Created by Fuzzy Cloud

JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

179 judgments · newest first · showing 1–179

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSHRI NANA SHRAVAN KADALI and ORS.

Allowed To be withdrawn

The State of Maharashtra appealed a determination of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) concerning compensation awarded to the respondents. The appellate court noted that the difference between the amount awarded by the SLAO and the amount awarded by the Reference Court was less than four …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSMT. GIRIJABAI VALU RANMAL

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against the legal heirs of the deceased Girjabai Valu Ranmal concerning a land acquisition matter. The dispute involved a modest sum of Rs.5,999. The High Court examined whether the appeal was maintainable given …

GIRIJABAI WALU RANMALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellants, a group of landowners, appealed against the State of Maharashtra challenging the Reference Court's failure to direct interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on amounts awarded under Sections 23(1A) and 23(2). The High Court noted that while interest was directed …

BHIKA PUNJA MALI (DECD.) BY LRS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellants, a group of landowners, appealed against the State of Maharashtra challenging the Reference Court's failure to direct interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on amounts awarded under Sections 23(1A) and 23(2). The High Court noted that while interest was directed …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBALU GOVIND BUTTE

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against Balu Govind Butte concerning a land acquisition matter involving a sum of Rs.1,06,000. The appellant sought relief, but the Court observed that the quantum of the dispute was modest. Consequently, the Court …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusVISHNU M. ZAPADE

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed a decision involving a sum of Rs.1,00,149 against Vishnu Maruti Zapade. The Court found that the amount in dispute was too small to warrant a full appeal and dismissed the appeal on the ground of quantum. The Court directed the Registry to accept the respondent's …

THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRAversusKANA BHURYA GAVAND AND OTHRS

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against Kana Bhurya Gavand and others concerning a dispute involving a bank guarantee, with the amount in controversy being Rs.1,57,494. The High Court examined whether the appeal was maintainable given the modest quantum. It held that the appeal could not be …

SUPDU TULSHIRAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Supdu Tulshiram Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra challenging the Reference Court's failure to award interest under Section 28 on the compensation awarded under Sections 23(1A) and 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court noted that a similar issue had arisen in Ambadas …

UNION OF INDIA and ANR.versusHEMANGI SATISH GUMASTE and ORS.

Disposed Off

On 23 June 1992 a military wagon collided with the scooter of the deceased, Satish Gumaste, who later died. The claimants – his parents, widow and daughter – sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 6,28,860 with 9% interest, denying …

SMT. MALATI KESHAV PAWAR AND ORS.versusMR. KARMELIN FRANCIS DESOUZA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay was Civil Application No.179 of 2020, arising out of First Appeal No.14566 of 2019. The applicant was required to furnish copies of documents within a time limit prescribed by the Registrar's order dated 08/03/2022. The applicant failed to …

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.versusVANITA SATYANARAYAN CHEDOOP AND ANR.

Allowed To be withdrawn

National Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal against a decree in favor of Vanita Satyanarayan Chedoop & Anr. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Ramesh Cheulkar, filed a written request to withdraw the appeal. The Court accepted the withdrawal, ordered a refund of court fees, and directed …

KARAM HUSSAIN SHAIKH AND ORS.versusJAIN DALCHAND TEJPAL AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellants, original claimants in a motor accident case, sought enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, from Rs.1,44,000 to a higher amount. The Tribunal had used a notional monthly income of Rs.2,500 and a 1/2 deduction for personal expenses, but …

KARAM HUSSAIN SHAIKH AND ORS.versusJAIN DALCHAND TEJPAL AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellants, original claimants in a motor accident case, sought enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, from Rs.1,44,000 to a higher amount. The Tribunal had used a notional monthly income of Rs.2,500 and a 1/2 deduction for personal expenses, but …

THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusCHANDRASHEKHAR SHRIPAD JOSHI AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application before the High Court of Bombay against Chandrashekhar Shripad Joshi and others. The matter was listed before Justice Shivkumar Dige. The court heard counsel for the applicant. It issued notice to the respondents, directing them to appear …

SUNITA SOPAN GAIKWAD AND ORS.versusPENOSH SERVICES/TRANSPORT AND ORS

Dismissed

The appellants, Sunita Sopan Gaikwad & Ors., filed an appeal against Penosh Services/Transport & Ors. but failed to appear despite a court notice. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution of the appeal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Any interim relief that …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDAMU KERU SHINDE and ORS.

