from a commercial dispute …
The petitioner, Dablusingh Punjabsingh Tak, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 319/2021 and the related charge-sheet and sessions case. He later instructed his counsel to withdraw the petition and instead file an application for discharge before the trial court. The …
The applicant, Ram Nivas Vengala, was arrested on 19 June 2024 in connection with a fraud case involving 14 accused, where he is accused No.4. The prosecution alleged that other accused induced investors and that the applicant transferred the proceeds to other accounts, but no specific allegation of …
Petitioner Ashok Harishchandra Diwate filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking to quash FIR No. 0934/2021 and the accompanying charge sheet for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition was taken out of turn at the request of the petitioner's counsel. …
The High Court considered the bail application of Asim Dagadu Shaikh, accused of offences under Sections 108, 115(2), 351(2) and 351 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of his wife. The prosecution argued that the suicide, occurring within …
The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 3294 of 2025, but failed to submit spare copies of the petition within the two‑week period ordered on 26 June 2025, leading to the petition’s dismissal. They later filed Interim Application No. 1438 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 223‑day delay in …
The petitioner, a motorcyclist, was involved in an accident with Respondent No.2, a pedestrian, resulting in minor injuries. Both parties settled the civil claim through the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and a Lok Adalat award, with the petitioner paying compensation. Respondent No.2 filed an …
The applicant, accused of murder and offences under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC, was arrested on 22 December 2023 and denied bail by the Sessions Court. He sought regular bail, arguing that a co-accused (Accused No.5) with similar allegations had been released on bail, invoking the principle of …
The Intervenor, Usha Popat Kate, who was the informant in the FIR (Crime No. 325 of 2021), filed an interim application seeking to be allowed to intervene in Bail Application No. 4566 of 2025 filed by the accused, Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaikwad. The Intervenor argued that as the original complainant …
The applicant, Devidas Madhukar Torawane, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State opposed bail, citing the applicant's prior criminal antecedents and an externment order that overlapped with the alleged offence. The applicant's counsel subsequently sought leave to …
The Intervenor, Muktai Ganesh Gaikwad, filed an interim application seeking to be added as a respondent in Criminal Bail Application No. 4566 of 2025 and to be allowed to file written arguments. The application was heard before Justice Ashwin D. Bhope, who noted that the Intervenor, through senior …
The petitioners, Shashank Rajendra Hagawane and another, filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 332/2025 and the related charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 506(2) and 34. The FIR …
Petitioners Vishal Ramesh Taloskar and others filed a writ petition seeking correction of typographical errors in the order dated 25.06.2026, which mistakenly referred to "R.C.C. No. 158 of 2029" instead of the correct "R.C.C. No. 158 of 2019". The petitioners highlighted the errors in specific …
The High Court considered the regular bail application of Kiran Prabhakar Pawar, accused No.12 in Crime No.72 of 2025, charged under Sections 318[4], 316[5] and 316[2] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly obtaining an unlawful loan and subsidy. The applicant was arrested on 22‑12‑2025 …
The High Court considered two criminal applications filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No.133 of 2026 registered for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR arose from a family dispute involving two minors, which the …
The applicant, Dinkar Malhari Koli, was charged under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder case registered at Khed Police Station, Pune. He filed a bail application (Criminal Bail Application No. 2530 of 2026) seeking release on bail. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Yash …
The petitioner, General Manager of Rebel Foods Pvt. Ltd., sought to quash an FIR and charge‑sheet filed under Sections 105, 125(a), 125(b), 288, 289 and 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the death of a worker during repair of an air‑conditioner by an independent contractor. …
Aakash Ananda Kedari filed a bail application that included a condition prohibiting him from entering Pune district until the trial concluded. He subsequently filed Interim Application No. 822 of 2026 seeking to modify that condition. The applicant, through counsel Prajyot Shinde, later requested to …
The applicant, Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali, filed an interim bail application in a PMLA special case pending before the Special Court in Mumbai. After hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Viral Babar, requested to withdraw the bail application, a request unopposed by the Enforcement Directorate …
