Created by Fuzzy Cloud

L NAGESWARA RAO

243 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2022 INSC 635Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined applications arising from a Central Empowered Committee (CEC) report on illegal mining in Jamua Ramgarh wildlife sanctuary, Rajasthan, and the broader issue of eco‑sensitive zones (ESZ) around protected forests. It affirmed that the State must act as a trustee of natural …

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDversusA. BALAKRISHNAN & ANR.

2022 INSC 630Appeal(s) allowed

Kotak Mahindra Bank (the appellant) sought initiation of a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Prasad Properties and Investments Pvt. Ltd. (the corporate debtor) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The corporate debtor had stood as guarantor for …

IN RE: EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT 1881versus.

2021 INSC 257Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu writ concerning the massive pendency of cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, noted that over 33 lakh complaints were pending, a sharp rise from 26 lakh five months earlier. An expert committee had recommended the creation of de novo special …

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANKversusM/S RCM INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 584Dismissed

Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) had taken possession of two secured assets of M/s RCM Infrastructure Ltd. and conducted an e‑auction under the SARFAESI Act, selling the assets to bidders who paid 25% of the price and were later allowed to pay the balance by 8 March 2019. The corporate debtor filed a …

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.versusG. RAMANARAYANA JOSHI

2022 INSC 581Dismissed

The respondent claimed ownership of a 45.01‑acre parcel that his ancestors bought at a public auction in 1887, which was forfeited for non‑payment of land revenue in 1892 but remained in the family's possession. The Karnataka Government, by a 1994 order, transferred the land to the Forest Department …

DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION

2022 INSC 522Dismissed

The dispute arose from a concession agreement between Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL) and Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) concerning a termination payment and the interest payable thereon. The arbitral tribunal awarded the termination sum and interest at SBI PLR plus 2% as …

JACOB PULIYELversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 503Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition challenging COVID‑19 vaccine mandates, the disclosure of segregated clinical trial data, the emergency approvals of COVISHIELD and COVAXIN, the adequacy of the adverse‑event‑following‑immunisation (AEFI) system, and the policy of vaccinating …

SMT. KAITHUAMI [L] THROUGH L.RS.versusSMT. RALLIANI AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 475Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned the inheritance of property belonging to the late P.S. Dahrawka and his wife Kaithuami under Mizo Customary Law. The appellant, Thansangi Huha, a divorced daughter who returned to care for her aged mother, claimed a share, while the respondents, including the widow Ralliani and …

STATE OF ODISHA & ORS. ETC.ETCversusSULEKH CHANDRA PRADHAN ETC.ETC.

2022 INSC 452Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Odisha and other respondents challenged the appointments of Hindi teachers in aided Middle English (M.E.) schools, arguing that the teachers were appointed without complying with the Odisha Education (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers and Members of the Staff of Aided …

ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 446Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered applications filed by two Delhi Judicial Service officers seeking modification of its earlier orders on promotion to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service (DHJS). The Court revisited its 2002 and 2010 directives that required a minimum of five years of service as a Civil …

DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusBIYANI SHIKSHAN SAMITI & ANR.

2022 INSC 419Appeal(s) allowed

The Dental Council of India (DCI) amended Regulation 6(2)(h) of its 2006 Regulations, mandating that new dental colleges be attached to a recognised medical college within a specified distance. Biyani Shikshan Samiti (respondent) challenged the amendment, alleging that the Council exceeded its …

CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR INDIAN MEDICINEversusKARNATAKA AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 416Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka Ayurveda Medical College sought Central Government permission to start postgraduate (PG) courses for the 2014‑15 academic year and later applied for the 2018‑19 session. The Union of India rejected the PG permission for 2018‑19 on grounds of lacking a central research laboratory and …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusMAJOR R. METRI NO. 08585N

2022 INSC 384Case Partly allowed

The case concerned Major R. Metri, a Recruiting Medical Officer, who was convicted by a General Court Martial for helping candidates clear Army recruitment rallies in exchange for money, under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Army Act. The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) set aside the …

PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHIversusA. MAYILERUMPERUMAL & ORS.

2022 INSC 378Disposed off

The Tamil Nadu Legislature enacted the 2021 Special Reservation Act, earmarking 10.5% of the 20% reservation for Most Backward Classes (MBCs) and Denotified Communities (DNCs) for the Vanniyakula Kshatriya community. Several writ petitions challenged the Act on the ground that the State lacked …

KALYAN DOMBIVALI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusSANJAY GAJANAN GHARAT AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 377Appeal(s) allowed

The Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDM Corp) and the State of Maharashtra appealed against a Bombay High Court order that set aside the suspension of Sanjay Gajanan Gharat, an Additional Municipal Commissioner (AMC), and quashed the departmental inquiry against him. Gharat had been arrested …

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusMEGA CORPORATION LIMITED

2022 INSC 344Dismissed

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) restrained Mega Corporation Ltd, a listed radio‑taxi company, from accessing the capital market after observing an unusual surge in its share price and alleged profit manipulation. SEBI issued a show‑cause notice alleging violations of the SEBI …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusLT. GEN. (RETD.) S.K. SAHNI

2022 INSC 332Dismissed

Lt. Gen. (Retd.) S.K. Sahni, former Director General, Supplies and Transport, was investigated by a Court of Inquiry (CoI) for alleged irregularities in procurement and quality control. The CoI recommended only a recordable censure, but the Army Commander ordered disciplinary action under the Army …

SHYAM SEL AND POWER LIMITED ANDversusSHYAM STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

2022 INSC 303Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, holder of the trademark ‘SHYAM’, sued the appellants for infringement and sought a temporary injunction. The Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court refused an interim injunction, granting the appellants time to file an affidavit and postponing the matter. The plaintiff appealed this …

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 230Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Excise Commissioner ordered the confiscation of land, building, plant and machinery of Rathi Ispat Ltd. (RIL) under Rule 173Q(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in 2007, even though that rule had been omitted from the statute by a 2000 notification. RIL had earlier mortgaged the same …

SHRIKANT G. MANTRIversusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

2022 INSC 217Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a stock‑broker, obtained an overdraft facility and subsequent enhancements from the respondent bank, pledging shares as security. After a dispute over the bank’s sale of the pledged shares, the appellant filed a consumer complaint seeking the return of the shares, alleging deficiency …

AZGAR BARID (D) BY LRS.versusMAZAMBI @ PYAREMABI AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 210Dismissed

The case arose from a partition suit (O.S. No. 388/77) where the trial court decreed shares only to plaintiffs 2 and 3, rejecting plaintiffs 4‑8. The appellant‑defendant appealed and the First Appellate Court set aside the trial decree, but the High Court restored it and, on remand, divided the …

MS. XversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 171Case Partly allowed

Ms X, an Additional District & Sessions Judge, was transferred mid‑term from Gwalior to Sidhi after a complaint by the District & Sessions Judge, allegedly following sexual harassment. She sought an eight‑month extension to allow her daughter to complete Class 12, but her representations were …

SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICEversusRAHUL MODI & ORS.

