Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
510 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The Executive Engineer & Ors. appealed against Shashi Construction Co. & Anr. before the Gujarat High Court. The appellant, S.S.N.L., communicated its willingness to accept the lower court's judgment and requested a two‑month period to deposit the decretal amount. The court recorded this …
The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of a 2007 agreement to sell land, having paid part of the consideration. During the suit, several co‑owners (Defendants 3‑10) were deleted from the parties, and subsequent purchasers (Defendants 11‑12) were added. The trial court rejected the …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The husband filed a divorce petition on the ground of cruelty, and the Family Court granted a decree of divorce. The wife appealed the decree before the Gujarat High Court. While the appeal was pending, the parties reached a settlement, with the husband paying Rs.18 lakhs as permanent alimony and …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed the Court …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The petitioners, Dinesh Kumar Shukkarbhai Patel, filed a series of miscellaneous and special civil applications, including a contempt application, against Shahmeena Husain, Chairman of the Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajesh M. Chauhan, informed …
The Union of India filed a first appeal (No.3151 of 2010) against Pratap Steels Rolling Mills Ltd. The appellants failed to appear before the High Court of Gujarat. The court noted the absence of counsel for the appellants and referred to its earlier order dated 20‑01‑2026. Relying on Order 41 Rule …
The wife filed a family suit under the Family Courts Act and the Hindu Marriage Act seeking recovery of her streedhan, which included movable items and an open plot of land. The Family Court directed her to declare the total value of the claim and affix the appropriate court fee; she paid a nominal …
The First Appeal challenged a decree that granted the plaintiff a half share in two survey parcels and declared two registered sale deeds void. During the appeal, the original plaintiff and defendants 6‑8 executed a registered settlement agreement relinquishing the plaintiff’s rights over survey No. …
Mahesh Govindbhai Patel filed a first appeal before the Gujarat High Court against Kantibhai @ Kantubhai Bhagubhai Patel and others. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel submitted a withdrawal affidavit. The court recorded the withdrawal and disposed the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, …
The applicants filed Special Civil Suit No. 66 of 2010 which was dismissed by the Civil Court on merits without any evidence being taken, prompting a review petition that was also dismissed. They later filed a first appeal (F/FA/31316 of 2023) after a delay of 475‑484 days and sought condonation of …
The appellant, a construction firm, claimed to have purchased agricultural land in 1985 and 1990 through agreements and irrevocable powers of attorney, and sought specific performance, declaration of a 2018 sale deed as void, and injunctions. The trial court dismissed the suit under Order VII Rule …
The State, represented by the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against a Reference Court award that granted an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kalikua Irrigation Pond Canal, over the original award of Rs 6.90 per square metre. The …
The appellant, Chetanben, filed a first appeal (No.166 of 2026) and a civil application for a stay concerning a property dispute that is already pending before the court in Civil Suit No.75 of 2022. The defendant, Dharmeshbhai Koradiya, submitted an affidavit assuring that he would not forcibly …
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Zampodar village under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, issuing a Section 4 notification in 1991 and a Section 6 notification in 1992. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates for Bagayat and Jirayat land, but the appellants were …
The appeal challenges a Land Acquisition Reference Court award of Rs.125 per square metre for land acquired for the Amreli‑Chittal bypass road. The original award ignored annual price appreciation since the base valuation year of 1993. The appellant argued that, following a prior decision (First …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that …
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against an award by the Principal Civil Judge that granted the land owners additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre, along with statutory solatium and interest. The acquiring body argued that …
The appellants, Rafiquebhai Ismailbhai Galar & ors., filed a first appeal (No. 3604 of 2014) against Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd & anr. The matter was listed as a critical old matter in the Gujarat High Court. When the case was called, the learned advocates for the appellants were not present to …
The appellant, Preeti, appealed against a decree of divorce granted in favour of her husband, Vijay Charansingh Prajapati. The matter was referred to the High Court Mediation Centre, where a settlement was reached and recorded in a mediation report. The settlement included a clause wherein the …
The appellants owned non‑agricultural residential land in Motipura, Himmatnagar, which was acquired for the Idar‑Vijapur bypass road. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.135 per square metre, which the Reference Court later increased by Rs.77.80 per square metre. Dissatisfied, …
The appellants owned non‑agricultural residential land in Motipura, Himmatnagar, which was acquired for the Idar‑Vijapur bypass road. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.135 per square metre, which the Reference Court later increased by Rs.77.80 per square metre. Dissatisfied, …