Petitioner Vipul Kanji Rajor filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the quash of FIR No./C.R. No.37/2016, the charge-sheet, and related proceedings against him. The petition alleged that the proceedings were improper and requested a writ of certiorari. The petitioner’s …
Maya Pandu Shinde applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 80, 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, through counsel, sought to withdraw the present bail application and obtain liberty to file a fresh …
The applicant, Piyush Nitin Donde, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail in a case involving alleged participation in a dacoity and charges under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Indian Arms Act, 1959, …
Umesh Kantikumar Gautam applied for bail in a 2020 offence (Crime No. 2666) before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Mr. Prasad Avad, requested permission to withdraw this bail application so that a fresh bail petition could be filed directly in the trial court, relying on a liberty granted in an …
The applicant, Vishweshwar, was charged under Sections 376(2), 354, 354-A, 506 of the IPC and Sections 5(l), 6, 7, 8 of the POCSO Act in a special POCSO case. He had already filed four bail applications before the trial court and sought a fifth bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking quash of an FIR registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they were informed that they had been dropped from the charge‑sheet. On that basis they applied to withdraw the criminal application. The …
The applicant, Amit Nagoji Pote, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving alleged murder, attempt to murder and conspiracy (IPC Sections 302, 201, 120‑B read with 34). The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the …
The applicant, Pankaj Prabhakar Baviskar, was arrested for alleged fraud involving investment schemes and charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 sections 3 and 4. He has been in custody for over two years without trial, despite the …
Mangesh Dipak Kalokhe applied under Section 528 of the BNSS for relaxation of bail condition 2(a) which required him to deposit Rs.2,00,000 as a pre‑condition for release. The Additional Judge of the Special Court, MCOCA, Pune had imposed the condition despite granting bail, and the lower court …
In Criminal Writ Petition No. 1675 of 2026, the Applicants sought relief from costs imposed on certain family members (Applicants Nos. 4 and 6) who were not named as accused but were parties due to a settlement. The Applicants' counsel, Mr. Azharuddin Khan, explained that the omission of this fact …
The applicants, Jaykumar Rampyare Yadav & Ors., filed an interim application seeking leave to amend their writ petition and to produce the charge‑sheet on record in a criminal appellate matter before the High Court of Bombay. The State of Maharashtra, represented by Ms. S. G. Talhar, did not oppose …
Kusum Jaiswar filed a writ petition challenging an order issued by a magistrate, which the respondent argued was a process order only reviewable by a criminal revision under Section 438 of the BNSS 2023. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition and instead file a criminal revision, …
The applicant, Bhau Nana Chavan, was arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 of the IPC and sought bail under Section 439 of the CrPC. The trial court granted bail on 3 February 2024, conditioning the applicant to deposit Rs.5 lakh within two months. The …
Mukesh Bhandari filed Interim Application No. 4031 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay seeking leave to unconditionally withdraw the application. The applicant was represented by Ms. Anushka Jain and Ms. Mittal Munoth, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Mrs. Rajeshree Newton. The …
The applicant, Manoj Ankush Gawali, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences under IPC Sections 302, 323 and 34. He had previously been granted regular bail in March 2018, but failed to appear for trial, leading to a non‑bailable warrant and his …
The applicant, Sohel Ahmed Ekhlak Ahmed, filed a bail application for C.R. No. 120 of 2024 under sections 8(c) and 22(c) of the NDPS Act. He later sought permission to withdraw this bail application and to file a fresh bail petition before the trial court, relying on a liberty previously granted by …
The applicant, Esha Dilipkumar Shah, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1263 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. On 06.05.2026, she was arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. Both counsel for the applicant and the State confirmed that the application was now …
Petitioners Raj Kundra and others filed Writ Petition No. 5003 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India. The petitioners, through counsel Harshada Parbhane, later sought unconditional withdrawal of the main petition and all related interim applications. The …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 349/2025 registered at Panchvati Police Station, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice Act, on the ground that the dispute was a matrimonial one that had been amicably …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 349/2025 registered at Panchvati Police Station, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice Act, on the ground that the dispute was a matrimonial one that had been amicably …
