Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
535 judgments · newest first · showing 401–535
The petitioner, Rajvindarsingh Ajeet Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 5396 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court. After 31 January 2018, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear for any further hearing and did not take steps to circulate the petition. The Court noted that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Somnath Waman Bhoir, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later submitted a letter seeking to withdraw the petition unconditionally, stating he does not wish to file a fresh petition. The petition was before a two‑judge bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Kamal …
The petitioner, Ravindra R. Koregaonkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
Fibercon Industries Ltd. and another filed Writ Petition No.2457 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal matter. The petition was listed for hearing but the petitioners failed to appear. The court observed that after 14 November 2019 the petitioners or their counsel did not take any …
The petitioner, Mohammad Shafiq Abdul Majeed Qureshi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and sought unconditional leave to withdraw it. The …
The petitioner, Pankaj Bhagwat Giri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel later sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the petition, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, …
Punjab National Bank filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after August 8, 2017, the petitioner and its counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the …
The petitioners, Mathurabai Rajara Bhandari and an associate, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear when called. The court record shows that after 25 September 2017, …
The petitioner, Tarachand R. Nashiney, filed a writ petition on 15 July 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing on 10 April 2026, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel made …
The applicant, Umesh Kondiba Avhad, sought suspension of his sentence and release on bail pending the appeal of his conviction. The record showed that co‑accused Nos.2, 3 and 4, who faced identical charges of assaulting the deceased, had already been released on bail. The respondent’s counsel …
The petitioner, Amit Devendraprasad Ojha, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after April 25, 2017, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Minee Bhise, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after July 11, 2017, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in …
The applicant, Rushikesh Sharad Suryawanshi, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his life sentence and release on bail pending an appeal against his conviction for rape, assault, criminal intimidation and false evidence under IPC sections 376(1), 323, 506 and 201. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Bhavna Wadhwa, filed a writ petition on 1 March 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner at any subsequent hearing, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the …
Vijaya Bank filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after February 1, 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. No petitioners appeared when the matter was called for hearing. The Court noted the absence and dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits were considered. The dismissal was recorded as an order of the Court.
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing. The record shows that after 19 July 2016 the petitioners and their counsel took no steps to circulate the petition. The Court observed that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the petition. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 15 July 2016 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, John Rudal Dcruz, filed Writ Petition No.2503 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after September …
A writ petition was filed on 11 August 2016 by Sudhakar Bhojaya Shetty seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 25 August 2016 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The record shows the petitioner was uninterested in pursuing the matter. The court noted the lack of prosecution by the petitioner. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Retd. ACP‑Shinde Sarjerao, filed a writ petition on 1 October 2016. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The respondent State, represented by Ms. P. P. Shinde, APP, highlighted the petitioner's inaction. The …
The writ petition filed by Mrs. Asha Ashok Nabar had been pending for over twelve years. During this period, the petitioner applied separately to the competent authority for registration of Jagruti Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Thane (East), and the authority, under the Maharashtra Co-operative …
The petition was filed on 27 October 2016 by Athar Ali Mohammed Mustakim Qureshi seeking relief. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. The issue before the …
Petitioner Pawan Khandu Patare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel, informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this …
Bilal Gaus Sayyed filed two interim applications seeking bail. The High Court, after hearing counsel, was not inclined to grant bail at that stage. However, the Court allowed the applicant to withdraw the interim applications and granted him liberty to file a fresh bail application after completing …
The petitioners, Ramji Ratanshi Dhedia & Ors., filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and to obtain liberty to give their statements before the trial court in Sessions Case No. 413 of 2016. The petitioners, through counsel Ms. Reshma Nair, requested that the trial court record …
Shamrao Govind Shendge filed an interim application in Writ Petition No. 17227 of 2024 against the Deputy Collector (Rehabilitation) Pune and others. The application sought relief as outlined in prayer clause (a). The Bombay High Court, comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, allowed the …
The petitioners, Chandraesh Residency ‘H’ Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The grievance centered on the status of the Index‑II of the petitioner's property. The respondent State, through its Advocate General, …
The judgment consists solely of a procedural order to stand over the matter to 21/07/2026; no factual background, legal issues, reasoning, or final disposition were provided in the text.
