Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
146 judgments · newest first · showing 1–146
The petitioner, Smt. Sarita @ Savita, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Ghaziabad to decide her appeal under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to stay the execution of an ex‑parte order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the …
The petitioner Bholanath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Tehsil Shohratgarh to decide a pending revenue case (T201917630505885) under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay in the SDO's disposal …
The petitioner, Mukhtiyar Haider Rizvi, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and other respondents to dispose of a pending representation and to demarcate a specific parcel of land. The petitioner alleged that an application for demarcation had been filed but no action …
The petitioner, Geeta Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue proceeding (Case No.11936 of 2025) under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding had been pending since …
The petitioner, Seema Srivatava, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur, to decide a pending mutation appeal (Case No. 10668 of 2025) under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal had been pending since 2 January …
The petitioners, Ghanshyam and four others, claimed peaceful possession of a 0.114‑hectare plot (Arazi No.151M) in Saurai Khurd, Uttar Pradesh, and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the land until the disposal of their appeal under Section 38(1) …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Kasya, Kushinagar to decide a pending revenue proceeding within a stipulated period. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding was not being conducted expeditiously. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 331 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj, to decide appeal No. 2322 of 2025 (Rakesh Kumar alias Ramesh Kumar v. State of U.P.) which had been …
The petitioner, Surendra Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later submitted an affidavit indicating a desire to withdraw the petition. Counsel for the petitioner moved that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The court examined the affidavit and the counsel's …
The petitioners sought a review of the High Court's order dismissing their writ petition concerning a title dispute over land claimed on the basis of a registered sale deed. They alleged that the consolidation officer and subsequent appellate authorities had acted arbitrarily, failed to give them a …
The petitioner, Hinchh Narayan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) of Handia, Prayagraj to decide a pending suit for division of holding under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The suit had been pending since 15 September 2025, and …
Petitioner Priya Upadhyay filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide her pending appeal (Case No. 21688 of 2025) under section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal arose from orders passed under Section 34 of the U.P. Land …
Petitioner Smt. Jyotiya filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Sub Divisional Officer (ASDO) of Sadar Ghazipur to decide a pending suit (No. 10555/2025) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 11 September 2025. The petitioner alleged …
Mulki Devi filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to implement an order dated 09‑06‑2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to consider her subsequent applications dated 13‑02‑2026 and …
Petitioners Smt. Vimla Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj Division, to decide a restoration application dated 9 December 2025 that had been pending since that date. The petitioners argued that the application was …
Ramsingar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial) of Mariahu, Jaunpur, to hear and decide a recall/restoration application filed on 26 July 2024 against an order dated 15 April 2024 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
Animesh filed a writ petition under Section 29/41 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide Appeal No.149/M, which challenges a 15 April 2023 order of the Deputy Collector. The petitioner alleged that the appeal, filed under Section 210 …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Officer Second, Azamgarh to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.10529 of 2026) under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding was not being conducted expeditiously. The …
The petitioner, Mahilal, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Dadri, to conclude demarcation proceedings and decide case No. 15293 of 2025 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the proceeding had …
Hareram filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Azamgarh Division, to decide Appeal No. 589/2017 (Triloki vs. Triveni) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from a suit …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Auraiya, to decide an application filed on 27 May 2026 under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court, after obtaining instructions, learned that the application had been registered as case …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State to demarcate specific land plots in Bareilly district. They claimed the court had previously ordered the Tehsildar to act, but no demarcation had occurred. The State contended that the petitioners had not …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to enforce an eviction order dated 29.05.2023, issued by the Tahsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the order had not been executed and requested the court to order …
Petitioner Major Singh filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an eviction order dated 8 May 2026 passed by the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar under Section 209(Ja) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and seeking a mandamus directing the officer to accept his restoration …
The appellant, Lotan, filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice directing the sole appellant to engage another counsel for representation. No counsel or party appeared to prosecute the appeal. Consequently, there was no one present to press the second appeal. …