The petitioners, Ankush R Singh and others, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 6286 of 2025 and Interim Application No. 1576 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court. After the trial court passed certain orders, the petitioners, through Senior Advocate Majeed Memon, sought leave to withdraw both the writ …
The petitioner, Sanjay Hariram Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 21 March 2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 37th Court, which framed charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 114, 120B and 34. The petitioner argued that the facts were identical to those …
The petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 251 of 2012 and the related chargesheet for an alleged offence under IPC Section 354. Both parties admitted that the dispute arose from a …
Vinod Juthalal Visaria applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under FIR No. 88 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The complaint stemmed from a disputed flat sale where the respondent alleged the applicant failed to clear a loan …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR 408 of 2021 and the accompanying charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and 34. The FIR arose from a matrimonial …
The applicant, Nasir Salam Saudagar, filed an interim application seeking an extension of a prior order dated 30‑04‑2025 that permitted him to submit a spare copy of his application to the court registry for the purpose of issuing a fresh notice to Respondent No.2. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. …
The applicant, Mohammed Sadique Qureshi, filed an interim application seeking continuation of an interim order granting anticipatory bail, originally dated 21 May 2025 and repeatedly extended up to 9 April 2026. He alleged a procedural lapse when the matter was not listed on the board on 9 April but …
The High Court considered the bail application of Atique Ahmed Mohammad Yakub, accused No.14 in FIR No.40 of 2025, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicant, arrested on 22 February 2025 and detained for over a year …
The applicant, Azim Husen Maniyar, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1084 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay seeking pre‑arrest bail for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b) and 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act, 1985. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Arbaz Pathan, requested …
The applicant, Sagar Baba Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in FIR No. 68 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 316(2) and 318(4). The applicant contended that the complaint stemmed from a commercial …
Multiple writ petitions were filed in the Bombay High Court by various petitioners, including Zeco Aircon Limited and individuals such as Nikhil Padte, Sujata Wathoo and Manish Gupta, against the State of Maharashtra. The complainant, Respondent No.2, informed the court that it no longer wished to …
The High Court of Bombay considered a batch of writ petitions (including WP No. 4081 of 2024 and several related petitions) after receiving an office note indicating that the date of disposal recorded in the earlier order was incorrect. The note stated that the correct disposal date should be 10 …
Petitioner Rahul Viresh Mehta filed a writ petition challenging FIR No. 654 of 2025 registered at Waliv Police Station, Vasai. The State, through APP Mrs. Rajeshree Newton, informed the Court that the investigation was nearing completion and a chargesheet would be filed within a month. On this …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 45 of 2026 registered at Kashimira Police Station and a stay on further investigation. They later requested to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition if a chargesheet is filed and cognizance taken. The …
The applicant, Prathmesh Prakash Kankekar, through Advocate Ms. Bhagyesha Kurane, admitted that due to inadvertence the compliance with the court's order dated 8 September 2025 remained pending. She sought a two‑week extension to fulfill the amendment required by that order. The State of …
The petitioners, a husband and his relatives, were charged in FIR No. 343 of 2024 for offences under Sections 506, 504, 498‑A, 342, 323 r/w 34 of the IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute. The wife (Respondent No.2) later filed an affidavit stating that the marriage dispute had been amicably …
The Applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 233 of 2021 and the related charge-sheet, alleging that the matter was a matrimonial dispute between Smit Shah and Respondent No.2 that had been amicably settled. Respondent …
Four petitioners, all in custody for offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, filed writ petitions alleging that their bail applications pending before the District Judge‑6 and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, were unduly delayed. …
The petitioners, Dax Vanbuerle & Anr., filed a writ petition (No. 4058 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The record showed that after 8 March 2018, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to advance the petition, including …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Suresh Bolakani, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash the FIR and charge-sheet filed against him for offences under sections 376, 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and 323 of the IPC. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the writ petition and …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order issuing process and sought relief, while the State argued that the order was revisable only by a criminal revision under Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner requested permission to withdraw the …
