Created by Fuzzy Cloud

IRSHAD ALI

28 judgments · newest first · showing 1–28

JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. EDU. AND OTHERS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Jai Prakash, filed Writ A No. 5200 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the standing counsel for the State was present. The Court observed that the …

DEO RAJ SINGHversusDISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS DISTT. FAIZABAD AND 2 ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Petitioner Deo Raj Singh filed Writ Petition (A) No. 6134 of 2001 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the District Inspector of Schools, Faizabad and two others. The petition was listed before the Bench of Hon'ble Justice Rajan Roy. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner …

CHHOTEY LAL JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH ITS SECY. BASIC EDUCATION CIVIL SECTT

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Petitioner Chhotey Lal Jaiswal filed Writ A No. 3498 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through its Secretary, Basic Education Civil Section. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ. The Court …

RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLAversusDIRECTOR OF EDUCATION U.P.AT ALLAHABAD AND 2 ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Rakesh Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition (No. 1476 of 2005) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging the Director of Education, U.P., and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the …

DHANI RAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.THRU.THE PRIN SECY P.W.D. CIVIL SECTT.LKO and ORS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Dhani Ram Yadav, filed Writ Petition No. 7670 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing, and no request for adjournment was made. The …

VISHWANATH PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. THORUGH SECY. SECONDARY EDU.LUCKNOW AND ORS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Vishwanath Patel filed a writ petition (WRIT‑A No. 4665 of 2011) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted an illness slip, but the court had repeatedly ordered that the case should not be further adjourned. Since the petition, originally filed in 2011, …

SHARDENDU SHUKLAversusKING GEORGE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW THROUGH REGISTRAR

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Shardendu Shukla filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 7463 of 2004) against King George Medical University, Lucknow. The petition was listed as an oldest case but the petitioner failed to appear even after a revised call. The respondent’s counsel and the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State …

AWDHESH KUMAR PANDEYversusTHE U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. THRU CHAIRMAN and 3 ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

The petitioner, Awdhesh Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition against the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, with counsel Pt S Chandra and N.N. Jaiswal representing him, while the respondent was represented by Sandeep Dixit and Sudeep Dixit. The bench, …

SHAILENDRA KUMAR ATTversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION and 3 ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Shailendra Kumar, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 6786 of 2006) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the standing counsel for the respondent was the only party present. The court …

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. DEPTT. LKO. and O

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Petitioner Vijay Singh filed Writ Petition (A) No. 7661 of 2012 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Basic Education Department, Lucknow. The petition was listed before Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Srivastava. No counsel …

ARVIND KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P.THR.SECY.OF BASIC EDUCATION SACHIVALAY and OTHERS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Arvind Kumar Verma filed Writ Petition (A) No. 1727 of 2013 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition was to be heard before a bench headed by Hon'ble Justice Rajnish Kumar. No representative of the petitioner appeared to press the petition, and no request for adjournment was …

IQBAL AHMADversusSHRI SWARNA SINGH AND OTHERS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Iqbal Ahmad filed a writ petition (WRIT C No. 1002920 of 2001) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent's counsel, including the Additional CSC for the State, was present. The court observed that the petitioner had not …

SHEO BUX SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. SECRETARY REVENUE

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Petitioner Sheo Bux Singh filed a writ petition (C No. 3000056 of 2000) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The petition remained unattended as the petitioner's counsel did not appear and no request for adjournment was made. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. …

KRISHNA GOPAL AND 2 ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECY. HEALTH CIVIL SECTT. LKO.AND

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioners, Krishna Gopal and two others, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 2015 of 2003) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, and the case list was subsequently revised. The Court observed that the petition …

SMT.GYANWATIversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL FAIZABAD

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Smt. Gyanwati filed a writ petition against the Additional Commissioner Judicial, Faizabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition, although the learned Standing Counsel was present. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the writ …

ANKIT OBJECTION FILEDversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. BASIC EDUCATION and 4 ORS.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioner, Ankit, filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 140 of 2008) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner’s counsel, H.G.S. Parihar, was absent on the hearing date, while the respondent’s counsel appeared. The court …

AMAN ULLAHversusSTATE OF U.P THRU PRIN SECY HOME LKO and ORS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The writ petition (WRIT-C No. 22877 of 2016) filed by Aman Ullah against the State of Uttar Pradesh was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and there was no request for adjournment or any other relief. The court noted the …

AVINASH MISRAversusTHE STATE OF U.P.THROUGH THE SECY EDUCATION MADHYAMIK

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Avinash Misra filed Writ Petition No. 6628 of 2004 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Secretary of Education. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing while the respondent's counsel was present. The court observed that the petition had become …

NISHAR AHMAD KHAN and 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.THRU COLLECTOR SHRAVASTI and 2 OTHERS

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The petitioners filed a writ petition (WRIT‑C No. 3000096 of 2002) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, while the respondents’ counsel were present. The court noted the absence of …

AJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY EDUATION AND 6 ORS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Ajay Kumar Singh filed Writ Petition (A) No. 1828 of 2005 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court noted that the list of cases was being revised …

SHATROHAN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU COLLECTOR SITAPUR AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners, Shatrohan and others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but later the list was revised and no further date was assigned to the petitioners. No progress was made in prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition …

UDAL L.R./ACTversusKRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

The petitioner, Udal L.R./Act, filed a writ petition against Krishan Kumar and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, that …

SUCHA SINGH AND OTHERSversusPRESCRIBED AUTHORITY KHERI AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners filed a writ petition (C No. 3000056 of 1999) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. Counsel for the petitioners reported that despite extensive efforts, the petitioners could not be contacted. Consequently, the petitioners' counsel requested that the writ petition be …

RAM BRIKSHA OBJECTION FILEDversusCOLLECTOR GONDA AND OTHERS

Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Ram Briksha filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the Collector, Gonda and others. The petition was listed but no further steps were taken to prosecute the case. The court noted the absence of any prosecution by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of …

JAMUNA PRASADversusADDL.COMMISSIONER DEVI PATAN GONDA AND OTHERS

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No hearing was conducted and the petitioners failed to prosecute the case. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any interim order that may have been in force. No …