Created by Fuzzy Cloud

DEEPAK VERMA

262 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

ARVIND YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita seeking to quash the complaint case No. 944 of 2025 (Sohan Yadav v. Arvind Yadav & Others) and the summons issued on 24 July 2026. They contended that the Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of an application …

SATYAVEER AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Complaint No. 787 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 392, 323, 452 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. They asserted that they had reached an out‑of‑court compromise with the second …

ASHOK KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants were summoned by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Etah under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, and a non‑bailable warrant was issued against them. They filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summons and the warrant. Counsel for the applicants …

ADITYA PRAKASH @ ADITYA RATHOREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aditya Prakash (Aditya Rathore), filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (No. 228 of 2021) and a summoning order dated 19‑02‑2026 issued under Sections 392 and 323 of the IPC. The applicant did not press the merits of the quash …

SWATEE SIROHI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summons dated 07‑03‑2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Complaint No. 54009‑2025. They alleged that the summons was issued without proper compliance with Section 223(1) of the B.N.S.S., as the process …

QAMAR AHMAD ALIAS MUNNA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Qamar Ahmad alias Munna and another, filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the order dated 02‑09‑2026 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 6583 of 2024) under IPC sections 380, 147, 323, 504 and 452. They argued that the first applicant is a disabled …

SANTOSH KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Santosh Kumari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2891 of 2025) filed under Section 468 IPC and to obtain an order for the speedy disposal of her bail application. The State did not oppose the request for an expeditious bail hearing. …

GIRVAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Non‑bailable Surrender (BNSS) Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑08‑2026 issued in a criminal complaint (Case No. 1649 of 2024) under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They also requested that the lower courts be …

ROMA JAISWAL @ ASHI JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The applicant, Roma Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Gopal Misra, expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and sought to withdraw it. The court …

KASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kasim, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and sought to withdraw it. The court considered the …

ROOP KISHOR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1062 of 2021) that alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 354, 323, 504, 506 and D.P. Act sections 3 and 4. Both the applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the …

DEEPAK AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief. The counsel for the applicants argued that the cause of action had been exhausted, rendering the petition infructuous. The court examined the submission and found no remaining issue to …

RAMSURAT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramsurat and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑Oct‑2011 issued by the Additional Civil Judge in a criminal complaint under IPC sections 427, 504 and 506. The applicants did not press the substantive relief …

NOORSABA KHATOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The applicant, Noorsaba Khatoon, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal and, finding no objection, dismissed the …

KUVAR ANSHUMAN PAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑10‑2022 in a complaint case filed under sections 406, 417 and 420 of the IPC. They contended that they were falsely implicated and that the trial court had not applied any …

SHASHI PRAKASH @ VINEET KUMAR TIWARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑08‑2023 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 24‑04‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Ghatampur, in a criminal case under IPC sections 323 and 504. The applicants later limited their …

ISRARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Israr filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 26‑03‑2025 and the proceedings in Complaint No. 500 of 2025 (K.B.Police (India) Ltd. v. I.S. Enterprises) before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. The complaint was lodged on …

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Sachin Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant later expressed a desire to withdraw the application. Counsel for the applicant submitted a request for withdrawal. The court considered the request …

SATYAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Satyapal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a revision thereafter. The State, represented by the Advocate General, raised no …

AJIT SINGH BANSAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summons dated 08.07.2026 issued by the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, F.T.C., Ghaziabad in Complaint Case No.42088 of 2025. They contended that the summons under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) B.N.S.S. was issued …

KAMAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Kamal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and recovery warrant issued by the trial court to enforce interim maintenance awarded to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife had obtained interim …

NITIN GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑01‑2021 issued in a criminal complaint (Arjun Singh v. Nitin Gupta, case No. 739 of 2014) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The counsel for the applicants …

BHARTENDU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Bhartendu Yadav, had filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant sought permission to withdraw that application and to file a fresh one. The learned Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) …

BHAJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Bhajan Singh filed Criminal Appeal No. 1983 of 1985 before the Allahabad High Court. A report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 5 September 2026 disclosed that Bhajan Singh had died ten years earlier. The court considered whether the appeal could continue after the death of the …

ZAREEF AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Uttar Pradesh Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS) and the inherent powers of the High Court (Section 482 CrPC) seeking to quash Complaint No. 111 of 2022, which alleged that they robbed a motorist under Section 392 IPC. The applicants …

