Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
148 judgments · newest first · showing 1–148
The Special Judge convicted four accused of dacoity and possession of arms under Sections 399 and 402 IPC based on a police raid where weapons were recovered and an alleged exchange of fire. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution evidence, noting the absence of medical reports, empty …
The appellant Desh Pal was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC for raping a 10‑11‑year‑old girl, Jasodha, after luring her into his rickshaw and taking her to an abandoned building where the assault occurred. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, an independent eyewitness (Ram …
The applicant filed a criminal complaint alleging that his father, Satyaveer Singh, was murdered in a conspiracy involving Sohanveer, Arjun Singh and others, and that the police had failed to act despite a DSP report identifying the accused. The Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint …
Gopal Goswami filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and pointed to a history of 26 cases where bail …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Usman under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged possession of 20.870 kg of ganja under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed false implication, non‑recovery of the narcotic, and non‑compliance with …
The accused Ahsan @ Kati filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, alleging that the 517 g of smack seized from him was not actually recovered from his possession and that the seizure violated the mandatory procedure of Section …
Ravindra applied for enlargement of bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 474 of 2024) involving charges of assault causing grievous hurt under Sections 126(2), 109, 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The first bail application had been rejected, and the applicant argued that he is innocent, that no witness …
The applicant, Happy @ Harpreet, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 367 of 2025) alleging assault under IPC Sections 351(3), 352, 3(5) and 109(1). He claimed innocence, asserted that no incriminating material was recovered from him, and argued that the …
The applicant, Saurabh, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 12‑year‑old boy under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5M(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication due to …
The accused, Yogesh Kumar, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 313 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 3(5) and 109(1) of the IPC, alleging grievous injuries to the victim. He argued that only five of the fourteen …
The appellant, Smt. Bimla, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnor, in Sessions Trial No. 209 of 1983 for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. She filed a criminal appeal (No. 1278 of 1989) before the Allahabad High Court …
The appellants were convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia. They filed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, appellants No.1, 2 and 4 …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision (No. 2201 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the trial court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the revision had become infructuous because a final judgment had already been rendered by the trial court. The court …
Pravesh Dhama, charged under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. in Binauli police station, filed a second bail application after his first was rejected. He argued that the co-accused Madhur @ Kukki had been granted bail, and asserted that he is a law‑abiding citizen who would not misuse …
The appellants Ramesh and Kalu were convicted by the Sessions Court for raping Smt. Munni under Section 376 IPC. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution's case, which relied on the victim's testimony, eyewitness accounts, and limited medical evidence showing no injuries to the victim. The …
The applicant, Kapil Sirohi, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 10 July 2023 passed by the Family Court, Mathura, which directed him to pay interim maintenance to his wife and son. The applicant alleged that the Family Court failed to consider …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Smt. Sunita, who is accused of embezzlement under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120‑B. The first bail application had been dismissed, but the applicant argued that the trial had stalled for five months after framing of …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 21 October 2021 that had been issued in a criminal complaint under Sections 452, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that the dispute was purely civil, …
The accused Pravesh applied for bail in a criminal case under sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This was his second bail application after a prior denial. He argued that the incident never occurred and that five prosecution witnesses had not supported the …
Karan Chauhan filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 26722 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel expressed an intention to withdraw the bail application. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, having …
The applicants, Nadeem Khan and another, were given a two‑week extension on 13 May 2025 to file a rejoinder affidavit in an application under Section 528 of the BNSS. They failed to file the affidavit despite seeking leave on 26 May 2026 due to personal difficulty, and the matter was adjourned for …
Akshay was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and has been in custody since 17 January 2026. He filed a second bail application, arguing that the charge sheet was filed on 13 April 2026 and charges were framed on 8 July 2026, and that co‑accused …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Tufani Nishad @ Munees in a criminal trial (Crime No.129 of 2025) under Sections 140(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that three of eight prosecution witnesses had already been examined and had given …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Tejendra, accused under sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered at Jansath police station. The applicant contended that the alleged incident never occurred and that five …
The applicants, Jitendra and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Ram Ashish Pandey, subsequently expressed the intention to withdraw the application. The Court, after noting the withdrawal request, dismissed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 20‑12‑2022 and the entire proceedings in case No. 260139 of 2022 (Manoj v. Ksristy & another), which arose from a complaint under Section 379 IPC. The complaint had named …