The appellant filed a first appeal (No. 1324 of 2007) against the respondents. During the hearing, the counsel for the appellant failed to remain present to assist the Court. The Court observed that no one had appeared to pursue the appeal for a long time, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing …
Vismay Rajnikant Patel filed a Letters Patent Appeal (No. 421 of 2026) along with two civil applications for interim relief and withdrawal of the matter. While the proceedings were pending, Patel secured admission to the Mechanical Engineering program at NIT Tiruchirappalli in the general category. …
The applicant, Prajapati Minaben Mohanbhai, filed an application seeking condonation of a 280‑day delay in preferring an appeal against Prajapati Mohanbhai Vajabhai. The court heard counsel for both parties and examined the reasons for the delay. It was held that the applicant had established …
The appeal challenged an interim visitation order dated 11‑09‑2024 passed by the Family Court, Vadodara, which required the mother to meet the child in Vadodara. The mother argued that the arrangement was impractical and amounted to a paper order given the husband’s conduct. The father submitted …
The appellant, Amritaben Kiritkumar Chinubhai Bhasvar, filed a first appeal (No. 3098 of 2026) along with a civil application for stay. The appellant, through counsel Ms. Medha N. Pandya, indicated that she would not pursue the appeal and instead sought the Court's permission to pursue a divorce …
The appellant, Pratham Sanjay Mahendru, filed a family suit seeking a declaration that his marriage was void under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court dismissed the suit, finding that the appellant had not produced a marriage registration, witnesses, or any proof that the marriage …
Lt. Col. Iqbal Bahadur Dutt, the original appellant, filed a condonation of delay application seeking to excuse a 1,655‑day lapse in filing a motion for review/recall of an order dated 30‑07‑2021 passed in First Appeal No. 694 of 2019. The Court noted that the order had already been unsuccessfully …
The appeal challenges a trial court order that struck out the appellant's counter‑claim for lack of territorial jurisdiction and dismissed his application for interim injunction, while also allowing the plaintiff's application to reject the counter‑claim. The parties are heirs disputing shares in …
Digvijay Cement Pvt Ltd filed a first appeal (No. 3112 of 2011) against Amrock Logistics & Trading Pvt Ltd in the Gujarat High Court. The appellant failed to appear before the Court despite being represented by counsel. The Court held that the appellant's non‑appearance amounted to a default. …
The appellants, grandparents, and the respondent, the mother, filed a first appeal and a civil application for stay concerning a dispute over the welfare of a child. Both parties appeared before the court and submitted sworn affidavits along with a notarized settlement agreement dated 17 July 2026. …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Raman Kantpal, a director of M/s. WLTPE, who was alleged to have orchestrated a large-scale GST fraud involving fake invoices and wrongful input tax credit …
The applicant, Ramakant Pal, a director of M/s WLTPE, was arrested in April 2026 for allegedly orchestrating a large-scale GST fraud by issuing fake invoices to claim input tax credit of Rs.63.21 crore, affecting 18 beneficiary companies. A complaint under Sections 32(1)(b), 31(c), 332(1)(i), 332(5) …
The Jetpur Navagadh Nagarpalika appealed against an order that granted a higher pay‑scale (Rs 5,000‑8,000) to Yakub Musabhai Dosani, a municipal employee, arguing that his predecessors obtained the same benefit only after approaching the Tribunal and that Dosani had not done so, and that the claim …
The applicant filed a condonation of delay application in a civil suit but failed to appear before the court as the advocate representing the applicant was absent. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the application. The judges reserved liberty to file a fresh application if …
The High Court of Gujarat heard a first appeal filed by Shipra Ocean Trade Pvt Ltd against Green Gold Timber Pvt Ltd. The appellant's counsel was unable to provide information regarding the status of the appellant company when questioned by the bench. In the absence of such instruction, the Court …
The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased, filed applications seeking condonation of delay—1288 days for filing the main First Appeal and 132 days for filing an application to bring legal heirs. The court noted that similar relief had previously been granted in related proceedings. After hearing …
The Municipal Commissioner of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation appealed against a Single Judge’s order directing it to incorporate yearly increments and re‑fix the pension of Sushilaben Pandya, who was appointed as Assistant Nursing Tutor on a fixed‑salary probationary basis with a pay‑protection …
Babul Harivadanbhai Parikh filed a divorce suit which was withdrawn and later re‑filed, but the case was re‑numbered and a notice was sent to his former address where he no longer resided. The Family Court, relying on a bailiff’s report, dismissed the suit for default and later rejected the …
The husband appealed a Family Court decree that granted him a divorce and ordered him to pay Rs.8,50,000 as permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, despite the wife not having requested such relief. The appellant argued that the Family Court failed to frame the issue of …
Bhanuben, the applicant, filed an application seeking condonation of an 11‑day delay in preferring a civil suit. The respondents opposed the condonation. The court examined the reasons provided by the applicant and found that sufficient cause was established for the delay. Consequently, the court …
The marriage between Dinaben Lucasbhai Macwana and Daudbhai Benarbhai Chauhan, solemnized in 1976, produced six children. The husband filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under Sections 10(1‑7) and 10(1‑9) of the Divorce Act, 1879 on grounds of desertion; the wife did not appear and an …
