Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
133 judgments · newest first · showing 1–133
Odette Richard Rodrigues filed a writ petition challenging an order. She applied to withdraw the petition while reserving the right to appeal under Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, should the final decree be adverse. The Court examined whether such a withdrawal with retained liberty …
The petitioner sought restoration of a suit dismissed in 2014 for failure to serve defendants, filing an application for condonation of a four‑year delay. The trial court rejected the application for lack of satisfactory explanation, and the petitioner appealed via writ petition, claiming compliance …
The petitioner sought restoration of a suit dismissed in 2014 for failure to serve defendants, filing an application for condonation of a four‑year delay. The trial court rejected the application for lack of satisfactory explanation and the High Court found the petitioner had not complied with its …
The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) filed a civil revision application before the High Court of Bombay. During the proceedings, counsel for the applicant sought leave of the court to withdraw the revision application. The court considered the request and, after hearing the counsel, granted …
The appellant, Neelkanth Constructions, filed four second appeals against various respondents. All parties, including a society that was added as a respondent by consent, signed a common consent order on 22 July 2026, which was recorded as "X1". The consent terms required the appellant to pay 20% of …
The petitioner, Swapnil Narayan Baburao Pawar, filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that required his suit to be valued under Section 6(iv)(ha) of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act. The suit seeks a declaration that a sale deed executed by the deceased Mahadu and Sahadu is false and …
The appellant, Neelkanth Constructions, filed four second appeals against various respondents. All parties consented to a settlement, signing a consent term that added a society as a respondent in each appeal. The court recorded the consent terms, accepted the undertakings, and directed the …
The case involved an ancestral joint family property where the plaintiff, a daughter of the deceased, claimed a one‑fourth share. The first appellate court granted her share, holding that no valid partition by metes and bounds had been effected and that the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, did not …
In Second Appeal No. 649 of 2015, Dadasaheb Nathu Pagar (appellant) challenged a decree against him before the Bombay High Court. The court noted that the notice served on the appellant was returned marked ‘insufficient address’ and that the appellant failed to appear despite an adjournment. Counsel …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners. The respondents' counsel informed the court that the underlying civil suit had been settled by compromise before the Lok Adalat, rendering the writ …
The petitioner, Sunilkumar Ramkumar Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that allowed amendment of the plaint and the addition of a third party as plaintiff No. 4. The petitioner argued that the amendment prejudiced his case. The High Court examined whether it should …
The appellants failed to appear before the High Court on the scheduled dates for their second appeal. Consequently, the court adjourned the matter and, upon continued non-appearance, dismissed the appeal in default. The pending interim and civil applications were declared infructuous. No substantive …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Order VII Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to file an appeal against the impugned order. The Court examined whether such withdrawal with …
The appellants, Ishwar Gopala Ghodke & Anr., filed a second appeal (No. 106 of 2020) against the respondents. The court initially granted them time on 25th February 2026 after being informed that the appellants had expired, and again on 17th June 2026 as a last chance. Despite these extensions, no …
The petitioner, M/s. Ajit Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions seeking relief, but the learned counsel informed the court that the underlying suit had already been disposed of, rendering the writ petitions moot. The court noted that the disposal of the suit made the petitions infructuous. …
The petitioner, M/s. Ajit Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions seeking relief, but the learned counsel informed the court that the underlying suit had already been disposed of, rendering the writ petitions moot. The court noted that the disposal of the suit made the petitions infructuous. …