The petitioner, allotted a plot in 2001, had his allotment affirmed by an order dated 18‑12‑2023 under Section 198(4) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950. He applied under Section 76 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 to be recorded as bhumidhar with transferable rights, which was …
The petitioner, Vasudeo Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing a private respondent, his younger brother, not to interfere with his possession of a residential house, tube well, and chak that were mutually partitioned in 2014, and also seeking enforcement of his life, limb, and …
The petitioner challenged a mutation order passed by a Naib Tehsildar under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which recorded the name of a private respondent based on a registered will deed dated 21‑02‑2009. The petitioner’s appeal under Section 35(2) and subsequent revision under Section …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar to decide a pending proceeding under Section 27 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding, initiated on 12 March 2026, was not being …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Up‑Ziladhikari of Etah to decide a suit filed on 31‑01‑2026 under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and to maintain status quo over certain lands. The petition also requested an order for an interim injunction …
The petitioner challenged three orders that recorded the names of private respondents as owners of a plot based on a registered sale deed, arguing that the sale deed was under a pending civil suit for cancellation and therefore the mutation court lacked jurisdiction. The petition sought a writ of …
The petitioner, Kailash, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the revenue authorities to demarcate a plot allotted to his father and to grant him peaceful possession as per a 1973 lease. He claimed the plot, recorded as banjar in revenue records, was allotted to his …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, to decide a pending revision (Case No.2036/2024) expeditiously. The petition alleged undue delay in disposal of the …
The petitioner, Ram Gopal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) 2nd Agra Division to decide appeal No. 935 of 2026 filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, and a certiorari to quash the order rejecting his interim relief. The petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Agra Division to decide Appeal No. 701 of 2024, filed under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal had been pending since 29‑12‑2023, and the petitioner alleged that …
Petitioner Rampa Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to decide her application dated 28‑08‑2025, which sought rejection of proceedings under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to act against other respondents for alleged forgery and false …
The petitioners filed a writ of mandamus seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Jakhaniya, Ghazipur, to decide a revenue case (Case No. 6998 of 2025) pending under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since 2024. The petition alleged undue delay and attached the order sheet …
Prem Singh and two others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil‑Khair, Aligarh, to decide a pending revenue proceeding (case No. 3817 of 2021, State v. Suresh) that had been remanded under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Banda to decide an objection filed on 11 March 2024 in a revenue proceeding under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The objection relates to a case concerning land parcels in Village Bhawanipurwa, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy District Magistrate of Ballia to register and decide two applications for demarcation of arazies filed on 30‑04‑2025 and 02‑06‑2026. The petitioner alleged that the applications had not been registered, while the State …
Petitioner Prahlad Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing revenue officials to investigate and order the return of his alleged illegally possessed land (Gata No. 621, 266 hectares) in Sambhal district. He asked the court to compel the officials to act on his application dated …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Administration (Gorakhpur) to decide appeal No. 657/2026 under Section 207 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since April 4, 2026. The petitioner alleged undue delay and …
The petitioners, Ramesh and others, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner (respondent No.2) to decide appeal No. 1159 of 2025, which arose under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zilla and Land Revenue Act, 1950, and to prevent their …
The petitioners Mahendra Kumar and others filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 20‑06‑2022 passed by the Sub‑Collector under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in a revenue case initiated in 2018. They argued that the initial decree was one‑sided and should be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3, a Sub‑Judge, to expedite the disposal of civil suit No. 9784/2024 (Horizon Rai v. Satish Kumar) filed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. They alleged that the lower court had delayed the case …
Ram Sevak Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Gaon Sabha (respondent No.2) to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.15290 of 2024) under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a time frame fixed by the court. The High Court examined whether it …
The petitioner, Sudama, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate and others to decide Suit No. 70 of 2023, which is pending before the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Padrauna, under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the suit had …
The petitioner, Suresh Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an eviction and damages order dated 18.02.2026 issued by the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and also sought a mandamus directing the recovery of Rs. 18,000 in damages. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Kasiya, Kushinagar to decide a proceeding under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 10 November 2025. The petitioner alleged that the case was not being progressed …
