Created by Fuzzy Cloud

M S KARNIK

71 judgments · newest first · showing 1–71

SHOBHA SURESH DAGALEversusAbhijit Goel

Disposed Off

Satish Ramchandra Sangar filed a contempt petition against the Municipal Commissioner and the Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation alleging non‑compliance with a prior order. The court observed that the order had been substantially complied with, but noted a dispute regarding the amount of gratuity …

MR. MAHENDRA JAGGANATH TAREversusHON. VICE PRESIDENT OF MHADA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Mahendra Jagganath Tare filed a writ petition (No. 3324 of 2024) against the Vice President of MHADA and other respondents seeking relief. An interim application was filed seeking a specific relief under prayer clause (a). The High Court examined whether the interim relief should be granted and …

MR. MAHENDRA JAGGANATH TAREversusHON. VICE PRESIDENT OF MHADA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Mahendra Jagganath Tare filed a writ petition (No. 3324 of 2024) against the Vice President of MHADA and other respondents seeking relief. An interim application was filed seeking a specific relief under prayer clause (a). The High Court examined whether the interim relief should be granted and …

SUNILKUMAR R GAHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sunilkumar Rameshwar Gathe filed a writ petition seeking a validity certificate confirming his belonging to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner relied on a previously validated caste certificate issued to his son, Suyash Sunil Gathe, and submitted a genealogy verified by the Vigilance Cell …

SHRI RAMMURTI R. YADAVversusTHE TRUSTEE DURGA EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a retired assistant teacher, sought pension benefits but faced objections that he was overage at appointment and lacked requisite qualifications. The State Government order dated 09.05.2019 granted age relaxation, removing the overage objection. A prior judgment of this Court in Writ …

AJAY ATMARAM JADHAV @ MOHD. MUSTAFA SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ajay Atmaram Jadhav, was convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment in 2016. He has been in custody for more than twelve years, having previously been released on COVID bail and a furlough without any adverse conduct. The State …

MADHUBEN CHIMANLAL TANK AND ORSversusSLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Madhuben Chimanlal Tank and others, filed a civil writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) and the competent authority under the Slum Act to promptly consider, hear, and decide their complaint/representation. The petitioners argued …

GAUTAM PURSHOTTAM BUDRANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Satish Ramchandra Sangar filed an interim application seeking a recall of the Court’s earlier order directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Panvel to enforce an order dated 11 April 2023 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division. The applicant also urged that the SDO consider the …

DAULAT P. KALAGversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Daulat Pandurang Kadalag was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khed‑Rajgurunagar, of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine. He has been in custody since March 2012, amounting to more than fourteen years, and his appeal has not been heard for over ten …

RAKESH MANILAL SHELKEversusUNION OF INDIA THR. DEFENCE DEPT. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation claiming ownership of a property and alleging that construction by Respondent No.6 was contrary to national interest because it proceeded without defence authority permission. An earlier suit filed in 2022 sought an interim injunction, which the …

NARAYAN YAJINDAR BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Narayan Yajindar Bhosale was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murdering his daughter by pouring kerosene on her and setting her ablaze, allegedly over a dowry dispute following her inter‑caste marriage. After serving more than twelve years in custody, he filed an interim bail …

NEW LOTUS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The New Lotus Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. filed writ petitions challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. In the court's order dated 23/04/2026, two clerical errors were identified: the abbreviation ‘PMC’ was mistakenly typed as ‘BMC’, and the filing date of Writ Petition No. …

ASHOK BHAGUJI DAUNDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU DEPT. OF REVENUE AND ORS

Disposed Off

Satish Ramchandra Sangar filed a writ petition (No.12762 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioner submitted a praecipe requesting the court's permission to withdraw on written instructions. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, …

GIRISH LAXMAN SURYAWANSHIversusSECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that a decision dated 17 June 2022, which disposed of their representation made on 27 April 2017, was never communicated to them. They contended that the decision was not rendered within the time prescribed by the Court's order of 3 December 2021. …

TUKARAM KISAN THITEversusTHE MINISTER (REVENUE)

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Tukaram Kisan Thite, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in hearing a revision application and a stay application filed before the Revenue Minister after an order of the Additional Commissioner, Pune. The petitioner alleged that neither the stay application had been decided …

MR. PRAKASH KUNDLIK GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT. PLEADER