MOHD WARIS AND 9 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband, Mohd Waris, and nine others were charged under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 354-A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act following a matrimonial dispute. The wife filed an FIR, but the parties later reached a compromise through a mediation centre, agreeing to …

SARMAN KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sarman Kushwaha, challenged an order dated 06‑12‑2025 of the Family Court, Mahoba, which had issued a recovery warrant and an arrest warrant to enforce arrears of interim maintenance granted to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife had obtained interim …

SHOBHIT NIGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a trial summons dated 15.03.2024 for offences under Sections 323, 498‑A and 504 IPC. The applicant and the opposite party (his wife) had settled their matrimonial dispute, withdrawn all pending criminal cases, and the wife confirmed …

RAHUL SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 01-11-2022 and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1127 of 2020) against them under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. They contended that the allegations were false, baseless and unsupported by any …

FIRM MAJIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Firm Majid, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (case No. 1072 of 2015) against it for alleged criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC, including a summons order dated 11.07.2016 and a non‑bailable …

AKIL AHAMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Akil Ahamad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 10 July 2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Rampur, in a criminal miscellaneous case under Section 125(3) CrPC. The applicant had earlier filed a …

RAJENDRA AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 104 of 2013) under IPC 420 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 16‑04‑2021 issued by the ACJM Court, Agra. The applicant’s counsel argued that the application should be dismissed and that the applicant …

CHINMAY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑07‑2026 and the entire criminal proceeding (complaint case No. 17264/2024) that arose from a matrimonial dispute. The court observed that the dispute appears to be amenable to …

ANURAG SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anurag Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 173 of 2010) filed under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He was served notice in January 2011, failed to appear, and a non‑bailable warrant was issued; bail …

ANKIT SAXENA @ SAURABH SAXENA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ankit Saxena and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. No counsel appeared for either party on the date of hearing. The sole issue before the court was whether the application should be entertained in the absence …

SMT. BITTAN DEVI @ SUSHMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Bittan Devi and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Counsel for the State and the second opposite party were present. The Court observed the …

DAVESHISH LASKER AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Daveshish Lasker and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The …

MUBARAK ALI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mubarak Ali and eight others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …

RAHUL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rahul and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, presumably to quash a criminal proceeding. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The …

KIRAN DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kiran Devi and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, presumably to quash criminal proceedings. The matter was listed in the revised court list, but no party appeared before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. …

MADAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The court noted that the case was listed but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court dismissed the application on the ground of …

HARESH YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

Haresh Yadav and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no party pressed the matter when it came up for hearing. The learned …

AVI GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that the dispute between the parties had been settled, rendering the petition moot. The court considered whether the application could proceed in light …

HEMANT GOYAL @ MINTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Hemant Goyal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a revision order dated 19‑06‑2024 and a summoning order dated 18‑07‑2025 in a criminal case involving IPC offences 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506. He did not press the merits of the quash relief and instead …

DURGESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Durgesh filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑03‑2024 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1800 of 2023 (Gulab Chand v. Smt. Asha) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ghaziabad. …

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in Complaint Case No. 50510 of 2019 (Devendra Kumar Sharma v. Anil Kumar Sharma & others) under Sections 504 …

SHEELENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sheelendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging an order dated 21‑02‑2024, which the complainant had appealed before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hathras. The applicant contended that he retained the right to contest the …

NARESH BABOOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant later informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal, asking for liberty to file a fresh application if needed. The court considered …

MUNNA LALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Munna Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to challenge an order dated 27‑04‑2023. The complainant had already filed a revision before the Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad, and the applicant requested to contest the revisional court’s order by filing a fresh revision. The High …

SMT ARTI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 04‑07‑2025 and the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 164/2024, which alleged offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint was lodged …

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Raj Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 08‑06‑2022 issued in Criminal Case No. 1786 of 2016 (Ram Singh v. Ajay Pal) under IPC sections 323 and 504. Instead of pressing the merit of the quash petition, the …

VIJAY AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 02‑06‑2025, the summoning order dated 10‑07‑2026, and the entire proceedings in State Vs. Manoj and others. They also requested that the lower courts decide their bail applications …

SANDHYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Sandhya filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Muhammad Nadeem, while the State of U.P. and others were represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested that the application be withdrawn. …

GANESH MADHESIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ganesh Madhesiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a recovery warrant dated 27‑07‑2026 issued by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, in execution case No.1163/2025 (Pooja Devi v. Ganesh). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging …

RAMESH PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. filed by Ramesh Prajapati seeking to quash a summoning order dated 04‑04‑2023 and a bailable warrant issued by the Additional Civil Judge, Mirzapur in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 of …

BRIJLALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Brijlal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a recovery warrant dated 04.05.2026 issued by the Family Court, Kaushambi, in a maintenance case (Sunita Devi v. Brijlal). The applicant's wife had earlier filed a maintenance application under Section 145(2) …

AMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. filed by Amar Singh and two others seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑06‑2026 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in Farrukhabad. The applicants alleged that they were falsely implicated and that the magistrate …

JAMALUDDIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2557 of 2008, Anjum Bano v. Dr. Rakesh Pathak & Others) that alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 201, 218 and 120B. They asserted that the parties had reconciled and a written compromise …

SAJID @ ASIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sajid (also known as Asif), challenged recovery and arrest warrants issued against him for arrears of interim maintenance granted to his wife under Section 125 CrPC. The wife had obtained interim maintenance on 22.01.2019 and later filed an application under Section 147 BNSS for …

ABHISHEK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but the parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, which was verified on 11 May 2026. The court, noting the settlement, ordered the trial court to consider any application under Section 320 …

SMT. AMRIKANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Smt. Amrikan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State of U.P., represented by the Additional …

JITENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed in the revised list but no further action was taken to advance the proceedings. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present, indicating the …

PRAKASH AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Prakash and ten others filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was listed but no further steps were taken by the petitioners to prosecute the matter. The learned Additional …

PAWAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioners failed to appear before the court. The respondent's counsel was present and ready to argue. The court observed that the petitioners had not …

SMT. KAMLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Kamla and another, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking judicial review of a lower court order. The petition was listed before the Allahabad High Court and counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Vindesh Kumar, appeared. The court noted that, according to the …

NIDHI SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nidhi Saxena, sought a first information report (FIR) against her brother Sushant Saxena for allegedly withdrawing Rs. 38.85 lakh from their deceased father's PPF account and refusing to share the proceeds. She filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code …

ARVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Arvind Kumar filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash an order dated 29.01.2025 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge in a criminal revision, and an order dated 31.05.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …

DEVBRAT SINGHversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

Devbrat Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petitioner was represented by counsel Raju Ratan Chauhan, while the respondents were represented by G.A. No party appeared before the Court to press the petition. The Court …

SAYED AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sayed Ahmad and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 08.01.2025 and the entire proceedings in a complaint case under Section 365 IPC. They later refrained from pressing the substantive relief and instead requested …

MOHD. SALEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Mohd. Saleem filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash two orders dated 05.01.2026 and 19.06.2026 issued by the Family Court, Muzaffarnagar, which authorized a recovery warrant for arrears of maintenance in a case arising under Section 128 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …

ANUPAMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 03.07.2024 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Mirzapur, which had summoned them under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code in a private complaint. The counsel argued …

SMT. INDRANI DEVI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the entire proceeding of a complaint and a summoning order dated 30.04.2026. They contended that the complaint originated from an application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S., which the magistrate incorrectly treated …

KUNAL @ KUNAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Kunal Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 31.01.2026 that had issued both a recovery warrant and an arrest warrant for the enforcement of arrears of maintenance. The maintenance was originally granted to his wife under Section 125 of the …

NAJIRA BEGAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 237 of 2014, which involved charges under IPC sections 498, 406 and 506. The State opposed the application and the matter was heard by the Hon'ble Justice …

JAGDEESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Jagdeesh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested that the application be withdrawn. The High Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. The court dismissed the Section 528 …

HARI PRAKASH SHUKLA AND 5 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 801 of 2026) and a summoning order issued by the Additional Civil Judge in Jaunpur. They did not press the merits of the quash request and instead asked the High Court to direct the …

AKIL RANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akil Rana, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act seeking to quash the criminal proceeding (Complaint case no. 115 of 2026) filed against him and three others. The application also requested that the lower courts decide his bail application …

GAYATRI YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24-12-2025 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.420 of 2025 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj. They also requested that the lower courts be …

YOGENDRA @ YOGENDRA VARSHNEY AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 06‑06‑2024 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj. They alleged false implication and argued that the summons were issued without …

MANSHARAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the pending criminal complaint (Case No. 2388 of 2025) and a summons issued by the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mainpuri, which charged them under sections 115(2), 351(3) and 74 of the BNS. The applicants did not press …