2022 INSC 158Appeal(s) allowed

The Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) appealed against the Delhi High Court's order granting statutory bail to Rahul Modi and others, who had been arrested in connection with alleged offences under the Companies Act and the Indian Penal Code. The charge‑sheet was filed within the 60‑day …

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusPOST MASTER GENERAL AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 156Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants purchased Kisan Vikas Patras (KVPs) in joint names and, relying on an agent named Rukhsana, handed the certificates to her for transfer. Rukhsana encashed the KVPs at a different post office and received Rs. 25,54,000 in cash, which she kept. The appellants filed a consumer complaint; …

AJANTA LLPversusCASIO KEISANKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA D/B/A CASIO COMPUTER CO. LTD.

2022 INSC 151Dismissed

The appellant Ajanta LLP sued Casio for alleged infringement of its registered design on a scientific calculator marketed as ORPAT FX‑991ES PLUS. The parties mediated and entered into a settlement agreement on 16 May 2019, which the High Court incorporated into a decree on 3 July 2019. The appellant …

THE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS.versusSURJAKUMAR OKRAM & ORS.

2022 INSC 134Disposed off

The Manipur Legislature enacted the 2012 Parliamentary Secretary Act to create the post of Parliamentary Secretaries, mirroring Assam's 2004 Act which the Supreme Court had struck down as unconstitutional in Bimolangshu Roy. After the Assam judgment, Manipur repealed its 2012 Act by the Repealing …

PRAVEEN KUMAR C.PversusKERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

2022 INSC 112Appeal(s) allowed

In a miscellaneous application (No. 1769 of 2021) filed in Civil Appeal No. 4846 of 2021, the petitioner sought correction of a typographical error in the cause title of the judgment dated 17‑08‑2021. The judgment incorrectly read the respondent's name as "Kerala Public Service Commission Commission …

JARNAIL SINGH & ORSversusLACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA & ORS

2022 INSC 105Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the legal framework governing reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Articles 16(4‑A) and 16(4‑B) of the Constitution. It clarified that the State must collect quantifiable, cadre‑wise data to demonstrate backwardness and inadequate …

K. ARUMUGA VELAIAHversusP.R. RAMASAMY AND ANR.

2022 INSC 103Dismissed

The appellant‑plaintiff, K. Arumuga Velaiyah, claimed a one‑fourth share in ancestral joint family property based on a 1994 will of his grandfather, Periyaiya Servai, and sought partition and separate possession. The lower courts dismissed the suit, holding that a partition had already been effected …

B.B. PATEL & ORSversusDLF UNIVERSAL LTD

2022 INSC 91Disposed off

The appellants, buyers of apartments from DLF Universal Ltd., entered into an Apartment Buyer Agreement in 1993 promising possession within 2½‑3 years. Possession was delayed and the builder imposed extra charges, leading the buyers to allege unfair trade practice under the Monopolies and …

RENAISSANCE HOTEL HOLDINGS INC.versusB. VIJAYA SAI AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 70Appeal(s) allowed

Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc., a US company, holds a registered trademark "RENAISSANCE" for hotel‑related services and goods in Classes 16 and 42. The respondents operated hotels under the name "SAI RENAISSANCE" in Bangalore and Puttaparthi, prompting the plaintiff to seek a permanent injunction. …

BHAGWANIversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2022 INSC 52Case Partly allowed

The appellant was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering an 11‑year‑old girl after she disappeared from a village ceremony. Circumstantial and forensic evidence, including DNA matches to the co‑accused Satish and blood‑stained clothing recovered from the appellant's cowshed, linked the …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusSHAIKH ISTIYAQ AHMED & ORS.

2022 INSC 38Appeal(s) allowed

Shaikh Istiaq Ahmed was convicted in Mauritius for possession of heroin and sentenced to 26 years. He was transferred to India under the Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003 and sought to have his sentence reduced to 10 years, the maximum punishable term under Section 21(b) of the NDNDPS Act, …

RAJESH PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ETC.

2022 INSC 19Case Partly allowed

The case concerned an appeal by Rajesh Prasad, the informant, against a High Court order that set aside the conviction and death sentences of three accused who had been found guilty under IPC s.302/34, 120B and the Explosive Substances Act s.3/4 for throwing bombs that killed his father and another …

NGAITLANG DHARversusPANNA PRAGATI INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

2021 INSC 923Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of Meghalaya Infratech Ltd., where four resolution applicants submitted bids and Ngaitlang Dhar emerged as the highest bidder (H‑1). The losing bidder, Panna Pragati Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (PPIPL), …

PANI RAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2021 INSC 922Appeal(s) allowed

Pani Ram, a former regular army infantry officer, re‑enrolled in the Territorial Army (TA) and suffered a severe accident while returning from leave, resulting in an 80% disability. The Medical Board and a Court of Inquiry found the injury attributable to military service, and he was invalided out, …

BRIJMANI DEVIversusPAPPU KUMAR & ANR.

2021 INSC 919Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, mother of the deceased Rupesh Kumar, filed two FIRs alleging that the respondent, Pappu Kumar, attempted to murder her son in 2017 and murdered him in 2020, also violating the Arms Act. The respondent was arrested after absconding for seven months and was denied bail by the Sessions …

SUNNY ABRAHAMversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2021 INSC 920Appeal(s) allowed

Sunny Abraham, an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, was subjected to disciplinary proceedings under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. A charge memorandum was issued on 18 Nov 2002 without the Finance Minister’s (the Disciplinary Authority’s) …

JAIKAM KHANversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2021 INSC 896Disposed off

Six members of a family were murdered in a house on 23 January 2014. The prosecution relied primarily on the ocular testimony of two interested witnesses, PW‑1 (Ali Sher Khan) and PW‑2 (Jaan Mohammad), who were closely related to both the deceased and the accused. The Supreme Court held that because …

LOCHAN SHRIVASversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2021 INSC 882Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a 23‑year‑old resident of Chhattisgarh, was convicted of kidnapping, rape, murder and related offences after a missing‑child case led to his confession and the recovery of the victim’s body from a concealed sack. The trial court sentenced him to death for murder and to rigorous …

M.R. VINODAversusM.S. SUSHEELAMMA (D) BY LRS. AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 878Dismissed

The case involved three branches of a Mitakshara joint Hindu family that executed a partition deed in 1961. In 1969 the eldest brother of one branch, acting as Karta, and a cousin executed a relinquishment deed surrendering their branch's share in favour of the eldest uncle who had repaid a family …

MURTHY & ORS.versusC. SARADAMBAL & ORS.

2021 INSC 862Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased E. Srinivasa Pillai executed a will bequeathing his house to his only son S. Damodaran, excluding his daughters. The will was produced fifteen years after the testator's death by the son’s widow, C. Saradambal, who sought Letters of Administration, while the daughters contested its …

BHAGCHANDRAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2021 INSC 851Case Partly allowed

The appellant Bhagchandra was convicted of murdering his two brothers and a nephew during a property dispute, with the prosecution relying on the ocular testimony of several rustic village witnesses who identified him as the assailant wielding an axe. The trial court sentenced him to death under IPC …

IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 796Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation's (DMRC) request to proceed with Phase‑IV of the Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) through areas of the Delhi Ridge, South‑Central and Morphological Ridges, which are either notified forest or deemed forest lands. The petitioners argued that …

HARI & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2021 INSC 792Disposed off

The case involved the brutal honour killing of a Jat girl, a Jatav boy and another Jatav youth who were tortured for twelve hours and murdered by a large group of villagers after the couple attempted an inter‑caste marriage. The trial court convicted 35 persons under IPC sections 147, 149, 302, 323, …

AKKAMMA & ORS.versusVEMAVATHI & ORS.

