Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
92 judgments · newest first · showing 1–92
Petitioner Ravi Kant filed a habeas corpus writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and seven others, alleging that he was produced before the magistrate beyond the statutory 24‑hour period. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was released on bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued …
The petitioners, Kishore and his wife referred to as 'X', filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the release of X, who was detained in a police lock‑up in connection with a POCSO case where Kishore is the accused. The court examined X's age, noting the absence of school records and relying on an …
The petitioner, Zunaid Saifi, was arrested on 12 June 2026 and remanded in judicial custody until 19 June 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 31 March 2021 alleging offences under Section 66-C of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The petitioner, Lokendra, was detained under the PITNDPS Act and filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the legality of his detention. The core issue was whether the detaining authority had specifically informed him of his right to make a representation to that authority, as mandated by Article …
The appellants Ram Kunwar and Ram Kewal were convicted for the murder of Smt. Shanichari and for concealing the offence based on the testimony of the victim's five‑year‑old daughter, Kumari Pramila, and the alleged recovery of a knife. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the …
The appellant, Smt. Munni, filed a criminal appeal (No. 327 of 1990) before the Allahabad High Court. An office report dated 07‑09‑2026 indicated that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, had recorded the death of appellant No.1 on 16‑10‑2024. The court considered whether the appeal could …
The appellants Sukhram, Aushan Singh and Jeet Raj were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the death of Veerpal Singh. The High Court examined the prosecution’s case, which relied mainly on the testimony of two relatives of the deceased and lacked any forensic linkage …
The appellant, Rajni Mishra, filed an appeal against a trial court order that dismissed her husband’s divorce suit filed under the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty. She argued that the order adversely affected her because her husband had remarried during their subsistence of marriage and …
The appellant, Saurabh Gupta, appealed after a mutual consent divorce under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, wherein a settlement required him to pay Rs.90 lakhs to the respondent, Shalini Rai. During mediation, a demand draft of Rs.45 lakhs (No. 411770 dated 04‑04‑2025) was issued by …
The petitioner, Kamlapati Dixit, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 17909 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later filed a supplementary affidavit expressing the desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition. Counsel for the petitioner, Sangeeta …
The petitioner, Damodar Housing Co‑Operative Society Ltd., filed a writ appeal before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently moved that the appeal be withdrawn, seeking liberty to pursue any other legal remedies. The court considered the petitioner's request and, finding no objection, allowed the …
The petitioner, Gurmukh Singh, a sugarcane grower, filed a writ petition alleging non-payment of dues by respondent No.6, a private sugarcane buyer. The petitioner also claimed that a representation filed before respondent No.2 was pending decision. Respondent No.6 contended that 50% of the amount …
The petitioner, Amina, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief while a related complaint filed by her on 5 July 2025 before Respondent No.2 was still pending. The petitioner argued that the pending complaint should be decided before the writ petition proceeds. The court …
Petitioners Badale Singh and four others filed Writ Petition No. 44882 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel Akshara Rai and Sujeet Kumar Rai, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition …
The appellant husband appealed against a trial court order that granted his wife maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, in addition to an existing Rs.3,000 per month awarded under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The husband argued that the total …
A writ petition (Writ-C No. 27488 of 2021) was filed by Rajesh Kumar Mishra against Mansha Ram Mishra and others. The petitioner failed to appear before the court even after a revised call. The court noted the non‑appearance and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits …
The appellant, Bharat Tomar, filed a first appeal (No. 770 of 2022) against a decision involving Smt. Neetu. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal. The court, noting the request, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were …
The appellant, Sarita, filed a first appeal but later expressed a desire not to pursue the matter. Counsel for the appellant informed the court that the appeal should be treated as withdrawn. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered the request and, finding no objection, dismissed the …
Alok Kumar Singh filed an appeal against a decree and later, through his counsel Lavlesh Kumar Shukla and Mahesh Kumar, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The appellant filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 04 of 2025) before the Allahabad High …
The petitioners, Smt Poonam Kumari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners on the revised call. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Atul …
Smt. Vidyawati Devi and another filed a Special Appeal (No. 1594 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court against the District Inspector of School and another. The appellants were represented by counsel A.K. Roy and Anil Bhushan, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. No appellant appeared …
The appellant, Abhishek Rai, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. No further arguments or evidence were presented. The respondent, Smt. Rinki Rai, was …
Smt. Prerna Shrivastava filed an appeal against Mohit Shrivastava in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel, Yatharth Nath Pathak, failed to appear even after a revised call. The Court noted the non‑appearance and held that the appeal could not be prosecuted. Consequently, the judges …
Robin Saini filed an appeal against Smt. Soonali Saini in the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel failed to appear for the hearing, and even after a revised call, no appearance was made. The court, noting the non‑appearance, dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. No …
Shyam Narain Yadav filed a special appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the District Inspector of Schools. The respondent's counsel submitted an illness slip, but the appellant failed to appear for the hearing, even after a revised call. The court noted the appellant's non-appearance as a …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an appeal by Smt. Rupali Dwivedi against a trial court order that granted her husband, Navneet Kumar Dwivedi, a divorce. The appellant was not contesting the divorce itself but sought maintenance, which the trial court had not awarded. The court observed that …
The appellant, Anuj Soni, filed a first appeal against Chanchal Soni in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Shri Prakash Dwivedi, expressed that the appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal. The court considered the request and noted that the appeal was not …