DR. MOHD. UMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Mohd. Umar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑08‑2026 issued in Complaint Case No. 2035 of 2025 (Nazarul v. Dr. Mohd. Umar) under Section 304 IPC. The warrant was issued by the Chief Judicial …

SIMRAN SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Simran Singhal filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 25‑01‑2024 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Gautam Budh Nagar, and the pending criminal case (Complaint No.1964 of 2023) under Section 406 IPC. The applicant alleged …

KESHAR PRATAP PATELversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Keshar Pratap Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, his counsel sought to withdraw the application and requested that it be dismissed, with liberty to file a revision if needed. The Court entertained …

VINOD KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order in a criminal complaint (Case No. 304 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 392, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court …

MEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition filed by Meera Devi under Article 227 was listed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent’s counsel, Sanjay Singh, was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation and observed that the petition had …

RAEES KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Raees Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of his complaint alleging that the respondent altered the amount on two cheques from Rs.3,000 to Rs.300,000, causing dishonour. The petitioner failed to produce any evidence of such alteration. The Chief …

RAMAKANT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 07 of 2018) for alleged rape and offences under the POCSO Act, claiming the complaint lacked a medical report and was filed out of personal enmity. The court noted that summons were issued in …

MOHD AZAM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Azam and five others, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC challenging a notice issued by a magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The matter had earlier been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of the …

SUMIT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 seeking interference with a prior order that had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The court noted that the applicants had failed to comply with the April 4, 2024 order to deposit money, which prevented issuance of …

MOHAN CHANDRA BALMIKI ALIAS MONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohan Chandra Balmiki, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The court …

SUBHASHCHAND AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking interference with an interim order. The court had earlier referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, directing the applicants to deposit money before notices could be issued. The …

BRAHMADEV AND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking interference with a prior order that had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The court noted that the applicants had failed to comply with the April 1, 2024 order to deposit money, …

M/S AVAN ELASTOMERS INDIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Avan Elastomers filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 11‑07‑2023 issued by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant claimed it had returned Rs 1,81,000 before the …

DR VIVEK CHAKRAVERTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dr. Vivek Chakraverti filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the matter, and only counsel for the opposite party was present. The court noted the absence of any …

VINOD KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 17‑11‑2025 and the criminal proceedings in case No. 3773 of 2020 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. During the hearing the applicant withdrew his …

DEEPAK AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Deepak and three others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No party appeared to argue the application, and only counsel for one opposite party was present. The Court dismissed the application …

DILEEP KUMAR PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 04‑11‑2022 issued in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments case. The applicant later withdrew his challenge to the warrant and only requested protection to surrender before the trial court. …

UPENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Upendra Singh and others. No counsel appeared to press the application, although counsel for one opposite party was present. The Court dismissed the application for want of …

AJAY AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑10‑2023 and a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 26‑02‑2026 issued by the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) in Mathura, as well as the criminal proceedings under Section 138 of …

AMRESH YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, comprising a husband and his in‑laws, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a domestic‑violence complaint (Case No. 878 of 2023) filed by the wife. The wife had left the matrimonial home after a dispute and initiated criminal proceedings under Section 12 …

DEEPAK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Deepak Mishra, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summons issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially a money claim and could be settled by compounding, …

KAMLESH KUMAR SHRIWASTVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband, Kamlesh Kumar Shriwastva, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash an ex‑parte order dated 27‑08‑2025 passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. in a domestic‑violence case (Swati Srivastava v. Kamlesh Kumar Shriwastva). The order had granted the wife interim …

PRAMOD KUMAR AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Pramod Kumar and others. No counsel appeared to prosecute the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted …

JAGDISHversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Jagdish filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel or party appeared before the court to argue or press the application. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the …

NAZIM TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nazim Tyagi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers. No counsel or parties appeared before the court to argue the application. Consequently, the court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the …

JAY PRAKASH SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No.20290 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complainant, who is the husband’s wife, had settled the dispute …

MOHAMMAD FAISAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking relief. The matter had earlier been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the applicants were required to deposit Rs.25,000 but failed to do so, resulting in no notice being issued to the second opposite party. Despite …

MANOJ GUPTA @ KULDEEP GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, a husband and his in‑laws, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS (inherent jurisdiction) seeking to quash the order dated 08‑01‑2025 and the subsequent proceedings under Sections 12, 18, 19 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, issued by the …