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed a compensation award in a land acquisition matter where the Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs.960, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs.4,900. The appellant argued that the difference of Rs.3,940 was insufficient to warrant appellate adjudication. …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDADA E. RANDHAVAN

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed a land acquisition award where the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed compensation at Rs.1,840, which the Reference Court later enhanced to Rs.5,865, creating a difference of Rs.4,025. The High Court observed that the quantum involved was trivial and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAYBHAN R. GORADE

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order of the Reference Court dated 19 December 2000 concerning a land acquisition award. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially awarded Rs. 3,360, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs. 22,386, a difference of Rs. 19,026. The appellant …

PUNDALIK MAHADU GHUGE. and ANR .versusTHE STATE OF MAH. and ANR .

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay dealt with a group of appeals and cross‑objections concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 1990 and 1991. Both the claimants and the State agreed that the matter was governed by the Division Bench decision in State of Maharashtra …

PUNDLIK MAHADU GHUGE and ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court dealt with a series of appeals and cross‑objections concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 1990 and 1991. Both the claimants and the State agreed that the matter should be decided in line with the Division Bench’s earlier order in State …

SHRI TRIMBAK KHANDU SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay dealt with a group of appeals and cross‑objections filed by various claimants and the State of Maharashtra concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 4 January 1990 and 7 March 1991. Both parties agreed that the matter was governed …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPUNDALIK MAHADU GHUGE and ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay dealt with a group of appeals and cross‑objections concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 1990 and 1991. Both the State of Maharashtra and the claimants agreed that the matter was governed by the Division Bench decision in State …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBHIMA BHIKA WAGH and ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay dealt with a group of appeals and cross‑objections concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 1990 and 1991. Both the claimants and the State agreed that the matter was governed by the Division Bench decision in State of Maharashtra …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSMT. KUMUBAI JAGANNATH MAHALE and ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay dealt with a group of appeals and cross‑objections filed by various claimants and the State of Maharashtra concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 4 January 1990 and 7 March 1991. Both parties agreed that the matter was governed …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBALU MAHADU KORHALE

Disposed Off

The High Court dealt with a series of appeals and cross‑objections concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 1990 and 1991. Both the claimants and the State agreed that the matter should be decided in line with the Division Bench’s earlier order in State …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusTRIMBAK KHANDU SONAWANE

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay dealt with a group of appeals and cross‑objections filed by various claimants and the State of Maharashtra concerning the valuation of land acquired for the Punegaon Dam under notifications of 4 January 1990 and 7 March 1991. Both parties agreed that the matter was governed …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusMR.NARAYAN MARUTI BHAGAT and ORS.

Allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed a decree awarded to Mr. Narayan Maruti Bhagat, filing the appeal within four times the original amount. The State sought leave to withdraw the appeal under Notifications dated 3 November 2016, 11 May 2018 and 13 August 2018. The Court granted the leave, ordered the …

MADHUKAR GANPAT GHODINDEversusTHE SPL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Disposed Off

The appellants, heirs of the deceased original claimant, appealed for a higher compensation for land acquired in Karanjade village, Raigad, under a 1970 notification. The Reference Court had awarded Rs.18 per square meter, but a later decision in Yashwant Changu Bhagat v. State of Maharashtra set …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusGOVIND BHAU ZANKAR

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed several appeals (Nos. 550, 551, 553, 571, 554 of 2000) against various respondents, while the original claimant filed cross‑objections concerning interest on solatium. The Court held that the State appeals involved only a meager quantum and therefore dismissed them …

SMT. TEJASHREE RAJENDRA KATHE AND ORSversusSHRI VIKAS MARCUS SAWANT AND ORS

Allowed

The appellants filed a first appeal in the Bombay High Court, which was admitted in September 2012. An interim application was filed seeking deletion of Appellant No.5, which the court allowed, dispensing with reverification. The parties subsequently reached a settlement and submitted consent terms, …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDEVAKIBAI SHANTARAM MHATRE AND ORS.

Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 27‑31) challenging judgments against various respondents. The State sought condonation of delay in filing the appeals, citing reasons detailed in the applications. The High Court, after considering the applications, granted condonation of …

WILO MATHER AND PLATT PUMPS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusFORBES AND COMPANY LIMITED

Allowed

The applicants filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of Commercial Suit No. 169 of 2024, pending before the City Civil Court, to the Bombay High Court and to tag it with Commercial Suit No. 232 of 2016, already pending before the High Court. Both parties consented that the subject …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.versusSUNITA ANIL POL AND ORS.

Dismissed

An application was filed seeking restoration of an appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove an objection. The appeal concerned an order passed under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The applicant argued that the delay in filing the restoration application should be condoned. …

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.versusROHIT UDAYRAJ PAL AND ANR.

Dismissed

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. appealed a Tribunal order that awarded Rs.17,22,426 plus interest to Rohit Udayraj Pal & Anr. for injuries sustained in a motor accident. The insurer argued that the driver’s lack of a valid licence breached the policy and that the Tribunal should not award …

SHRI. MICHAEL THOMAS GRACIOUSversusSHRI. ASHISH ASHOK SUTAR

Dismissed

The appellant, Michael Thomas Gracious, was ordered on 1 July 2024 to deposit 75% of a sum, but failed to comply despite repeated follow‑up by counsel. The appellant did not provide any instructions to his counsel, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court observed this …

SHRI. MICHAEL THOMAS GRACIOUSversusSHRI. ASHISH ASHOK SUTAR

Dismissed

The appellant, Michael Thomas Gracious, was ordered on 1 July 2024 to deposit 75% of a sum, but failed to comply despite repeated follow‑up by counsel. The appellant did not provide any instructions to his counsel, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court observed this …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusMR. SANDEEP VINAY DIXIT AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application seeking a stay of the order dated 16 September 2015 passed against it. The applicant contended that the decretal amount had been deposited, warranting a stay of the impugned order until the appeal is finally decided. The court examined the …

MR. SATISH CHANDRA ASHWIN PANDEY AND ORS.versusK.R. CONSTRUCTION AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants/appellants, Saeed Ali and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing their appeal against K. R. Construction & Anr. The court noted that the appeal had been filed beyond the prescribed period. The applicants submitted reasons for the delay as recorded in …

PANDURANG NARAYAN TAPKIRversusM/S BALASAHEB BABANRAO SHIRKE

Disposed Off

The petitioners Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Pandurang Narayan Tapkir filed arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator and the deletion of certain respondents. The respondents argued that the partnership firm had …

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE OC. LTD.versusSMT. PURNIMA PRASHANT HAZRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The applicant, Tata AIG General Insurance, filed an appeal 16 days beyond the prescribed period. A civil application was filed seeking condonation of the delay. The High Court examined whether the delay could be condoned under procedural law. Relying on the reasons set out in the application, the …

ASHOK J. ARORA AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicants, Ashok J. Arora and others, had filed First Appeal No.1543 of 2019 against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appeal was dismissed by the High Court for non‑prosecution, i.e., failure to pursue the proceedings. The appellants filed Interim Application No.9610 of 2025 …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusSUSHEELA JANAKRAO TAMADA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pune, challenging the inclusion of a Rs.17 lakh ex gratia amount and the use of the deceased's last drawn salary rather than the average income of the preceding three years. The Court held that, …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusMR GANPAT HARIBHAU JADHAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 326 of 2016) against Ganpat Haribhau Jadhav & Ors. The appellant sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted the leave, ordered that the statutory deposit of Rs.25,000 be transferred to the concerned Motor …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusMR GANPAT HARIBHAU JADHAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 326 of 2016) against Ganpat Haribhau Jadhav & Ors. The appellant sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted the leave, ordered that the statutory deposit of Rs.25,000 be transferred to the concerned Motor …

MR. RAJIYA TAHIR KURESHI AND ORSversusSHRI SANJAY APPASAHEB SWAMI AND ORS

Dismissed

The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 536‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order dated 2 March 2012. They claimed the delay was due to awaiting receipt of the awarded sum and attending to the ailing health of respondent No.4, which …

BHAGYASHREE VIJAY JADHAV AND ORSversusMUKESH M. WARUDKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellants, the family of an engineer who died in a road accident on 6 December 2009, appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs 39,70,000. The Tribunal had calculated compensation based on the deceased’s monthly salary of Rs 33,000, deducted one‑third for personal …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDHARMENDRA SHYAMLAL GUPTA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.86,000 to the claimant, a vegetable vendor who was injured in a 2005 road accident while transporting his own goods. The insurer argued that the claimant was a gratuitous passenger and thus ineligible …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusSHRI NARESH MANDAL..

