Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

DEEPAK VERMA

11 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

M/S. PUSHPA SAHAKARI AVAS SAMITI LTD.versusM/S. GANGOTRI SAHAKARI AVAS S. LTD. AND ORS.

2012 INSC 15330 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed

In a suit for permanent injunction, the parties entered into a compromise decree dated 06‑09‑1996 requiring the defendant to pay a sum within six months. The defendant failed to pay, and the decree-holder filed an execution petition on 17‑02‑1997, before the six‑month period had expired. The defendant objected under Se

GOPALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2011 INSC 40519 May 2011Dismissed

Five persons were charged for a violent incident in which Gopal stabbed Mitthulal, causing his death, while the others inflicted injuries with swords and a cycle chain. The trial court convicted Gopal under sections 148, 302, 323, 149 IPC and the others under similar provisions. The High Court altered Gopal's convictio

NANHAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 34311 June 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Nanhar and others were convicted for the murder of Vijay under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC, primarily on the basis of a note recovered from the deceased's pocket that the trial court treated as a dying declaration, and on circumstantial evidence. The Supreme Court held that the prosecution failed to

GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.versusM/S. OBULAPURAM MINING CO. PVT. LTD.& ORS. ETC.

2010 INSC 30110 May 2010Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court was called upon to resolve a dispute over the right to mine iron ore in six leases in Andhra Pradesh that bordered the state of Karnataka. The State of Andhra Pradesh sought to maintain a status‑quo injunction, arguing that mining could prejudice the demarcation of the inter‑state boundary, while the

IMPROVEMENT TRUST, LUDHIANA ETC.versusUJAGAR SINGH & ORS. ETC.

2010 INSC 3429 June 2010Disposed off

The Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, acquired land and was awarded compensation which it failed to pay, leading to the attachment and auction of the property in 1992. The auction purchaser, Jagan Singh & Co., paid Rs.22.65 lakh, but the Trust later filed objections under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC, which were dismissed in defaul

VISHWANATH S/O SITARAM AGRAWALversusSAU. SARLA VISHWANATH AGRAWAL

2012 INSC 2694 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 alleging mental cruelty by his wife, who had publicly defamed him, hidden his clothes and keys, and made false criminal allegations. The trial court and appellate courts dismissed the petition, deeming the evidence unreliable a

SURAZ INDIA TRUSTversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2011 INSC 2604 April 2011Matter referred to larger bench

The Suraz India Trust, a Rajasthan public trust, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking review of two Supreme Court judgments that had affirmed the primacy of the collegium in appointing Supreme Court and High Court judges. The trust contended that those judgments effectively amended Article

STATE TR. P.S. LODHI COLONY, NEW DELHIversusSANJEEV NANDA

2012 INSC 3203 August 2012Case Partly allowed

The appellant State prosecuted Sanjeev Nanda for a 1999 hit‑and‑run accident in which six persons died and one was injured after he, allegedly under the influence of alcohol, drove a BMW at high speed and fled the scene. The trial court convicted him under Section 304(II) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusHOPESON NINGSHEN & ORS.

2010 INSC 2593 May 2010Disposed off

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sought transfer of two kidnapping‑murder cases involving an NSCN (IM) activist from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Ukhrul, Manipur to a CBI‑court in Delhi under Section 406 of the CrPC. The incidents involved the abduction and killing of three government employees, sp

MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2012 INSC 1593 April 2012Disposed off

The petitioners, private unaided medical and dental colleges in Madhya Pradesh, challenged the manner in which unfilled NRI seats were to be allocated. The State argued that such seats should merge into the general pool and be filled through the state‑conducted common entrance test, following the view expressed in R.D.

MARKIO TADOversusTAKAM SORANG & ORS.

2012 INSC 702 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Markio Tado, was elected to the Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly and the respondent, Takam Sorang, filed an election petition alleging booth capturing. During the trial the respondent sought, via two interlocutory applications, production of voters' counterfoils (Form 17A) from 38 polling stations

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search