MOHD SADIQ NAWABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mohd Sadiq Nawab filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the summons and the criminal complaint (Case No. 24332 of 2025) filed by Mustjab under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque of Rs.10 lakh. The applicant claimed the complaint was malicious and that …

SHASHWAT MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shashwat Mishra filed a B.N.S.S. application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summons dated 15‑10‑2025 and the entire Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act proceedings pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division‑2, Kanpur. The applicant contended that the dispute …

SWAYAMVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Swayamveer Yadav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the …

SWAYAMVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Swayamveer Yadav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the …

SMT. MAMTA AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Smt. Mamta Agarwal filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other parties. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan. No further submissions or evidence were presented by the applicant. The learned …

SANDEEP KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a matter was referred to a Mediation Centre. The court noted that, although the matter was referred to mediation on 23 October 2024, the applicants failed to deposit the required Rs 30,000 with …

IRSHAD AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Irshad Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of proceedings. The matter had been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the petitioner was required to deposit Rs.30,000 but failed to do so, resulting in no notice to the second …

DIPU SAHAversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dipu Saha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a matter was referred to a Mediation Centre. The court had ordered the matter to be mediated on 21 October 2024, and the Mediation Centre required the applicant to deposit Rs. …

TARUN KUMAR @ TARUN KUMAR GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Tarun Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash proceedings. The matter had earlier been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the petitioners were required to deposit Rs.30,000 but failed to do so. Consequently, no …

SHYAMVEER AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a mediation process was initiated. The court had ordered the matter to be referred to a Mediation Centre, and the applicants were required to deposit Rs.25,000 before the Centre. The Mediation …

SHIVAM @ CHHOTU AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Shivam @ Chhotu and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter had been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the petitioners were required to deposit Rs.25,000, which they failed to do, resulting in no notice being …

ASHOK KUMARversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter had earlier been referred to a Mediation Centre, where the applicant was required to deposit Rs.60,000 but failed to do so, resulting in no notice being issued to the second …

RAJKUMAR PANDEY ND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. The opposite party informed the court that the case had been referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre, where mediation was completed but no settlement was reached. The …

SACHIN JAISWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sachin Jaiswal and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no party appeared to press the matter. The learned …

VEERENDRA SINGH @ VIRENDRA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No substantive hearing took place as the matter was listed but no party appeared to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court, noting …

JAGAT ALIAS JAGATRAJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a matter was referred to a Mediation Centre. The court noted that the applicants had failed to deposit the required Rs.20,000 with the Mediation Centre, resulting in no notice being issued to …

ANGAD KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17.03.2021 and a subsequent revision order, as well as the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 825 of 2020 under Section 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant had earlier been referred to the Mediation and …

KULDEEP MISHRA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking interference with the trial court's order that referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The High Court noted that the mediation report dated 30.05.2025 showed that mediation was completed but no …

RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA @ PRASADI AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, seeking relief. The court noted that the matter had been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the applicants failed to comply with the order to deposit money, yet they continued to enjoy an …

PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS YOGENDRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Pawan Kumar Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 766 of 2021) instituted under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. They did not press the merits of the quash petition …

VIKAS DUTT SHARMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking interference with ongoing trial court proceedings under Sections 244 and 246 CrPC. The High Court examined the record and noted that the trial court proceedings were at an advanced stage with witness …

SURENDRA KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a CrPC Section 482 application seeking to quash the summons and criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1999 of 2023) filed by Jyoti Devi under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 376 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter had been referred to the Court’s Mediation and Conciliation …

AWADH NARAYAN GIRIversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No party appeared to argue the application, though counsel for one opposite party was present. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. Consequently, the interim order previously …

SACHIN RAJPUT AND OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑10‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 13004 of 2023) arising from allegations of physical and mental torture under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and D.P. …

MOHIT SINGHversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

Mohit Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of U.P. and another party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, although counsel for the opposite party was present. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the …

SUNIL SENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Sunil Sen. No party appeared to argue the application, and only counsel for the second opposite party was present. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. Consequently, the interim order previously …

NIDHI SINGHALversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Nidhi Singhal, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel or parties appeared to argue the application. The court noted the absence of any party pressing the matter and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No …

GAURAV SAXENA AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Gaurav Saxena and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. No counsel appeared for either side on the date of hearing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The …

RAGHVENDRA YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking interference with an interim order that had been obtained in the context of a mediation process. The matter had earlier been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, which reported that the …

DEVESHversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devesh, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking interference with a mediation process ordered on 13 May 2024. The matter had been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, which reported on 12 July 2024 that the applicant had not complied with the order to …

DINESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel or parties appeared before the court to argue the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted earlier was …

SANJEEV BALMIKI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 5319 of 2023) filed under Sections 498A, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging domestic violence. The complaint arose from a matrimonial dispute between the husband (applicant No.1) and …

MALLAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mallan Khan filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the summoning order dated 11‑09‑2014 and the entire proceeding of Complaint No.1341 of 2014, which was instituted under Sections 51 and 59(1) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

SMT. LATA DEVI SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Lata Devi Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑01‑2026 and the underlying criminal complaint (Case No. 4036 of 2025) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint alleged that the applicant, …

SONU TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sonu Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 30 July 2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, and the entire proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …

YOGENDRA KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 18553/2022) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had settled their dispute through the …

HEMANT KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Hemant Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash non‑bailable warrant orders dated 07.03.2026 and 25.03.2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments …

DR MUNISHWAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dr. Munishwar Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal complaint (case no. 889/2020) filed by the State of U.P. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially a monetary one and could be settled …

ANSAR AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ansar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Security of the State (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the summons, warrant and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No.27 of 2025) initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the …

ANIL KAPOORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anil Kapoor, filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 02‑04‑2025 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that he never issued the cheque in question because the bank had merged. The court held that the factual …

MOIN ABBAS ZAIDI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the summoning order issued by a Judicial Magistrate and the revision order of an Additional Sessions Judge in a dowry case involving sections 498A, 323 IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

AJIT @ SONU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, who are in‑laws of the opposite party, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire proceedings in a domestic‑violence case (Smt. Anita v. Yogesh & Ors.) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Saharanpur. The opposite party had earlier obtained …

RAJ BAHADUR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Raj Bahadur Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS to quash the summons and criminal complaint (Case No. 758 of 2021) filed by his daughter‑in‑law, Shradha, under Sections 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute between the applicant’s …

SALMAN QADIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Salman Qadir, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summons dated 02‑04‑2021 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No.1408 of 2020) against him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint alleged that …

SHANTANUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 17‑09‑2024 and the entire proceedings in a Section 138 complaint (Om Prakash Dubey v. Shantanu) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. The applicant argued that the dispute was …

POOJA CHADDHAversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pooja Chaddha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention in a criminal proceeding. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. No counsel for the opposite party appeared, and the learned …

POOJA CHADDHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Pooja Chaddha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The application was listed in Court No. 74 before Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. Counsel for the applicant were Ayyaz Khan and Vivek Kumar Shukla, while the opposite …

POOJA CHADDHAversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

Pooja Chaddha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No substantive material or prosecution was presented before the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate was …

SHIV KUMAR SOLANKIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shiv Kumar Solanki, filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act seeking to quash a summons issued by a Civil Judge in a Section 138 cheque‑bounce case. He argued that the dispute was essentially a money dispute and that there was a real prospect of …

POOJA CHADHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Pooja Chadha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the application remained unprosecuted. The learned Additional …

RAKESH TRIVEDI AND OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rakesh Trivedi and others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention. The opposite parties, the State of Uttar Pradesh and another, were represented by counsel. No case was listed for the applicants, and they were not present before …

SHAFIQUE AHMADversusNASIM AHMAD AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Shafique Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the summons issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by Nasim Ahmad. The court examined the contention that the …

AVISHEK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Avishek Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a Session Court order dated 10 December 2025 that arose from a criminal appeal and a domestic‑violence proceeding. The order under challenge was based on Section 19(1) of the Domestic Violence …

NARENDRA NATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Narendra Nath Gupta, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a non-bailable warrant dated 18‑03‑2023 issued in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The warrant arose from Complaint Case No.19737 of 2021 (Vipin Agarwal v. Narendra Nath Gupta …

SMT. PARUL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Parul Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 04.03.2020 that discharged/acquitted the accused. The High Court noted that the applicant has a statutory remedy to contest the discharge by filing an appeal. No …

MAHESH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mahesh Chandra, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 11 May 2023 and a subsequent arrest warrant dated 18 February 2026. The maintenance order, issued under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from …

MULAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mula, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons and criminal proceedings in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case where he allegedly issued a Rs.4 lakh cheque that was dishonoured due to a mismatched thumb impression. The magistrate had …