2021 INSC 785Case Partly allowed

The appellants (Akkamma & Ors.) filed a suit in 1987 seeking a declaration of ownership of land and a permanent injunction against the respondents (Vemavathi & Ors.) alleging interference with possession. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground that the plaintiffs could not establish …

STATE OF HARYANAversusHARNAM SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2021 INSC 786Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana challenged a High Court order that had set aside the findings of the trial court and first appellate court which held that a will purportedly executed by Kishan Singh in favour of Harnam Singh was not genuine. The dispute centered on whether the will satisfied the requirements …

MOHD. MUSTAFAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 731Dismissed

The case concerned the appointment of Dinkar Gupta as Director General of Police (HoPF) of Punjab, which was challenged on the ground that the empanelment panel prepared by the UPSC violated the directions in Prakash Singh v. Union of India. The appellants alleged bias, procedural impropriety and …

THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA ANDversusM. J. JAMES

2021 INSC 732Appeal(s) allowed

The former manager of the Bank of Cochin, M.J. James, was dismissed for sanctioning advances in violation of head‑office instructions. During the disciplinary inquiry he was denied the right to be represented by an officer of a bank‑employees' union other than the Bank of Cochin, which he claimed …

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERSversusPAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS ETC.

2021 INSC 713Directions issued

The State of Bihar appealed against a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that barred sand mining in Banka district until a District Survey Report (DSR) received approval from the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) and the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). The Supreme Court …

IRAPPA SIDDAPPA MURGANNAVARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2021 INSC 707Disposed off

The appellant, Irappa Siddappa Murgannavar, was convicted of raping and murdering a five‑year‑old girl, R, and disposing of her body in a stream. The prosecution relied on eyewitness accounts, the appellant’s own disclosure statement, and post‑mortem evidence to establish the crime. The Supreme …

V. ANANTHA RAJU & ANRversusT.M. NARASIMHAN & ORS.

2021 INSC 669Case Partly allowed

The case involved a partnership firm that was reconstituted in 1992 and again in 1995, altering the profit‑and‑loss sharing ratios of the partners. The plaintiff‑appellants claimed a 50% share based on the 1995 Deed, while the respondents argued that the plaintiffs were entitled to only a 10% share …

SHAIKH ANSAR AHMAD MD. HUSAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2021 INSC 614Dismissed

The appellants challenged a Bombay High Court order that disposed of two public‑interest litigations concerning a housing scheme in Naldurg, alleging that the court failed to give reasons for its operative part and that they were not heard before criminal proceedings were initiated against them. The …

RAJENDRA NAROTTAMDAS SHETH & ANR.versusCHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN & ANR.

2021 INSC 579Dismissed

The Union Bank of India (financial creditor) granted loans to R.K. Infratel Ltd. (corporate debtor), which defaulted on 30‑09‑2014, leading to the account being classified as an NPA. The bank filed a recovery suit under the 1993 Recovery of Debts Act and, later, an application under Section 7 of the …

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS.versusSHAHEENA MASARAT & ANR.

2021 INSC 573Disposed off

The State of Jammu & Kashmir sought to appoint a Re‑T (teaching guide) under its Rehbar‑e‑Taleem scheme. An advertisement dated 29‑Nov‑2002 stipulated an upper age limit of 35 years as on 1‑Jan‑2002, with the phrase "as far as possible" regarding age qualification. Respondent No.2, born on …

S. KARTHIK & ORS.versusN. SUBHASH CHAND JAIN & ORS.

2021 INSC 534Dismissed

The appellants, guarantors of a loan of Rs.21.14 crore extended to Ace Concrete Pvt. Ltd., contested the sale of four mortgaged properties by Indian Overseas Bank under the SARFAESI Act. The bank issued a first sale notice on 21‑Jan‑2012 with a 30‑day period, but the sale was stayed by the Debt …

RAJENDRA BAJORIA AND OTHERSversusHEMANT KUMAR JALAN AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 514Dismissed

The plaintiffs, heirs of some original partners of the partnership firm ‘Soorajmull Nagarmull’, filed a suit seeking declaration of entitlement to the firm’s assets, representation before authorities, injunctions, and dissolution of the firm. The defendants, heirs of the remaining original partners, …

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusEMTA COAL LIMITED

2021 INSC 523Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd (PSPCL) entered a joint‑venture with EMTA Coal Ltd for the captive Pachhwara coal block. After the Supreme Court’s Manohar Lal Sharma judgment, the block was re‑allotted to PSPCL, which later decided to invite competitive bidding for a mine‑developer‑operator, …

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHIversusM/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION

2021 INSC 495Disposed off

M/s Mitsubishi Corporation, a non‑resident Japanese company, was assessed for income attributable to its Indian operations for the years 1998‑99 to 2004‑05 and was levied interest under section 234B of the Income‑Tax Act for alleged default in payment of advance tax. The company argued that, because …

DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT. LTD.versusDELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.

2021 INSC 464Disposed off

The Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL) and Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (DMRC) entered into a concession agreement for the Airport Metro Express Line. DMRC was served a termination notice for alleged defects in the civil structure, which DAMEPL claimed were not cured within the …

K. N. NAGARAJAPPA & ORS.versusH. NARASIMHA REDDY

2021 INSC 461Dismissed

The appellants challenged two second appeals decided by the Karnataka High Court, which had reversed a trial court's decree in favour of the respondent concerning ownership of certain parcels of land. The High Court, invoking its power under Section 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, re‑examined …

KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusK.N. RADHAMANI & ORS. ETC.ETC.

2021 INSC 446Dismissed

The dispute concerned the educational qualification required for in‑service candidates applying for clerk/cashier posts in Kerala cooperative banks where the starting salary exceeded Rs 250 per month. The candidates contended that SSLC (or equivalent) was sufficient, while the Kerala Public Service …

SAU. SANGEETA W/O SUNIL SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2021 INSC 434Dismissed

The appellant, Sau. Sangeeta, was elected as Gatneta (Group Leader) of the INCPS Party, a Panchayat Samiti party formed by four elected members of the Shrirampur Panchayat Samiti, in a 2017 meeting chaired by the Ahmednagar District INC President. The meeting resolution gave the District President …

SANJAY RAMDAS PATILversusSANJAY AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 435Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over the reservation of the Mayor's office in Dhule Municipal Corporation. The State of Maharashtra had notified that the post would be reserved for the Backward Class (BC) for the term starting June 2021, despite earlier reservations for BC and no reservation …

PRAVEEN KUMAR C.PversusKERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

2021 INSC 404Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Praveen Kumar C.P. and Anitha Devi, applied for High School Assistant posts in Kerala where the recruitment notification required a B.Ed. in the concerned subject (Natural Science). Their B.Ed. degrees were in Biological Science (and related subjects) obtained from universities …

ABDUL AHAD AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2021 INSC 411Dismissed

The petitioners, who qualified the NEET 2016 exam, were admitted to the 1st year MBBS course at Glocal Medical College through a private counselling process conducted by the college, contrary to the Uttar Pradesh Government's notification dated 22‑08‑2016 that mandated centralized counselling for …

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusDR. RAM NARESH SHARMA & ORS.