The petitioner, S.S.B.M. Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court’s order dated 18 March 2026 mistakenly recorded the date ‘17 February 2016’ instead of ‘17 February 2026’. The petitioners sought a correction of this clerical error and asked that the corrected order be uploaded on the …
Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (No. 291 of 2020) before the National Lok Adalat against Hemandra Dhulichand Chandore & Anr. The appellant's counsel, Sayanthani Mitra with Gargi Mandvikar, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The panel, headed by Justice Kamal Khata, granted …
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal against Smt. Hansaben Nathubhai Patel and others before the National Lok Adalat. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the leave and permitted the appeal to be withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal …
In First Appeal No. 958 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, the applicants Dilip Anandji Karia & Ors. appealed against New India Assurance Co. Ltd. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and submitted duly executed Consent Terms, which were verified and signed by …
The National Lok Adalat heard First Appeal No.1666 of 2006 filed by The New India Assurance Co. against Dodhabai Chintaman Birari & Ors. The appellant, through counsel S.S. Dwivedi, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court considered the request and, without addressing any substantive merits, …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, National Lok Adalat Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, against Smt. Bitte @ Arbunnisa. The appellant, through counsel Mr. Shrikant M. Dange, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. No respondent counsel appeared. …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No.141 of 2008) before the National Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, against Baban Maruti Neharkar and others. The appellant, through counsel Ms. S.S. Dwivedi, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request and, …
Oriental Insurance Company filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Vishwanath Laxman Gaikwad and others. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing counsel for the appellant, granted the leave and permitted the withdrawal. Consequently, the appeal was …
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 369 of 2012) before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay against Mr. Travor Jude and another. The appellant, through counsel Mr. Devendranath S. Joshi and Mr. Pradyumna S. Thakurdesai, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No.295 of 2019) before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court against Naz Mohammad Imam Ali Khan, Father of Deceased & Ors. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court considered the request …
The Head Personnel Division of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (the appellant) and Navin Lokkya Shetty (the respondent) reached a settlement of their dispute. The appellant deposited ₹5,64,487 in the appellate court and now seeks to withdraw the appeal. The settlement provides that the respondent is …
The appellant, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a civil appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Shakuntala Dagadu Deore. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court, after hearing counsel Ms. Poonam Mittal for the appellant, granted the request to withdraw. …
The appellant, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a civil appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Shakuntala Dagadu Deore. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court, after hearing counsel Ms. Poonam Mittal for the appellant, granted the request to withdraw. …
Santosh Jayantilal Ranawat filed First Appeal Nos. 1056/2012 and 974/2012 against The National Insurance Co. Ltd. before the High Court of Bombay (National Lok Adalat). The appellant, represented by Ms. Prachi Deshpande, sought leave to withdraw the appeals. The Court, after hearing the counsel, …
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Ltd (MSRTC) filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court against Aashabai Daulat Wagh. The appellant, through its law officer Mr. Ankush Gaharwar, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request and, …
The Divisional Manager of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Mathuraprasad N. Varma and others. The appellant sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The bench, comprising Justice Kamal Khata, Registrar Dr. M. S. Deshpande and Court Receiver …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat in the High Court of Bombay. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing the application, granted leave and permitted the appeal to be withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal …
The appellant and respondent, a married couple, filed an appeal in the Family Court seeking divorce. Both parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and submitted Consent Terms, which were recorded as Exhibit X. The court clarified that a decree of divorce will be granted once the …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Smt. Naina Vishal Karwarkar. The appellant's counsel, Shrikant M. Dange, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The matter was listed before the Lok Adalat and the court considered the request. The panel, headed by …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Asmita Suresh Jadhav & Ors. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the appeal was deemed disposed, …
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Pradnya Ravindra Ramteke and others. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Lok Adalat, presided over by Justice Kamal Khata and members, granted the leave to withdraw. …
The New India Insurance Co. appealed against Vaishali Vinayak Sawant and others before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request and, noting procedural provisions, granted leave to withdraw. …
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 2461 of 2005) before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, National Lok Adalat Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, against Shri Yellappa Laxman Pawar & Ors. The appellant's counsel, Ms. Jyoti B. Pandey, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., as appellant, filed a civil appeal before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court against respondents Nafisa Naved Kamal & Ors. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted the leave and permitted the …