Manish, accused in a case under Sections 109(1), 352 and 3(5) B.N.S., applied for enlargement of bail after his earlier bail plea was rejected. He argued that other co‑accused (Gagan, Vishan Kana and Shivam) had been granted bail, and that he had no criminal antecedents. The State opposed, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 28‑06‑2024 in a criminal complaint (Case No. 143827 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 511 of the IPC. The parties were engaged in a financial …
The applicants, Rohit Chaurasiya and four others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Shiv Kumar Singh, expressed the intention to withdraw the application. The State's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no …
Mohan Lal, accused in a land‑dispute case (Crime No. 305 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 109 of the IPC, applied for bail for the third time. He claimed false implication and pointed out that a co‑accused, Hetram, had already been released on …
Naved Malik, charged under several IPC provisions and Section 66D of the IT Act, applied for enlargement of bail after his first bail plea was rejected on 22‑04‑2026. He argued that a co‑accused, Raghav Rohila, was later granted bail on similar charges, and therefore he should be released on the …
The accused, Sartaz, filed a second bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 27305 of 2026 after an earlier bail denial on 23 April 2026. He argued that four prosecution witnesses had already been examined and only formal witnesses remained, reducing the risk of influencing evidence, …
The revisionist Rinki filed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which led a Civil Judge to order Rs 2,000 as rent and Rs 2,500 as monthly maintenance on 27‑Oct‑2023. Rinki appealed (Appeal 147/2023) seeking higher amounts, while the opposite party Prasun …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash Special Session Trial No. 474 of 2024 in which they were summoned under IPC sections 323/149, 392/149, 394/149 and 395/149. They asserted that a compromise between the parties was entered …
The applicant, Mohammad Haneef, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No.18308 of 2023 and related summons and N.B.W. orders, alleging that the complaint was a false, retaliatory claim arising from a family dispute. The opposite party contended that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Special Session Trial No. 474 of 2024, wherein they were summoned under various IPC offences. They asserted that a compromise between the parties was entered on 4 August 2025 and verified by the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No.3388 of 2021, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and 506. They contended that the allegations were false, frivolous and a duplicate of an earlier 2020 complaint, and that no …
The applicant, Vishwanath Singh @ Bhola, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Krishna Kant Tiwari, informed the court of his intention to withdraw the application. No opposition was raised by the …
The applicant Mahaveer filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 17874 of 2023) filed by Om Prakash under IPC sections 323, 427, 452 and 506. The applicant alleged that the complaint was fabricated, that there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dr. Akhilesh Dubey, who faces multiple IPC charges including cheating, forgery, criminal intimidation and conspiracy in a property dispute involving alleged usurpation of Waqf land. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 628 of 2019) filed under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. A settlement between the parties was reached on 26 May 2022 and later verified by the Judicial Magistrate on 25 June …
The applicant, Manoj Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking relief. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the dispute with the State of U.P. had been amicably settled and requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court considered whether a …
The applicant, Bhaiya Lal, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 424 of 2025 under Sections 109(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault with a lathi-danda and axe. He claimed innocence, stating that no specific role was assigned to him in the FIR and that no incriminating material was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Laxmi Shankar Upadhyay, who was charged under Sections 8, 21 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly possessing 950 grams of heroin. The applicant contended that the seizure was illegal, no heroin was …
Lalit Kaushik applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 350/2024) under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that the FIR was filed due to political rivalry. The State contended that Kaushik, together with his nephew, abducted the …
The High Court heard bail applications filed by two accused, Dheeraj Sahni and Satendra Sahni, in a criminal case (Crime No. 299 of 2025) involving alleged assault and grievous injuries. Dheeraj Sahni’s counsel voluntarily withdrew his bail plea, leading the court to dismiss the application as …
The applicant, Vijendra Pratap Singh, aged 66, sought enlargement of bail in a trial concerning FIR No. 222 of 2025, which alleged his involvement in a violent assault resulting in grievous injuries and amputation of the victim's left arm. The FIR was lodged 23 days after the alleged incident, and …
The applicant, Pawan, was arrested in connection with crime no. 41 of 2026 under Sections 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the B.N.S. and filed a bail enlargement application. He pleaded that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR only named four persons without assigning him a specific role, and that …
Rajesh, who is in jail since 9‑Dec‑2024 for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 109, 127(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., applied for enlargement of bail during trial. This is his second bail application; the first was rejected by Justice Gautam Chowdhary on …