2021 INSC 376Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) against orders that allowed Ayurvedic (AYUSH) doctors to continue in service up to the age of 65 and to receive salary arrears. The Court examined whether AYUSH doctors are entitled to the same enhanced …

MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2021 INSC 332Disposed off

The Madras Bar Association challenged the Finance Act, 2017 as amended by the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021, contending that the first proviso to s.184(1) (minimum age of 50 for appointment as Chairperson or Member), the second and third provisos …

IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMICversus.

2021 INSC 302Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu writ petition concerning the management of the COVID‑19 pandemic, examined the Central Government's Liberalised Vaccination Policy, which shifted free vaccination for the 18‑44 age group to State/UT governments and private hospitals and introduced differential …

LALIT KUMAR JAINversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 297Dismissed

The petitioners, who were personal guarantors to corporate debtors, challenged a Central Government notification dated 15‑Nov‑2019 that brought certain provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) into force only for personal guarantors. They argued that the notification exceeded the …

IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMICversus.

2021 INSC 280Directions issued

The Supreme Court, exercising suo motu jurisdiction under Article 32, examined the humanitarian crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and issued directions to the Union and State governments on the supply of oxygen, essential drugs, and vaccines, as well as on hospital admission policies and …

STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERSversusM/S RAMKRISHNA FORGING LIMITED

2021 INSC 278Dismissed

The Jharkhand State Electricity Board (the Board) entered into an initial agreement with M/s Ramkrishna Forging Ltd. (the respondent) on 14 April 2004 for a 325 KVA high‑tension supply, which was subsequently enhanced to 4000 KVA through a series of supplemental agreements. In September 2007 the …

RAHUL S SHAHversusJINENDRA KUMAR GANDHI & ORS.

2021 INSC 270Dismissed

The case arose from a protracted dispute over a one‑acre property in Bengaluru that had been sold multiple times, leading to conflicting claims and a series of suits for declaration, possession, and execution. The decree‑holders obtained a decree for possession, but the judgment debtors and …

IN RE: EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT 1881versus.

2021 INSC 257Directions issued

The Supreme Court, acting suo motu under Article 32, examined the massive backlog of cases filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which was impeding the disposal of other criminal matters. After hearing the Amicus Curiae, the Solicitor General, the Reserve Bank of India and …

SUMAN DEVI & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.

2021 INSC 212Dismissed

The Uttarakhand Government advertised 440 ANM vacancies in 2016 without specifying the statutory requirement of an intermediate qualification in the science stream, which the appellants challenged as contrary to the 1997 Service Rules (amended 1998) that continued to apply after the state's …

PATRICIA MUKHIMversusSTATE OF MEGHALAYA & ORS.

2021 INSC 213Appeal(s) allowed

In July 2020, a group of tribal youths attacked non‑tribal youngsters playing basketball in Lawsohtun, Meghalaya. Journalist Patricia Mukhim posted a Facebook message condemning the attack and urging the state government and police to act, which was complained about as hate speech. An FIR was lodged …

NETAJI ACHYUT SHINDE (PATIL) & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2021 INSC 200Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Suhas on 5 July 2011, for which three accused—Netaji Achyut Shinde (A‑1), Samadhan Shinde (A‑2) and Balasaheb Shinde (A‑3)—were charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. A telephonic intimation at 17:45 was treated by the trial court as the FIR, leading to …

IN RE: COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATIONversus.

2021 INSC 168Disposed off

In a suo motu writ petition, the Supreme Court examined the extension of limitation periods granted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier orders had excluded the period from 15 March 2020 to a date to be fixed, allowing litigants extra time to file suits, appeals and other proceedings. Observing …

SRIDEVI DATLAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2021 INSC 141Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, Sridevi Datla, challenged the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) dismissal of her appeal against the environmental clearance for the Bhogapuram Greenfield Airport, arguing that the appeal was filed within the extended 60‑day period because the last day fell on a Sunday and that the NGT …

KALOJI NARAYANA RAO UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCESversusSRIKEERTI REDDI PINGLE & ORS.

2021 INSC 92Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant university rejected the NRI student’s application for the MBBS programme on the ground that she had not satisfied the biology subject requirement of the Medical Council of India (MCI) Regulation 4(2). The student relied on an equivalence certificate issued by the Telangana State Board …

GAJANAN BABULAL BANSODE & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2021 INSC 63Appeal(s) allowed

The Maharashtra Government, without consulting the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC), issued a Government Resolution on 22 April 2019 to appoint an additional 636 candidates as Police Sub‑Inspectors, effectively doubling the vacancies advertised for the Limited Departmental Competitive …

TATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.versusSMT. SURESHWATI

2021 INSC 32Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a claim by Smt. Sureshwati that her services as a clerk/assistant teacher in a private school turned government‑aided were illegally retrenched on 8 March 2006 without a disciplinary enquiry. The school contended that she had abandoned her post in July 1997 after marriage and had …

DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (APPELLATE AUTHORITY) AND OTHERSversusAJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

2021 INSC 7Appeal(s) allowed

Ajay Kumar Srivastava, a clerk of State Bank of India, was charged with seven counts of misappropriating bank funds. The enquiry officer found charges 2‑7 proved and charge 1 not proved. The disciplinary authority disagreed on charge 1, held it proved, but upheld the findings on charges 2‑7 and …

G H MADHAVIversusCHAGAN & ORS.

2020 INSC 690Appeal(s) allowed

Madhavi was appointed as a temporary teacher in a private secondary school on 16 July 1985, holding a BA and B.Ed., and was placed in Category ‘C’ of Schedule ‘F’. Chagan was appointed on 1 August 1985 as an assistant teacher with only a senior secondary certificate and a Diploma in Education, …

PANKJESHWAR SHARMA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 673Dismissed

The Director General of Police of Jammu & Kashmir advertised for Sub‑Inspector posts and prepared a province‑wise merit list, which was challenged as contrary to the recruitment rules. After several rounds of litigation, the Supreme Court, relying on a concession by the Advocate General, …

S. D. CONTAINERS INDOREversusM/S. MOLD TEK PACKAGING LTD.

2020 INSC 668

S.D. Containers (Indore) sued M/s Mold Tek Packaging Ltd for infringement of its registered container and lid designs, seeking a declaration and permanent injunction. The defendant counter‑claimed, seeking cancellation of the designs under Section 4(a) of the Design Act, 2000, and filed an …

MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2020 INSC 666Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 (the 2020 Rules) and the mechanisms for appointment, tenure, and service conditions of members of 19 …

C. BRIGHTversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS.

2020 INSC 633Dismissed

The appellant C. Bright challenged a Kerala High Court order that held Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, which obliges a District Magistrate to deliver possession of a secured asset within 30 days (extendable to 60), is a directory provision. The Supreme Court examined the language of the provision, …

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2020 INSC 634Appeal(s) allowed

A complaint was lodged in 1989 alleging adulteration of Dalda Vanaspati Ghee manufactured by Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). The trial magistrate initially absolved the company’s directors and continued prosecution against the nominated officer, Nirmal Sen, who was later convicted under the …

HITESH VERMAversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.