The petitioners, Smt. Malti Hanumant Khamkar & Ors., filed an interim application seeking recall of an order dated 01‑09‑2023 that dismissed their criminal writ petition for failure to remove office objections and supply a spare copy. The dismissal was predicated on non‑compliance with the court’s …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking the quashing of FIR No. I-295/2019 and the accompanying charge sheet. During the hearing, the petitioners and Respondent No.2 produced a copy of an order dated 09.01.2026 in which the accused were acquitted by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 64 of 2025 on grounds that it violated sections 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While the petition was pending, the State informed the Court that a charge‑sheet had been filed. The …
The petitioners filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay and recall of a dismissal order dated 16‑06‑2025, which had dismissed their criminal writ petition for non‑prosecution because no counsel appeared. The petitioners' advocate admitted the lapse was due to his inadvertent …
The petitioner, Neeraj Ashok Khatanhar, challenged the order dated 12 January 2026 in which the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, framed charges under Sections 69, 316(2), 318(4) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, without affording him a prior hearing. The petition was filed under …
The applicant, Hemant Bhansali, sought discharge under Section 227 of the CrPC from a trial for alleged abetment of suicide (Sec. 306 IPC) and cruelty (Sec. 498A IPC) arising out of the death of his sister‑in‑law Purvi. The Sessions Court rejected his discharge application, relying on a comment …
The petitioner, Yakshi Vitesh Jain, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash FIR No. 0065 of 2026 registered by the Kalachowki Police Station. The matter was heard before Justice Ashwin D. Bobe. The petitioner’s counsel, Harshad Meshram, subsequently …
The applicant, Vikas Jaywantrao Shelke, filed a criminal application seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 06-07-2024 and the FIR No.75/2024 along with the charge sheet invoking Section 409 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The relief sought was the setting aside of the …
The Bombay High Court, sitting on 9 March 2026, issued a common order directing the handling of several pending criminal appellate matters. Due to time constraints, the listed matters could not be heard and the court set deadlines for removal of office objections, filing of any affidavits-in-reply, …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 0480 dated 15 December 2025 under Articles 226, 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC, alleging that the case stemmed from a private commercial dispute that had been settled by a deed and a payment of Rs 30 lakhs to Respondent No. 2. …
The applicant, Kamlog Kalasing Kro, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 355 of 2024 and charge‑sheet No. 198 of 2024 relating to offences under Sections 64(1), 64(2)(m), 69, 74, 89, 115(2) and 351(2) of the BSN. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 0507 dated 8 July 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 316 and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Both parties disclosed that the dispute arose from a private …
The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) seeking to quash FIR No. 0042 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 420 and 120B IPC arising from a dispute over a sale deed of 43.20 acres of land. The …
The petitioner, Haseen Hasan Nizami, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 19 December 2023 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, alleging violations of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The State contended that the order was merely revisable and could be …
The petitioner, Divyesh Ashwin Chandarana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No. 515 of 2023 filed by the RA Kidvai Marg Police Station. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the petition …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 74 of 2021 filed under Sections 323, 498A and 504 read with Section 34 IPC, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The complainant, Respondent No.2, filed an affidavit stating that the marriage had been dissolved by mutual consent and that she withdrew all …
Pravin Baburao Patil filed a criminal application seeking to quash FIR No.0119/2025 registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bombay Police Act. The applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application and to later file a separate application for discharge before the …
The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 129 of 2018 and the related charge‑sheet alleging offences under Sections 294, 114 and 34 IPC and the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act, on the ground that he was only a "customer" present at a bar where obscene dance was alleged. The court …