Disposed Off

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application seeking relief against an order affecting its claim. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Himanshu Takke, submitted that the insurance company had already deposited the decree amount with the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The court accepted this …

SHRI IQBAL EBRAHIMversusMR. SANJAY JAIN AND ORS

Disposed Off

The plaintiff filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 60‑day delay in filing a first appeal against a judgment dated 22‑Oct‑2012. The application was heard before Justice K.K. Tated. The court ordered that the application be returned after 12 weeks, allowing the plaintiff to serve the …

NAITONAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusPARUL RAGHU RAJ GANIGA AND ORS

Dismissed

The National Insurance Co. appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order awarding Rs.9,97,500 plus interest to the claimants. The insurer challenged the award on the ground that the deceased’s name was inconsistently recorded in the FIR as “Raghu Raj Shetty” versus “Raghu Raj Ganiga Mahalinga” in …

NAITONAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusPARUL RAGHU RAJ GANIGA AND ORS

Dismissed

The National Insurance Co. appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order that awarded Rs.9,97,500 plus interest to the claimants. The insurer challenged the award on the ground that the deceased’s name was inconsistently recorded in the FIR as “Raghu Raj Shetty” versus “Raghu Raj Ganiga Mahalinga” …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusTHUMMALA PALLI KAVITA and ORS

Disposed Off

The case arose from a fatal road accident on 25 August 2000 in which a Tata Sumo vehicle, being used on a hire basis, collided with a truck, killing Mr. Thummala Palli Ravi, an employee of Ispat Industries. The dependents of the deceased filed a claim for compensation before the Motor Accident …

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusM/S. DESIGN MULTIPLES AND ANR.

Dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed a group of civil applications seeking condonation of an eight‑year delay in filing an appeal against a 2009 City Civil Court order that had upheld a demolition notice under section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The corporation …

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusMR. PANKAJ MEHTA AND ORS.

Dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed a group of civil applications seeking condonation of an eight‑year delay in filing an appeal against a 2009 City Civil Court order that had upheld a demolition notice under section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The corporation …

KATHIRVEL ELYAPANNADIversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY

Dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay appealed a City Civil Court order that held a demolition notice issued under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, to be illegal and allowed the plaintiff to reconstruct the demolished premises at his own cost. After the …

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMRS. ARMIN BOMI KANDWALA AND ORS.

Allowed To be withdrawn

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (No. 1631 of 2016) before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against Nilam and other respondents. The appeal was listed before Justice Shivkumar Dige and counsel for both sides appeared. Mr. Rajesh Kanojia represented the appellant, while …

SUMAN SIYARAM PARIKversusDIGUMBAR LAXMAN TAWARE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) order that rejected a claim under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on the ground that the deceased was at fault. The Supreme Court’s decision in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunil Kumar (2019) clarified that …

SMT.RUKMINI DATTA SHINDE AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA THR.GENERAL MANAGER,

Allowed

The appellant, Smt. Rukmini Datta Shinde and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 93‑day delay in filing their appeal (First Appeal (ST) No.19925 of 2017) against the Union of India. The Court, after considering the reasons provided, granted the condonation of delay and ordered …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. DHOBUNI SANTOSH NAYAK AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The New India Assurance Co. appealed against an order of the Commissioner who had awarded interest against the insurer contrary to the policy terms and had held that a sub‑contractor employee was entitled to compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The appellant sought to stay the …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. DHOBUNI SANTOSH NAYAK AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The New India Assurance Co. appealed against an order of the Commissioner who had awarded interest against the insurer contrary to the policy terms and had held that a sub‑contractor employee was entitled to compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The appellant sought to stay the …

SMT. MADHURI SANDIP PATIL AND ORS.versusSHRI. PAGARE VIJAY CHHABU AND ORS.