The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a civil appeal (First Appeal No. 1508 of 2012) before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court against the respondents. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court considered whether such a withdrawal could be …
In a National Lok Adalat proceeding before the High Court of Bombay, the appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal against Suman Abasaheb Khedekar & Anr. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing counsel H.G. Misar for the appellant, granted leave to …
The New India Assurance Co. filed an appeal (First Appeal No.1665 of 2016) before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay against Abhimanyu Mahada Kamble & Ors. The appellant, through counsel Ms. Poonam Mittal, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request and, …
The appellants, Vandana W/o Gautam Waghmare & Ors., filed an appeal but failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled dates. The Court had previously warned the appellants to present themselves and proceed with the matter. On the hearing date of 7 February 2024, no representative for the …
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. filed a first appeal (ST) No. 30948 of 2012 before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel, Mr. D. R. Mahadik, appeared on behalf of the appellant and requested that the appeal be withdrawn. The …
The Divisional Manager of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat against Mathuraprasad N. Varma and others. The appellant sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The bench, comprising Justice Kamal Khata, Registrar Dr. M. S. Deshpande and Court Receiver …
In a civil appeal (No. 175 of 2015) before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, the appellant, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., sought permission to withdraw its appeal against the respondents, Smt. Ranjana Shivaji Sonawane and others. The appellant was represented by Advocate H.G. …
The petitioner, Jaihind Baliram Gaikwad, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a matter against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner, through counsel, sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition …
Petitioner Ajay Raghuram Shetty filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The court examined the prayer clauses of the application and found merit in clauses (b) and (c). Accordingly, the judges allowed those …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 1499 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents, including Nashik Road Deolali Vyapari Sahkari Bank Ltd. The court examined the record and observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred since the alleged cause of …
The petitioner, Vithal Ravji Nare, filed Writ Petition No. 609 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court against the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 18 July 2016 and did not appear thereafter, nor did his counsel take any steps to circulate the …
The petitioners, Sau. Sharada Kailas Nikalje and another, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. They later sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. Respondents, including Annasaheb Magar Co-Operative Bank Limited, filed an affidavit containing statements relevant to the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 March 2016 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter, indicating a lack of interest in …
The petitioners, Hafiz Ur Rehman Ansari and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called for hearing. The record shows that after 28th April 2016 the …
M/s. Wellbert Pharmaceuticals (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the …
The petitioner, Shrirang Pardesh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing on 2 February 2017 and again on 9 March 2026. After the February hearing, the petitioner and his counsel made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition. The court …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Shivram Patankar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after May 2, 2017, indicating a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, but after July 20, 2018 neither the petitioner nor his advocate took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered whether the …
The petitioner, Suresh Dagdusingh Pardeshi, filed a writ petition on 30 July 2016 in the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the Commissioner of Police and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear and did not take any steps to circulate the …
The petitioners, Kenwood Co-Operative Housing Society Limited & Anr, filed a writ petition on 3 September 2016 in the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared for the petitioners at the hearing. The court noted that since the filing of the petition, the petitioners and/or their advocate have taken …
Meelan Mansukhlal Gandhi filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the Commissioner of Police. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 30 November 2016 the petitioner or his advocate did not take any steps to …
The applicant, Rekha Purshottam Shewale, filed an interim application to bring the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, Smt. Dhyanubai R. Shinde, onto the record in Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 2024. The appellant had died on 19 August 2025, and the application was filed 112 days later, raising a …
The petitioners, former committee members of Lok Nisarg Co‑operative Housing Society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging two orders dated 23 January 2024 and 20 March 2024 that directed a re‑audit of the society and the appointment of a special auditor. They alleged that the orders …
The petitioners, Suresh Narayandas Chawala & Anr., filed Writ Petition No. 6784 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court. On later instructions, they sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners moved the Court for such leave. The Court, after hearing the …