Petitioner Sonu Ram Mahesh Yadav filed a writ petition under the inherent power of Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No. 533 of 2025 registered under Sections 108, 352, 352(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner later …
The applicant, Jayesh Paramanand Khandwala, filed Criminal Application No. 217 of 2025 seeking the deletion of bail condition No. 3, which required him to obtain permission from the trial court before travelling abroad, in a CBI Special Case. The CBI and the State opposed the request, while the …
The applicants, led by advocate Yogesh Dalvi, filed an interim application seeking recall of the High Court's order dated 12 June 2025 that dismissed their writ petition for non‑prosecution. Dalvi admitted that his own bona‑fide mistake—his absence from the hearing—caused the dismissal. The State's …
The petitioners, Dilip Waman Mhatre and others, filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No.101 of 2024 and the accompanying chargesheet for offences under IPC sections 498A, 377, 506, 406 r/w 34. The …
Petitioner Arun Pandurang Ayare filed a criminal writ petition challenging the FIR and chargesheet. After learning of the filing of the chargesheet, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and instead file a composite petition contesting both the FIR and chargesheet. The petitioner’s counsel, …
The applicant, Dhanashree Ladoba Gaonkar, filed a criminal application seeking to quash the FIR, charge sheet and proceedings under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The application was filed in the High Court of Bombay before Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No.101/2024 and chargesheet No.77/2024 relating to alleged offences under Sections 498A, 377, 506 and 406 r/w 34 IPC. The dispute stemmed from a …
The petitioners, Vinay Arun Bhopi and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 1494 of 2025, which alleged offences under sections 354, 509, 506, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw …
Aishwarya Vivekanand Mayekar filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 22‑12‑2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vikhroli, which permitted Respondent No.2 to travel abroad while a criminal case (C.C. No. 1106/PW/2021) was pending. The petitioner argued that allowing …
Pratik Rajendra Jadhav, accused of offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act, was granted bail on 9 December 2025 with a condition that he not enter Supa village. He entered the village on 11 December 2025 to collect his clothes and get a haircut, prompting the State to seek …
The petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of an FIR (C.R. No. 98 of 2019) and a charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 354, 354(D), 323, 500 and 506. The petitioner and Respondent No. 2 had …
The applicant, Mangesh Shridhar Satamkar, filed a criminal application seeking to quash FIR No.137/2023 alleging offences under sections 376(2)(n), 312, 420, 504 and 506(2) of the IPC. The State argued that a summary report had been filed in July 2023, rendering the application moot. The applicant …
Kamala Landmarc Cars Pvt Ltd. and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 32 of 2016 (re‑numbered FIR No. 5 of 2023) registered at Borivali Police Station for offences under IPC …
The Applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 246/2023 and the related charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 498A, 509, 323, 504, 506 read with 34. Respondent No. 2, the complainant, submitted an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 373 of 2025 registered for offences under IPC sections 498A, 406, 323, 504 read with 34. The dispute involved a matrimonial conflict …
The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the quash of FIR No. 0245/2023 and any related criminal proceedings under Sections 464, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the FIR was illegal, arbitrary and an abuse of …
The petitioner, Kishor Kapoorchand Porwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quash of FIR No.148/2025 and the accompanying chargesheet, alleging that he was merely a mediator in an extortion case and not a principal offender. The …
The Bombay High Court, on 12 February 2026, issued a common order directing that pending matters be listed on specified dates in April 2026. It ordered that any office objections be removed within one week and that any interim orders previously granted would continue. The court required any …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 0106 of 2023 and the charge‑sheet RCC/3850/2023 relating to offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 and 34 IPC. The dispute arose from a matrimonial conflict …
The applicant, Sudhir @ Rahul Dattatray Handore, filed Criminal Application No. 172 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court. After filing, he submitted a separate application under Section 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the trial court, which was pending. Unaware of this development, he sought …
The petitioner, Shivratan Deendayal Suthar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 618 of 2024 and the subsequent charge‑sheet for offences under Sections 64(1), 352 and 351(2) of the …
The applicant, Pradeep D’Souza, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his Criminal Writ Petition No. 2255 of 2022, which had been dismissed on 10 September 2025 for non‑appearance. The applicant’s counsel explained that the non‑appearance was a bona‑fide mistake by the advocate and …