The petitioner, Pyare Lal, a sugarcane grower, filed a writ petition alleging that a private company (respondent no. 6) had failed to pay dues owed for supplied sugarcane. The petitioner claimed that a representation filed with respondent no. 2 was still pending decision, and that no payment had …
Petitioner Parvati Devi, a sugarcane grower, filed a writ petition alleging non‑payment of dues by a private company (respondent No.6) and contended that a representation filed before respondent No.2 was still pending. The petitioner claimed that no payment had been received, while respondent No.5 …
Ashu Dubey appealed to the Allahabad High Court seeking relief from an order directing the release of Rs 2,00,000 deposited with the court’s Mediation Centre. The parties had earlier been referred to mediation, where they settled their matrimonial dispute, filed a joint divorce petition under …
Ashu Dubey appealed against the dissolution of his marriage to Preeti Dubey. The respondent filed a joint petition under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court, Jaunpur (Case No.1465 of 2023), which was granted on 27 May 2025, dissolving the marriage. The appellant …
The appellant, Vishwajeet Sharma, filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.3 of 2026) seeking to withdraw his appeal against Aditi Pandey. The application was supported by an affidavit. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, comprising Judges Atul Sreedharan and …
The appellant, Nathan Singh Principal Tyagi Inter College, filed a special appeal (No. 1397 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared for the appellant even after a revised call. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, …
The petitioners, Union of India and four others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined this submission and found no merit in continuing the petition. …
The appellant, Smt Salini Jain, filed an application seeking to withdraw the appeal filed against Sachin Jain. The application was supported by an affidavit explaining the desire to withdraw. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered the request and found no objection to the withdrawal. …
The appellant, Mohan Singh, failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Vivek Saran, granted the appellant a one‑month period to file a restoration …
The petitioner, Jagmohan Dutt Sharma, filed Writ No. 38233 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf at the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and consequently dismissed it. The judges granted the petitioner liberty to file a …
The appellant, Smt. Ranjana Singh, the first wife of Rohit Singh, filed a suit under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking to declare her husband's second marriage to a woman identified as "X" void. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding that only a party to the second marriage could …
The dispute concerned the election of the Committee of Management of Aryan Educational Trust, Prayagraj, conducted by the Assistant Registrar, Prayagraj despite pending objections under Section 4‑B of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The Single Judge set aside the election result, but the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear or present counsel when the matter was listed. The respondents' counsel was present. The court, noting the absence of any representation for the petitioners, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
Bajaj Agencies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call, and no further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The Court observed that the petition was …
The appellant, Gorakh Singh, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal for want of prosecution. The judges granted the appellant liberty to file a restoration application within one month if …
The petitioners, C/M P.M.S. Public School, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 72580 of 2010) against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners even after the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want …
The petitioners, represented by counsel Sachin Kumar Sharma, filed Writ Petition No. 5717 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and nine other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel prayed to withdraw the writ petition. The standing …
Gopal Singh filed a special appeal (No. 215 of 2007) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared for the appellant even after a revised call. The Court observed that the appeal had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for …
Petitioner Sudha Mishra filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative legal remedy. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh raised no objection to the …
The petitioners, a group of scheduled tribe members, filed a writ petition seeking a record of their forest rights from the State Government. They had earlier submitted an application on 12-12-2025 to the second respondent, which remained unconsidered. The petitioners argued that their request was …
The petitioner, Kamal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash a 21 April 2025 order rejecting his representation and a mandamus directing the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Koil to order police eviction of respondents 4 to 8 from a plot purchased by his wife. The petition was filed …
Petitioners Yogesh Kumar Sharma and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel Ashish Srivastava, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue any other legal remedies. The Court …
The petitioners, Bhola and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners' counsel prayed to withdraw the writ petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative remedy …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and fined Rs.2,000, a sentence that had been completed before the filing of the writ petition. He sought a writ directing the issuance of a passport without the requirement of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners prayed to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any alternative remedy available under law. The Additional …
Petitioner Haleemuddin applied for a passport which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal case under Sections 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. P.S. Saraimeer, Azamgarh. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decisions in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) and Rahimuddin (2025) to argue …
The petitioners, Swastik Infratech and two others, challenged a one‑year debarment order issued by the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department (PWD) after a work order for road repair was found to be substandard. They alleged that the debarment was a retaliatory act for their whistle‑blowing complaint …
The petitioner, Avusad, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was being held up due to his involvement in a pending criminal case (Case Crime No. 0357 of 2025) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decisions in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. …
Petitioner Ashish Kumar Sharma applied for a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in two criminal cases under Sections 147, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of …
Manoj Kumar Singh applied for a passport but the application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 867 of 2013) under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of …
The petitioner, a member of the Gram Panchayat of Sonsa in Etah district, sought to have voters of Wards 9, 13 and 15 shifted from the polling station at Uchh Prathmik Vidyalaya, Sonsa to the polling station at Janta Inter College, Parson. He filed a representation on 9 October 2025, which was …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0672 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in …