The applicant, Saurabh @ Gola, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 77 of 2026) under Section 117(3) of the B.N.S., alleging false implication in an assault where the victim was struck on the head with a brick, resulting in loss of vision. He contended that he had no specific role …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Lal, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged physical assault causing grievous injuries to the victim, Abhimanyu. The applicant's counsel argued that the injuries were simple, the applicant was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shoaib Suleman Shaikh, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 143(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly luring a four‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the victim’s statement …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Tavish Raza, who is charged under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 for allegedly shooting Arman Sonu during a dispute over a marriage. The applicant contended that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rameshchandra, who is accused in a 1999 case under IPC sections 307, 323, 324 and 506. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR did not specifically charge him, asserting he only carried a ballam while the co‑accused fired …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Singh, who is charged under Sections 109, 126(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assault causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to the bail of co‑accused, while the State …
The accused, Sartaz, Farukh and Samedin, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 15 of 2026) filed under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the injuries alleged in the FIR were simple in …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Junaid, who is charged under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2) and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly inflicting grievous injuries on Nafees and Amir. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely …
Sarvesh Kumar, along with two co‑accused, was charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 118(2) for allegedly assaulting Roop Singh with an axe, brickbats and an iron rod, causing grievous injuries. The FIR was lodged a day after the incident, and the applicant argued that the delay and the …
In a bail cancellation application (No. 821 of 2023), the petitioner Dilip Kumar Yadav sought to have his bail cancelled. The application was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but no representative appeared on behalf of the applicant or the informant. The State's Additional …
The applicant, Narendra Kumar, filed a bail cancellation application in the High Court of Allahabad seeking to set aside bail granted by the Sessions Judge, Pilibhit, to the accused Nilesh in a case under Sections 307, 34 and 504 of the IPC. The application was filed under Criminal Misc. Bail …
The High Court considered the fifth bail application of Pradeep @ Chhote, who has been in jail for about four years on a charge of murder under Section 307 IPC. Earlier four bail applications had been rejected or withdrawn, and the trial court had been directed to complete the trial within one year, …
The applicants Bhola and Neelu were charged in FIR No. 405 of 2025 for assaulting Manoj with a baton, causing serious head injuries and a fractured arm. They applied for bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the incident stemmed from a matrimonial dispute involving the victim's wife. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Azeom Husain, accused in a criminal case under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged knife assault causing grievous injuries to the victim Rizwan. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Garg (alias Pankaj Garg) in a criminal case under Sections 109 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the FIR was lodged 19 days after the alleged …
Madhav Prasad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 416 of 2025) alleging false implication and a cross‑case scenario where both parties lodged FIRs over the same incident. The applicant claimed no prior criminal record and argued that the injuries were minor and that it was unclear who the …
The Allahabad High Court examined a bail application filed by Chhotu alias Anil Chauhan, who is charged in FIR No. 249 of 2025 for allegedly stabbing Jai Prakash Singh with a knife, causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that he was not arrested at the scene, no knife …
The applicant, a Class‑XII student, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 444 of 2025 alleging that he stabbed a victim with a knife, violating Section 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no prior record, and that no weapon or …
The applicant, Sajid, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 68 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 9M/10 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was filed due to a monetary dispute with the informant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunal, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the case involved cross‑reported FIRs, making it …
The accused, Chutku, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 254/2025) under Section 109(1) of the B.N.S. for alleged involvement in causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted lack of prior criminal record, and noted that co-accused had already been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitish Kumar Singh @ Mohan Singh, who was charged under Section 109(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly opening fire on police during an encounter, though no police officer was injured. The applicant claimed false implication and that he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit, who was accused under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and a provision of the Bombay Narcotic Substances Act in a case pending before the trial court. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that …
The applicant, Rajat, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 470 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 109(1) of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that the sole witness – the victim’s brother – was an interested party. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin Kumar, who is charged under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly kidnapping a minor. The FIR alleged that the applicant enticed the girl, while the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 …
Nitin Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 12974 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant was represented by counsel Ashish Goyal, while the State of U.P. was represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh Singh, who is accused in Crime No. 362 of 2025 under Sections 87, 137(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim voluntarily left her parental home and later returned, and that …
Mohammad Parvez filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court, with Shahbaz Hassan and Zawwar Haider Naqvi appearing for him. The State of U.P. opposed the bail, represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant announced his intention to withdraw …
