Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
100 judgments · newest first · showing 1–100
The petitioners, members of Chandresh Terrace Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged a notice declaring their building dangerous and ordering its demolition, seeking to halt the redevelopment planned by a developer. They relied on a structural audit report classifying the building as requiring …
M/s. Prabhat Medical Stores filed a writ petition challenging its delay in filing a statutory appeal against an order dated 24-04-2026, which became effective on 01-08-2026. The petitioner filed the appeal only on 10-07-2026, after the 90‑day period, and was criticised for wasting time despite a …
The Maharashtra State Judges Association filed a writ petition seeking leave, traveling allowances and leave travel concessions for its member judicial officers. The State of Maharashtra responded that these benefits had already been granted under a Government Resolution dated 6 February 2024. The …
The petitioner, Mahfooz Islam Mohammad Khan, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No representative appeared for the petitioner either in person or via video conference. The Court had previously ordered that any objections be removed by 24 June 2026, failing which the petition …
Ms. Sujata Sidramappa Angadi filed a public interest litigation alleging that educational hostels run by her clients are not child care institutions under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 because they lack children in need of care and protection. The Court expressed …
Ekveera Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the levy of an additional lease premium by CIDCO and other respondents. The petitioner later moved a praecipe seeking withdrawal of the petition, stating an intention to pursue a separate remedy …
The petitioner, Manohar Jagannath Jadhav, filed a criminal writ petition alleging an offence under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, but the complaint did not contain any utterances that would attract the Act. The petitioner’s counsel later expressed …
The petitioner, Dr. Mandar Madhukar Patole, sought the registration of an FIR in a domestic dispute with his wife, who is the respondent. Multiple family and domestic violence cases are pending in various courts. The High Court expressed disinclination to order FIR registration and directed the …
The petitioner, Dilip Madhukar Bhurke, filed a writ petition challenging the Thane Municipal Corporation's refusal to allocate a flat that is the subject of a dispute between two private individuals. The corporation argued that, because the ownership of the flat is contested, it cannot hand over …
The petitioner, Shri Bhulabhai Nensi Patel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel filed a praecipe on 1 July 2026 requesting withdrawal of the petition. The court noted the withdrawal request and, on 2 July 2026, ordered the petition to be disposed of as …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief, but failed to appear before the court on 30 June 2026. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted a communication from Yerwada Central Jail confirming that the petitioner had already undergone the sentence imposed. In view of this …
The Union of India filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Basantabai, seeking relief. The petitioner submitted a photocopy of an order from the competent authority indicating that the Armed Forces Tribunal's order dated 19 October 2022, in Original Application No.23 of 2020, had …
Petitioner Prashant S. Kokane applied for a certificate to appear in person and sought preservation of CCTV footage of an incident dated 17-20 March 2025. The petitioner also filed an interim application (No. 1946 of 2026) requesting the same preservation. The Court noted that the petitioner had …
Petitioner Mohammed Salim Shaikh filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order related to FIR No. 0490 of 2023. The petition was listed for hearing on 22 June 2026, but the petitioner did not appear in person or via video conference. The Respondents, represented by APP Mr. Ajay S. Patil and …
Petitioner Chetan Ramesh Gomta filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an FIR. The petitioner, through counsel, later informed the court that the FIR had already been registered and that he wished to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the State opposed no point. …
M/s. Perfect Enterprise & Anr. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners, through counsel, later filed a praecipe on 12 June 2026 indicating their desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the …
The petitioner, Liladhar Manikrao Duphare, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to execute an order dated 6 January 2025 passed by the 6th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC, Belapur. The issue before the Court was whether a writ petition is the appropriate remedy for enforcing that …
Both criminal writ petitions (WP No. 2287 of 2026 and WP No. 2288 of 2026) were filed by the petitioners against the Intelligence Officer, Central Intelligence Unit, Mumbai. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that the purpose of filing the petitions had been achieved. …
The appellate court considered an interim application seeking a stay of an injunction granted by the trial court in a dispute over a suit property. The trial court had relied on an alleged 1994 unregistered Development Agreement and Section 48 of the Transfer of Property Act to restrain the …
The petitioner, We Care Foundation, filed a writ petition seeking liberty to withdraw the petition and pursue appropriate civil proceedings. The petitioners' counsel, Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar, requested the court's permission to withdraw. The High Court considered whether such liberty could be …
Petitioners numbered 1‑42 and 44‑48 sought to withdraw their writ petition (Writ Petition No.13336 of 2024) because petitioner No.43 refused to issue a No Objection Certificate for appointing a new advocate on record, thereby hindering their ability to proceed. The petitioners requested the court’s …
