Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
29 judgments · newest first · showing 1–29
The petitioners, Dipakbhai Patel and another, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including IAS officer Ms. Punya Salila Srivastava and others, had willfully disobeyed a Bombay High Court judgment dated 29 September 2025 in Writ Petition No. 11565 of 2025. The respondents had …
The petitioner, a former stock broker, challenged SEBI's demand for registration fees and the subsequent recovery of Rs.38.63 lakh by the Delhi Stock Exchange. He filed Appeal No. 298 of 2019 before the Securities Appellate Tribunal, which was disposed of together with five other appeals on the …
The petitioners, Security Agencies Welfare Organization and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India. On 23 July 2026, the petition was listed for dismissal, and the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the advocate on record was …
The petition filed by Ruby Ojha, Pro‑Vice Chancellor of SNDT Women’s University, sought relief against disciplinary action initiated by the Vice Chancellor. The parties, after extensive hearing, reached a consensual arrangement. It was agreed that the Vice Chancellor is empowered under Sections 12 …
The appellants, heirs of a deceased landowner, claimed ownership of parcels CTS 220 and 227/1 in Borivali and sought an injunction to stop the developers from using these lands as access for new Wings D and E of the Veerdhaval Building and to restrain further construction. The trial court restrained …
The petitioners filed a series of writ petitions and civil applications before the High Court of Bombay. On the hearing date, none of the petitioners appeared before the Court, and no counsel was present to represent them. The Court noted that the petitioners had also failed to appear on the …
Khushbu Impex, the original plaintiff, had deposited Rs.61,25,697.50 with the Bombay High Court to obtain a stay of the trial court decree. The appellants, Lyka Labs Ltd., sought the return of this amount, conditioned on the applicant furnishing a bank guarantee from a scheduled nationalised bank. …
The petitioner, Shri Satishkumar Gayaprasad Gupta, filed a writ petition seeking payment of all consequential service benefits, including back wages, gratuity, and leave encashment, after his superannuation on 30 June 2011. The respondent, MSEDCL, produced documents showing that certain benefits …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners filed a series of writ petitions and civil applications before the High Court of Bombay. On the hearing date, none of the petitioners appeared before the Court, and no counsel was present to represent them. The Court noted that the petitioners had also failed to appear on the …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners, Dhumane‑Patil Foundations and an associated institute, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra to issue a government resolution permitting the institute to commence a Diploma in Pharmacy course. The High Court had earlier ordered the State to …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioners failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple dates for a series of writ petitions and related civil applications. The respondents, represented by various advocates, were present and argued the case. The court noted that no petitioners were present on the previous date …
The petitioner, Shubham Santosh Chavan, filed a writ petition seeking the cancellation of a Scrutiny Committee order dated 12 June 2026 that denied his claim to Thakar Schedule Tribe status and a declaration that he belongs to that category. The petitioner had earlier applied for verification of his …
The petitioner sought correction of his minor son’s date of birth in the School Leaving Certificate, alleging the entry (11 December 2008) was erroneous and should read 11 December 2010 as per the birth certificate and Aadhar. The Deputy Director of Education rejected the application on the ground …
The petitioner, Pritesh Bhalchandra Ghumare, filed a writ petition and later sought leave to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The bench consisting of Justices R.I. Chagla and Farhan P. Dubash considered the application. …
Surya Education Trust entered into consent terms with a private respondent (Respondent no.6) concerning salary claims and appointment to grant‑in‑aid posts. The Trust filed a writ petition seeking relief against the Education Authorities, while the consent terms stipulated that a prior order of the …
Pravin Vijay Desai filed Writ Petition No. 5296 of 2006 in the High Court of Bombay against S.B. Abhyankar and others. The petition sought relief, but during the proceedings the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. No further arguments or evidence were …
The Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Mandir filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of its appeals under Section 3(4) of the Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 on the ground that they were filed beyond the prescribed 15‑day period. The State argued that the Act provides no power …
The applicants, legal heirs of the deceased Baburao Narayan Gaware, filed an interim application seeking to amend their 2004 writ petition to include the deceased's wife as a petitioner. The amendment was required to bring the legal heirs on record. The court noted a substantial delay in filing the …
The petitioner, Aamir Khan, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Shreekrishna More, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The Court entertained the request and allowed the withdrawal, …
The petitioners sought an extension of a status quo order that had been repeatedly continued since 23 April 2026, pending the final decision on their Exhibit ‘5’ application scheduled for 15 June 2026. The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Silvassa, adjourned the matter without extending the status quo, …
The National Federation of Farmer’s Procurement Processing & Retailing Co-operatives of India Limited filed a civil writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Additional Director General of Police and others. During proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Tushar …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Surya Prakash, proprietor of Winmin Metals, who was accused of cheating the Daund Sugar factory by tampering with weighing scales using electronic chips, leading to a loss of about Rs. 3 crores. The FIR alleged offences under …
The applicants, Sumit Prafulchandra Desai and Pranavkumar Prafulchandra Vora, had filed four interim applications (including two stay applications) in two separate criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Arpit Mutha, moved the court seeking leave to withdraw all four …
The matter of Vinod Chandrakant Pitale & Anr. v. Tanaji Shivram Kothawale & Ors. was before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The Court, presided over by Justice Farhan P. Dubash, dealt with procedural aspects of the appeal. An order dated 18 April 2026 had earlier fixed a deadline for …
