Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
86 judgments · newest first · showing 1–86
The petitioners filed a criminal revision (No. 7632 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners requested to withdraw the revision and sought liberty to file an appropriate application before the trial court. The Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) …
A criminal revision petition (No. 2914 of 2024) was filed by Shailendra Singh against the State of U.P. and another. The petition was presented before Hon'ble Justice Lakshmi Kant Shukla, with counsel Jitendra Pal Singh, Satyendra Narayan Singh and Sushil Kumar Pandey for the petitioner, and G.A., …
The wife filed a criminal revision under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking enhancement of the Rs 25,000 monthly maintenance awarded by the Family Court, alleging the order was illegal and based on an erroneous assessment of the husband’s income. The husband filed a counter‑revision seeking to set aside …
The revisionist, Dilip Kumar Sonkar, filed a criminal revision challenging a trial court order under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and a subsequent appellate order that imposed a cash payment, monthly maintenance, and compensation for mental agony on him. He …
Dinesh filed a criminal revision under Section 126(2) of the Cr.P.C. challenging the Family Court's order dated 17.01.2025 that rejected his application for condonation of a 13‑day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The trial court had earlier served notice, proceeded ex parte, and passed …
Anit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 7,000 per month granted by the Meerut Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a dispute with his wife, Smt. Anju Devi. The revisionist alleged that the order was arbitrary, illegal, and that …
Shafiqurrahman appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Family Court order that granted monthly maintenance to two opposite parties, alleging that the court had erred in finding a valid marriage and paternity without proper evidence. The revisionist contended that the alleged marriage to …
The husband, Abhisehk Kumar, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 05.08.2024 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code granting maintenance to his wife, Pinki Sahu. Both parties later settled their matrimonial dispute through mediation, agreeing to divorce under …
Naresh Kumar, a retired Additional District Judge, filed a criminal revision challenging an order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code that enhanced his monthly maintenance obligation to Rs 18,000 in favor of his wife, Aruna Srivastava. He contended that the trial court had erred in …
Akash Nayak filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court’s order that he pay Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Nayak contended that the trial court had not properly considered his income, claiming he earned only Rs 10,000 a …
Sachin Raykawar filed a criminal revision against the State of U.P. and others, seeking relief from an order of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jhansi dated 25.07.2025. The parties had earlier mediated their dispute before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court Allahabad, …
Sonia Gupta and Astha Gupta filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order rejecting their applications for condonation of delay and recall of a maintenance order under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. They argued that the delay of about 15 years was caused by the death of their counsel …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar Saxena, challenged a recovery warrant issued against him by filing a criminal revision. He subsequently filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, which was referred to mediation and successfully concluded. Following the mediation, the petitioner sought to …
The appellant, Hira Lal, filed a criminal appeal. An office report dated 17-12-2025, based on a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadoi, confirmed that Hira Lal died on 10-10-2015. The court considered whether the appeal could continue after the appellant's death. It held that the death of …
Mohammad Rashid filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code that required him to pay Rs.3,000 and Rs.1,000 monthly as maintenance to two claimants. He argued that the trial court fixed the amount without properly ascertaining his actual …
Seema filed a criminal revision under Section 125 CrPC seeking maintenance from Mukesh Soni, alleging that she is his lawful wife. The trial court had rejected her claim, holding that her earlier marriage was still subsisting and therefore her subsequent marriage to Mukesh Soni was void. Seema …
Arjun Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that issued a recovery warrant for maintenance arrears against him. He claimed he was unaware of the ex parte maintenance order and had not been given a chance to defend himself, offering to deposit 50% of the amount claimed. The …
Pratik Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs 12,000 to one party and Rs 5,000 to another, totaling Rs 17,000 per month. He argued that the trial court failed to consider his financial situation and the existing maintenance …
Shachi Dubey and another filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Fatehpur dated 28.11.2024 in a matrimonial dispute. The parties had earlier undergone mediation at the High Court’s mediation and conciliation centre and executed a settlement …
Manisha Shankhwar filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order that denied her claim for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code while granting a modest maintenance to her minor son. She alleged that she was forced out of her matrimonial home due to dowry …
The revisionists Smt. Jyoti and two others filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Banda, which directed opposite party No.2 to pay Rs.5,000 as rent and Rs.8,000 as maintenance per month, totaling Rs.13,000. They argued that the appellate court …
Sandhya Singh filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted maintenance of Rs.10,000 per month to her son but denied maintenance to herself and her daughter. She contended that the trial court failed to consider her allegation that her husband was cohabiting with his …
In a criminal revision (No. 6260 of 2024) filed by Chandrasen against the State of U.P. and two others, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the revision. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to this request. The court considered whether a revision …
Sadhana Devi filed a maintenance application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Family Court admitted the marriage but held that she was living separately from her husband without sufficient reason and consequently declined to decide the remaining points concerning her inability …
Petitioner Rukam Singh, the first informant in an FIR dated 29 March 2026, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a free, fair and impartial investigation and to transfer the investigation to another officer. He alleged that the police were not investigating …