Dismissed

The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring an appeal. No counsel appeared on the scheduled date of 14.08.2019, and the matter was adjourned. The applicant again failed to appear on the subsequent date. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MUMBAI AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant filed Civil Applications No.822 of 2018 and No.823 of 2018 in First Appeal No.28700 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court. The court observed that Respondent No.4 had not been served with the proceedings. It directed that the appellant be given four weeks, excluding the Diwali vacation …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF BOMBAY AND ORS.

Allowed

The State Bank of India (SBI) filed a civil application before the High Court of Bombay seeking condonation of a 35‑day delay in filing an appeal against a City Civil Court order dated 27 April 2015, which held SBI jointly liable to pay Rs 307,736 with 10% interest. The High Court examined whether …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MUMBAI AND ORS

Disposed Off

The State Bank of India, as original defendant No.3, filed a civil application seeking a stay of a decree dated 23 December 2016 that made defendants 1 to 3 jointly and severally liable to pay approximately Rs. 9 lakh with interest. In the earlier appeal, defendants 1 and 2 had already deposited the …

PRAKASH RAGHUNATH SHENAIversusMR. M RAMCHANDRA RAJU

Disposed Off

In an interim application filed in First Appeal No. 397 of 2025, the appellant Prakash R. Shenai sought to amend the cause title because the original appellant, Ms. Prabha Shenai, died on 15 October 2025. The amendment proposed to substitute the deceased appellant’s husband, Mr. Prakash Shenai, as …

PRAKASH RAGHUNATH SHENAIversusM/S. PUNJ LIOYD TLD.

Disposed Off

The appellant, Prakash R. Shenai, filed an interim application seeking to amend the cause title of First Appeal No. 22 of 2016 because the original appellant, the deceased Ms. Prabha Shenai, had expired on 15 October 2025. The amendment sought to replace the deceased appellant’s name with that of …

DR. AMOL D. WAJEversusTHE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant, a vehicle owner, appealed an order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation which held that United India Insurance Co. was not liable because the insurance policy cited (No.162300/31/28/01/0001/624) was not produced. The appellant later sought to introduce that policy as …

DR. AMOL D. WAJEversusTHE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant, a vehicle owner, appealed the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation’s order that exonerated the insurance company on the ground that the relevant insurance policy was not produced. The appellant filed an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CPC to introduce the missing policy …

DR. AMOL D. WAJEversusTHE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant, a vehicle owner, appealed an order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation which had held that United India Insurance Co. was not liable because the insurance policy cited (No. 162300/31/28/01/0001/624) was not produced. The appellant later filed an application under Order 41 …

BABURAM SHIVMURAT YADAVversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR.MUMBAI

Disposed Off

The appellant, Baburam Shivmurat Yadav, constructed a commercial building of approximately 2,850 sq. ft. in Kandivali without obtaining the requisite municipal approvals. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 on 24 …

MR. BALARAM SHANKAR KARBHARI AND ORS.versusMR. SAGARMAL CHOGMAL JAIN AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellants filed a first appeal and a civil application in the High Court of Bombay. No counsel or parties appeared for the appellants on the scheduled hearing date of 13 February 2026, and the same situation persisted on the next date. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the appeal and …

MUMBAI CRICKET ASSOCIATIONversusBRIHAN MUMBAI MAHANAGAR PALIKA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The Mumbai Cricket Association appealed against a dismissal by the Small Causes Court of its challenge to various taxes and cesses levied in a property tax bill for FY 2011-12. The appellant argued that General Tax, Education Cess, Street Tax, Sewerage Tax, State Education Cess and Employment …

MUMBAI CRICKET ASSOCIATIONversusBRIHAN MUMBAI MAHANAGAR PALIKA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The Mumbai Cricket Association appealed against the Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika regarding the determination of the rateable value for a specific year. Both parties concurred that the decision rendered in First Appeal No. 247 of 2018 should also govern the present appeals, namely First Appeals …

THE NEW INDIA ASURANCE CO.LTDversusSHRI SAMEER MAJID SHAIKH

Disposed Off

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, alleging two substantial questions of law: (a) whether the Labour Commissioner was justified in finding the driver’s licence genuine, and (b) whether the Commissioner was justified in awarding 100% loss of …