The appellant, Sadashiv Laxman Shelar, filed a second appeal seeking to maintain the interim stay that had been granted on 20 June 2001. The principal issue before the Court was whether that stay should be continued pending the final determination of the appeal. The Court examined the submissions of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the respondents. The matter was adjourned earlier as a last chance hearing. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that she had no instructions to proceed further with the petition. …
The petitioner, Smt. Neela Ravindra Kamathe (deceased) represented through Lr. Madhumilind R. Kamthe, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner subsequently sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and found no legal impediment to …
The second appeal filed by Shantilal Bhikchand Surana challenged the first appellate court’s decree granting partition and separate possession of joint family property. The appellant argued that House No. JA‑2‑16/4 was in his wife’s name and thus not part of the joint family, relying on documents …
The appellants filed an interim application seeking a fresh notice to be issued to Respondent No. 1 at a new address. They also requested permission to amend the cause title of the civil application for condonation of delay and the second appeal to incorporate this new address. The court examined …
Dilip Waman Mhatre filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petition listed Ravi Waman Mhatre and others as respondents, with Ms. Ankita Rathod of S.K. Legal Associates LLP appearing for Respondent No.3. The court observed that the appearance of Respondent No.1 required correction …
The appellants filed a suit seeking a declaration and injunction that the Maharashtra State Electricity Board should not charge excessive amounts for electricity consumption. The trial court and the first appellate court found that the plaintiffs had not produced sufficient documentary evidence to …
Revati Alias Sapana Ranjit Pawar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Ranajit Murlidhar Pawar and others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. Since the settlement resolved all issues, the court found that no relief remained …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a civil suit. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the underlying suit had been disposed of on 9 September 2021, rendering the writ petition moot. The court took note of the order of disposal of the suit. Since the suit …
The petitioner, Kanchan, sought to recall the order dismissing her writ petition for default and to restore the petition, citing reasons for non‑appearance and unpaid costs by the respondents. She also moved to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased respondent and to amend …
M/s. Siddhivinayak Kohinoor Vastu and its partners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners alleged that a suit pending before the court clerk had not been disposed of. Upon examination, the court clerk’s records indicated that the …
The Bombay High Court, on a petition filed by Swapnil Shankar Yashvant Kaudare, noted that the petitioner's appearance on 12 June 2026 was not recorded. The court ordered that the earlier order dated 12 June 2026 be corrected to include the name of the petitioner's counsel, M. S. Lad, and to delete …
The petitioner, Madan Vyankatesh Damale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a signed instruction indicating that the execution proceeding related to the dispute had already been disposed of. Consequently, the petitioner argued that …
The petitioner, Shri Tushar Shivaji Thorat, filed Writ Petition No. 4076 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging the suit filed by the respondents. While the suit was pending, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the petition. The Court, after …
The petitioners, Prithvivallabh B. Rawat and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM). The respondents, including Manju Santosh Agarwal, contended that the underlying civil suit had been dismissed on 23 …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking liberty under Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to raise grounds of objection in an appeal concerning a suit that had already been disposed of. The petitioners argued that the suit’s disposal rendered the writ petition infructuous, but …
Mrs. Sushila Suresh Babu Malge filed writ petitions (Nos. 5185 and 5186 of 2016) against M/s. J.S.M. Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court on the scheduled dates. Consequently, the court listed the petitions for dismissal due to non-appearance. The respondent's …
The High Court considered four writ petitions challenging a trial court's refusal to dismiss a suit under Order XI Rule 21 of the CPC on the ground of alleged non‑inspection of documents. The petitioner argued that the plaintiff had failed to produce certain documents referenced in the plaint and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared for the petitioners. The respondents, through Ms. Chaitanya Nikte, submitted a copy of the final judgment and decree in the underlying suit. The court found that the petition …