The applicant, Jay Bharat Bhai Thakkar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant, Shantanu, announced at the Bar his intention to withdraw the bail application. The court, noting the applicant's intention to withdraw, …
Subhaan filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 40620 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant announced his intention to withdraw the bail application. The court, noting this statement, dismissed the bail application as withdrawn. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sushil Kumar Yadav, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 01 of 2026) for alleged assault under Sections 109(1), 352, and 351(3). The applicant claimed absolute innocence, argued that the FIR lacked a motive, and highlighted a …
The applicant, Indrajeet, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 174 of 2025, charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2) and 109(1) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault with a lathi‑danda, rod and pharsa. He claimed innocence, stating that no specific role was assigned to him, no …
The applicant, Aditya Prajapati, sought enlargement of bail during trial for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 109 of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that his name was added only during investigation, with no incriminating material …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep Nagar, who is accused in Crime No. 507 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 131, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was recovered and that he has no prior criminal record. The …
The applicant, Shitla Prasad Singh, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 489 of 2025 alleging assault with a 'Balli' against six persons, including him, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute with the informant, …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Krishna Bhati, who is accused in crime no. 507 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 131, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault with intent to kill. Bhati’s counsel argued that he is innocent, that no incriminating …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Yadav, accused under IPC Sections 109(1), 352 and 118(1) for allegedly stabbing a victim. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a three‑day delay in filing the FIR, contradictions between the FIR, the victim’s statement and witness …
The applicant, Lallu, sought enlargement of bail in a criminal trial (Crime No. 228 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 109(1), 110, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. He claimed innocence, stating that his name was added only during investigation and that no incriminating material …
Golu Pandey was arrested in connection with FIR No. 296 of 2025 alleging assault and related offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 109 of the B.N.S. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the FIR named him only as an unknown person, and that no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Praveen Jain, who is accused under Sections 8, 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly possessing 202 gm of various scheduled drugs. Jain contended that he was falsely implicated, that no drugs were …
The applicant, Pankaj Singh, was arrested in connection with a 2006 assault case (Crime No. 20) involving multiple injuries to the victim, Ranvir Pratap Singh, and is seeking enlargement of bail during trial. The applicant claims he is innocent, falsely implicated due to village factional politics, …
The applicant, Brajkishore, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault on the informant's brothers and has been in custody since 21 November 2025. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed six days after the incident and that no specific role was assigned to him, …
The applicant, Shadab, was charged under IPC sections 109, 118(1), 115(2), 352 and 361(3) for allegedly assaulting three persons with a baton, causing head injuries. He sought bail, claiming innocence, a delayed FIR, lack of independent witnesses and no prior criminal record. The State argued that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Raj, who was accused of kidnapping, assaulting, and selling a woman for Rs. 50,000, offences alleged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that no injury was …
The applicant, Lakhan Lal, was charged under Section 109 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. for allegedly causing a gun‑shot injury to a 14‑year‑old boy during a marriage celebration. He claimed innocence, arguing that the injury resulted from celebratory firing and that the FIR was lodged fifteen days …
The applicant Saurabh, charged under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M(L)/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual abuse of a 12‑year‑old boy, applied for enlargement of bail during trial. He claimed innocence, asserted that he was falsely implicated due to enmity, and …
Anuj Yadav was charged under Sections 115(2) and 109 of the B.N.S. for allegedly pushing a train passenger, Mukesh Kumar, off a moving intercity train, causing the victim to fall under the wheels and lose both legs. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming the incident was an accident and that he …
The applicant, Ravindra, filed a bail application in a criminal trial (Crime No. 474 of 2024) where he is charged under Sections 126(2), 109, 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. He claimed absolute innocence, alleging that the victim, Sanjay, was intoxicated and attacked by unidentified assailants, and …
Jagatpal, accused under sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. in a case registered at P.S. Sajeti, Kanpur Nagar, applied for bail during trial, claiming he is falsely implicated and that both parties sustained injuries, making it unclear who the aggressor is. The applicant’s counsel …
The applicants, Ramchandar and another, were arrested in connection with crime No. 206 of 2025 under Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. and have been in jail since 18 September 2025. They claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged more than 14 hours after the incident and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rakesh Kori, who is accused under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code in a case pending since 2014. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted that the charge was framed in 2016 and that the trial had not progressed beyond the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yuvraj Singh, who is accused in Crime No. 299 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR only made a general allegation of firing and did not assign a specific role to …