Manju Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Barhaj, Deoria to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.856 of 2025) filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the magistrate had delayed the proceedings since …
The petitioner Hari Ram filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 32213 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was filed against the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine other respondents. The petitioner was represented by counsel Kamlesh Sharma. The respondents were represented by counsel …
Petitioners Aditya Singh and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Ghazipur, to consolidate several pending cases (Nos. 3112‑3117 and 3102 of 2026) filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to decide them together …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Phulpur, Prayagraj to expeditiously decide a pending suit for division of land holding filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and also requested a status‑quo injunction to prevent …
The petitioner Sushil Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide a recall/restoration application filed on 2 July 2025 under Section 30(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to stay the effect of an order dated 22 …
The petitioner, Sarita Pathak, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Azamgarh to decide a pending revenue proceeding (Case No.972/2025) under Sections 34 and 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Chaurasiya, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Belthara Road, Ballia, to decide his pending mutation case (No.4064/2025) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the mutation proceeding, …
The petitioner, Gauri Shankar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (respondent No.3) to decide a pending suit for division of holding under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the case, initiated in 2024, had not been …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Mirzapur to decide an application filed on 22 April 2026 under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, for measurement and demarcation of specific land parcels. The petition alleged that the …
The petitioner, Sona Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to demarcate plot no. 693 belonging to the Gaon Sabha and to remove the illegal possession of private respondent No.5, and also to order respondents No.2 and No.3 to decide an application …
Somaru Prasad Verma filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Assistant Collector to enforce an eviction and damages order dated 24‑08‑2020 passed under Section 122‑B of the U.P. Zilla and Land Revenue Act, 1950. The petitioner alleged that despite the order, the authorities had taken …
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash the order dated 6 July 2026 of the Sub Divisional Officer that rectified plot no. 962 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and to maintain a status‑quo on the patthargarhi. He alleged that the revenue report relied upon was …
Petitioner Bhola Nath Pal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Mirzapur to decide a pending mutation application (Case No. 14495/2025) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 27 August 2025. The petitioner alleged that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner Judicial, Prayagraj Division, to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 2828 of 2024) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the case, involving private …
The petitioner Deshraj filed a writ petition seeking certiorari and mandamus to quash an eviction and damages order dated 04-03-2025 passed by the Tehsildar of Ghatampur under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, claiming long‑standing possession of the land. The petition was filed after a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a stay application dated 16‑April‑2026 and a suit for division of holding pending before the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Kasya, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. …
The petitioner, Ram Soorat Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to grant possession of plot No. 454M in Prayagraj, based on a decree passed by a Sub‑District Magistrate under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The decree had been appealed …
The petitioner, Vikesh Garg, challenged an eviction and damages order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Tehsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. He had filed an appeal under Section 67(5) of the same Code, which was pending before the Additional District Magistrate. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 35708 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Dhirendra Bahadur Singh, informed the court that the petitioner wished to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 11 May 2026 and 9 September 2025 that rejected his objection to the demarcation of a field book and dismissed his appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 without a hearing. The petitioner alleged that the …
Petitioner Dinesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division to dispose of his appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which has been pending since 30 September 2024. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Deena Nath, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue authority to record his name on a land plot in accordance with a final decree in a suit filed under Section 229‑B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The decree had been passed by …
Smt Geeta filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Revenue Officer, District Azamgarh, to expedite a pending proceeding (Case No.834 of 2024) under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901. The proceeding had initially been allowed by the Chief Revenue Officer on …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Nizamabad and the District Magistrate, Azamgarh to enforce an order dated 11‑May‑2026 in a land‑holding division suit under Section 176 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The order had …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Bhadohi to decide a pending mutation suit (No. 518479 of 2025) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay since the suit was filed on 29-12-2025. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Collector of Mau to decide a pending restoration/recall application and a revenue case under Section 30(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application was subsequently allowed, leaving only the revenue …