The appellant, Swapnil Babu alias Dhondu Laxman Padwal, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple scheduled dates for his second appeal against Shankar Genu Padwal and others. The court had previously adjourned the appeal on at least four occasions due to the appellant's …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief against the respondents. The court examined the case status of the underlying suit and found that it had been disposed on 3 May 2018. Since the suit was already concluded, the writ petitions were deemed infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed …
The petitioners, Swapnil Ajay Madhukar Chaudhari and an associate, filed Writ Petition No. 10604 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court against respondent Pritam Ramchandra Pawar. The petition was heard before Justice Gauri Godse. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the underlying suit had already …
The applicant, Mr. Mohammad Mustafa Gafor Shaikh, filed a civil revision application (No. 365 of 2016) against Mr. Ramesh Jairam Gupta and others. Conditional directions were issued on 20 February 2026, but one of the respondents was unserved and had died. The court directed that the revision …
The appellants, originally defendants, appealed the concurrent judgments that granted an injunction to protect the plaintiffs' possession of a suit property and dismissed the appellants' counter‑claim for an injunction. The plaintiffs relied on a sale deed executed by the father of the defendants, …
The applicants sought to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased respondent in a pending civil application for condonation of delay. The respondents opposed, alleging the applicants should have known of the death. The Court examined the applicants' sworn statement that they …
The applicant, Alka Netaji Wagh, filed a civil application seeking a temporary injunction to restrain Respondent No.1 from interfering with her possession of the suit land. The underlying suit for specific performance was initially decreed in her favour by the trial court, but the defendant …
The petitioner, Mr. Munal Indrakumar Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. No counsel appeared on the scheduled hearing date, and the petition was adjourned for listing. On the subsequent date, again no counsel appeared for …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that struck out the name of Defendant No.12, a Special Land Acquisition Officer, in a suit for partition and separate possession. The petitioners argued that the plaint could not be partially rejected and that the deletion of the …
The High Court considered two writ petitions challenging a trial court's order that allowed the plaintiff to delete certain prayer clauses in an amendment to the plaint but refused the addition of a new paragraph concerning service of summons on a defendant. The defendants argued that the order …
The applicants filed an interim application seeking to record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased respondent (respondent no.1) and to delete respondent no.4 from the proceedings. The court noted that notice to certain respondents had been waived, a fresh notice was served to respondent …
The applicants filed an interim application seeking to record the names of the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No.6 in a second appeal. The court noted that respondents No.6(a) and 6(d) had been served but did not appear. The court allowed the interim application in accordance …
The applicants filed an interim application seeking to record the names of the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No.3 in Civil Application No. 1396 of 2017. The court noted that notice had been served on the proposed respondents but none appeared. After reviewing the …
The petitioner, Bagaria Builders and Developers, failed to appear before the High Court. The petitioner’s counsel did not serve the unserved respondents, and the respondent’s counsel submitted copies of orders dismissing Special Civil Suit No. 203 of 2008 and Regular Civil Suit No. 6 of 2010. These …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to set aside a trial court order that rejected their application for the appointment of a Court Commissioner. They argued that the order, though interlocutory, affected their rights and should be reviewable under Article 227 of the Constitution. The High …
The High Court noted that the second appeal in the matter had already been disposed of. Consequently, the pending civil application was held to be infructuous and was disposed of. No further substantive issues were addressed. The order was pronounced by Justice Gauri Godse on 15 April 2026.