Mahendra Sitaram Mohite applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under FIR No.38 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR stems from a commercial dispute between M/s BMG Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Chemical Corp Pvt. Ltd. …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shekhar Bapusaheb Chindhe, who was implicated in a loan transaction of Rs. 50 lakh involving alleged usurious interest and the seizure and sale of the complainant's property. The FIR, lodged in April 2026, charges the applicant …
The applicants, Neeta Pankaj Modani and others, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions from the investigating officer present in court, submitted that the applicants' custody was not required. The investigating officer’s …
The applicant, Rajshree Bharat Ahire, was arrested under FIR No.125 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and later granted bail on 7 January 2026. She subsequently filed an interim application seeking relaxation of a bail condition (paragraph 7(vii)) that restricted contact …
The applicants, students who had cleared third‑year studies but still held backlogs from the second year, were provisionally admitted to the fourth year of their degree by a circular issued by Savitribai Phule Pune University. After appearing for and passing the backlog examinations in …
The applicants, students who had cleared second‑year backlogs but were provisionally admitted to the fourth year of their degree programme, sought permission to appear for the May 2026 examinations. The university (Respondent No.2) had issued a notice that such provisional students could sit for …
Allied Blenders and Distilleries Ltd filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax. The petition was later presented before the court by counsel seeking leave to withdraw it. The court considered the request to withdraw the petition. No …
The applicant, Bhalchandra Gopal Dusane, filed Bail Application No.1723 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Rohit Sinha, informed the court that the charge-sheet had already been filed before the trial court and requested permission to …
Reema Ajay Bansal applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged accusing her of forging a Release Deed concerning shop no.209, alleged to have been executed on 27 January 2001. The property dispute stemmed from a family settlement that was the subject of a civil suit (Suit No.2868 of 2000) …
M/s Dhamaraj Land Developers filed Writ Petition No. 6703 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar, requested permission to withdraw the petition to file an appropriate application before the …
The petitioners, Mrs. Durriya S. Shahiwala and others, sought a writ to restrain the State of Maharashtra and a bank from taking possession of residential flat No. 401 in Tulsi Darshan building, Karjat. The bank contended it could enforce its security interest, but the Court required it to refrain …
The petitioners, Ambernath Vikas Aghadi and others, filed Writ Petition No. 6647 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioners, through their counsel, sought to withdraw the petition. The Court noted the request and, without …
The petitioner, a 17‑year‑old survivor of sexual assault, sought a medical termination of her pregnancy after her mother’s death, residing with her aunt. An FIR was lodged under Sections 64(1) and 64(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. A Medical Board, …
The appellant Dugad Infrastructure LLP filed an appeal against an order dated 6 May 2026 which had dismissed its Exhibit‑5 interim application. The respondent, Lunkad Realty, contended that the order was passed without complying with the mandatory requirements of the proviso to Order XXXIX Rule 3 of …
M/s. Omshanti Packaging Company filed a writ petition seeking a stay of the handover of a mortgaged property to the Special Recovery Officer of Pune District Central Co-operative Bank. The petitioners argued that the execution of possession was premature and sought relief pending a detailed hearing. …
The petitioner, Mayur Sharad Balwadkar, filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the respondents. The court was required to consider a stay application and a revision application filed on 9 February 2026. The Additional Government Pleader, on behalf of the respondents, directed that the …
The petitioner, Zabbar Asif Movar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 September 2025 issued by the District Magistrate of Diu under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act. The petition argued that the order failed to specify a detention period and did not disclose any …
The Union of India appealed a civil matter and sought to correct the description of Respondent No.2 in the judgment dated 30 April 2026, which mistakenly listed the party as ‘M/s. Mira Salt Work Company’ instead of ‘M/s. Mira Real Estate Developer’. The appellant filed a motion on 27 July 2026 …
Shree Aniruddhay Namah Pvt. Ltd. and an associate filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to compel Axis Bank to de‑freeze a current account that had been frozen. The petition also requested interim relief to reactivate the account pending final disposal. …
The appellant IFFCO‑Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an interim application in the First Appeal No. 194 of 2026 seeking an order that Rs. 5 crore be deposited before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pune, to be made available to any of the six respondents authorized by the others. The …
The Principal General Manager Telecom of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging an order that granted family pension to the younger daughter of a deceased employee. The petitioner argued that the employer could not alter the pension scheme and that the elder daughter, who was …
The petitioner, Rahul Madhukar Birla, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the BNSS (replacing Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code) seeking a mandamus directing the police to register an FIR under Section 154 of the CrPC against respondents 2 to 4 for …
The petitioner, SGDC India Private Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking multiple directions including mandamus to cancel a tender award, set aside a rejection notice, open its bids, and stay further steps in an e‑tender for upgrading a golf course. The petition listed eight specific …
