Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
23 judgments · newest first · showing 1–23
The petitioners, Chokshi Arvind Jewellers and another, filed Writ Petition No. 6257 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel informed the Court that they had instructions to withdraw the petition, following an order in Writ Petition (L) No. 14265 of 2026. …
T.K. Steel & Allied Industries filed Writ Petition No.8278 of 2007 against Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation. The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court on two occasions, despite a warning that the petition would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the Court …
T.K. Steel & Allied Industries filed Writ Petition No.8278 of 2007 against Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation. The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court on two occasions, despite a warning that the petition would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the Court …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
The petitioner, Rohan Nayan Shah, challenged a notice and order of assessment for AY 2015-16 issued by the Income Tax authorities. The petitioner argued that the assessment and any subsequent re‑assessment, demand or penalty notices were unlawful. The Court observed that the matter fell within the …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
The petitioner Shubhada R. Bora filed multiple writ petitions challenging notices, reassessment orders, demand and penalty notices issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik. The Court noted that these petitions would be decided in accordance with the precedent set in Hexaware Technologies …
Zentest Software Private Limited filed several writ petitions challenging income tax notices and assessment orders for AY 2016-17 and 2017-18, alleging that the sanction for assessment was improperly obtained. The Court relied on its earlier decision in Siemens Financial Services Private Limited v. …
The petitioner Shubhada R. Bora filed multiple writ petitions challenging notices, reassessment orders, demand and penalty notices issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik. The Court noted that these petitions would be decided in accordance with the precedent set in Hexaware Technologies …
The Bombay High Court dealt with a large batch of writ petitions (WP 3641/2022 and many others) all concerning the Assessment Year 2015-16. Petitioners challenged notices, reassessment orders, demand and penalty notices issued by the Income Tax authorities. The Court observed that the matters are …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
A series of writ petitions filed by various taxpayers challenged income‑tax notices, demand notices, penalty notices and re‑assessment orders for different assessment years. The petitioners argued that the orders were illegal and sought their quashing. The Court observed that the matters fall within …
Lt. Colonel Rajendra J, a retired commercial helicopter pilot, filed a writ petition challenging the non‑renewal of his Commercial Helicopter Pilot Licence and alleging wrongful termination from his post as Flight Operations Inspector with the DGCA. He claimed his contract, which was set to expire …
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd filed a Review Petition (ST) No.23489/2025 but delayed its filing by 69 days. The company then moved an Interim Application No.10370/2025 seeking condonation of this delay. The Court examined the reasons provided in the Interim Application for the delay. Finding the explanation …
The Applicant, half‑brother of Petitioners, sought clarification of the High Court's order dated 20 October 2023 in Writ Petition No. 5618 of 2014, alleging that the order had not decided the title of a property in Dhankawadi, Pune or the issuance of TDR/DRC. The property, originally belonging to …
The petitioner, Magestic Premises Private Ltd., challenged a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the subsequent order disposing its objections, alleging that the reasons for reopening the assessment for AY 2013-14 were untenable. The assessment had earlier been reassessed with …
Size Control Gauges and Tools Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging orders of the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle‑5, Pune. The petitioner, through counsel Ms. Mrunal Shinde (i/b Pratik Jha), later instructed the court to unconditionally withdraw the …
The petitioners filed an interim application seeking amendment of their writ petition. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court accepted this statement and dismissed the interim …
The petitioners, Royal Energy Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. to accept two demand drafts/pay orders for appeal fees and to decide an appeal filed in 2014. The court clarified that the appropriate appellate …
The High Court had earlier disposed of Writ Petition No.2158 of 2023 on 12 February 2026. On 30 March 2026 the Court was informed that the order dated 12 February 2026 had been fully complied with by the parties. Both petitioner and respondents appeared through counsel. The Court recorded the …
Petitioner Rohan Agarwal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petitioner wished to unconditionally withdraw the petition. The Court accepted the withdrawal …
Prithviraj Enterprises and another filed a writ petition (ST.) No.17937 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court challenging certain office objections raised by the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners sought relief to have the deadline for removing those objections extended. The Court, …