Mr. Dhar filed a criminal petition (No. 143 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and an additional respondent. The petition was heard by a bench comprising Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Shyam C. Chandak on 24 January 2024. The court examined the …
Kirti Kumar Mangaldas Shah filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash FIR No. 163 of 2017, which alleged offences under IPC sections 465, 466, 468, 471 and 420. The State of Maharashtra, through its A.P.P., informed the Court that an A‑Summary report had been …
The petitioner, Vinod Nagrekar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution read with Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Session Case No. 1422/2025) arising from FIR No. 0164 of 2025. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw …
The petitioners, college students, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quash of FIR No. 41 of 2026 registered for offences under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66E of the IT Act. The …
The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quash of FIR No. 529 of 2025 and charge‑sheet No. 1940 of 2025 pending before the JMFC Cantonment Court, Pune. The applicant and Respondent No. 2 had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
The applicants, Guru Bakshish Kohli and others, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. The learned counsel for the applicants stated that both the petitioner and Respondent No.2 had deposited the amount as required by the Court's order dated 2 February 2026. The Court accepted …
The petitioners, Fahim Aslam Shaikh and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quash of FIR No. 193/2023 and charge‑sheet PW/3259/2024 relating to offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 406, 504, 506 and …
The petitioners, Kamran Mohammed Yusuf and others, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of criminal case No. 923/PW/2023 pending before the 69th Judicial Magistrate (First Class) at Mazgaon, Mumbai. The petition was filed on 3 December 2025, well after the commencement of trial proceedings, which …
The applicant, Reshma Aziz Khan, filed Criminal Application No. 1694 of 2025 before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant, through counsel Harshad Eknathrao Palwe, sought leave to unconditionally withdraw the application. The State, represented by A.P.P. Tanveer G. Khan, did not oppose the …
The Applicants filed a criminal application seeking the court to call for investigation papers and to quash the charge sheet filed under Sections 395, 458 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code in FIR No. 198 of 2019. They alleged that the investigation papers were improperly seized and that the charge …
The petitioner, Vaishali Anil Tikam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 348 of 2017 and the pending chargesheet (Sessions Case No. 169 of 2018). The complainant (Respondent No.2) …
The petitioner, Vaishali Anil Tikam, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a writ of certiorari to quash FIR No. 188 of 2025 registered under Sections 406, 408, 409, 420, 34 IPC and Section 1860. After …
Manasi Inamdar filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 0385/2023 registered for offences under Sections 279 and 337 of the IPC. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a chargesheet had been filed. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking to quash the FIR, charge-sheet and criminal proceedings (Police Case No. 949/Pw/2017, CR No. 292/2016) for offences under sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter was listed, but the applicants and their counsel …
The Bombay High Court heard two criminal applications, APL/807/2025 filed by Abdul Hafeez Shaikh and APL/446/2024 filed by Saket Anil Bagaria, both against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought enforcement of an earlier order dated 28 January 2026 that directed the respondents to pay …
Vivek Mangala and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the quash of FIR C.R.No.I‑111 of 2014 registered at Kalwa Police Station, alleging that the FIR was illegal, null and void. The petitioners argued that the investigating agency had filed a ‘C’ Summary Report which was still …
M/S A.R.S. Agri Science Pvt. Ltd. filed a criminal application seeking a review of the final order dated 21 April 2015 in Criminal Writ Petition No.2470/2014, requesting that the order be called for rehearing. The application was listed under "Prioritised Cases" but the applicant, a person named …
The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash FIR No. 436 of 2023 and the accompanying charge‑sheet, alleging that the dispute with Respondent No. 2 had been amicably settled. Both the applicants’ counsel and Respondent No. 2’s counsel consented to the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings (R.C.C. No. 753 of 2013) pending before the trial court. The trial court had previously listed the case on 23 July 2021, but the petitioners failed to appear, resulting in non‑framing of charge. On 20 January 2026 the …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 169 of 2020 and related criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The dispute arose from …
The applicants sought quashing of FIR No. 561/2025 registered for alleged trespass and offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST Act, claiming the allegations were false and that a civil suit over the property was pending. The State argued that the FIR disclosed all …
