Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9
The petitioners, Yashomangal Developers & Anr., filed Writ Petition No. 685 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging an order arising from earlier civil proceedings. The petitioners later informed the Court that the original civil suit had been finally decided because the parties had amicably …
The petitioner, Sonali Milind Patil, filed a writ petition seeking directions for the approval of her appointment proposal pending before the Deputy Director of Education, Pune Division, and the Pune Zilla Parishad. The court noted that the proposal required detailed verification and scrutiny by the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. They had joined duties between 1993 and 2000 and had been working in plain areas. The Zilla Parishad produced a ready reference chart marked 'X' showing their service details. On comparing it with the chart at page 82, the Court …
M/s Fiza Constructions Co. filed a writ petition (No. 5034 of 2019) in the High Court of Bombay against the legal heirs of the deceased Ramchandra S. Deshmukh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The Court, recalling its earlier order, observed that the petition had not been prosecuted. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2019 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra, but neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared before the court for any hearing. The State's counsel also indicated that no copies of the petition were supplied to the State Government. The matter …
The petitioner, Shweta Pravin Parmar, filed a contempt petition (No. 265 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay, which was at the pre‑notice stage. The petitioner’s counsel moved on 27 April 2026 to withdraw the petition, stating that the grievance had been redressed. The respondents, represented by …
Petitioners Kailas Bhima Gunjal & Anr. and Pradeep Ramchandra Shinde & Anr. filed contempt petitions alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to issue reasoned orders on their eligibility for National/State teaching awards. The respondents, senior officials of the Rural Development …
The applicant, Israil Mohd. Ali Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Rahul Raj (in the name of R. Sathyanarayanan), sought relief pending a trial before the Sessions Judge, 27th Court, Mumbai. The court noted that there was no …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After filing, the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and submitted an undated statement signed by an advocate. The court recorded the statement and, on the …
