Created by Fuzzy Cloud

BHARATI DANGRE

60 judgments · newest first · showing 1–60

MR. SANDEEP TODIversusMRS. NEHA TODI

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard three family court appeals filed by husband Sandeep Todi against wife Neha Todi. No counsel appeared for the appellant. The court considered a Supreme Court judgment dated 07‑04‑2026, which, under Article 142 of the Constitution, dissolved the marriage, quashed all …

SHANTI SURESH PALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Shanti Suresh Pal, a 76‑year‑old woman convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed an interim bail application pending her appeal. The prosecution’s case relied on circumstantial evidence, a memorandum statement leading to the recovery of a hammer, and an …

RESHMA GUFRAN RIZVIversusDR.AKHTAR HASAN RIZVI AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant Reshma Gufran Rizvi filed a Family Court Appeal challenging an order dated 28.08.2025 of the Family Court at Bandra. Along with the appeal, an interim application was filed seeking condonation of a 76‑day delay in filing the appeal. The appellant explained that a writ petition was …

RAJNI PRAVIN KUMAR SHETEversusPRAVIN KUMAR JANARDHAN SHETE AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellant-wife filed an interim application seeking Rs.1 lakh per month as interim maintenance pending the hearing of her appeal against a Family Court decree granting divorce, permanent alimony refusal, and child custody. She contended that the respondent-husband, who owns multiple properties …

RAJENDRA RAMCHANDRA BAJAREversusMALTI RAJENDRA BAJARE

Allowed

The appellant, Rajendra Ramchandra Bajare, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 213‑day delay in filing his appeal. He explained that, being a senior citizen with limited financial means and health problems, he required additional time to engage counsel and prepare the necessary …

NANDA TAKWANEversusSUB REGISTRAR COOPERTIVE SOCIETY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, led by Nanda Takwane, were personal guarantors for a loan taken by Siddheshwar Industries Pvt. Ltd. (SIPL) and faced recovery actions under the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960 (Section 101 and Section 156) including notices for attachment of mortgaged property. They …

MAYUR GORAKH GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mayur Gorakh Gaikwad, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 43‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. The impugned judgment was pronounced on 26 February 2026, but the applicant obtained a certified copy only on 8 June 2026, citing …

SHIRISH PATTANSHETTYversusUNION OF INDIA THR JOINT SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

Shirish Pattanshetty filed writ petition No. 7443 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner and no substantive pleadings were filed. The respondents, represented by State counsel, were prepared to contest the petition. …

PRALHAD NARHARI RUPNARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

Pralhad Narhari Rupnar, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife, filed an interim application under Section 389 of the CrPC seeking suspension of his life sentence and bail while his appeal is pending. The applicant argued that the conviction was perverse, relying solely …

AMAN PRAKATSINGH JATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …

CHETAN YASHWANTRAO PAGAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusCHETAN YASHWANTRAO PAGARE AND ANR.

Allowed

The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …

LATA VITHAL KATKARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Lata Vithal Katkari, claimed a 4,500 sq. m. parcel of land allotted to her under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2008, located in Survey/Gat No.219. The Forest Department proposed to erect a boundary wall around Gat …

INDUS TOWERS LIMITEDversusNAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Indus Towers Limited, a telecom infrastructure company, obtained permission from Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation to install a cellular tower in 2008. After complaints from local residents, the corporation issued a notice and the Ward Officer attempted to dismantle the equipment, prompting the …

PRADEEP VALJIBHAI PARMAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, Pradeep Valjibai Parmar and an associate, filed Interim Application No. 1659 of 2026 seeking permission to travel to and reside in Australia for one year while a criminal appeal (No. 848 of 2009) filed by the State of Maharashtra remains pending. The appeal challenges an acquittal …

SMT. SARASWATI PRAYAGDIN VARMA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, street vendors licensed for Vending Zone No. 216 in Pune, challenged the Pune Municipal Corporation's attempt to remove their carts during footpath repairs, invoking protection under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. The …

NANDKUMAR MOHAN BHATversusADITI NANDKUMAR BHAT ALIAS ADIT SHRAIKANT KULKARNI

Disposed Off

The husband appealed a Family Court order that dissolved his marriage, granted maintenance for his son, and directed the wife to pay Rs.15,00,000 as permanent alimony. He accepted the dissolution and child maintenance but contested the alimony direction, arguing that no specific prayer for permanent …

NITIN MARUTI GAIKWADversusYOGITA NITIN GAIKWAD

Allowed

The applicant, Nitin Maruti Gaikwad, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 33‑day delay in filing a Family Court appeal against a judgment dated 17‑09‑2025 that dismissed a restitution petition and partially allowed a divorce petition. The delay was attributed to the applicant not …