The petitioner, Shiv Pujan, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 10919 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Vishnu Kant Tiwari, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The Court …
The petitioner, Kiran Sahani, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a …
Ankit Kumar filed a revision under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to summon five alleged accomplices in a murder case, alleging that the trial court had mechanically rejected his application without applying judicial mind. He argued that the accused were present at the scene, that Section 106 of …
Ashok Kumar Baghel filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, his counsel, Raj Kamal, sought permission to withdraw the revision. The State, represented by G.A., and the second opposite party, represented by Komal Prasad Maurya, raised no objection to the …
Anand filed a criminal revision under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that his deceased sister had been kidnapped and forced into marriage, and that the opposite parties had threatened his life. The Judicial Magistrate rejected the application, directing a preliminary police …
The revisionist, Rajat Pandey, filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. The court was informed that the trial in the underlying case was already underway, with charge framing and witness examinations completed. The revisionist subsequently sought permission to withdraw the …
Abdul Hakeem alias Munna filed a criminal revision under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting his application for discharge. He argued that the trial court failed to apply judicial mind to the facts and evidence. The State opposed, …
Om Saran filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mainpuri who had dismissed his protest petition against a chargesheet in State v. Mohit under IPC sections 279 and 304‑A. The revisionist argued that the magistrate failed to appreciate the …
The revisionists, Smt. Priti and three others, filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate’s order rejecting their application under Section 198 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to drop the proceedings. They argued that a written certificate from the …
Vikram Bansfor filed a criminal revision challenging a Special Judge's order that dismissed his complaint under section 203 of the Cr.P.C. He alleged the trial court failed to consider his complaint version, statements recorded under sections 200 and 202, and did not give him an opportunity to …
Virendra Bahadur Pal filed a criminal revision challenging a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, which had treated his application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS) as a complaint and refused to order an investigation. Pal contended that the magistrate should have …
The revisionist, Sukhdev, filed a criminal revision (No. 2634 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. At the hearing, counsel for the revisionist announced that he does not wish to pursue the revision and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the …
Santosh Singh filed a criminal revision under Section 319 Cr.P.C. challenging the Additional Sessions Judge’s order that summoned him as an accused in a murder case (Sections 302, 504, 436 IPC). The revisionist argued that the trial court relied on eye‑witness statements claiming a licensed gun was …
Arvind Chaudhary (Kalua) filed a criminal revision under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. challenging a Judicial Magistrate’s order dismissing his complaint. He alleged that the Magistrate ignored material evidence, including his exoneration from an FIR containing serious IPC offences, and that the order …
Sachin Kumar appealed to the Allahabad High Court by filing a criminal revision against the Family Court’s order rejecting his application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. His wife had obtained a maintenance decree under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. after the husband failed to appear, leading to …
The revisionists Jagdish Singh and others filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Gram Court Magistrate dated 5 September 2024, which rejected their application under Section 245(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) on the ground that the evidentiary stage under Section 244 CrPC …
The petitioner, Upendra Kumar Prajapati, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6711 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent's Additional …
Mahendra Sharma filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6735 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Pankaj Satsangi, announced at the Bar that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they do not wish to pursue the petition and requested its withdrawal. The Attorney General for the State and the counsel for the third …
The petitioner, Golden Sahni, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed. The petitioner did not …
The petitioners, Sandeep Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Pramod Kumar, announced that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the …
Petitioner Vikas Thakur filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better …
Petitioners Zainul Aabedeen and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 6695 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and counsel for respondent …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the police investigation was complete and the report had been submitted. The petitioners did not contest these facts but …
Petitioners Ravi Shankar Pandey and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of proceedings after the police investigation had been completed and a report filed. The State of Uttar Pradesh, through its Additional Government …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7456 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection. The court considered the …
The petitioners, Jainesh Mishra and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing criminal proceeding. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 12-10-2025. The …
Monti @ Raviraj Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7399 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, the Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that more serious charges had been added to the …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The Additional Government Advocate and counsel for the respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, …
Petitioner Rupwati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The investigation in the underlying matter had already been concluded, and a final report favoring the accused respondents had been …
Petitioners Satyapal Yadav and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7403 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the present …
Sweta Gautam filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7342 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings of a criminal investigation in which a charge sheet had already been filed against her. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The respondent's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the …