The applicant, Kuldeep Nishad, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 109(1) and 118(1) of the B.N.S., alleged to involve an assault with an axe intended to kill the informant's son. He claimed innocence, arguing that the medical report showed no serious injuries and that he has no …
Shyamlal Bhuiyan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 554/2025) alleging child labour and trafficking, filed under Section 143(5) of the B.N.S. He claimed false implication, lack of detailed evidence on the deployment of children, and asserted no prior criminal record. The State opposed …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pravesh Dhama, accused in a criminal case under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the injuries to the complainant were not fatal, arguing he had no …
The applicant, accused in Crime No. 367 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., applied for enlargement of bail during trial. He claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found on him and that the alleged weapon was recovered from a co‑accused. The …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad listed the criminal miscellaneous bail application No. 9065 of 2026 filed by Sandeep Singh Thakur against the State of U.P. for fresh hearing on 11 May 2026. The application was presented before Hon’ble Justice Harvir Singh. No substantive order on the bail …
The bail application filed by Karan Alias Kannu (applicant) against the State of U.P. was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla. No party appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The matter was adjourned and listed for further hearing after three weeks. No substantive …
The applicant, Dinesh Saini alias Mintu, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the bail application, the person who had sustained injuries in the alleged offence died. The applicant’s counsel submitted this development before the …
Rohit alias Bittu filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel sought a short period to file a supplementary affidavit disclosing the current status of the trial and any witness statements recorded to date. The court considered whether to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jogendra (applicant) who is charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 325 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly causing firearm injuries to four persons. The applicant's counsel argued that the prosecution case is false, the …
Geeta Saini, accused in a 2024 case under sections 109(1), 3(5) and 93 of the B.N.S. for allegedly burying a newborn female child, applied for bail while in custody since November 6, 2024. She claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was based on overheard information, that there was no material …
The revision petition filed by Satan Bahadur Dhuriya challenged a Family Court order granting Rs. 5,000 per month as maintenance to his former wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner argued that the amount was excessive and beyond his financial capacity as a driver. The …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision against a Family Court order dated 10‑10‑2023 that enhanced his maintenance liability from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 10,000 per month under Section 127 of the CrPC, resulting in arrears of about Rs. 21 lakhs. The original maintenance application was filed in 2007, …
The revision petition was filed by Mukesh Tyagi and others under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 16 August 2022 that granted accommodation and maintenance to the complainant. The petitioners contended that they had not received the …
The revisionist, Mohammad Shamshir Khan, challenged a family court order dated 20 October 2016 that awarded Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance, claiming it was ex parte and beyond his means. He also contested the family court’s dismissal of his application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. on 24 …
The revision petition was filed by Abhishek, a Class‑1 GST/customs officer, challenging a Family Court order dated 23‑04‑2024 that awarded Rs 15,000 as maintenance to the wife (Opposite Party 2) and Rs 6,000 to the minor son (Opposite Party 3). The petitioner contended that the awarded amount was …
The revisionist Smt. Anam Zafar Shamsi filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the CrPC challenging the Family Court's dismissal of her maintenance application. She alleged that the Family Court ignored the substantial income of the opposite party No.2, who runs two shops in Pilibhit, and …
The revisionist, Vineet @ Goldi, challenged a family court order dated 8‑12‑2023 that directed him to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs 10,000 to the opposite party. He argued that his salary of Rs 12,000 per month and lack of other income made the amount excessive and that the trial court ignored his …
The petitioner Ritu Rai filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order dated 17‑01‑2024 that dismissed her application for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court held that the Family Court had not applied its mind, had placed the burden of proof …
Smt Sanyukta Shahi and another filed Criminal Revision No. 2244 of 2024 against the State of U.P. and another. The revision was listed before Hon’ble Justice Harvir Singh. The court disposed of the revision by referring to the order dated 18 March 2026 in the connected Criminal Revision No. 3302 of …
Akash filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a Family Court order dated 4 May 2024 that dismissed his maintenance application, noting the matter was scheduled for final judgment on 18 May 2024. The High Court scheduled the case for a fresh hearing on …
The revisionist, Vikesh Shahi, challenged a Family Court order granting Rs.3,500 per month to his wife and Rs.2,500 per month to his son as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, alleging that the total amount was excessive and that he was mentally unstable and unemployed. The opposite parties …
The revisionist, Smt. Jyoti Singh, filed a revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the dismissal of her maintenance application by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Firozabad. She contended that the trial court erred by not considering her unemployment …
The revision petition filed by Abhishek Sharma challenged a Family Court order granting monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000 to his wife and Rs.5,000 to their child, alleging the amount was excessive and that the wife, a qualified MBA graduate, voluntarily left the matrimonial home and could support …