The petitioner, Lakhawinder Surjit Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to invoke specific provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Bombay Police Act in criminal case No. 617/2024, and to conduct a fair further investigation with a supplementary …
Petitioner Vijay Mangilalji Chandrawat filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the release on bail, the calling of records of FIR No.126 of 2025 under Sections 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985, and a waiver of verification due to his judicial custody. The petition …
The petitioner, Sayyedurrahman Abdul Wahab Khan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking mandamus orders for police protection, an independent investigation into an extortion call from jail, a status report on a FIR, and transfer of the investigation to the Crime Branch. The petition was filed …
The Bombay High Court, acting suo moto, examined a dispute arising from the Municipal Commissioner’s attempt to requisition High Court and subordinate court staff for the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation elections. The Court noted that Section 159 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 does …
The petitioner, a retired Class‑III police employee, was directed by the Commissioner of Police to deposit Rs.1,04,603 on the ground that it was an excess payment under the Sixth Pay Commission revision. He deposited the amount shortly before his retirement and filed a writ petition under Article …
The petitioner, Mangesh Dinkar Satav, filed Writ Petition No.1243 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay challenging an unspecified action of the Returning Officer and other respondents. On 17th February 2026, the petitioner issued a letter to his counsel, Mr. Mahesh B. Gupta, instructing the …
The petitioner, Hidaytullah Shaukat Ansari, complained that the post‑mortem of his deceased son was not conducted due to alleged negligence by the investigating officer and the hospital. He filed a criminal writ petition seeking the transfer of the investigation from Nirmal Nagar Police Station to …
The petitioner, Jayant Vishwanath Salunke, filed Writ Petition No. 2481 of 2025 challenging the maintainability of his reliefs and sought an early hearing of an interim injunction application (No. 22460 of 2025) pending before the trial court. The respondents, Dilip Kachardas Sanklecha & Ors., …
The petitioner, claiming to be the Palghar District President of a social organization, filed a public interest litigation seeking a stay on mining and industrial operations of numerous private respondents and police protection. The petitioner alleged rampant illegal quarrying, mining, and …
Mohammed Ismail Abdul Khalik filed a petition seeking a direction to a Special Investigation Team regarding several FIRs and a declaration that section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1964 is unconstitutional. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Union of India, submitted that the …
The petitioner, Tasneem Mohammad Siraj Shaikh, contested a municipal election and filed a criminal writ petition seeking a statutory remedy. The petitioner later requested to withdraw the writ petition while retaining the right to pursue the statutory remedy available under law. The Court considered …
The petitioners, a partnership firm and Automark Industries, challenged pre‑qualification conditions in eleven tenders issued by the Maharashtra State Infrastructure Development Corporation, alleging arbitrariness, discrimination, and violation of constitutional principles. They sought quashing of …
The petitioner, Prakash Mangal Kambere, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to register an FIR based on his complaints regarding alleged forged sale deeds of ancestral property. He alleged that family members had altered revenue records and executed …
The petitioner, Mahesh Mangal Ghare, sought a writ of mandamus directing the police to register an FIR based on his complaints concerning alleged forgery and collusion by certain respondents in altering land revenue records. He also requested an independent investigation, preservation of records, …
A criminal writ petition (No. 236 of 2026) was filed by Amit S. Wagmare against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled hearing dates of 27 and 28 January 2026. The court noted the absence of representation for the petitioner. …
The Union of India, Ministry of Defence filed Writ Petition No. 3821 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court challenging the legality and propriety of an order dated 08/06/2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal in Original Application No. 119 of 2021. The petitioner sought to have the Tribunal's order …
The petitioner, Harshali Akash Solwande, challenged the rejection of her nomination for the Takari Panchayat Samiti SC (Female) seat on the ground that the Returning Officer had not accepted her Form II, a document required under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Panchayat Samiti (Electoral Division & …
The petitioner, Dajiram Govind Katare, filed a public interest litigation seeking to shift the scheduled election date from 5 February 2026 to 6 February 2026, citing past precedents where election dates were moved to avoid clashes with local festivities. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board’s opinion that a disease was a constitutional disorder and not attributable or …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board’s opinion that a disease was a constitutional disorder and not attributable or …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board’s opinion that a disease was a constitutional disorder and not attributable or …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
Mahesh Kamat filed Criminal Application No.108 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court. No party appeared on the scheduled date, and the applicant failed to appear thereafter, indicating loss of interest. The court noted that the matter had not been circulated since filing. Consequently, the court …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking quash of FIR C.R. No.I‑2 of 2019, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code arising from an assault incident in a school. The FIR was lodged by the complainant, Respondent No.2, as a counter‑complaint to a …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The applicants, Haresh Parmanand Jashnani and others, filed Criminal Application No. 288 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. They later approached the court seeking to withdraw the application, stating that a settlement had been reached between the parties. The learned counsel for the applicants, …