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR. BOMBAYversusBANK OF BARODA

Disposed Off

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay appealed a Small Causes Court order that had set aside an earlier determination of a property's rateable value of Rs.2,88,180 per annum effective from 1 April 2002. The Small Causes Court held that the original order was based on circulars issued by the …

CENTRUM CAPITAL LTD.versusSHRI. MADAN JHAMAND BABANI

Disposed Off

The applicant, Centrum Capital Ltd., filed a civil application seeking a stay of the September 21, 2017 order that decreed a suit and directed original defendant No.3 to pay Rs.22,11,114 with interest. The applicant claimed that, through execution proceedings, it had already received Rs.49,02,450, …

DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER PversusIndira Kirtising Rawal

Allowed

The Divisional Railway Manager (P) filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order of the Labour Commissioner under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The appellant argued that the delay was justified and that the objections raised were not removed. The …

SMT. RAMABAI YESHWANT NAVALKAR -DECEASED- THROUGH LRS.1- SHRI.VISHWAS YESHWANT NAVALKAR AND ORS.versusSHRI. PRABHAKAR JAYWANT DADARKAR-DECEASED-THROUGH HIS LRS. SMT.USHA PRABHAKAR DADARKAR ORS.

Allowed

An interim application was filed seeking donation of a delayed cause. The applicant, represented by LRs Vishwas Y. Navalkar and others, requested the court to consider the matter despite the delay. Respondent No.4, Chandraprabha P. Damani, opposed the application, while other respondents (Nos. 4A, …

MR.SHAMIM AKHATAR SIRAJUDDIN AND ORS.versusMR.HAFIZUR REHMAN K SHIAKH AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellants sought a stay of the judgment and decree dated 02‑02‑2018 that awarded possession of a suit property to the plaintiff. An ad‑interim stay had been extended only up to January 2019, after which the defendants continued to occupy the property, which had been earmarked for redevelopment …

MR. KAIZAR TAHER MITHAIWALLAversusMR. VIVEK BANARSIDAS GULATI AND ANR.

Dismissed

Kaizar Taher Mithaiwalla filed a first appeal (ST) No. 32645 of 2015 against Vivek Banarsidas Gulati and another respondent in the Bombay High Court. The appellant failed to appear before the court on 5 February 2026, and again on the scheduled date of 12 February 2026. The court noted the continued …

MR. KAIZAR TAHER MITHAIWALLAversusMR. VIVEK BANARSIDAS GULATI AND ANR.

Dismissed

Kaizar Taher Mithaiwalla filed a first appeal (ST No.32645 of 2015) before the High Court of Bombay against Vivek Banarsidas Gulati & Anr. No party appeared on 5 February 2026, and the matter was listed for dismissal. The same situation persisted on 12 February 2026, when the court again noted the …

LOKESH SOKHELAL SENversusMUNILAL SADHULAL RAWAT @ ADIVASI AND ORS.

Dismissed

The appellant, Lokesh Sokhelal Sen, filed an interim application in a first appeal. No counsel appeared for the appellant on the scheduled dates of 29 January 2026 and 6 February 2026. Consequently, the court listed the matter for dismissal due to lack of prosecution. The court dismissed both the …

MR. VIREN KANAYALAL VALANI AND ANR.versusMRS. MINAXI KANYALAL VALANI AND ANR.

Dismissed

The appellants, Viren Kanayalal Valani and others, filed a first appeal (No.112 of 2019) and a civil application (No.358 of 2019) against the respondents, Minaxi Kanyalal Valani and others. The High Court examined whether the appeal and the accompanying civil application should proceed. The court …

PHIROZ ABDUL HUSSEINversusSHRI. J. A. GOMES AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellant filed an interim application seeking to bring the legal heirs of the deceased appellant No.2 onto the record. The appellant No.2 had died on 15 June 2025, and a death certificate was produced. The court examined the application and the death certificate and found no impediment to …

MR. RAMESH D. PATEL @ GRAMIversusTHE MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, Ramesh D. Patel, sought revival of interim relief that had been vacated by an order dated 23 December 2025 in his dispute with the Mumbai Municipal Corporation over an alleged illegal structure under Section 351 of the MMC Act. The Court asked the appellant to produce a speaking order …

PRAMILA SUMAN SINGHversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS.