Lok Prakashan Ltd filed two first appeals under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, challenging an Appellate Tribunal order that had reversed a 2009 adjudicating authority decision. The appeals were listed as old matters and the appellant’s counsel withdrew, after which no …
Lok Prakashan Ltd filed two first appeals under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, challenging an Appellate Tribunal order that had reversed a 2009 adjudicating authority decision. The appeals were listed as old matters and the appellant’s counsel withdrew, after which no …
The wife (applicant) filed a condonation of delay application seeking permission to file an appeal 308 days after the prescribed period. The husband (respondent) indicated that he would pay the permanent alimony within a month. The court heard counsel for both sides and examined the reasons for the …
The appellants filed two first appeals under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging orders that dismissed their plaints under Order 7 Rule 11. Both appeals were listed as old matters and the appellants, despite being served notice after their counsel retired, failed to appear before the …
The appellants filed two first appeals under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging orders that dismissed their plaints under Order 7 Rule 11. Both appeals were listed as old matters and the appellants, despite being served notice after their counsel retired, failed to appear before the …
The appellant, Taraben Jigneshbhai Parmar, filed a first appeal (No. 5053 of 2023) against Jigneshbhai Punabhai Parmar. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel informed the Court that the parties had settled the dispute amicably and the appellant no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The …
The appellant husband appealed a Family Court order dismissing his petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. He claimed the wife had left the marital home without reasonable excuse after living together for seven years and having a child. The wife …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking leave to appeal a judgment and decree dated 17‑02‑2025 passed by the 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Gandhinagar, in Special Civil Suit No.9 of 2019. The judgment rejected the plaint on the ground that the original plaintiff had executed an …
The appellant, Tarunaben Miteshbhai Desai, filed a first appeal (No. 674 of 2022) seeking to join legal heirs to the suit. The respondent parties opposed the application. The Court examined whether the legal heir could be added as a party under the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code. It held …
Ketul S Shah & ors. filed a miscellaneous civil application for contempt against Chairman (Ms Ardra Agarwal) & ors. in the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the contempt application. The court examined whether it could allow the …
The petitioner, Alpesh Popatbhai Navadiya, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking recall of an earlier order. The application was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Manan A. Shah, did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. The court …
Parmeshbhai Havajivb... applied for successive regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under IPC Sections 394, 397 and 114. He had been in custody since 23‑April‑2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the alleged robbery, stating he was a mason …
The plaintiff filed a Special Civil Suit seeking specific performance of a contract concerning a disputed property. During the suit one defendant died, prompting the surviving defendant to apply for abatement of the suit, while the plaintiff applied to bring the deceased's legal heirs on record. The …
The appellant married the respondent in 2008 and, citing a customary practice of their Maisuriya Bhatia community, executed a notarized divorce deed in 2009. In 2025 the appellant filed a divorce suit in the Surat Family Court to obtain a judicial decree required for a US visa, but the court …
The appellant husband filed a divorce suit under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, but the Family Court dismissed it on the ground that it was filed within one year of marriage, violating Section 14. The trial court, however, proceeded to examine merits such as cruelty and …
The appellant filed a first appeal (No. 972/2022) against a judgment dated 27 July 2021 in Special Civil Suit No. 52 of 2020, where the trial judge had dismissed the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC. The appeal was admitted on 31 March 2022, but the appellant’s counsel withdrew and the …
The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted claimants an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kali Kuva Irrigation Pond Canal project. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was …
The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted claimants an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kali Kuva Irrigation Pond Canal project. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was …
The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted claimants an additional compensation of Rs 300 per square metre for land acquired for the Kali Kuva Irrigation Pond Canal project. The original award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer was …
The applicants, heirs of Ashok Manubhai Patel, filed a civil suit in 2020 for declaration, injunction, cancellation of a sale deed and specific performance, but the suit was dismissed because the advocate handling the case failed to pay the required court fees despite receiving full payment, leading …
Mas Financial Services Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, financed a vehicle that was hypothecated to it under a loan agreement with the original owner, Chandrasinh Jadeja. The vehicle was seized by police in a case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and later released to the purchaser, …