The appellant, Pratibha Sadanand Shetty, sought leave to withdraw Criminal Appeal No. 252 of 2025 and requested liberty to contest a separate MPID Special Case No. 781 of 2024 pending before the Designated Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai. The High Court, after hearing counsel, granted the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after December 18, 2015. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing after August 26, 2016 and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court considered …
The petitioner, Pratap Sarnaik, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel applied for unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after July 7, 2015, the petitioner and/or his counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Parind Sushil Parekh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing on 13 July 2015, the petitioner and his counsel failed to take any steps to circulate the petition or appear before the court. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 May 2015 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court …
The petitioners, M/s Whiz Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioners' counsel, on instructions, sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 1 June 2015 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. After the hearing date of 16 November 2015, the petitioners and their counsel failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted that the …
The petitioner, Kimtilal Manoharlal Dang, filed Writ Petition No. 2233 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing on 20th November 2017, the petitioner and his counsel failed to take any steps to circulate the petition or appear before the court. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Hemant B. Patil, filed a writ petition on 10 June 2015 but failed to take any steps to advance the petition, including not circulating it for hearing. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
Mahesh @ Manish Bhupat Oza filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra. The respondent's counsel submitted a copy of an order dated 28 October 2015 in which a coordinate bench of the same court had already quashed the criminal case. The court observed that, in view of the earlier …
The petitioner, Yasmin M.Y. Valibhoy, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were …
The petitioner, M/s. Shree Sati Travels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive …
The petitioner, Mr. Urvinder Pal Singh, filed a writ petition but failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition after the first hearing on 1 December 2016. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on …
The petitioner, Bharat Mukti Morch, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The respondents, …
The applicants, originally accused Nos.3 and 4, filed an interim application seeking suspension of their sentence and release on bail pending the appeal. The court noted that a co-accused, Naresh Donde (A‑2), had been released on bail, and that the eyewitness testimony linked the applicants' alleged …
The petitioner, Mohammad Kalim Khan, filed Writ Petition No. 3217 of 2015 in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear when called. The court record shows that after July 13, 2016, …
The petitioner, Salim Anwar Memon, filed Writ Petition No. 3334 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing on 13 July 2018, the petitioner and his counsel failed to take any steps to circulate the petition or appear before the court. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
Girishkumar Vasudevbhai Pandya filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after September 15, 2015, made no effort to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. …
The petitioner, Ramesh Ranchhoddas Joshi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing on 4th March 2026. The record shows that after 2nd March 2016, the petitioner or his counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred …
Anita Shankar Patel filed Writ Petition No. 3637 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 23 October 2015. The Court observed …
Cajetan Simon Fernandes filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified matter. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing scheduled on 30 September 2016 and again on 4 March 2026. No steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to circulate the petition after …
The petitioners, Ratan Framji Tata & Anr., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 16 November 2015. The court observed that the …
The petitioner, Shivaji Natha Mali, filed a writ petition on 23 September 2015 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate or pursue the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the …
Martin Alex Correa filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition contained two prayer clauses: clause (a) seeking a certain relief and clause (b) seeking another relief. The Court examined clause (a) and held that it was not …
The petitioner, Sanjay Bedia, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were …
Industrial Bhavan (Worli) Ltd. filed a writ petition (No. 4046 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The counsel for Respondent No.2 submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition …
Manjiri Kaustubh Marathe filed a writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation in a criminal case, alleging bias in the investigating agency. The petition was presented before the High Court of Bombay. The Court examined the legal question of whether a writ petition for transfer of …
The applicant, Vitthal Raghu Kamble, had earlier filed an interim bail application which was dismissed on 5 April 2023. No change in circumstances occurred to merit reconsideration of the evidence. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the interim application and to continue pursuing …
Shailesh Mistry filed Writ Petition No. 4351 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief under prayer clause (b). The Court examined the petition and held that the relief sought under clause (b) is not tenable under law. It further …
The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Dattatraya Sawai, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Satsang Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. and others, seeking reliefs. The court observed that a writ petition against a private individual is not maintainable under law. Counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sitaram Shetty, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition …
The petitioner, Munya Shaikh, was convicted of murder and related offences and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed the classification of his offence under the Maharashtra prison guidelines, arguing that the murder arose from a family feud and should fall under Category 3(b) (22 years …
The applicants, Vijay Prabhakar Pingale and Vishal Prabhakar Pingale, were convicted under Sections 307 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 and sentenced to life imprisonment for a violent assault that caused grievous injuries to the victim. They filed an interim application …
The New Khwaja Garib Nawaz Co-Op. Housing Society (Proposed) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the Deputy Registrar of Co-Op Society and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing despite the petition being circulated. The Court noted the non‑appearance and …
The applicant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a civil application seeking refund of a statutory deposit. The court examined the record and noted that the first appeal in the underlying matter had been dismissed on 19 October 2010. Since the dismissal removed any legal obstacle, the court found …
The appeal concerned whether chemical additives imported by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL) were subject to octroi duty under Entry 22(a) of Schedule ‘H’ of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, as petroleum products or their by‑products. The Small Causes Court had held that the …
The appellants, joint owners of a larger agricultural property, acquired title by a deed of conveyance in 2014 and sought to recover possession of a portion leased to the respondent under a 50‑year lease that expired in 2018. The respondent filed a suit challenging the conveyance and obtained an …
The appellants, joint owners of a larger agricultural property, acquired title by a deed of conveyance in 2014 and sought recovery of possession of a portion leased to the respondent. The respondent, a lessee under a 1968 lease that expired in 2018, filed a suit claiming the conveyance was void and …
Mr. Savlaram Anant Kamte, the appellant, appeared in person before the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw his appeal against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. The court considered the procedural rule that an appellant may withdraw an appeal at any stage before the …
The appellant, Mrs. Supriya Milind Shelar, filed an appeal against an order dated 2024 in a civil suit involving M/s. Kasturi Infrastructure & Developers and others. The respondents submitted that the parties had resolved their disputes and executed consent terms, rendering the suit moot. The court …
The appellant, Salim Raza (also known as Mohammed Salim Jaffery), filed an appeal against Manav Builders Pvt. Ltd. The appellant’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal, stating it had become infructuous. The court entertained the request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No substantive …
The appellant, Shree Mahavir Enterprises, filed an interim application seeking leave to withdraw its appeal in First Appeal No. 743 of 1996, stating that the dispute with the respondent, Chand Co-op Hsg. Soc. Ltd., had been settled out of court. The appellant's counsel, Adv. Ankita Rathod of S.K. …
The appellant, Mr. Arif Sayyed Shaikh, filed an appeal against the order dated 2023. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted the request, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, the interim application filed in the same proceedings was also disposed …
The appellant, Janeta Stanislaus Gonsalves, filed an appeal against Transcon Properties Pvt. Ltd. and others and later sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The appellant's counsel, Dileep Satale, appeared on behalf of the appellant. The respondents were represented by Pooja Kane (for Respondent …
The appellant filed a partition suit claiming a one‑sixth share in ancestral lands, while the respondents contended that an oral partition in 1980 barred the claim by limitation. The trial court granted a partial decree in favour of the appellant and ordered partition of certain schedules of …
The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal filed by Mulund Sejal Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. against an order of the City Civil Court that had restrained the society from interfering with the possession of Sunil Omprakash Agarwal. The court examined the pleadings and found that the plaintiff’s …
The appellant, Brahmjyoti B‑Wing Mirani Tenants Association (Proposed), filed an appeal against orders of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted the request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, all …
The appellant, Brahmjyoti B‑Wing Mirani Tenants Association (Proposed), filed an appeal against orders of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted the request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, all …
The appellant, Kulin Ravindra Sampat, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on the scheduled date of 19 November 2025, leading to an adjournment to 22 December 2025 to give a fair opportunity. Despite the adjournment, the appellant remained unrepresented and the appointed advocate returned …
The appellant, Sarafuddin, filed an appeal against an order of the Trial Court while the suit was already at the evidence stage. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal, arguing that the proceedings were ongoing in the lower court. The High Court considered the request and found …
The appellant, Sarafuddin, filed an appeal against an order of the Trial Court while the suit was already at the evidence stage. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal, arguing that the proceedings were ongoing in the lower court. The High Court considered the request and found …
HLV Limited appealed an order of the Airports Authority of India before the Bombay High Court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, without awarding costs. All pending interim …
The appellant, Vinod Khimchand Bhatt, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court but remained unrepresented throughout the proceedings, including on 17th December 2025 and on the date of hearing, 8th January 2026. The court observed that the appellant showed no interest in prosecuting the …