2020 INSC 636Disposed off

The appellant, Hitesh Verma, challenged a charge‑sheet filed under Sections 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(e) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the FIR was based on a property dispute and was false. The High Court dismissed …

PAPPU DEO YADAVversusNARESH KUMAR AND ORS.

2020 INSC 553Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a 20‑year‑old data‑entry operator, lost his right hand in a motor‑vehicle accident and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal assessed his disability at 89% but reduced it to 45% and used a monthly income of Rs 8,000, omitting a 50% …

SHREYAS SINHAversusTHE WEST BENGAL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES & ORS.

2020 INSC 541Dismissed

Shreyas Sinha applied for admission to the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS) for the 2019‑2020 academic session, invoking the 30% reservation for West Bengal domiciles introduced by the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (Amendment) Act, 2018, which came …

STATE OF M.P. & ORS.versusRAKESH SETHI & ANR.

2020 INSC 506Appeal(s) allowed

The Madhya Pradesh High Court struck down Rule 55A of the State Motor Vehicles Rules, which imposed fees for reserving specific vehicle registration numbers, holding it ultra vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. The State appealed, arguing that under …

SRI V.N. KRISHNA MURTHY & ANR. ETC. ETC.versusSRI RAVIKUMAR & ORS. ETC. ETC.

2020 INSC 502Dismissed

The owners of certain land executed an agreement to sell to a housing society and also a General Power of Attorney (GPA) authorising the society's officers to sell the property. Sale deeds in favour of the appellants were later executed under the GPA. The respondents filed suits seeking cancellation …

DR. ASWATHY R. S. KARTHIKA & ORS.versusDR. ARCHANA M. & ORS.

2020 INSC 470Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, members of the Hindu Nadar community, sought to have the shortfall in the 1% reservation granted to their community (effective from 21‑Nov‑2009) adjusted in future vacancies without disturbing earlier appointments. They argued that Rule 15(a) of the Kerala State and Subordinate …

DAHIBENversusARVINDBHAI KALYANJI BHANUSALI (GAJRA) (D) THR LRS & ORS.

2020 INSC 450Dismissed

The plaintiffs sold agricultural land to respondent No.1 in 2009 and alleged that only a small part of the sale consideration was paid, seeking cancellation of the sale deed. They filed the suit in December 2014, more than five years after the deed, claiming the cause of action arose only when they …

BHAGWAT SHARAN (DEAD THR. LRS.versusPURUSHOTTAM & ORS.

2020 INSC 327Dismissed

The appellant, Bhagwat Sharan, a grandson of Umrao Lal, filed a partition suit claiming six houses and several agricultural lands as joint Hindu family (HUF) property of his ancestors Madhav Prashad and Umrao Lal. The defendants denied the existence of an HUF, asserting the properties were …

DELHI TELEVISION LTD.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2020 INSC 330Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant New Delhi Television Ltd. challenged a notice issued under section 147 of the Income Tax Act alleging that undisclosed income had escaped assessment. The Court examined whether the revenue had a prima facie reason to believe such escapement, whether the assessee had fully disclosed all …

NAND RAM (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusJAGDISH PRASAD (D) THROUGH LRS.

2020 INSC 315Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of land leased for 20 years to the respondent, sought possession after the lease was deemed terminated for non‑payment of rent and after part of the land was de‑notified following acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act. The respondent claimed a share of compensation for …

DHANPATversusSHEO RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2020 INSC 316Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Dhanpat sought a declaration that he, his mother and sisters were entitled to equal shares in a suit land, challenging a Will dated 30‑April‑1980 that favored his brother’s sons. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the suit, holding that the Will was duly executed and …

AARIFABEN YUNUSBHAI PATEL & ORS.versusMUKUL THAKOREBHAI AMIN & ORS.

2020 INSC 297Appeal(s) allowed

The cooperative bank (R‑2) obtained a decree for repayment of a loan from respondents R‑1 and R‑3 and obtained a court order to sell the mortgaged flats. The sale was conducted and the appellants were the highest bidders. R‑1 later filed a writ petition and, after its dismissal, filed an application …

INDIAN SOCIAL ACTION FORUM (INSAF)versusUNION OF INDIA

2020 INSC 290Disposed off

The Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), a registered society, challenged the constitutionality of Sections 5(1) and 5(4) of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 and Rules 3(i), 3(v) and 3(vi) of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Rules, 2011, alleging vagueness and violation of …

PATRAMversusGRAM PANCHAYAT KATWAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 267Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Patram occupied a parcel of land in Haryana described in revenue records as "Shamlat Patti Dhera & Khubi" for over a century, but the land was never used for the common purpose of the village. The Gram Panchayat entered the land as "Panchayat Deh" in 1987‑88, leading to a dispute over …

ARUN KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2020 INSC 228Dismissed

Two former judicial officers of Jharkhand challenged orders of compulsory retirement issued by the High Court’s Screening and Standing Committees, alleging that the committees ignored later service records, that promotions should erase earlier adverse entries, and that the retirements were not in …

SITABAI SHANTARAM TALAWNEKAR & ORS.versusCUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY & ORS.

2020 INSC 222Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned the "Conde‑Mayem" property in Goa, declared evacuee property and administered by the Custodian of Evacuee Property. The appellants were in possession as tenants of the Custodian, while Respondent No.2 sought declaration as a tenant (or deemed tenant) under Sections 7 and 8‑A of …

NARAYAN YADAV (D) THR. LRS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 221Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants purchased mortgaged land at an auction on 15 June 1983 after the original owner defaulted on a loan. The writ petitioners, who claimed to be bona‑fide purchasers under earlier registered deeds, filed an application under Section 28 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, …

PARTAP SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSHIV RAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

2020 INSC 219Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, heirs of Shri Partap Singh, sued Shiv Ram alleging ownership of certain lands and seeking possession and injunctions, while the defendant claimed to be a tenant and that the suit should be tried in the revenue court. The trial court, relying on oral testimony, held that the …

PARMESHWAR NANDA ETC.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS. ETC.

2020 INSC 149Disposed off

The appellants were employed under a centrally funded Adult Education/Non‑Formal Education Project in the undivided Bihar between 1978‑1990, and after the creation of Jharkhand their services were declared surplus and later absorbed as fresh appointees under a 2007 notification that denied seniority …

KAJALversusJAGDISH CHAND & ORS.