The wife appealed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against a Family Court judgment that dismissed her petition for annulment of marriage on the ground that the Hindu marriage ceremony of ‘Saptapadi’ was not performed, and directed a police complaint for alleged false statements. The …
The wife appealed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the Family Court's order of interim maintenance of Rs.4,000 and Rs.2,000 per month granted under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband had obtained a decree of divorce on 8 May 2025, and the court also …
The Suart Municipal Corporation filed a civil application for condonation of delay against New India Assurance Company Ltd. and others. The applicant, through counsel Ms Jirga Jhaveri, sought permission to withdraw the pending application and requested liberty to file a fresh application before an …
The appellant sought to challenge an order of enhanced maintenance passed by the Family Court. The respondent objected, invoking Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984, which bars appeals against maintenance orders under Chapter IX of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant counter‑claimed …
The husband filed a suit for dissolution of his marriage before the Family Court, Nadiad, which was dismissed by the Principal Judge. The husband appealed the dismissal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The wife was served notice but did not appear. The appellant’s counsel requested …
The appellant, Goswami Bhagwangiri Punjgiri, filed First Appeal No. 248 of 2016 against the respondents, Chavda Hemuji Badarji & Ors. The appeal was listed before a division bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ilesh J. Vora and Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. T. Vachhani. Counsel for the appellant (Mr. MJ Parikh, …
The husband appealed a judgment of the Family Court, Junagadh (Family Suit No.69 of 2013), which had dismissed his suit for a declaration of dissolution of marriage. The appeal was filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Both parties …
The original plaintiff appealed the dismissal of a suit for partition of family property and accounts of joint family firms. The appeal had earlier been dismissed for non‑prosecution, was restored, but the appellants again failed to pursue it. No counsel appeared for the parties when the matter was …
Krishnanben, daughter of Rambhai Jariya, filed a first appeal (No. 4304 of 2024) against Vijay Ranmalbai Garchar. The parties appeared before the Gujarat High Court, with counsel representing each side. The appellant requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The Court, per the common oral order dated …
In a criminal miscellaneous application for successive regular bail before the chargesheet, Sandip Bharatbhai Berawala sought an order directing the trial court to conclude the trial within two months, as the case was at the stage of recording the investigating officer's evidence. The applicant's …
The applicant, Radhikkumar Jayantibhai Dhameliya, filed a successive regular bail application under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after a charge sheet was filed for offences under Sections 61, 316(3), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody …
Vijaybhai R. Boriya applied for successive regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after a chargesheet was filed for alleged offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 111(3) of the BNS, 2023. He had been in custody since 7 May 2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the …
The applicant, Roshani @ Manisha Atulbhai Rajpur, filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit. The court heard counsel for the parties and examined the reasons provided for the delay. Finding that the applicant had established sufficient …
The petitioner filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in filing a civil suit. The court heard counsel for the parties and examined the reasons for the delay. It found that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for the lapse. Consequently, the court …
Jamniben Lalji Dhila filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit against Lalji Petha Dhila. The applicant argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay. The court heard counsel for the applicant and, after considering the averments, …
The applicant filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in filing a civil suit. The court heard counsel for both parties and examined the reasons for the delay. It was found that the applicant had established sufficient cause for the delay. Consequently, the …
The applicant, Vishal Bhai Raju Bhai Patani (Dantimar), filed an application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit. The respondent, Divya Ben, opposed the application. Both parties were represented before a two‑judge bench of the Gujarat High Court. After hearing the counsel, the …
Lata Ben Tulsibhai Patel (GOTI) filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a civil suit against Balubhai Nathubhai Patel and others. The respondents included several parties, some of whom were deceased, raising issues of representation by heirs. The applicant argued …
The petitioner, Ajay Anant Gaurav, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a suit. The respondent, Jagruti, opposed the application. The court examined the reasons for the delay presented by the petitioner. Finding that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for the …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a first appeal. The respondent highlighted that a related matter had already been granted condonation by the Coordinate Bench of the same court. After hearing both sides, the court found that the petitioners had …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a first appeal. The respondent highlighted that a related matter had already been granted condonation by the Coordinate Bench of the same court. After hearing both sides, the court found that the petitioners had …