RAHUL JINDAL @ RAHUL AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rahul Jindal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons and criminal proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by M/s Mahashay Ji and Sons. He contended that the magistrate had taken cognizance without …

SHRI SHARAD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sharad Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a domestic‑violence complaint (case no. 3095 of 2025) filed by his wife under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. He alleged the complaint was false, filed with malice, and …

RIFAQAT ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rifaqat Ali Khan filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 24‑02‑2025 and the entire proceedings of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by the State. He contended that the dispute was essentially a monetary …

M/S K.G.N. ENTERPRISESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, M/s K.G.N. Enterprises, filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07‑04‑2021 and the entire criminal proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from Complaint No. 39787/2021. The applicant alleged malicious prosecution, …

AKHILESH KUMAR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 09‑02‑2026 issued by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Complaint Case No. 23484 of 2024 (Vimlesh Kumari v. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Others) under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and the Dowry …

RAJENDRA SINGH ASWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajendra Singh Aswal and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. Counsel for the applicants was Hemant Shukla, while the respondent was represented by G.A. The matter was listed …

VINAY KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vinay Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) was present in court. The presiding judge …

AVINASH MISHRAversusRAJA BABU

Avinash Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. against Raja Babu. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, …

SATPAL SINGH KASHYAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satpal Singh Kashyap, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive merits of the original …

SATPAL SINGH KASHYAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satpal Singh Kashyap, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and, without further argument, dismissed the …

GIRRAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Girraj filed a criminal appeal (No. 2579 of 1988) before the Allahabad High Court. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, reported on 3 January 2026 that Girraj had died on 26 October 2016. The court considered whether the appeal could continue in view of the appellant's death. It …

SHIV PD. @ RAJA PANDITversusSTATE OF. U.P.

The appellant, Shiv Prasad @ Raja Pandit, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kanpur Nagar reported that the appellant died on 29 November 2010. The court considered whether the appeal could continue after the appellant's death. Relying on the …

SATYAM SHANKHVAR AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHER

Satyam Shankhvar and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while the learned Additional …

BEER BAHADUR PASWAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a prior order. The court had earlier referred the matter to mediation on the condition that the petitioners deposit Rs.55,000 before the mediation centre. The petitioners failed to make the …

SANJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash an ex‑parte maintenance order dated 20‑10‑2014 and a subsequent order dated 06‑11‑2023 that rejected his request to recall the ex‑parte order. He alleged that he was falsely implicated and that his legally wedded wife, the …

RAKESH GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 Others

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, and only the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted and …

MIRZA SALEEM BEG AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Mirza Saleem Beg and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel or parties appeared before the court to argue the application. Consequently, the court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the application. The …

MUNNA PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Munna Pandey and others. No counsel or parties appeared to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but no counsel appeared to prosecute the application. The court noted the absence of any party to press the matter and consequently dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vijay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the order dated 02.07.2025 of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a dishonoured cheque. The applicant contended …

RAM KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ram Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceeding and summoning order dated 5 January 2026 in a POCSO case (Mahesh Chandra v. Ram Kumar) pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Special Judge (POCSO), Farrukhabad. …

SATYAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satyam Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The applicant argued that the dispute is essentially a money dispute …

NOOR MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Noor Mohammad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, relying on the precedent set in Dinesh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another (2017 AIR All 29). The High Court …

AMILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08‑07‑2019 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, in a case under Sections 4, 5, 6 and 23 of the PC‑PNDT Act, 1994. The applicant alleged that the complaint’s allegations were false, baseless and …

AMARPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Amarpal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued in a cheque‑bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Siddhu Enterprises. The applicant argued that the dispute was essentially a money …

BHOLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Bhola filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order that rejected his request for an expert opinion on a Rs.5 lakh cheque alleged to be fabricated. The Magistrate had dismissed the request on the ground that the applicant's evidence under …

JITENDRA SINGH @ JITENDRA KUMAR BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Swati Singh, informed the court that she no longer wished to pursue the application and requested …

SAHILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sahil, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 5 May 2025 issued by the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. in a criminal complaint (Smt. Sadaf vs Sahil) under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Deepu filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order, a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑01‑2026, and criminal proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. and a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. During the hearing, …

NAIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Naim, filed a Section 528 BNSS application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 17 September 2025 issued by a Village Court that had authorized a recovery warrant and a conditional non‑bailable arrest warrant against him under Section 12 of the Protection of …