The petitioner, Panna Lal, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine other respondents. The petition sought dismissal on the ground that it was not pressed. The petitioner’s counsel, Sachin Kumar Sharma, specifically prayed for dismissal as not …
The petitioner, Rakesk Verma, filed Writ No. 9363 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and five other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the petitioner wished to explore …
The petitioner sought re‑issuance of his passport, which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal FIR (sections 506, 494, 498A IPC) pending in Kushinagar. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (2023) that mere pendency of an FIR cannot bar …
The petitioner, Abhijeet Srivastava, filed a writ petition after lodging a complaint against a practicing advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, which was subsequently transferred to the Bar Council of India. The petitioner objected to the advocate's response and sought the Bar Council of …
The petitioners, Kaushal Kishore Rai and six others, filed a writ petition seeking a subsidy of Rs 1,50,200 for a 9 HP power trailer they had purchased, claiming entitlement under the Rajya Audyogik Mission, Uttar Pradesh and the Ekikrit Bagwani Vikas Mission (Rashtriya Bagwani Mission). The central …
Smt. Mansa Devi filed a writ petition seeking relief from the State of U.P. for its failure to decide her application filed on 13‑08‑2025 under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatana Kalyan Yojana after her husband’s death. The Court noted that the scheme is intended to provide social security to …
The petitioners, claiming to be forest dwellers, sought protection under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, asserting that the land they occupy is tribal land despite being within a reserved forest. The respondents, representing the …
The petitioners, claiming to be forest dwellers, sought protection under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, asserting that the land they occupy is tribal land despite being within a reserved forest. The respondents, including the …
Petitioner Azam Quraishi sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST Act. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar, which held that mere pendency of a …
Qamar Alam filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the revised call. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges granted the petitioner liberty to file a …
Vikram Singh applied for a passport which was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 314 of 2024) under Sections 324(4), 352, 115(2), 333 and 191(2) of the B.N.S, P.S. Sheeshgarh, Bareilly. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …
The petitioner sought renewal of his passport, which was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 353 of 2025) under several IPC sections. He relied on earlier judgments that mere pendency of a criminal case does not automatically bar passport renewal if the petitioner obtains …
Petitioner Yogesh Chauhan sought a passport but his application was held up because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0161 of 2021) under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He relied on the Allahabad High Court’s earlier decision in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar …
The petitioner, Veena Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that her bank account was frozen after a Rs.10,000 online fraud transaction, reported by Coimbatore Police, was credited to her account. She claimed ignorance of how the amount was deposited and sought relief to access her funds. The court …
The petitioner, Brijkishor Kushwaha, applied for re‑issuance of his passport which was withheld because he is implicated in a criminal case (Case Crime No. 36 of 2022) under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 506. He relied on the Division Bench judgment in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar v. Union of India, arguing …
The appellant, Gopal Singh, failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan, granted the appellant liberty to file a restoration application …
The appellant, Gorakh Singh, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges, Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan, granted the appellant liberty to file …
M/s J.J. Construction Company and another filed writ petition No. 35368 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court even after a revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the …
The appellants failed to appear before the High Court even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the special appeal for want of prosecution. The judges, however, granted the appellants liberty to file a restoration application within one month if they wish. No substantive merits of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear even after the revised call. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. However, the …
The petitioners, Mohammad Yamin and others, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call was issued. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The Court, however, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear even after a revised call. The court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. The judges granted the petitioners liberty to file a restoration application within one month if they wish. No …
The petitioner, Anirudh Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that a representation filed on 30 August 2025 before the District Magistrate, Deoria, was pending. The petition sought judicial intervention regarding the pending representation. The Court noted that the matter was sub‑judice before the …
The petitioners, minor children Rifat Bano and Jigyansh, filed writ petitions after their biometric data were interchanged during Aadhaar enrolment at a Union Bank of India franchise. The error resulted in each child's biometrics being linked to the other's Aadhaar number, a fact admitted by the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the revised call. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. The judges, however, granted the petitioners liberty to file a …
The petitioner, Durga Prasad Asthana, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear even after a revised call. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the petition. However, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a restoration application within one …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of encroachments on several plots of land in Chandauli district. The State submitted an affidavit showing that the revenue authorities had already set aside a 1997 order, restored the plots to their original category, and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ-C No. 67376 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. No petitioner appeared in court even after the revised call, indicating a lack of prosecution of the petition. The Court observed that …
The appellant, Arun Kumar Pathak, challenged a single judge’s order that denied his request to continue in a teaching post after the short‑term vacancy he filled became substantive. The court examined the procedure prescribed under the U.P. Secondary Education Service Commission (Removal of …
Smt. Meenakshi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 74572 of 2011) before the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared to press the petition on the scheduled hearing. The Court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble …
The petition filed by the Cricket Association of Uttar Pradesh was heard before a two‑judge bench. The respondent Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association and others filed a counter‑affidavit, which was taken on record. The petitioner was served with a copy of the counter‑affidavit and sought time to file …