The appellant, Nayanaben Bhupendrabhai, filed a first appeal against Bhupendrabhai Dhanrajbhai. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties reached an amicable settlement, and a settlement agreement was presented by the appellant's counsel. The court recorded the settlement agreement and …
The husband appealed a Family Court order that rejected his suit seeking a declaration that his marriage, registered on 13 June 2022 in Junagadh, be declared null and void. Both parties, now residing abroad (the husband in Canada and the wife in Cyprus), appeared virtually and submitted affidavits …
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 123‑day delay in preferring a criminal appeal. The High Court examined the application and the accompanying office note. Counsel for the applicant argued that sufficient cause existed for the delay. After hearing both sides, the Court found …
The appellant, a wife, filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of a 105‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Family Court decree of divorce dated 13‑05‑2025. The respondent argued that the delay was not due to genuine financial hardship, citing the …
The Family Court in Ahmedabad dismissed a suit filed by the wife seeking a declaration of marital status. The wife appealed to the Gujarat High Court under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 19 of the Family Court Act. During the hearing, both parties informed the Court that …
The appellant, Natvarji @Chako Dajuji Thakor, filed a bail appeal under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, seeking regular bail and the quashing of an order dated 10.04.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The …
Aarifbhai Akbarali Ravjani, accused under Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS after being in custody since 22 January 2026. The State opposed bail, arguing the nature of the offence and the applicant's …
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116‑B). The applicant was a labourer involved in loading and unloading prohibited …
The applicant, Hamir @Hamlo Arshibhai Chandravadiya, was arrested on 17‑12‑2025 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11185004251947 alleging offences under several sections of the BNS Act and Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, …
The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, filed a special criminal application seeking parole after the competent authority rejected his request. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion, the presence of other family members able to provide financial assistance, and concerns …
The petitioner, convicted to ten years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier application. The rejection was based on adverse police opinion, poor jail conduct, the seriousness of the offence, availability of family financial support, and concerns …
The petitioner, sentenced to 750 days of imprisonment, applied through the jail for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier application. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion, concerns about potential breach of peace, risk of absconding, and the presence of …
The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The authority's rejection was based on the presence of other family members who could provide financial assistance, concerns of breach of peace, risk of absconding, and …
The petitioner, Mangal Manjibhai Vaghela, sentenced to five years' imprisonment, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion and concerns of breach of peace and possible absconding. …
The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The authority's refusal was based on apprehensions of breach of peace and the possibility of the prisoner absconding. The court noted …
The petitioner, Rasikbhai Babubhai Vaghari, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier application. He claimed entitlement to parole on grounds set out in his application, but the authority cited the presence of other family …
The applicant, sentenced to three years' imprisonment, applied for parole leave after the competent authority rejected his request. The rejection was based on a negative police opinion, the presence of other family members who could provide financial assistance, and concerns about breach of peace …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed by Kuldeep under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the BNSS and Sections 66(c) and 66(d) of the Information …
The petitioner, Bahadursinh Amarsinh Rathod, filed an application for anticipatory bail before the High Court of Gujarat. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. …
The applicant, Imranbhai @Bandra, filed a regular bail application before the charge-sheet was filed. After the charge-sheet was lodged, the applicant's counsel, on instructions, chose not to press the bail application and instead sought the court's permission to file a fresh bail application before …
The petitioner, Habib @ Sufiyan Mohammadbhai Kalra, was arrested on 1 May 2026 in connection with an FIR alleging violations of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 2017, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He filed a regular bail application under …
The applicant, Ghanshyambhai Bhupatbhai Baraiya, was detained on 2 May 2026 in connection with an FIR registered at the Cyber Crime Police Station, Ahmedabad, alleging offences under Sections 319(2), 61(2)(a) and 54 of the B.N.S. and Sections 66(d) and 43(b) of the Information Technology Act. He …
Hemang Bhadreshbhai Pathak was arrested in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11203055250397 of 2025) for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and the B.N.S. Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming confinement since 30‑03‑2026 and asserting that he …