2020 INSC 135Disposed off

Kajal, a 12‑year‑old girl who suffered 100% physical and severe mental disability after a truck hit the tractor she was travelling in, filed a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.11,08,501 and the High Court enhanced it to Rs.25,78,501. The Supreme …

GHAT TALAB KAULAN WALAversusBABA GOPAL DASS CHELA SURTI DASS (DEAD) BY LR RAM NIWAS

2020 INSC 123Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Ghat Talab Kaulan Wala Trust, sued the sevadar Baba Gopal Dass for a mandatory injunction to remove him from managing the temple and its properties. The trial court denied the injunction but ordered rendition of accounts; the first appellate court decreed in favour of the trust. The …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusYOGENDRA SINGH JADON & ANR.

2020 INSC 124Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh filed a criminal appeal against Yogendra Singh Jadon and Harshvardhan Singh Jadon, alleging that they obtained cash credit facilities from District Cooperative Kendriya Bank through their father, the former President of the bank, without proper documentation, constituting …

SANJAY MARUTIRAO PATILversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 85Dismissed

The appellant, a Sepoy in the Indian Army, was tried by a Summary Court Martial for three misconduct charges under Section 63 of the Army Act and pleaded guilty, receiving a reduction in rank. Later, the Army authorities served a show‑cause notice under Section 20 read with Rule 17 of the Army …

VARADARAJANversusKANAKAVALLI & ORS.

2020 INSC 75Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Varadarajan, sought to execute a decree in favour of the deceased decree‑holder Umadevi by filing an application as her legal representative under a Will. The Executing Court allowed the application, but the High Court, in revision under Section 115 of the CPC, set aside that order on …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusR. KARTHIK

2020 INSC 62Dismissed

The sailor R. Karthik was dismissed from the Indian Navy under Section 45(a) of the Navy Act after a superior officer complained that Karthik had struck him during an incident at sea. The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) set aside the dismissal, deeming it disproportionate, and substituted it with a …

INDU BAI & ORS.versusSTATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.

2020 INSC 63Disposed off

The Supreme Court disposed of two appeals. In Indu Bai & Ors. v. State of Telangana, the Court set aside the High Court's order that had allowed the State's challenge to the claim of pre‑partition tenancy and remitted the matter to the High Court for proper determination. In The Home Secretary …

RAJNEESH KHAJURIAversusM/S. WOCKHARDT LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 43Dismissed

Rajneesh Khajuria, a sales employee of Wockhardt Ltd., was transferred from Sagar to Mumbai and failed to report, after which his services were terminated. He filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 alleging that the …

MOHD. RASHIDversusTHE DIRECTOR, LOCAL BODIES, NEW SECRETARIAT & ORS.

2020 INSC 44Dismissed

The appellants, who applied for direct recruitment to the posts of Administrative Officer/Assistant Assessor and Collector in the Delhi Municipal Corporations, challenged the advertisement of 30 vacancies on the ground that the recruitment rules required promotion or deputation quotas to be filled …

STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEversusM. MURUGESAN & ANR.

2020 INSC 46Appeal(s) allowed

The State, represented by the Inspector of Police, appealed against a Madras High Court order that, after granting bail to M. Murugesan and another under Section 439 of the CrPC, retained the case file and directed the State to collect extensive data on criminal cases and submit reform …

SHRI UTTAM CHAND (D) THROUGH LRS.versusNATHU RAM (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2020 INSC 42Appeal(s) allowed

Shri Uttam Chand purchased a government‑owned property at a public auction in 1964 and obtained a sale certificate in 1965. He filed a suit for possession in 1979 against Nathu Ram and others, who claimed ancestral ownership and alleged that the Managing Officer had no authority to auction the land. …

G H STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusHEAVY ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

2019 INSC 1405Dismissed

The plaintiff Heavy Engineering Corporation (HEC) ordered equipment from Simon Carves India Ltd. (SCIL) and obtained two bank guarantees from Standard Chartered Bank (formerly ANZ Grindlays) as security for advances. SCIL failed to deliver, and HEC demanded encashment of the guarantees, which the …

JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusMANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR.

2019 INSC 1401Disposed off

The Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) advertised the Jharkhand Eligibility Test (JET) to determine eligibility for lecturer appointments, requiring candidates to secure 50% in Papers I and II before attempting Paper III. The petitioner obtained the required 50% in Papers I and II but failed …

THE STATE OF TELANGANAversusSRI MANAGIPET @ MANGIPET SARVESHWAR REDDY

2019 INSC 1333Disposed off

The State of Telangana filed a criminal appeal against a Hyderabad High Court order that partially quashed a charge‑sheet under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against former OSD Sri Managipet @ Mangipet Sarveshwar Reddy for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. The High …

DARSHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2019 INSC 1327Dismissed

The deceased, Surjit Kaur, was found dead in a jute bag with her face disfigured by acid; she had inherited land and was not receiving lease money from her son, providing a motive for the accused. The prosecution relied on extra‑judicial confessions recorded by a witness, medical evidence of a …

RAJESH KUMAR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2019 INSC 1331Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant applied for the post of Instructor (Fitter) in a Government Industrial Training Institute, where the eligibility required a certificate in the trade from the National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT). He possessed three separate NCVT certificates – a basic one‑year Mechanical …

DHARMENDRA PRASAD & ORS.versusSUNIL KUMAR & ORS.

2019 INSC 1332Disposed off

The Uttarakhand Pey Jal Nigam, a statutory body created under the Uttar Pradesh Water Works and Sewer Arrangement Act, 1975, appointed Junior Engineers in several categories using separate merit lists. Although the higher‑merit candidates (appellants) were appointed later than some lower‑merit …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusP. S. GILL

2019 INSC 1290Dismissed

The Union of India appealed against the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order quashing the convening of a General Court Martial against former Army officer P.S. Gill, who was alleged to have been involved in procurement irregularities. After a Court of Inquiry identified twelve officers, including Gill, a …

RATHNAMMA & ORS.versusSUJATHAMMA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1255Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Sujathamma, a maternal granddaughter of the deceased's father, claimed to have married her maternal uncle Hanumanthappa on 7 March 1986 and sought a share of his estate as his wife. The alleged marriage was supported only by a registration document (Ex.P/1) with no evidence of any …

RAM KRISHAN GROVER AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 1239Dismissed

The petitioners, tenants in Chandigarh and Punjab, challenged Section 13‑B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which gives Non‑Resident Indian (NRI) landlords a preferential right to evict tenants, and the extension of this provision to the Union Territory of Chandigarh by a 2009 …

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.versusM/S. R.M. SERVICE CENTRE & ANR.

2019 INSC 1222Appeal(s) allowed

The dealer, M/s R.M. Service Centre, held a retail licence for petrol, diesel, oil and grease. A joint inspection revealed a positive stock variation of High Speed Diesel beyond permissible limits and lack of reference density. Samples drawn were sent for testing; the first was dispatched five days …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusV. R. NANUKUTTAN NAIR

2019 INSC 1220Dismissed

The case concerned V.R. Nanukuttan Nair, a former Navy sailor who was discharged after 10 years and 169 days of service, having been placed in a low medical category. He was granted a 50% disability pension but was denied the service element of that pension because he had not completed the 15 years …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusLT. COL. OM DUTT SHARMA (RETD.) DEAD THROUGH LRS & ORS.