Petitioner Lal Bahadur filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Powayan to decide a mutation case (No. 3339 of 2016) pending since 2016 under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay and unnecessary …
Dashrath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) of Azamgarh to decide a pending land revenue case (No. 1022 of 2026) under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901. The petitioner argued that the proceeding, remanded on 16‑12‑2025, was not …
The petitioner, Smt. Nargish Parveen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a mutation order dated 8 July 2026 passed by the Naib Tehsildar of Dhampur in favour of private respondent No.6, and to restrain any alteration of the disputed land pending a statutory appeal. The …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Singh Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) Kanpur Nagar to decide a pending proceeding (Case No.1292 of 2025) under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending …
Smt. Shivpatti Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Phoolpur Tehsil to decide a pending mutation proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding, initiated on 20‑01‑2023, was unduly delayed. The Court, …
Petitioners Gaya Prasad and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to stay their appeal (No. C202602000001082) under Section 207 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 2006 and to maintain status quo over a disputed 1.4950‑hectare property. The appeal, along with an interim relief application, …
The petitioner, Saroj, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib‑Tehsildar of Tarya, Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar to decide a mutation proceeding (Case No. 1962 of 2022, Computerized No. T202205440101962) pending under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 since 2022. The …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Shahganj Tehsil to decide a pending mutation case (case no. 5124 of 2026) and to mutate his name in the revenue records based on a registered sale deed dated 12‑01‑2026. The petitioner alleged …
Petitioner Smt Manni Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, through counsel Manvendra Nath Singh, she filed a withdrawal application seeking dismissal of the writ petition. The court examined the affidavit supporting the withdrawal and the counsel's statement, …
The petitioner, Lalman, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 23148 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, upon receiving …
The petitioner, Shankar Lal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Soraon to decide a pending restoration application filed on 4 February 2022. The restoration application pertained to an earlier case (Computer case No. T202002030308201 of 2019) …
The petitioner Jiyalal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus order to set aside a notice (R.C. No. 22 dated 29.04.2022) and to prevent interference in his peaceful possession of a plot of land (Arazi no. 596) in Kasaujha, Prayagraj. The petition alleged that the respondents, including the State …
The petitioner, Komal, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Rudhauli Tehsil to enforce an order passed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 for demolition of an illegal construction, and also directing the Collector to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Varanasi Division to decide an appeal (computerized case no. C202514000000543) pending under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from a suit for division of …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Upadhyay and two others, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 28051 of 2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justice Chandra Kumar Rai. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, …
Petitioner Mahipal Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Najibabad to decide a pending suit (No.5406 of 2024) concerning division of holding. The petitioner alleged that the suit had been pending since 21‑Dec‑2024 without expeditious progress, as …
The petitioner Jiyalal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to set aside an eviction and damages order dated 18‑June‑2026 passed by the Tehsildar of Handia and to restrain the respondents from interfering with his possession of a disputed plot until the petition is decided. He also requested …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a computerized revenue case (T202616660108771/2026) concerning land in Village‑Musahi, under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the proceeding, …
Sonu filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Rati Bhan Singh, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the counsel’s statement that there was no longer any cause of …
Petitioner Mohit Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Prem Shankar Sharma, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, after noting this statement, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to comply with an order dated 12‑Nov‑2020 passed under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to deliver possession of the land. The petitioners argued that the order had been affirmed after an appeal was …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide a suit for division of holding filed under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 15 May 2023. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner sought to quash a mutation order dated 17‑12‑2008 that was based on a sale deed executed by his mother, alleging the deed was illegal. After a nine‑year delay, the petitioner filed a restoration application, which the mutation court allowed but ultimately upheld the original mutation …
The petitioner, Narendra Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) II, Agra Division, to decide an appeal (No. 1909 of 2025) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from proceedings under Section 144 of the …