The revisionists, Smt. Urmila Yadav and another, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 26‑09‑2023 that denied their claim for arrears of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. They argued that a 17‑02‑2022 High Court direction to adjust amounts already paid should extend …
Ramraj filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted his wife Rs 4,000 per month as maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. He contended that the trial court failed to frame any issue or make a finding on the wife’s alleged unchastity, which is a statutory bar to …
Ramchet and four others filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's order rejecting their discharge application in a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 451. The revisionists argued that the complainant’s statements under Sections 200 and 244 of the CrPC contained …
Ram Briksha Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Azamgarh, which dismissed an application under CrPC Section 227 to frame a charge under IPC Section 308 against four accused, on the ground that there was no material evidence. The …
Vikram Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order treating his Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application as a complaint in a POCSO matter. He argued that the court erred in law, exceeded jurisdiction, and failed to order statutory medical investigation despite the …
Geeta Devi filed a criminal revision under Section 175(3) B.N.S.S. challenging a Judicial Magistrate's order that dismissed her application on the ground that the dispute was purely civil. She alleged that opposite parties fraudulently obtained a mutation of agricultural land belonging to her late …
The revisionist Atul Kumar challenged an order of the Additional Session Judge, Basti, which summoned him under Section 302 IPC by invoking Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He argued that the court relied solely on uncorroborated oral statements of three witnesses and failed to record a …
The revisionist Asif challenged an order dated 24‑09‑2024 whereby the Additional Sessions Judge summoned him under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code to stand trial in Sessions Trial No. 486. The revisionist argued that the trial court failed to record a satisfaction that the evidence on …
The appeal filed by Jagdish, Pratap and Tirath against the State of U.P. was considered by the Allahabad High Court. An official report confirmed that appellant No. 3, Tirath, died on 20 February 2025. The court noted that the appeal against appellants No. 1 and No. 2 (Jagdish and Pratap) had …
Petitioners Hemant Srivastav and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1135 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. After subsequent developments, they sought to withdraw the petition, filing a withdrawal application. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by the …
Petitioner Mohan Prakash challenged an FIR dated 20‑12‑2025 registered under Section 111(2)(b) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. He filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but later withdrew the substantive prayer, asking only that the court …
The petitioner, Vikrant Thakur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR dated 08‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 333, 109(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, including a charge of murder under Section 302. The State, represented by the …
Petitioner Gaurav Goyal filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 31‑01‑2026 under sections 352 and 109(1) of the BNS, alleging that the dispute with the informant Harsh Garg had been amicably settled by a written settlement deed dated 19‑02‑2026. Both the State’s A.G. and the …
Petitioner Vipin Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 17.01.2026 and a notice dated 24.08.2024 issued by respondents under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, 1970. The petitioner alleged inherent mistakes in the petition and argued that …
Petitioner Devendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a stay of an order dated 17-01-2026 and a notice dated 24-08-2024 issued under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, 1970. The petitioner alleged inherent mistakes in the petition that could not be remedied by a supplementary …
Petitioner Devendra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 74, 333, 351(3) BNS and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that …
Petitioners Ramakant Pandey and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 15-02-2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 110 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing the petitioners withdrew their prayer to quash the FIR and …
Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 27‑01‑2026 under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 324(2). The petitioners claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and executed a compromise affidavit on 03‑02‑2026, arguing that …
Petitioners Tulsi Pathak and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quash of an FIR dated 21-02-2026, registered under sections 61(2) and 87 BNS, alleging that the alleged victim’s modesty was forcibly removed and no consent was given. The State, …
Petitioners Suraj and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 25.01.2026 registered under sections 137(2), 87, 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR but later the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw …
The petitioners, Rakesh Singh and four others, challenged an FIR dated 02‑02‑2026 filed by Vimal Kumar Singh under sections 191(2), 351(2), 352 and 324(4) of the IPC, alleging that the criminal case arose out of a civil land‑dispute involving consolidation proceedings under the U.P. Consolidation of …
Petitioner Avnish Bhadauriya filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 15‑01‑2026 lodged by informant Rajkumar under several IPC sections. The State argued that a second FIR dated 18‑01‑2026 was filed by the petitioner’s side, indicating that the incident was …
Petitioners Birendra Chaturvedi and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25‑12‑2025 under IPC sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 21‑02‑2026 under CrPC section 193(3), and …
Petitioners Pradeep Soni and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 13‑11‑2025 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a …
The petitioners, married to the complainant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 28‑02‑2024 that alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had amicably settled their matrimonial …
Petitioner Abhishek Kushwaha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑09‑2025 and the subsequent chargesheet filed under various sections of the B.N.S. and the D.P. Act. The State, represented by the Advocate General, submitted that the chargesheet had already been …
Shiv Kumar, the first informant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to conduct a fair investigation into a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. The State, represented by the Advocate General, …
The petitioners, Rukhsar Khatoon and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 137(2) BNS dated 13‑04‑2025 and protection from arrest. They contended that both were adults at the time of the alleged incident, relying on birth certificates and Aadhaar details, …