2019 INSC 1205Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed against an Armed Forces Tribunal order that had granted One Rank One Pension (OROP) to Lt. Col. Om Dutt Sharma (deceased) and other personnel who served in the Army Postal Service (APS) on deputation from the Department of Posts. The respondents argued that, as temporary …

RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, AJMER & ANR.versusSHIKUN RAM FIRODA & ANR.

2019 INSC 1197Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) issued an advertisement on 18 June 2013 for recruitment to State and Subordinate Services. A press note dated 12 November 2014 allowed candidates to correct mistakes or change categories in already‑submitted online applications, but did not invite fresh …

BIJAY KUMAR SINGH & OTHERSversusAMIT KUMAR CHAMARIYA & ANR.

2019 INSC 1181Dismissed

The landlord filed eviction suits under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 alleging non‑payment of rent arrears for two shops. The tenants filed applications under Section 7(2) of the Act seeking determination of the disputed rent and deposited the arrears they admitted. The trial court …

RAMESH PARSRAM MALANI & ORSversusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1178Dismissed

The appellant, whose father was a displaced person from Sindh, claimed the balance of his verified land claim (43.7 standard acres) after having received an initial allotment of 40.4 acres. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA) allotted 19.26 acres in 2003, but the High Court held the …

UTTAM RAMversusDEVINDER SINGH HUDAN & ANR.

2019 INSC 1160Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an apple orchard owner, supplied packing material on credit to the respondent, who later settled the account and issued a cheque for Rs.5,38,856 which was returned for insufficient funds. The appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which …

MANI PUSHPAK JOSHIversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.

2019 INSC 1161Appeal(s) allowed

The father of a six‑year‑old girl filed an FIR alleging sexual assault by a teacher at her school. The child’s statements, recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC, later identified two men, one wearing spectacles, as perpetrators; the latter was the school manager, not a teaching staff. The …

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusDEVENDRA SHARMA

2019 INSC 1157Disposed off

The case concerned a large number of appointments to Class III and Class IV posts in the Bihar Health Department that were made without sanctioned vacancies, advertisement or competent authority, many on forged documents. A State Committee classified the appointments as illegal, forged or irregular …

M/S. MADHOOR BUILDWELL PVT. LTD.versusYEOLA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS.

2019 INSC 1133Disposed off

M/s Madhoor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. was awarded a contract by Yeola Municipal Council to lay a sewer system under the centrally‑sponsored Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme (AMRUT). After completing about 35% of the work, the contractor was not paid because the Central Government had not released …

AIR COMMODORE NAVEEN JAINversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1120Dismissed

Air Commodore Naveen Jain, along with nine other officers, was considered for promotion to Air Vice Marshal. Although he topped the merit list, he was third in seniority on the select list and the vacancies arose after his superannuation, so he was not promoted. He challenged the Air Force Promotion …

NO. 1466828M EX CFN NARSINGH YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 1121Dismissed

Narsingh Yadav, a Craftsman (CFN) in the Indian Army, was discharged in 2007 after an Invaliding Medical Board diagnosed him with schizophrenia (20% disability) and held that the disorder was neither attributable to nor aggravated by his military service. He sought a disability pension, which was …

K. H. NAZARversusMATHEW K. JACOB & ORS.

2019 INSC 1100Dismissed

The appellant, K.H. Nazar, sought environmental clearance to operate a quarry on land that was originally a plantation. Respondents filed writ petitions contending that the land could not be used for quarrying because such land does not qualify as a "commercial site" under the Kerala Land Reforms …

DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ODISHA & ORS.versusPRAMOD KUMAR SAHOO

2019 INSC 1092Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Pramod Kumar Sahoo, was appointed as a primary school teacher in 1988 with an intermediate qualification and later became a graduate. He claimed that, despite lacking formal teacher training, he was entitled to the pay scale reserved for Trained Matric Teachers under the Orissa …

GOVINDBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL & ORS.versusPATEL RAMANBHAI MATHURBHAI

2019 INSC 1070Dismissed

The appellants, sons of the deceased donor, claimed that a property gifted by their father to the respondent was ancestral and that the donor lacked authority to execute the gift deed, alleging the deed was forged. The trial court held the property ancestral, a view affirmed by the first appellate …

SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.versusDHARMBIR SINGH

2019 INSC 1063Appeal(s) allowed

Dharambir Singh, a former Territorial Army soldier, was injured in a scooter accident while on two days of casual leave and claimed a disability pension. The Armed Forces Tribunal had granted the pension, holding that leave is deemed duty, but the Government appealed. The Supreme Court examined …

PRADEEP SINGH DEHALversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.

2019 INSC 1045Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned two recruitment advertisements for Assistant Professor posts at Himachal Pradesh University. The appellant, an OBC candidate, was appointed, while the respondent, a General category candidate, claimed he was denied five marks for "publications" that had been awarded in an earlier, …

RITU SAXENAversusJ. S. GROVER & ANR.

2019 INSC 1047Dismissed

Ritu Saxena filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a flat, claiming she was ready and willing to pay the balance consideration of Rs.50 lakhs. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding that she failed to prove her financial capacity, a finding affirmed by the Delhi High …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSANDEEP KUMAR ETC.

2019 INSC 1030Disposed off

The case arose from the loss of two pistols during a T‑90 tank conversion exercise of the 71 Armoured Regiment at Pokhran. The accused soldiers, Neeraj Kumar Dhaka and Sandeep Kumar, were convicted by a District Court Martial for theft and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and dismissal. The Armed …

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusAMAN MITTAL & ANR.

2019 INSC 1001Case Partly allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed criminal appeals against Aman Mittal and others for alleged short delivery of petrol and diesel, invoking offences under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, the Essential Commodities Act, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The High Court had quashed the charge‑sheet under …

SEP. SATGUR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 988Dismissed

Sep. Satgur Singh, a serving army personnel, was discharged after a show‑cause notice highlighted seven punishments (red‑ink entries) incurred over 11 years of service. He replied only with vague family‑related explanations, and the Commanding Officer recorded him as a habitual offender and ordered …

EX-SEPOY (WASHERMAN) RAM KHILAWANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 987Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Khilawan, an ex‑sepoy (washerman) who joined the Indian Army on 23 Oct 1987, was discharged on 31 Aug 1993 on medical grounds after being placed in a permanent Low Medical Category (BEE) due to a CNS seizure. He challenged the discharge, arguing that it was made under Rule 13(3)(III)(v) of the …

BOBINDRA KUMAR & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 966Dismissed

The case concerned seniority of Sub‑Inspectors (General Duty) in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). Direct recruits were selected through a 2007 advertisement, allotted to units on 5 October 2009 and issued offer letters in mid‑October 2009, reporting for training in January 2010. Promotee …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusBRIG. DEVINDER SINGH

2019 INSC 948Appeal(s) allowed

Brigadier Devinder Singh, who commanded a brigade during the Kargil War (Operation Vijay), alleged that several internal military documents – the Battle Performance Report, After‑Action Report, and related reports – incorrectly recorded his role and sought their correction. The Armed Forces Tribunal …

SMT. CHINTAMBARAMMA & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2019 INSC 944Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, the mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of the deceased Sahitya, were convicted by the trial court and the Karnataka High Court for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC based on a prosecution theory that they conspired with alleged assailants (accused Nos. 4 and 5). …

MUSTAFAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2019 INSC 924Disposed off

An FIR was lodged under the United Provinces Excise Act, 1910 and the IPC for the seizure of illicit liquor and a firearm, leading to the confiscation of a truck owned by the appellant. The District Magistrate, who also acted as the Collector, issued a show‑cause notice and subsequently ordered the …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.versusB. RANGA REDDY (D) BY LRS & ORS.