The applicant, Bhagirath Amrubahai Moya, was arrested on 13 May 2026 for allegedly receiving contraband liquor, charged under Sections 65(A), 65(e), 81 and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act. He filed an application for regular bail before the chargesheet under Section 483 of the BNSS. The State opposed …
Lakhman @ Gogo Rajabhai Galchar was arrested on 10 May 2026 for allegedly injuring a complainant with an iron rod, facing charges under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 238(a) and 3(5) of the BNSS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Rameshbhai Majethiya, a peon, was arrested on 9 March 2026 in connection with a case registered as C.R. No. 01 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 7(A), 12 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He filed an application for regular bail under Section …
The petitioner, Jayeshbhai Dalabhai Chauhan, was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No. I/170/2013 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 197, 465 and 468. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming he had been in custody since 4 December 2025 and that he did …
The petitioner, Rajeshnath @ Rajlo Babunath Madari, was arrested on 17 March 2026 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11216010260119 for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 54 of the BNSS. He applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after the charge‑sheet had been filed, claiming he …
The applicant, Salim Valibhai Khilji, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the B.N.S. after a charge-sheet was filed for offences including assault with a deadly weapon and other violent crimes. He was arrested on 30‑12‑2025 and alleged to have caused injuries to the victim with an …
Shaileshbhai Maganbhai Chauhan applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences alleged under Section 111(3) of the BNS and several provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. He had been in custody since 2 May 2026 and argued that he played no vital role and that no material …
The convict filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, by counsel Ms. Mayuri P. Chauhan. The State, represented by Mr. Ronak Raval, opposed the grant of parole. Justice Ilesh J. Vora examined the grounds …
Jay Pradipbhai Patel was arrested in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11192050260248 of 2026) for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. He applied for regular bail after the chargesheet was filed, invoking Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming he had been in custody …
Vicky Manubhai Thakor was arrested on 6 April 2026 in connection with a FIR (C.R. No. 11192050260248) alleging offences under Sections 8(c), 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The applicant filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, contending that he had been in custody since …
Vijaybhai Jitendrabhai alias Jetabhai Sindhal, accused No.2 in FIR C.R. No.11203030260304 registered at Keshod Police Station, was alleged to have been armed with an axe and charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. He applied for …
The petitioner, Tabrez Rojuddin Ansari, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The court examined his prior history of temporary bail, parole and furlough leaves, noting that he consistently surrendered on time and maintained good conduct in jail. Relying on these factors, the …
The applicant, Madhuvansinh Udesinh Solanki, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The applicant’s counsel later requested permission to withdraw the pending application. The Hon’ble Justice Ilesh J. Vora granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the …
The applicant, Digvijaysinh Narendrasinh Jhala, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the …
Bekakhan Pathan was arrested on 29 March 2026 in connection with a FIR (C.R. No. 11195019260384) alleging violations of Sections 65(A)(E), 116-B, 81, 83 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming he had no vital role in the …
Ajaybhai Hamirbhai Vala was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No.11203008260042 registered at Bilkha Police Station, Junagadh, for offences under Sections 65(e), 116B, 81 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming confinement …
The petitioner, Zebunben Jakirsha Shahamdar, was arrested on 6 March 2026 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11203025260100 alleging offences under Sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), 317(4), 317(5) and 54 of the BNSS. She contended that she merely mortgaged stolen ornaments and sold them, without taking …
The convict filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was presented through the jail, and the State was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. Justice Ilesh J. Vora examined the grounds raised by the convict and found no sufficient cause to grant parole. The court concluded …
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences under Sections 25(1)(a) and 25(1)(b) of the Arms Act, Section 281 of the BNS, and Sections 177 and 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The applicant claimed he had been in custody since 13‑04‑2026 and asserted he played no vital …
The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Application No. 9581 of 2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicants were already in police custody at the time of filing. The issue before the court was whether anticipatory bail could be granted when the applicant is …
Vashrambhai Ramjibhai Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11996006260457 alleging offences under Sections 140(3), 64(2)(m), 123, 351(3) and 54 of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior record and that custodial …