Allowed

The appellant sought restoration of an appeal that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 13 June 2025. The appellant explained that the non‑appearance was due to personal difficulty of the advocate, and filed an interim application on 28 January 2026 seeking condonation of delay. The court, …

MRS. PREMALATHA GORGE AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER,

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal that was originally due in 2016. The appeal was not presented before the stipulated date, and the matter was listed under the caption of dismissal. The applicant argued that the delay was due to circumstances beyond …

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusMRS. CHRISTY MURLIDHARAN

Dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for demolition of a suit structure. The corporation appealed the order that quashed the notice. The High Court held that the notice was invalidly issued and therefore quashed …

MR. MOHD HAMID KHANversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI

Disposed Off

The appellant, Mr. Mohd Hamid Khan, filed a civil application seeking a stay of the City Civil Court's order that dismissed his suit challenging a notice issued under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act. The trial court had held that the appellant failed to prove that …

B.JOSEPH BALIAH NADAR AND ORSversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Disposed Off

The appellants, the heirs of the late B. Joseph Baliah Nadar, challenged a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, alleging illegal construction of a 100 sq.ft. shed. The City Civil Court had upheld the notice and …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusRAJKUMAR MUNNAR GAUD AND ANR.

Allowed

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed a decision concerning the existence of an employer-employee relationship and the nature of a disability suffered by a respondent. The Commissioner had held that an employer-employee relationship existed between the two respondents despite the vehicle being …

ALI HASAN S/O ABDUL AHAD IDRISI AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA THR.GENERAL MANAGER

Disposed Off

The appellants Ali Hasan and others filed a first appeal against the Union of India (Western Railway). No counsel appeared for the appellants on 8 January 2026 and again on the hearing date. The Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, vacated any interim relief, and ordered that any …

PREMLATHA GEORGE VALAVATH AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

Allowed

The applicants, Premlatha George Valavath & Anr., had their appeal dismissed by the High Court for a non‑removal objection. They filed Interim Application No. 261 of 2026 seeking restoration of that appeal. The court examined the application and considered the delay in filing it. It decided to …

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INS. CO. LTD.versusJAHANARA BIBI NASIRUDDIN SEKH AND ORS.

Dismissed

The applicant, IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd., appealed a decree awarding compensation to the respondents and sought a stay of execution of the award. The applicant assured the court that it would deposit the entire compensation amount in the tribunal within six weeks. The court granted a …

SMT. BASANTI GANGARAM FULWADIYAversusUNION OF INDIA, THORUGH GENERAL MANAGER

Admitted and Disposed Off

The appellant, Smt. Basanti Gangaram Fulwadiya, appealed against the Railway Claims Tribunal’s rejection of her claim for compensation after her son, a 20‑year‑old railway porter, died in an alleged train accident on 25 March 2011. The Tribunal had relied on police, station and hospital reports that …

THE UNION OF INDIA THR.THE GENERAL MANAGER, MUMBAIversusMR.ANIL TRIKAM KALIWADA

Disposed Off

On 16 August 2013, the plaintiff, holding a platform ticket, entered a moving Vadodara Express to see off a relative and attempted to alight while the train was in motion, resulting in a fall that led to the amputation of both legs. The Railway Claims Tribunal held that the plaintiff was a bonafide …

ALLAHABAD BANKversusMR. ABHAY NARENDRA LODHA

Allowed

Allahabad Bank filed an appeal against an order but missed the 30‑day filing deadline by 31 days. The bank sought condonation of the delay through an interim application, while the respondent opposed, relying on a prior decision of the court. The judge examined the reasons for delay and considered …

SHRI. SANTOSH TULJARAM KENDALEversusSMT. JYOTI AMARLAL MEGHANI

Disposed Off

The appellant, Santosh Tuljaram Kendale, filed an appeal against Order (ST) No. 35619 of 2018 along with Civil Application No. 1096 of 2018. The original suit underlying the appeal had been disposed of on 12 November 2022. The appellant contended that the appeal should still be heard despite the …