The petitioner, Dinanath Bhikaji Kanade, filed a criminal writ petition in 2014 which was initially dismissed for want of prosecution. The dismissal was later recalled in 2017, and the petition was restored for admission after four weeks. However, the petitioner and his counsel did not appear before …
The petitioner Kunal Anuj sought to quash an FIR (RC.12(A)/2019-MUM) and the related charge sheet pending before a Special CBI Judge. While the petition was pending, the petitioner applied for discharge in the trial court, which was rejected on 13 October 2025. The petitioner then requested to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of FIR No. 338 of 2024 and the charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 323, 406, 498‑A, 504, 506 read with section 34. The petitioners and the wife (Respondent No. 2) had …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 1064 of 2022 and the charge‑sheet C.C. No. 313/PW/2023 relating to offences under IPC Sections 420 read with 34. Respondent No. 2 submitted an …
The applicants, Abhijeet Rode and another, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of FIR No. 73 of 2019 and the related charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 354‑A, 509, 323, 504, 506 read with 34. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and the alleged …
The applicant, Dattaram Pandurang Masurkar, filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 339 of 2025 and the order of cognizance dated 06.10.2025. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested a pass over and later sought …
The applicant, Shashikiran Janardhan Shetty, filed an application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (R.C.C. No. 7 of 2019) pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Uran. The State objected, contending that the order issuing the complaint is revisable under Section 438 of the Bharatiya …
The applicant, Nimesh Prakashbhai Patel, challenged a notice issued by the Investigation Officer of Wada Police Station requiring him to appear for a statement regarding a Rs. 10,45,000 deposit in his bank account. He argued that the deposit was unsolicited, he promptly transferred the amount back, …
Narendra Kothari filed criminal applications (Nos. 219, 220, 222, 223 of 2026) against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The applications sought relief concerning the execution of a warrant issued under Section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned counsel for Respondent …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to obtain the FIR (No. 334 of 2023) and to have it quashed, alleging that the matrimonial dispute with the complainant (Respondent No.2) had been amicably resolved and that she no longer wished to pursue criminal action. Respondent No.2 filed an affidavit …
The respondents filed a praecipe on 3 February 2026 seeking correction of a typographical error in paragraph 7 of the order dated 17 January 2026, where the name of the advocate was incorrectly printed as Mr. Yuvraj Tajane instead of Ms. Iqraa Zabin Qureshi. The court examined whether it has the …
Pawandeep Singh filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (referred to as Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) seeking to quash FIR No.208 of 2023, which alleged offences under various IPC sections and the Maharashtra Prevention of …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 294 of 2022 and a regular criminal complaint pending before a civil court, which alleged offences under sections 498‑A, 406, 323, 354 and 504 r/w 34 of the IPC. The complaint was filed by Respondent No. 2, Beauty Sunil Singh, who later executed a …
The applicants, Balkrishna Gopal Kshirsagar and others, filed an interim application seeking to recall a dismissal order dated 09‑12‑2025 that had dismissed Criminal Application No. 340 of 2022 for non‑prosecution. They argued that the dismissal resulted from a bona‑fide mistake by the advocate’s …
The applicants, Sanjay (Sanju) Bhekho Yadav and another, filed a criminal application seeking to quash FIR No.301 of 2016 registered at Kandivali Police Station for offences under Sections 408 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The charge‑sheet was filed on 12 June 2017, showing the applicant as …
Gulzar Malhotra, the former Chief Operating Officer of TREC, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking interim relief against the State of Maharashtra. The State of Maharashtra appeared as the respondent. Counsel for the applicant and the respondent …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a writ of mandamus to quash FIR No. RC0772022E0002 registered by the CBI for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC. During the pendency, …
The applicant, Hasmukh Bhai Jesha Bhai Bhutak, filed a criminal application seeking the High Court's inherent powers under sections 482 and 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for records of a pending magistrate case (PS/3220/2017) and to quash the FIR filed against him under IPC sections 279 …
The petitioner, Irfan @ Chipdya Noor Mohd. Shaikh, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash a notice dated 20 December 2025 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police under section 163(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State argued that the order was ex parte and that any …