Lekhraj filed a criminal revision challenging orders that dismissed his claims in a domestic violence petition and a related criminal matter. He argued that no domestic violence was committed by him or his family and that the petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic …
The revision petition was filed challenging an order dated 5 June 2024 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. 4, Agra, which granted maintenance of Rs 12,000 per month to the minor son of the petitioner until he reaches majority. The petitioner argued that the amount was excessive and …
Natthulal filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that awarded Rs. 5000 as maintenance to his daughter, alleging the amount was excessive and beyond his financial means despite owning seven acres of land. The opposite party argued that the sum was modest and the petitioner could …
The revisionist Abhay Patel challenged a Family Court order that awarded Rs.3,000 to his wife and Rs.1,500 to his daughter as maintenance, arguing the total of Rs.4,500 was excessive and beyond his financial means. The State, represented by the learned A.G.A., contended that the revisionist earns …
The revisionist, an unemployed woman with a B.Pharm diploma, challenged the Family Court's order rejecting her claim for maintenance, arguing that the interest earned on a Rs. 14 lakh fixed deposit gifted by her father (or husband) does not constitute income. The Additional Principal Judge had held …
The revisionist Gaurav challenged a Family Court order that awarded Rs 3,000 per month as maintenance to his wife and son, arguing the amount was excessive given his unemployment and pending criminal cases. The State contended that the award was proportionate to the revisionist's income potential. …
Irfan and three others filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was listed before the Allahabad High Court, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Counsel for the …
Petitioner Rajendra Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Ghaziabad to dispose of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act within six months. The High Court examined whether it could impose such a …
The revisionist, Devpratap @ Raju, filed a criminal revision against the Family Court's order dated 18 September 2024 which awarded a monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000 to the opposite party No.2 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revisionist agreed to continue paying the monthly …
The petitioners, Indrajeet Singh and others, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking relief from the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner’s counsel requested additional time to file a copy of a compromise deed that was recorded by a Civil Court in 2004. The court considered the request and, …
The petition under Article 227 (No. 10268 of 2025) was listed as fresh on 4 May 2026. Respondent No.2 to 4, represented by Advocate Devendra Kumar Pandey, sought a adjournment to prepare their case. No substantive merits were addressed in the order. The matter was noted by the court and the order …
The revisionist, Ravendra Singh, filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court and simultaneously sought condonation of a 1,941‑day delay in filing that revision. He claimed that he only learned of the underlying criminal case and the recovery order against him after returning to his …
Shesh Mani Maurya filed a criminal revision challenging an order dated 28-10-2021 passed by the Principal Judge Family Court, Mirzapur. Along with the revision, he sought condonation of a 922‑day delay in filing the revision, claiming he attempted settlement through mediation which failed. The State …
Rameshchandra filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders dated 5 September 2023 and 5 August 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur. He also sought exemption to file a certified copy of those orders. The court observed that the …
Manoj Kumar, accused in a multi‑charge case (including murder under IPC s.304) arising from an incident on 21‑June‑2024, applied for enlargement of bail. He claimed false implication, delay in filing the FIR, and pointed to bail granted to co‑accused. The State argued that the applicant inflicted a …
Nazim filed a criminal revision and a separate application seeking condonation of a 924‑day delay, alleging that he had not been served any summons or notice in the recovery proceedings under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court examined the affidavit and found that Nazim had …
Manoj Kumar, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 331 of 2024) under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, has been in custody since July 5, 2024. He filed a bail application seeking enlargement of bail during the trial. The High Court noted that the facts and incident are identical to those in a …
The High Court considered the third bail application filed by Pradeep Singh, who is charged under Sections 8, 20, 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 975 kg of ganja valued at over Rs. 42 crore. The applicant contended that the seizure …
Manoj @ Aryan Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case alleging impersonation of a jailer and extortion of approximately Rs.50,000, charged under several IPC sections (417, 418, 419, 420, 384, 467, 468, 411) and Section 66-D of the IT Act. The accused contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The applicant, Ujjwal Porwal, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 44756 of 2024) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking release from custody. The State of Uttar Pradesh opposed the bail, and counsel for both sides were listed. The bench, presided over by Hon'ble …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra Alias Deva, who was in custody since 27‑12‑2023 for alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC relating to the purported sale of a property in which he had no title. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhagwan Singh, who is accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B for allegedly selling a property fraudulently and obtaining a loan against it. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the dispute was essentially …
Shahjad Ahmad, arrested in connection with Crime No. 181 of 2024 under IPC sections 363 and 377 and POCSO Act sections 5M/6, applied for bail while in jail since 30 May 2024. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging the alleged conduct did not constitute an offence under Section 377 and that he has …