The petitioners filed a writ seeking certiorari to quash two appeals filed by private respondents under Section 331 of the U.P. Zilla Adalat & Land Revenue Act, which challenged a 2006 decree and a rejected restoration application. They argued the appeals were filed after a 19‑year delay and that …
Petitioner Lilawati Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar, Hata Kushinagar, to expedite a mutation proceeding under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2013 (case no. 6025 of 2026). The petitioner alleged that the proceedings …
The petitioner, Ritika Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Varanasi Division to decide a pending revision under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, relating to a mutation proceeding. The petition alleged undue …
The petitioners, Amarnath and five others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a revenue case (Computerized Case No. T202616660108772/2026) concerning 1.9050 hectares of land in Musahi village. The petition alleged that the …
The petitioners challenged an eviction and damages order, alleging that the district magistrate had illegally rejected their restoration application. They filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the district magistrate to decide the pending restoration application within a fixed period and …
Petitioner Smt. Deepa filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner later filed a withdrawal application (Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.4/2026) seeking to withdraw the writ petition. The court, after hearing counsel …
The petitioner, Smt. Saroj, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Settlement Officer (respondent No.2) to decide Appeal No.525/1090/0801 of 2025 filed under Section 11(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The appeal had been pending …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer, Rustampur, Gorakhpur, to decide a title objection under Section 9‑A(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Housing Act (case No. 1333 of 2018). The objection remained pending despite a remand order under …
The petitioners from Village Beraspur challenged a notification dated 5‑June‑2024 issued under Section 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, seeking its production and quashment. They argued that the conditions for such a notification were not met and that the State should not …
The petitioner Bindeshwari Prasad filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 4910 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the relief sought had already been granted by the consolidation …
Shiv Shankar Pandey filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 4806 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the relief sought had already been granted by the consolidation authorities, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered applications filed in Writ Petition No. 6581 of 2008, originally filed by the deceased petitioner Arun Kumar Singh against the Joint Director of Consolidation and others. The petitioner sought condonation of delay for filing a substitution application to …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Gorakhpur to decide Appeal No. 0162 of 2025 (Gajendranath Mishra vs. Shyam Sundar) under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The petitioner alleged …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Azamgarh, to decide a pending title revision case (Case No.1327 of 2025) filed under Section 48(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner alleged that the case, filed on 22 …
Vijay Pal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer of Sonupar, Basti to dispose of case No.69 under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation Holding Act, 1953, which had been pending for more than 24 years following a remand order dated 8 April 2002. The …
The petitioners Mahesh Kumar Gupta and two others filed Writ Petition No. 1758 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shrawan Kumar Pandey, submitted that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The court took note of this submission. Accordingly, …
Petitioner Vijay Kumr Vatsa filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Bijnor to decide a title appeal (Smt. Savitri Devi v. Ajay Kumar Vatsa) that has been pending since 10-12-2025. The petitioner alleged undue delay and attached the order sheet as …
The petitioners, recorded tenure‑holders of plots 270, 271 and 272 in Rasulpur Mawaiya, Prayagraj, applied to the Settlement Officer under Section 5(1)(c) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 for permission to construct a house. The officer rejected the application, stating that …
Petitioners Doodh Nath and others filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash three orders dated 4‑Jan‑1997, 30‑Jul‑1999 and 31‑Dec‑1999 passed by the Consolidation Officer, and mandamus directing respondents not to disturb their peaceful possession of land (Araji No. 299). The High Court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation Officer, Jaunpur, to decide a restoration application dated 13 January 2023, which was filed after a revision was dismissed on 29 November 2022 without a hearing. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Rooprani, filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18 February 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Kannauj, which granted interim protection in a title revision filed by the respondents without hearing the petitioner. The petitioner alleged …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Rai, challenged the consolidation officer’s orders dated 01.07.2025 and 09.10.2025 relating to a time‑barred title objection filed under Section 9‑A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The officer had earlier condoned the delay in filing the objection …
The petitioner sought to have his name recorded under Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 based on a sale deed dated 13 July 2020, after the village had been notified under Section 6 of the same Act on 28 February 2013. Earlier orders by the Consolidation Officer in his favour …
The petitioners filed applications to substitute the legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner and to seek condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found the affidavit explaining the delay satisfactory and allowed the substitution, noting the petitioner as deceased and …