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order that dismissed her application for interim relief in a suit seeking a prohibitory injunction against demolition of her premises. The trial court had denied a temporary injunction on 9 April 2014, and the first appellate court affirmed that …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4543 of 2017 seeking relief against several respondents. A conditional order by the Registrar had dismissed the petition with respect to respondents 1e and 1f due to lack of service. The petitioners argued that a caveat filed on behalf of all respondents …
The petitioners, defendants nos. 9 to 13, challenged a trial court order that refused their application to withdraw previously filed consent pursis and directed the parties to continue with the underlying suit. The petitioners argued that the consent terms had been signed and acted upon, rendering …
The petition filed by defendant‑1 challenged the trial court’s refusal to allow him to produce payment receipts during the cross‑examination of plaintiff‑1. The suit concerned the cancellation of three sale deeds and a rectification deed allegedly obtained by misuse of a cancelled power of attorney. …
Petitioner Smt. Vaijayanti Sadanand Taru failed to appear before the Bombay High Court and did not comply with the court's order dated 21 February 2025 to serve copies of the petition on Respondent No. 5, a necessary party. The petitioner also did not file the required service affidavit for personal …
The High Court examined three writ petitions (2417/2014, 3613/2017, 11573/2019) where suits were erroneously marked as "Stayed by High Court" in the Roznama and CIS due to unverified entries. In WP 2417, the petition for impleadment was dismissed for non‑prosecution after the court found no actual …
The petitioner, Shri Nanikram Laxmandas Bohra, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondent, Shri Manoj Lachhmandas Jagwani. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, on instructions, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered …
The petitioners, Sangeeta Balu Chormale and others, filed Writ Petition No. 8050 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court. They later filed a fresh application in the trial court pursuant to an earlier order dated 5 April 2023. Seeking to avoid parallel proceedings, the petitioners applied to withdraw the …
The petitioners, Sangeeta Balu Chormale and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. They later filed a fresh application in the trial court after obtaining liberty from this Court on 5 April 2023. The petitioners now moved to withdraw the writ …
The petitioners, Sangeeta Balu Chormale and others, filed a writ petition (WP No. 8050 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court. They later filed a fresh application in the trial court after receiving liberty from this Court on 5 April 2023 to pursue that remedy. The petitioners sought permission to …
Mrs. Meena Diliprao Paygude filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging a decision of the Union of India and the Defence Estate Officer. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled date. The Court noted the non-appearance and proceeded to consider the …
The petitioner, Kanchan, sought to recall the order dismissing her writ petition for default and to restore the petition, citing reasons for non‑appearance and unpaid costs by the respondents. She also moved to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased respondent and to amend …
Azhar Ahmed Zafar Shaikh filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The court noted the petitioner's non‑appearance and dismissed the writ petition in default. No merits of the petition were considered. The order was pronounced by Justice Gauri Godse on 4 …
The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a civil suit, challenged the trial court's refusal to admit certain documents tendered through a deceased plaintiff. Since two of the plaintiffs had died, the petitioners sought to bring the heirs and legal representatives on record. The High Court noted that …
The Fashion Market Vyapari Welfare Association, through its President, filed Writ Petition No. 7354 of 2018 against the Pune Cantonment Board and its Executive Officer. The petition sought relief challenging an order that had been passed in a civil appeal. Respondents submitted that the impugned …
Manav Enterprises, through its partner, filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that rejected its application for leave to produce documents as secondary evidence. The petitioner relied on the precedent set in Kartik Gangadhar Bhat v. Nirmala Namdeo Wagh, arguing that a separate …
The Central Warehousing Corporation filed a writ petition (No. 10314 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court against Kaumudi P. Kothari and others. The petition sought relief pending the outcome of a related civil suit. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the underlying …
The petitioner, Madan Mohan Chandrabhan Gupta, filed Writ Petition No. 10028 of 2018 before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, a civil suit concerning the same matter was instituted. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that the suit was proceeding. The Court …
The petitioner, Kuldeep Gulabrao Charvd, failed to appear before the High Court despite being allotted time on earlier dates. No representation was made on the scheduled date of 4 March 2026. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition in default. No substantive merits of the petition were …
The petitioners, Devi Deep CHS, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 9 January 2018 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation under Section 155(1) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 for laying a drainage pipeline. Respondent No.2, a society, applied to be added as a …