The petitioner, Sajidmiya Mehbubmiya Malek, filed a Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) No. 6738 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The application sought permission to be released on parole from custody. The respondent, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the …
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 17‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The respondent opposed the application. The court heard counsel for both sides and examined the reasons for the delay. It found that the applicant had established sufficient cause for the delay. …
The petitioner, Kishan Baldevbhai Ravad, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested on 26‑Nov‑2025 in connection with an FIR (CR No. 11192006250255 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64(2)(m), 87 and 137(2) of the BNSS and Sections 4, 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The alleged facts state that the accused had …
The applicant, Niraj, was arrested on 25 October 2025 in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11191024251306 alleging that he and his brother inflicted a knife blow on the victim Sanjay, offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 54 of the BNS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. He filed a …
The applicant, Vijaysinh @ Baso Pandar Kalubhai Gohil, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 98(2), 81 and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act. He had been in custody since 24 March 2026 and claimed he played …
The Gujarat High Court considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bombay Narcotic Substances Act by Munavar Khalid Mamji, who had been arrested on 02‑03‑2026 in connection with FIR C.R. No.11199012250439 of 2025 alleging theft. The charges invoked Sections 331(4), …
The applicant, Bhavinbhai Babubhai Amaliy ar, was in judicial custody since 8 February 2026 for an FIR (C.R. No.11821033260195) alleging offences under Section 107 of the BNS, 2023 relating to the suicide of a minor. The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, arguing that the …
The applicant, Sunny, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Mohammed K. Vohra, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Additional Public Prosecutor …
The applicant, Sirinbanu Mohammad Shaikh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail. The applicant waived service of the notice on behalf of the State. The Court, after considering the peculiar facts and circumstances, exercised its discretion and granted temporary bail for a …
The applicant, Afrojkhan Firojkhhan Pathan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Satyajit S. Sonagara and Ms. Nasimbanu Z. Pathan, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the bail application. The …
The applicant, Chunara Bharatbhai Punjabbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No.11191016260038 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The …
The petitioner, Roop Narayan Meena, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave after the competent authority rejected his earlier parole request. The authority’s rejection was based on negative police opinion, poor jail conduct, the seriousness of the offence, prior absconding, and …
The applicant, Karan @ D.K. Nagdanbhai Dav, was arrested on 16‑12‑2025 in connection with FIR C.R. No.11203030250977 for alleged offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. He filed a regular bail application under …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the BNSS by Mohammad Sajid, arrested on 5 May 2026 in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Section 325 of the BNSS, several provisions of the Animal Preservation Act, the Animal Cruelty Act and …
The accused, Chirag Jitendrakumar Agrawal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 54, relating to a commercial transaction of Rs.74,88,746. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The petitioner, Irfan Gulam Nabi Belim, was arrested on 29 January 2026 in connection with an alleged cow‑slaughter offence and charged under multiple provisions of the B.N.S., Gujarat Police Act, Gujarat Animal Preservation Act and the Animal Cruelty Act. He filed a regular bail application under …
Mahesh @ Katto Rajubhai Patani, the applicant, filed a temporary bail application before the High Court of Gujarat against the State of Gujarat and another respondent. The applicant appeared in person while the prosecution was represented by Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Niraj Sharma. The court …
Mustakin Yasinbhai Pipadwala filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave against the State of Gujarat and others. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, by counsel Mr. Aditya T. Pancholi. The principal issue was whether the applicant was entitled to …
The petitioner, Harshadkumar @Hasubhai Mahipatdan Mod (Gadhavi), filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was heard before Hon’ble Justice Ilesh J. Vora of the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Avanidhar M. Thakore, withdrew the petition during the …
The High Court considered a successive regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in a case involving alleged possession of a commercial quantity of opium under Sections 8(c), 18(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act. Earlier bail applications by the applicant were rejected, while …
The petitioner, Sangram Rakesh Singh Sikarvar, filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw the petition after the bail applications were withdrawn. The petitioner requested liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. The Court considered whether it could allow such …
Upesh @ Kano Shantibhai Sarvaiya was preventively detained on 24-04-2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" based on two pending IPC cases. He challenged the order, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not …
Hiren, a bootlegger, was preventively detained on 24‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act (sections 65(E), 116(B), 81) pertained only to law and order, not public order as …