H.K.S. Developers Pvt Ltd filed a review petition against the Allahabad High Court's order dated 17‑08‑2023 that dismissed its writ petition challenging a title dispute. The petitioner argued that the earlier judgment should be recalled and the writ heard afresh, contending that the court erred in …
The petitioners Santram and six others filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Jalaun, to transmit certain consolidation records and to decide a pending revision. They argued that the Deputy Director had already passed a final order, which they …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer to first record statements of primary witnesses and then secondary witnesses, and to decide an application filed under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 within a stipulated …
The petitioner, Gulzar, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the court and did not file a vakalatnama authorizing counsel. The court issued a notice for the petitioner to engage another counsel, but no response was received. The standing counsel for the …
The petitioner, Kamta Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the case was listed for priority hearing but the petitioner failed to appear and had not filed a vakalatnama authorizing counsel. A notice was issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel, …
A writ petition (Writ B No. 14069 of 1982) was listed for priority hearing before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the court, and only counsel for the private respondents and the State respondents were present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and, after hearing …
The petitioner, Smt. Sundri Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the case was listed for priority hearing but the petitioner failed to engage counsel and no vakalatnama was filed. The petitioner was not present to pursue the petition, while the standing …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur, to decide Revision/Case No. 0980 of 2023 (Hemant Kumar v. Murari) which had been pending since 20‑02‑2023. The petitioner alleged undue delay and attached the order sheet as …
The petitioners, recorded tenure holders of Gata No. 2276 (0.7139 ha) in Shikarpur, Bulandshahr, challenged an ex‑parte order dated 30‑07‑1994 that reduced their land by 0.100 ha and merged it into Gata No. 2275, which belongs to respondents and is claimed to be abadi land excluded from …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Consolidation authorities. While the petition was pending, the Consolidation authorities disposed of the underlying matter, rendering the relief sought by the petitioners unavailable. The petitioners, …
The petitioners filed applications to substitute the legal heirs of a deceased sole petitioner and several deceased respondents, also seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court examined the affidavit explaining the delay and found it satisfactory, thereby condoning …
The petitioners, Sursati Devi and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they filed a withdrawal application supported by an affidavit stating they no longer wished to pursue the writ. Counsel for the petitioners requested that the writ be dismissed as …
The petitioner, Raj Kishore, filed Writ Petition No. 2151 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed for priority hearing among the oldest pending matters. On the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner appeared to press the petition, while the standing counsel for the …
Bankarai filed writ petition No. 2790 of 1982 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against D.D.C. and others. The case was listed for priority hearing under the oldest pending cases. No petitioner or representative appeared to prosecute the petition, although the standing counsel for the …
Firoz Ahmed filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the State to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Gata No. 901 Ka (0.3560 ha) in Village Vairagal, Basti, and to compel the District Magistrate to decide his application dated 30‑Oct‑2023. The State Law Officer informed …
The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing certain respondents to take legal action to remove encroachments on public utility land in Fulaich village, Azamgarh. The petitioner alleged that the land, recorded as a pit, wasteland, and pond, …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on land registered as Ambedkar Park and pond, which belongs to the Gram Sabha as public utility land. The petitioner highlighted eight pending cases …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, to decide Revision No. 563/2010-2011 concerning a land mutation case that had been pending since 2010-2011. The petition alleged an inordinate delay of over fifteen years in adjudicating the …
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation seeking a mandamus directing the State to evict illegal occupants from Araji No. 1062Sa, a 31.4170‑hectare revenue land in Ghazipur, after a Tehsildar’s order of ejectment and damages (maintained in appeal under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State and local authorities to remove alleged illegal encroachments by private parties on three parcels of Gaon Sabha land in Mau district. The State responded that ten cases under Section 67(1) of the Uttar …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking mandamus to remove alleged illegal encroachments on land recorded as road and banjar land in Prayagraj and to compel the District Magistrate to decide a representation dated 16-12-2025. The Court directed the parties to obtain instructions, …
The petitioners, Ram Datt Singh Yadav and two others, filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State and its officials to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by respondent No. 6 on a plot recorded as Navin Parti in Ghazipur district. The State submitted that a proceeding under Section …
The petitioner, Dharam Raj, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a 7 November 2001 ex‑parte order of the Collector, Azamgarh, and a 31 May 2016 order of the Board of Revenue, both of which removed his and other villagers’ names from land records under Sections 33, 39 and 225 of the Land Revenue …