The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a civil suit, challenged the trial court's refusal to admit certain documents tendered through a deceased plaintiff. Since two of the plaintiffs had died, the petitioners sought to bring the heirs and legal representatives on record. The High Court noted that …
The petitioner, Jagruti Arun Ugale, filed a writ petition (No. 13215 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Nashik Municipal Corporation and others. The petitioner, through counsel Renuka Yadav, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition. The court considered the …
The petitioner, defendant No.1, challenged an injunction granted by the trial court and affirmed by the first appellate court that restrained him from disturbing the plaintiffs' possession of a suit property and from alienating it. The injunction was based on the plaintiffs' claim of title under a …
The petitioner, Anubai Alias Anusaya Kathod Thakur, filed Writ Petition No. 14084 of 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. The petition sought relief against the respondents, Sadanand Eknath Bhoir and others. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the underlying suit …
The petitioner, Smt. Savitrakbai Laxman Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a civil suit. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the underlying suit had been settled by consent terms, rendering the writ petition unnecessary. The court examined the submission and …
The petitioner, Shri Dnyaneshwar Laxman Dongre, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Shri Prashant Mahadev Nagarkar and others. During proceedings, counsel informed the court that the petitioner had died and that there were no instructions from any heir or legal representative to …
The petitioner, Madlyan Marchand D’silva, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the Commissioner, Vasai-Virar Corporation. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the underlying suit had already been disposed of, rendering the writ petition unnecessary. The …
M/s. Nivedita Mercantile and Financing Ltd., the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sought leave to appeal the acquittal of respondents under Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant relied on a recent Supreme Court decision …
The petitioners, purchasers of portions of a suit property, sought restoration of second appeals after their objections to the execution of a partition decree were rejected. The trial court had decreed a partition in 1986, which was confirmed on appeal, and the purchasers later acquired undivided …
The petitioners, Mrs. Indabai Dattatray Bhosale and others, filed Writ Petition No. 2526 of 2017 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against Shri Ramchandra Sadashiv Bhosale and others. The petition sought relief from the respondents, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the …
Petitioner Mr. Arif Dada Memon filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel failed to submit the required copies of documents, and the petitioner did not appear in court. The court, on 16 January 2026, gave the petitioner a final two‑week opportunity to supply the …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay to file an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, challenging a magistrate's order acquitting the respondents of offences under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court examined whether the …
The case concerns second appeals filed by purchasers who had bought undivided shares of a partitioned property and had objected to the execution of the partition decree. The trial court had granted a partition decree in 1986, which was confirmed on appeal, and the purchasers later sought …
The case concerns second appeals filed by purchasers who had bought undivided shares of a partitioned property and had objected to the execution of the partition decree. The trial court had granted a partition decree in 1986, which was confirmed on appeal, and the purchasers later sought …
The plaintiff occupied a flat in 1984, left India in 1992, and filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 in 1997 alleging illegal dispossession by the defendants in 1996. The suit was filed through his father as attorney, and the defendants claimed they entered the flat using …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. During the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement and informed the court that no issues remained. Consequently, the petition was deemed infructuous. The court disposed of the …
The petition was filed by the original defendant (original plaintiff) to challenge the dismissal of a miscellaneous civil appeal by the District Court and the trial court's rejection of an application under Section 9A of the CPC read with Order VII Rule 11. The petitioner argued that the application …
The petitioner, a third‑party applicant, sought to be added as a defendant in a suit filed by Respondent No.1 for specific performance of a 2009 agreement. He claimed that a subsequent tripartite agreement dated 15 June 2010 transferred the right, title and interest in the suit property to him, …
The petitioners, Anjuman Talim E Jamhur A Registered Public Trust, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against respondent Mohd. Ayyub Mohd. Hanif. The petition sought relief, but the underlying civil suit had already been decreed in favour of the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners …
The applicant, Gulabrao Mahadevrao Ghorpade, filed criminal applications seeking leave to file an appeal against the trial court's order concerning respondent Rajendra Gurappa Mudkanna. The High Court examined whether the procedural requirements under Section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code were …