Dharmendra @ Lalo Sampatsinh Chauhan was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the order, arguing that his alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS affect only law and order, not public order. The …
Palkesh @ Palli Kishanchand Dhamecha was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and the BNS …
Girish @ Giri Sevakram Pahelwani was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS pertained only to law and order, not to public …
Vikramsinh Diwansinh was preventively detained on 25‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS did not affect public order, only law and order. The State …
Arjunbhai Bhimabhai Bharai was preventively detained on 24‑04‑2026 by the District Magistrate, Rajkot, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act pertained only to law and …
The petitioner, Raish @Pandu, challenged his preventive detention order dated 13/04/2026 issued under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that he was not a "dangerous person" as defined by the Act. The petitioner argued that the alleged offences related only to …
Rahul Bablu was preventively detained on 15 April 2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences (under IPC sections 304(2) and 54) pertained only to law …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 20‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order. The State …
Subhanbhai Movar was preventively detained on 20‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that the alleged offences, including bootlegging, pertained only to law and order and did not affect …
Imran GafurBhai Malani was preventively detained on 20‑04‑2026 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 18/04/2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by Section 3(4) …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 29‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences related only to law and order and did not affect public order as required by Section 3(4) of …
The petitioner, Sagar @ Mali, was preventively detained on 18‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences related only to law and order and did not affect public order …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 18‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He challenged the order, arguing that the alleged offences – bootlegging and a few assaults for which he had obtained bail – did not affect public order. …
The petitioner was detained on 16‑04‑2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention order, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order and not to public order as required by Section 3(4). …
Ilaben Hiteshbhai Dineshbhai was preventively detained on 22 April 2026 as a “dangerous person” under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public …
Amit Dineshbhai Sudhwani was preventively detained on 28‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order, not public order, as required by Section 3(4) of the Act. …
The petitioner, a self‑identified bootlegger, was preventively detained on 11 March 2026 by the District Magistrate under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect …
Ashrafkhan @ Bapu Ajijakhan Usmankhan Pathan was detained on 29‑04‑2026 as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences for which he was booked pertained only to law and order and did not …
Kanabhai Laxmanbhai Gami was preventively detained on 2 April 2026 by the District Magistrate under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that his bootlegging activities threatened public order. He filed a petition challenging the legality of the detention, …
The petitioner, a bootlegger, was preventively detained on 6 April 2026 by the District Magistrate, Botad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He filed a petition challenging the legality of the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and …
Vijaybhai Ravubhai Boricha was preventively detained on 15 April 2026 by the District Magistrate, Botad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences relate only to law and order, not public order as …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 29 April 2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a “dangerous person”. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences listed against him—various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …
The petitioner, Darsak @ Bogho Ravindrabhai Wadkar, was preventively detained on 18‑04‑2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention, arguing that the cited offences under the Indian Penal Code pertained only to law and …
Vijaybhai @Faglo Pabjibhai Dantani was preventively detained on 18 April 2026 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detention was based on three criminal cases (Sections 303(2) and 54) for …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 21‑04‑2026 under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order and not to the "public order" …
Mahesh was preventively detained on 29‑04‑2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences pertained only to law and order and did not affect public order as required …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 30‑04‑2026 by the Vadodara Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention, arguing that the offences for which he was booked pertained only to law …
The petitioner, a bootlegger, was preventively detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 on 13 April 2026 (detention effected on 30 April 2026). He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences relate only to law and order and do not affect public order …
The petitioner, Naresh Madanlal Ghishaji Chauhan, was preventively detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 on the ground that he was a bootlegger whose activities allegedly threatened public order. He challenged the detention order, arguing that the alleged …