The applicant, Anuj Jitesh Shah, filed Criminal Application No.293 of 2019 seeking relief against the respondents. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the dispute had been settled between the parties and requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request …
The applicant, Santosh Sitaram Gaikwad, filed a criminal application but failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, indicated that the charges had been framed and the trial was proceeding to the evidence stage. Since the applicant did not …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The petitioner, Vaishali Vitthal Kharade, filed Criminal Application No.421 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. No counsel or party appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled date of 22 January 2026, and the petitioner continued to be absent thereafter. The court observed that the application …
Dr. Rashmi Saluja, former Executive Chairman of Religare Enterprises Ltd., challenged the registration of FIR No.355/2024 and the ECIR/MBZO‑I/27/2024 issued by the Directorate of Enforcement under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA). She argued that the FIR was barred by special statutes …
The applicants failed to appear before the High Court on the scheduled date for Criminal Application No.608 of 2019. The respondent's counsel informed the Court that the police had filed a "B" Summary Report, which the complainant challenged by filing a protest petition (C.C. No.3605/MISC./2022). …
Mahesh Kishan Motewar filed Criminal Application No.630 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. No party appeared on the scheduled date of 22 January 2026, and the applicant continued to be absent. The court observed that the matter had not been progressed since filing and the applicant appeared to …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that had granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel on the ground that their diseases were not attributable to or aggravated by military service. The High Court examined the …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The petitioners, Virendra Chandrakant Joshi and another, filed Criminal Application No. 898 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants on the scheduled date of 22 January 2026, nor did they appear subsequently. The court observed that the application had …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The applicants filed Criminal Application No.1216 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing on 22 January 2026, and no further appearances were made. The court noted that the matter had not been progressed since filing and the applicants appeared to have lost interest. …
The applicants filed Criminal Application No.1217 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but failed to appear at the hearing on 22 January 2026 and again on 23 January 2026. The court noted that the matter had not been progressed since filing and the applicants appeared to have lost …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
Shabbir Abdul Shaikh filed Criminal Application No.1440 of 2019 against the State of Maharashtra. No party appeared before the Court on the scheduled date, and the applicant continued to be absent. The Court observed that the application had not been circulated since filing, indicating the …
The applicants, Arvind Vasant Baraskar and another, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court when their criminal application was listed on 22 January 2026, and they have not appeared since. No counsel was retained for the applicants, and the matter had not been circulated. The court noted the …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to various retired Army and Navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Tribunal should not have interfered with the opinions of the …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The applicants filed Criminal Application No.1452 of 2019 and an interim application, but failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 20 January 2026 and thereafter. The court observed that the matter had not been progressed since filing and the applicants appeared to have lost …
The petitioner, Sitaram Sudama Gupta, challenged his arrest and police custody ordered by an Additional Sessions Judge under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, alleging that no investigation had been completed and that the grounds of arrest were furnished only in English, which he could …
The petitioner, Balya Mama alias Suresh Gopinath Mhatre, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) against the National Highway Authority of India and several other respondents. The petition sought relief, though the specific relief sought is not detailed in the judgment. The High Court examined the …
The appellant, Shashikant Shankar Jadhav, filed a First Appeal (No. 576 of 2022) and an interim application (No. 111 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. The appellant’s counsel submitted an email dated 7 January 2026 indicating that the parties had settled the dispute. On the basis of this …
The petitioner, Shrikant Harishchandra Hodawadekar, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 3470 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition and to avail a statutory remedy under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner’s counsel, B. K. Barve & Co., argued for …
The petitioner, Mrs. Chitra Kunal Ghaste, sought a writ of mandamus directing senior police officers to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) and the Regional Passport Officer to renew her passport in her new name despite an FIR (No. 688 of 2024) alleging offences under sections 408, 420 and 34 of …
Petitioner Ravindra Rajaram Patil filed Writ Petition No.155 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of Kalyan‑Dombivli Municipal Corporation and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted an email dated 7 January 2026 indicating that the dispute had been settled between the parties …