2019 INSC 886Appeal(s) allowed

Three civil suits involving the State of Andhra Pradesh were tried together, two of which (suits No. 274/1983 and 276/1983) were dismissed while the third (suit No. 141/1984) was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs. The State appealed the decree in the third suit, arguing that the findings on the …

THE DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE, ODISHAversusPRAVAT KUMAR DASH & ORS.

2019 INSC 888Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents underwent pre‑service gardener training under a 1998 circular that expressly stated no guarantee of employment after training. The selection of 362 trainees out of 1,359 applicants was not transparent, and the circular did not create a statutory right to appointment. The State later …

MAHESH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 872Appeal(s) allowed

Mahesh Kumar was convicted under Section 304-B IPC for the death of his wife, Omwati, alleged to be a dowry death. The prosecution's case relied mainly on statements of the deceased's father and brother, and on several letters written by the deceased, asserting continuous harassment and dowry …

AMIR HAMZA SHAIKH & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2019 INSC 874Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant sought permission under Section 302 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to conduct the prosecution for offences under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The magistrate declined the request without giving reasons, but the Bombay High Court granted the permission …

DR. SRIDIP CHATTERJEEversusDR. GOPA CHAKRABORTY & ORS.

2019 INSC 867Appeal(s) allowed

The University advertised a post of Assistant Professor in Physical Education (Yoga Therapy) requiring a Post Graduate Diploma in Yoga or Yoga Therapy. Dr. Sridip Chatterjee applied with a Post Graduate Diploma in Yoga Education and was selected by a Selection Committee of subject experts, and later …

SUNITAversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 828Appeal(s) allowed

The victim Sushila's charred remains were recovered from a burning 'Bitora' in Village Kailash and DNA testing identified her. The prosecution alleged that the appellant Sunita, a cousin of the victim's husband, was the last person seen with the victim and her children, citing hostile witnesses who …

G H RANJIT KUMAR HALDARversusSTATE OF SIKKIM

2019 INSC 811Dismissed

The appellants Ranjit Kumar Haldar and Mamta Mohanta were convicted for the murder of Netai Mohanta, whose body was found concealed under wooden flooring in a house they had rented. The prosecution relied on the discovery of the body, statements of witnesses, and a disclosure statement by the wife …

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusATINDRA NATH BHATTACHARYYA & ANR.

2019 INSC 812Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Atindra Nath Bhattacharyya, a chief manager of State Bank of India, was charge‑sheeted with 16 allegations of financial irregularities and was removed from service after an inquiry found ten charges proved. The Calcutta High Court Single Bench set aside the removal on the ground that …

POSTMAN VENGAISAMY & ORS.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ORS.

2019 INSC 802Dismissed

The case involved fifteen accused who, on 26 April 2003, surrounded and brutally attacked the deceased Chinnaperiaiyah and two witnesses, Irulandi (PW‑1) and Ramar (PW‑2), using swords, resulting in the victim's death. The prosecution proved a prior attack on the victim on 8 April 2003, establishing …

RANDHIR KAURversusPRITHVI PAL SINGH & ORS.

2019 INSC 806Appeal(s) allowed

Randhir Kaur filed a suit for specific performance of a 2004 agreement to sell 193 kanals 18 marlas of land, having paid earnest money of Rs.13.5 lakh through her son Dhanwant Singh. The trial court decreed specific performance, but the High Court, in a second appeal under Section 41 of the Punjab …

KANTA YADAVversusOM PRAKASH YADAV & ORS.

2019 INSC 808Dismissed

Zorawar Singh owned immovable property in Delhi and executed a will (1985) and codicil (1995) bequeathing it to the parties. After his death, the respondents filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction concerning the will, while the appellant filed a suit for natural succession. The Delhi …

DR. S. KUMAR & ORS.versusS. RAMALINGAM

2019 INSC 760Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a 16‑feet‑by‑103‑feet passage in a Chennai property. The plaintiff (Dr. S. Kumar & Ors.) claimed exclusive right to use the passage based on a sale deed dated 31 May 1988, while the defendant No.2 (S. Ramalingam) relied on an earlier sale deed dated 1 April 1976 that reserved a …

G H STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusMOHAMMAD BADRUDDIN

2019 INSC 764Disposed off

The State Bank of India (SBI) conducted a departmental inquiry against Mohammad Badruddin on five charges, finding only charge No. 4 proved. The Disciplinary Authority, disagreeing with the Inquiry Officer on charges 1 and 5, imposed removal from service, while an earlier appellate authority had …

PHAREZ JOHN ABRAHAM (DEAD) BY LRS.versusARUL JOTHI SIVASUBRAMANIAM K. & OTHERS

2019 INSC 713Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the partition of the estate of John D. Abraham, who died intestate in 1964 leaving a wife, two sons and two daughters, one of whom (Triza Kalyani John, later A.S. Meenakshi) converted to Hinduism, married the plaintiff and was paid Rs 50,000 and gold ornaments allegedly to …

GIRISH KUMARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 665Appeal(s) allowed

Girish Kumar, a senior assistant in the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Service, was promoted to Office Superintendent with effect from 7 Oct 2005. Respondent No.3, a junior assistant, was granted deemed dates of promotion under Rule 5 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Regulation of Seniority) …

BEEMANENI MAHA LAKSHMIversusGANGUMALLA APPA RAO (SINCE DEAD) BY LRS.

2019 INSC 656Dismissed

The appellant, a vendor, entered into an agreement to sell land to the respondent, the vendee, on 30‑12‑1985, with part payment of Rs.55,000 and the balance to be paid within three months, subject to the vendor measuring the land and delivering the original sale deed and land‑ceiling clearance …

MANGATHAI AMMAL (DIED) THROUGH LRS ANDversusRAJESWARI & OTHERS

2019 INSC 664Case Partly allowed

The appeal arose from a partition suit where the plaintiffs claimed a three‑quarter share in several properties, alleging that the properties were purchased by the deceased husband, Narayanasamy Mudaliar, in his wife’s name using money from the sale of ancestral lands, thus constituting benami …

KHETRI VIKAS SAMITIversusDIRECTOR COLLEGE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2019 INSC 659Appeal(s) allowed

Khetri Vikas Samiti, a society running Vinodini P.G. College, abolished the posts of lab assistant, sweeper, waterman and mechanic in 2003 due to heavy financial losses, paying the employees six months' salary and terminating them. The employees appealed to the Non‑Government Educational Tribunal …

RAJESH & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 613Dismissed

The appellants were among ten persons named in an FIR for a violent incident but were not listed in the charge‑sheet after the investigating officer concluded they were not present at the scene. The investigating officer and the SHO later applied to a magistrate for their release from judicial …