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay had earlier ordered, on 26 February 2025, that the State of Maharashtra decide within six weeks on the petitioner’s request to change the classification of a watan land from class‑II to class‑I and communicate the decision. The State failed to comply within the stipulated …

RAJNARAYAN YADAVversusTHANE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRU. COMMISSIONER AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a representation on 9 January 2026 alleging unauthorized construction, seeking judicial intervention. The Thane Municipal Corporation contended that it had previously issued notices under Sections 52 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, but no further …

MANGAL PRABHAKAR JADHAV AND ORSversusDIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER NASHIK AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, including Mrs. Mangal Prabhakar Jadhav, sought the transfer of a tribal Inam land (gat no. 80) in Nashik district, for which the Additional Collector, Malegaon, had forwarded a proposal to the Divisional Commissioner on 13‑Nov‑2025. The petitioners alleged inaction and delay by the …

COLLEGE OF EINGINEERING, PUNE AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a writ petition and a civil application against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners later instructed the court, via email, to withdraw the petition. The court, on receipt of the instruction, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, both the writ petition and the …

SHRI. SURESH ANNAJI PATILversusDINESH MOTIRAM BACHHAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed writ petitions (Nos. 9442/2023 and 10978/2023) challenging decisions related to the Nashik Municipal Smart City Scheme. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Nashik Municipal Corporation, argued that the scheme had been cancelled by a General Body …

PRAVIN YASHWANT PANCHALversusPRAMILA YASHWANT PANCHAL

Disposed Off

The petitioners, co‑sharers of a family property, challenged an order of the Senior Citizens Tribunal that directed the petitioner to vacate his share and hand over peaceful possession to his 76‑year‑old mother. The mother had earlier filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of that order, which …

USHA SHAMRAO KHUBIKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.8783 of 2007 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. An order dated 29 May 2017 had been passed by the High Court, which the petitioners sought to set aside. The petitioners filed an interim application (No.10794 of 2024) seeking condonation of delay …

SUNANDA RAMESH KHARAIT KULKARNIversusMR. BALASAHEB MHASKE

Disposed Off

The Court noted that an order dated 15 March 2023 directed Respondent No.3 (the Tahsildar, Shirur, Pune) to conduct and conclude an enquiry within six months of the petitioner's appearance before the Tahsildar on 31 March 2023. The order remained unimplemented, prompting a contempt petition. The …

MRS. MANGALA BAJIRAO POTREversusSHRI. SHESHRAO BADE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, who work as peons in a private unaided school, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of salary and pay‑scale under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Earlier proceedings had resulted in a court‑ordered …

MRS. MANJULA KASHINATH JAMDADEversusSHRI. SHESHRAO BADE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, who work as peons in a private unaided school, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of salary and pay‑scale under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Earlier proceedings had resulted in a court‑ordered …

SURESHKPUMAR TARACHAND GHUSARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Eshekumar Tarachand Ghusar, a police officer, filed Petition No. 165 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court challenging a suspension order dated 5 March 2024 issued by the Special Inspector General of Police. The petition alleges that the suspension was unauthorized, marked “A” for …

WAHEED AKHTAR ANSARIversusFATIMA R ZAKARIA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to bring the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner onto the record in a contempt petition. The application was filed after a delay of one year, seven months and seven days. The Court examined whether such delay warranted condonation. It held that the reasons provided …

SOMNATH DIGAMBAR GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA , THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, employed as a security guard, claimed Thakar Scheduled Tribe status based on school certificates showing his ancestors as Thakar, seeking a reservation post. The Caste Scrutiny Committee, after a vigilance enquiry and hearing, found that the petitioner did not satisfy the affinity …

SANGITA BHIKAJI MASAGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sangita Bhikaji Masage, challenged the rejection of her claim to belong to the Thakar Scheduled Tribe by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. The High Court had dismissed her writ petition, but the Supreme Court partially allowed her appeal, setting aside the High Court's order and …

SUMEET DATTATRAY PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner Satish Sangar challenged the cancellation of his Scheduled Tribe (Thakur) caste certificate by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, arguing that the committee improperly required an "affinity test". The Supreme Court had earlier set aside the High Court’s order and remanded the matter for …

PRADEEP SHRIRANG JAGTAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ANR

Disposed Off

Pradeep Shrirang Jagtap filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner raised specific objections on pages 17, 19 and 23 of a paper‑book. The State, represented by its Additional Government Pleader, opposed the petition. The Court directed the Tahsildar …