The Valentina Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a civil revision seeking restoration of a revision application that had been dismissed as a rejected case for failure to remove an office objection. The revision challenged the trial court’s order rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of …
The applicants filed a civil revision seeking to set aside the trial court's order that refused to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The applicants argued that the plaintiff, a partnership firm, was not registered under Section 69 of the Partnership Act, 1932, and therefore the …
The applicant, Prakash Anant Valame, filed a civil application seeking restoration of a civil revision (CRA No. 213 of 2018). The respondents, Vishwanath Balwant Phatak and others, submitted that the original suit had been withdrawn and produced the order confirming the withdrawal. The court …
The petitioners filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing a review petition against an order dated 7 February 2025 that dismissed their appeal challenging an interim injunction. The review petition was filed by the original defendants who wanted the order granting the …
The appellants challenged the trial court's decree granting partition and separate possession of all joint family properties described in Schedules I and II, alleging a prior partition in 1965 and procedural irregularities in the appellate process. The trial court and the first appellate court both …
The High Court of Bombay admitted the criminal appeal filed by Syndicate Bank against M/s. Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. The Court directed the trial court to comply with Section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code by issuing notices to respondents No.2 to No.7, requiring them to appear …
The applicant filed Civil Revision Application No.251 of 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. The matter was listed before Justice K.K. Tated on June 7, 2017. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called out. The court noted the applicant's non‑appearance and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a civil miscellaneous appeal (No. 672 of 2008) decided by the District Court. The court clerk retrieved the case status from the website, which showed that the appeal had already been disposed of. Since the subject matter of the petition was already …
Jayant Furnishers Private Limited filed an interim application seeking restoration of a civil revision petition that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. The revision petition was intended to challenge an order allowing the defendant’s application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and …
The appellants in Second Appeal No. 1362 of 2004 failed to serve the unserved respondents and did not file the required private paper‑book as ordered on 29 November 2007. The court, noting the office remark, observed that the appellant’s counsel had not complied with these procedural directions. By …
The petitioners, Smt. Ashy alias Seema Haresh Ahuja, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed in Special Civil Suit No. 19 of 2011 against the respondent, Shri Deepak Mohanlal Ahuja. The impugned order was sought to be set aside, but the court clerk’s case status indicated that the civil …
The appellant filed a second appeal and a civil application but failed to appear for the hearing scheduled to consider condonation of delay. The court noted that the appellant did not appear on the last date and again failed to appear when the matter was listed for dismissal. Consequently, the court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted leave to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Swapnil Rajan Pandhrinath Ahire, filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that rejected his application for framing additional issues. The order was characterized as an interlocutory order. The High Court examined whether such an interlocutory order could be interfered …
The petitioner, Shri Bhagwat Ramchandra Shinde, filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to restrain certain respondents from executing a notice dated 17 June 2016 issued under Section 54 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act and from removing his construction or obstructing his …
The original complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking leave to appeal a magistrate's order acquitting the respondents of offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court held that the …
The petition was filed by the guardian of minor plaintiffs to challenge orders directing the guardian to deposit a compromise amount and to reject the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint. The plaintiffs, now having attained majority, sought to withdraw the deposited amount and to amend the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear before the court. No representation was made on their behalf. The court noted the non-appearance and dismissed the writ petition in default. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The order was …
The applicant, Mr. Shrikant Nonaya Kotian, filed Criminal Applications No. 226 and 227 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court against the respondents. The applicant, through counsel, later sought leave of the court to withdraw these applications. The court considered the procedural request without delving …
Tata Communications Limited filed a criminal application against IYOGI Inc. and another respondent. The applicant failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates, including the final date. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant. The court noted the continued non-appearance and …
The original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed an application under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking leave to appeal after the accused was acquitted. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …
The original complainant, Suresh Gaikawad, filed a criminal application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of Sunanda Tayade under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 …
The complainant, Rajkumar Baburam Gupta, filed a criminal application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of Respondent No.1 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …
The appellants sought an interim order to record the names of the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 4 in a second appeal. The heirs, represented by counsel, raised no objection to the filing of the application. The court examined whether the application could be entertained …
The petitioner, Rashmi Ashok Joshi, filed multiple writ petitions before the Bombay High Court against Mohan Mahal Flat Owners Co-operative Housing Society Ltd and others. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that she had no instructions to continue with the proceedings. The court …
The petitioner, Rashmi Ashok Joshi, filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 4314, 4315, 4316, 4320, 4321 of 2011) against Mohan Mahal Flat Owners Co‑op Hsg Soc. Ltd and others. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the Court that she had no instructions to continue with the proceedings. The Court …
The petitioner, Rashmi Ashok Joshi, filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 4314, 4315, 4316, 4320, 4321 of 2011) against Mohan Mahal Flat Owners Co‑op Hsg Soc. Ltd and others. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the Court that she had no instructions to continue with the proceedings. The Court …
The petitioner, Rashmi Ashok Joshi, filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 4314, 4315, 4316, 4320, 4321 of 2011) against Mohan Mahal Flat Owners Co‑op Hsg Soc. Ltd and others. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the Court that she had no instructions to continue with the proceedings. The Court …
The applicant, Hemant Pandurang Kamate, filed a civil revision application (No. 405 of 2016) and a civil application (No. 136 of 2018) before the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the applicant on the scheduled date of hearing. The respondent, Shivram Ananda Sonawane, was represented …
The applicants filed a civil revision application seeking relief against the respondent. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that the original suit had been disposed of on 28 August 2021 and submitted the judgment for the record. The court noted that the suit’s disposal rendered the …
The petitioners, Mrs. Rajashree Rajendra Deshpande and others, filed writ petitions challenging actions of respondents Shri Gajanan Narayan Mulik and others. During the pendency of the proceedings, respondent No.1 died and his heirs and legal representatives filed interim applications seeking to be …
The petitioner, Rashmi Ashok Joshi, filed multiple writ petitions before the Bombay High Court against Mohan Mahal Flat Owners Co-operative Housing Society Ltd and others. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that she had no instructions to continue with the proceedings. The court …
The applicant, Smt. Vijaya Vilas Shinde and others, filed a civil revision application and sought leave to withdraw it along with all pending applications. Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Asmita Mauraya and Mr. Shyam Dewani, made the request before the Bombay High Court. The Court, after considering …
The appellant, Varsha, filed Interim Application No. 12498 of 2025 in a civil revision proceeding. Subsequently, a second interim application (No. 13697 of 2025) was filed. The appellant’s counsel then sought leave from the court to withdraw the first interim application. The bench, noting the …
The original complainant sought leave to appeal an acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that two cheques issued for a property sale were dishonoured. The complainant claimed the sale agreement was complete and the cheques were issued to satisfy a …
The applicant, Suresh Manulal Chowdhari, filed a criminal application seeking leave to file an appeal against respondents Dilip Gunvantrai Kachariya and others. No counsel appeared for the applicant on the scheduled date of 11 September 2025, leading to an adjournment. The applicant again failed to …
The petitioner, Mrs. Mandakini Madhukar Vanjale, filed writ petition No. 1533 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court. No substantive material was filed on behalf of the petitioner. The Court noted that there was no response or evidence from the petitioner. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ …
Mrs. Darshana Negandhi filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a dispute with the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the parties had reached an amicable settlement and that consent terms were filed in the underlying suit. A copy of the order disposing of …
In a civil application (SA No. 17 of 2012) filed in the Second Appeal No. 19 of 2012, the applicant, Mrs. Supriya K. Kasbekar, through senior counsel, informed the court that nothing survived in the application and sought leave to withdraw it. The learned senior counsel for the appellant also …
The petitioners, Lalit Balasaheb Shinde and others, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration of their right, title and interest over 23 R of land in Gat No. 1, relying on a decree dated 12 February 2015 from Regular Civil Appeal No. 2191 of 2005. They later moved the court for leave to withdraw …
The petitioner, Mrs. Pramila Laxman Bhosale, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order rejecting her application for appointing a District Inspector of Land Records (DILR) as Court Commissioner. The High Court noted that the petitioner's notice was returned unserved and no parties …