KIRTIDA BHAVESH CHHADVAversusBHAVESH SHAMJI CHHADVA

Disposed Off

The parties were married on 28 February 2002 but separated within three months, after which the husband filed for divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the wife filed for maintenance and residence under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and …

MR. MUSHTAQ AHMED ABDULversusTHE CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mushtaq Ahmed Abdul, filed a writ petition alleging that the Chief Vigilance Officer of MHADA failed to take cognizance of a complaint he lodged on 15 December 2022, which also implicated the police department for alleged irregularities. He sought a directive compelling the vigilance …

ANSARI WAQAR AHMAD MOHD. YUSUFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 7 June 2022 that rejected his request to lay a pipeline from Lonwade Shivar, citing prohibitions under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The communication was issued by the Forest Range Officer …

SUDARSHAN VISHWAS PATILversusWASIM SAYYED DISTRICT MINING OFFICER AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sudarshan Vishwas Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Wasim Sayyed and other officials. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous because of the lapse of time. The Court accepted this submission. No substantive merits of …

MANE FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR

Allowed

Mane Finance Private Limited filed a writ petition which was dismissed on 9 January 2026 for want of prosecution because its counsel failed to appear. The petitioner filed an interim application seeking restoration of the dismissed petition, explaining that the counsel's non‑appearance was …

X SINCE MINOR THR. MOTHERversusCENTRAL HOSPITAL ULHASNAGAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

A 16‑year‑old minor, through her mother, filed a writ petition seeking a court‑ordered medical termination of her pregnancy. The High Court initially granted permission for the procedure to be performed at a civil hospital, emphasizing the minor's autonomy and the fact that she was unmarried. The …

ASHIT BALWANT DOSHIversusUNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Ashit Balwant Doshi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel instructed the court to withdraw the petition. The court granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive adjudication on …

ACME HOUSING INDIA PVT LTD AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

Acme Housing India Pvt. Ltd. and its director sought a declaration that the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 no longer applied to their 54,500 sq m of land in Thane, the deletion of a mutation entry (No. 1125) that recorded an exemption under Section 20 of that Act, and the quashing of …

SUBHASH CHANDULAL TALERAversusSONA SUBHASH TALERA

Allowed

The husband, Subhash Chandulal Talera, filed a petition in the Family Court seeking a declaration that shares and immovable property held in his wife Sona Subhash Talera's name were benami and that he was the absolute owner, along with a direction to cancel a power of attorney and an injunction …

SOU.SEEMA NIRANJAN KARMALKAR @ SEEMA RAHUL SUTRAVEversusRAHUL DNYANESHWAR SUTRAVE

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an interim application seeking restoration of Family Court Appeal No. 35 of 2020, which had been dismissed because notice to Respondent No. 2 was not served and the appellant failed to act within the two‑week deadline. The Registrar had directed dismissal for non‑service, and the …

KALPANA PREMANAND NAYAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Kalpana Premanand Nayak, filed writ petition No.11082 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court seeking direction regarding a pending appeal before the Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner/Appellate Authority dated 14 February 2022. The petition alleged long pendency and asked …

YOGESH GORIversusTHE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA THR. DIRECTOR AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Yogesh Gori filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) that sought to remove his name from the Institute’s register of members on the allegation that he had issued false certificates. The High Court earlier stayed the publication of …

SHRI. UMESH VISHNU ATHAVALEversusSMT. AMITA UMESH ATHAVALE

Disposed Off

The husband, who runs a clinic in a flat undergoing redevelopment, filed an interim application seeking an order that his wife, a 50% co‑owner, execute the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement (PAAA) with the developer and that he be given possession of the new premises during the pendency of …

SMITA SUSHANTH SHETTYversusSUSHANTH SURESH SHETTY

Allowed

The applicant, Smita Sushanth Shetty, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 181‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Family Court decree for restitution of conjugal rights under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. She claimed she was unaware of the judgment until she obtained a …

ASHWIN CHAMPSHI GALAversusNEHAL ASHWIN GALA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Ashwin Champshi Gala, filed a family court appeal (ST) No.22792 of 2023 against the respondent, Nehal Ashwin Gala. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Punit Vyas, sought to withdraw the appeal. The court considered whether permission was required to withdraw an appeal pending before it. The …

TRAMBAK NATHA BHAGWATversusSHWETA TRAMBAK BHAGWAT

Allowed

The applicant, Trambak Natha Bhagwat, appealed a Family Court judgment that dismissed his petition for dissolution of marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act. The appeal, filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984, was delayed by 155 days. The applicant sought condonation of this delay, …