Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
411 judgments · newest first · showing 401–411
Vipul Ramanbhai Parmar filed a series of criminal miscellaneous and special applications seeking to quash and set aside an FIR and related orders. The High Court noted numerous pending applications and directed that any office objections be withdrawn by 28 July 2025. The Court warned that failure to …
Vipul Ramanbhai Parmar filed a series of criminal miscellaneous and special applications seeking to quash and set aside an FIR and related orders. The High Court noted numerous pending applications and directed that any office objections be withdrawn by 28 July 2025. The Court warned that failure to …
The petitioners, Prafulbhai Devjibhai Vasava, filed a series of Special Criminal Applications seeking quash of proceedings against them. The High Court observed that the petitioners had failed to remove the office objections raised by the court despite earlier directions. The court directed the …
The petitioners, Prafulbhai Devjibhai Vasava and others, filed a series of Special Criminal Applications and Criminal Miscellaneous Applications seeking quash of proceedings against them by the State of Gujarat. The High Court observed that the petitioners had failed to comply with the Court’s …
The applicants, represented by Siddhant R. Shah, filed a series of special and criminal miscellaneous applications against the respondent, the Public Prosecutor, in the High Court of Gujarat. The court noted that the applicants had raised office objections that needed to be removed. The issue before …
The petitioners, Dilip @ Diliprao Baliram Khandaare & others, filed a series of special criminal applications seeking quash of proceedings. The court observed that the petitioners had failed to remove the office objections raised by the court despite being directed to do so. Consequently, the court …
Ramkesh Sohanlal Meena filed a series of criminal applications against the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing the parties, directed the applicants to have the office objections removed by 21 July 2025. The Court warned that failure to remove the objections would result in dismissal of …
Ramkesh Sohanlal Meena filed a series of criminal applications against the State of Gujarat. The High Court, after hearing the parties, directed the applicants to have the office objections removed by 21 July 2025. The Court warned that failure to remove the objections would result in dismissal of …
The petitioners, Vishal Enterprise (proprietor Anilbhai Gopalji Umarigar & Anr), filed a series of special criminal applications seeking quashing of proceedings and interim relief against the State of Gujarat. The Court noted that the primary issue was the existence of office objections that the …
The petitioners, Piyush Bipinchandra Parikh and others, filed a series of special criminal applications seeking to quash proceedings and to join parties. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Public Prosecutor, opposed the applications. The Court examined whether the pending office objections …
The petitioner, Deendayal, filed a criminal miscellaneous application in 2016 seeking quashment of an FIR. The second respondent had not been served with the petition. The Court, upon the petitioner's request, granted an extension until 19‑06‑2025 for the petitioner to take necessary steps, warning …
